The γ134.5 Protein of Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Is Required To Interfere with Dendritic Cell Maturation during Productive Infection

The γ₁34.5 protein of herpes simplex virus 1 is an essential factor for viral virulence. In infected cells, this viral protein prevents the translation arrest mediated by double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase R. Additionally, it associates with and inhibits TANK-binding kinase 1, an essential component of Toll-like receptor-dependent and -independent pathways that activate interferon regulatory factor 3 and cytokine expression. Here, we show that γ₁34.5 is required to block the maturation of conventional dendritic cells (DCs) that initiate adaptive immune responses. Unlike wild-type virus, the γ₁34.5 null mutant stimulates the expression of CD86, major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC-II), and cytokines such as alpha/beta interferon in immature DCs. Viral replication in DCs inversely correlates with interferon production. These phenotypes are also mirrored in a mouse ocular infection model. Further, DCs infected with the γ₁34.5 null mutant effectively activate naïve T cells whereas DCs infected with wild-type virus fail to do so. Type I interferon-neutralizing antibodies partially reverse virus-induced upregulation of CD86 and MHC-II, suggesting that γ₁34.5 acts through interferon-dependent and -independent mechanisms. These data indicate that γ₁34.5 is involved in the impairment of innate immunity by inhibiting both type I interferon production and DC maturation, leading to defective T-cell activation.Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) is a human pathogen responsible for localized mucocutaneous lesions and encephalitis (51). Following primary infection, HSV-1 establishes a latent or lytic infection in which the virus interacts with host cells, which include dendritic cells (DCs), required to initiate adaptive immune responses (36). Immature DCs, which reside in almost all peripheral tissues, are able to capture and process viral antigens (15). In this process, DCs migrate to lymph nodes, where they mature and present antigens to T cells. Mature DCs display high levels of major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC-II) and costimulatory molecules such as CD40, CD80, and CD86. Additionally, DCs release proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-12 (IL-12), tumor necrosis factor alpha, alpha interferon (IFN-α), and IFN-β, which promote DC maturation and activation. An important feature of functional DCs is to activate naïve T cells, and myeloid submucosal and lymph node resident DCs are responsible for HSV-specific T-cell activation (2, 45, 52). Moreover, DCs play a direct role in innate antiviral immunity by secreting type I IFN.HSV-1 is capable of infecting both immature and mature DCs (20, 24, 34, 38, 42). A previous study suggested that HSV entry into DCs requires viral receptors HVEM and nectin-2 (42). Upon HSV infection, plasmacytoid DCs detect viral genome through Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) and produce high levels of IFN-α (16, 23, 30, 40). In contrast, myeloid DCs, which are major antigen-presenting cells, recognize viral components through distinct pathways, independently of TLR9 (16, 36, 40). It has been suggested previously that HSV proteins or RNA intermediates produced during viral replication trigger myeloid DCs (16, 40). Indeed, a protein complex that consists of HSV glycoproteins B, D, H, and L stimulates the expression of CD40, CD83, CD86, and cytokines in myeloid DCs (41). Hence, DCs sense HSV through TLR-dependent and -independent mechanisms (16, 40, 41). Nevertheless, HSV replication compromises DC functions and subsequent T-cell activation (3, 20, 24, 42). HSV-1 interaction with immature DCs results in the downregulation of costimulatory molecules and cytokines (20, 34, 38, 42). While HSV-2 induces rapid apoptosis, HSV-1 does so with a delayed kinetics in human DCs (4, 20, 38). HSV-1 is also reported to interfere with functions of mature DCs (24, 39). Upon infection, HSV-1 induces the degradation of CD83 but not CD80 or CD86 in mature DCs (24, 25). Additionally, HSV-1 reduces levels of the chemokine receptors CCR7 and CXCR4 on mature DCs and subsequently impairs DC migration to the respective chemokine ligands CCL19 and CXCL12 (39).Although HSV infection impairs DC functions, viral components responsible for this impairment have not been thoroughly investigated. It has been suggested previously that the virion host shut-off protein (vhs) of HSV-1 contributes partially to the viral block of DC activation (43). This activity is thought to stem from the ability of vhs to destabilize host mRNA. Emerging evidence suggests that ICP0 perturbs the function of mature DCs, where it mediates CD83 degradation via cellular proteasomes (25). Findings from related studies show that ICP0 inhibits the induction of IFN-stimulated genes mediated by IFN regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) or IRF7 in other cell types (11, 27, 32, 33). However, the link of ICP0 activities to DC maturation remains to be established. Recently, we found that γ₁34.5, an HSV virulence factor, associates with and inhibits TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1), an essential component of TLR-dependent and -independent pathways that activates IRF3 and cytokine expression (49). Interestingly, an HSV mutant lacking γ₁34.5 stimulates MHC-II surface expression in glioblastoma cells (47). These observations raise the hypothesis that γ₁34.5 may modulate DC maturation during HSV infection.In this study, we report that γ₁34.5 is required to perturb DC maturation during HSV infection, leading to impaired T-cell activation. Wild-type virus, but not the γ₁34.5 null mutant, suppresses the expression of costimulatory molecules as well as cytokines in DCs. We provide evidence that the viral block of DC maturation is associated with reduced IFN-α/β secretion. Furthermore, the expression of γ₁34.5 inhibits DC-mediated allogeneic T-cell activation and IFN-γ production. IFN-neutralizing antibodies partially reverse DC maturation induced by the γ₁34.5 null mutant. These results shed light on the role of γ₁34.5 relevant to DC maturation and T-cell responses in HSV infection.     

Interferons Accelerate Decay of Replication-Competent Nucleocapsids of Hepatitis B Virus

Alpha interferon (IFN-α) is an approved medication for chronic hepatitis B. Gamma interferon (IFN-γ) is a key mediator of host antiviral immunity against hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in vivo. However, the molecular mechanism by which these antiviral cytokines suppress HBV replication remains elusive. Using an immortalized murine hepatocyte (AML12)-derived cell line supporting tetracycline-inducible HBV replication, we show in this report that both IFN-α and IFN-γ efficiently reduce the amount of intracellular HBV nucleocapsids. Furthermore, we provide evidence suggesting that the IFN-induced cellular antiviral response is able to distinguish and selectively accelerate the decay of HBV replication-competent nucleocapsids but not empty capsids in a proteasome-dependent manner. Our findings thus reveal a novel antiviral mechanism of IFNs and provide a basis for a better understanding of HBV pathobiology.Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a noncytopathic hepatotropic DNA virus which belongs to the family Hepadnaviridae (11, 44). Despite the fact that most adulthood HBV infections are transient, approximately 5 to 10% of infected adults and more than 90% of infected neonates fail to clear the virus and develop a lifelong persistent infection, which may progress to chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and primary hepatocellular carcinoma (4, 33, 34). It has been shown by several research groups that resolution of HBV and other animal hepadnavirus infection in vivo depends on both killing of infected hepatocytes by viral antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes and noncytolytic suppression of viral replication, which is most likely mediated by inflammatory cytokines, such as gamma interferon (IFN-γ) and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) (10, 12, 15, 20, 26, 27, 48). Moreover, together with five nucleoside or nucleotide analogs that inhibit HBV DNA polymerase, alpha IFN (IFN-α) and pegylated IFN-α are currently available antiviral medications for the management of chronic hepatitis B. Compared to the viral DNA polymerase inhibitors, the advantages of IFN-α therapy include a lack of drug resistance, a finite and defined treatment course, and an increased likelihood for hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) clearance (8, 39). However, only approximately 30% of treated patients achieve a sustained virological response to a standard 48-month pegylated IFN-α therapy (6, 32). Thus far, the antiviral mechanism of IFN-α and IFN-γ and the parameters determining the success or failure of IFN-α therapy in chronic hepatitis B remain elusive. Elucidation of the mechanism by which the cytokines suppress HBV replication represents an important step toward understanding the pathobiology of HBV infection and the molecular basis of IFN-α therapy of chronic hepatitis B.Considering the mechanism by which IFNs noncytolytically control HBV infection in vivo, it is possible that the cytokines either induce an antiviral response in hepatocytes to directly limit HBV replication or modulate the host antiviral immune response to indirectly inhibit the virus infection. However, due to the fact that IFN-α and -γ do not inhibit or only modestly inhibit HBV replication in human hepatoma-derived cell lines (5, 22, 23, 30), the direct antiviral effects of the cytokines and their antiviral mechanism against HBV have been studied with either an immortalized hepatocyte cell line derived from HBV transgenic mice or duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV) infection of primary duck hepatocytes (37, 53). While these studies revealed that IFN treatment significantly reduced the amount of encapsidated viral pregenomic RNA (pgRNA) in both mouse and duck hepatocytes, further mechanistic analyses suggested that IFN-α inhibited the formation of pgRNA-containing nucleocapsids in murine hepatocytes (52) but shortened the half-life of encapsidated pgRNA in DHBV-replicating chicken hepatoma cells (21). Moreover, the fate of viral DNA replication intermediates or nucleocapsids in the IFN-treated hepatocytes was not investigated in the previous studies.To further define the target(s) of IFN-α and -γ in the HBV life cycle and to create a robust cell culture system for the identification of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) that mediate the antiviral response of the cytokines (25), we established an immortalized murine hepatocyte (AML-12)-derived stable cell line that supported a high level of HBV replication in a tetracycline-inducible manner. Consistent with previous reports, we show that both IFN-α and IFN-γ potently inhibited HBV replication in murine hepatocytes (37, 40). With the help of small molecules that inhibit HBV capsid assembly (Bay-4109) (7, 47) and prevent the incorporation of pgRNA into nucleocapsids (AT-61) (9, 29), we obtained evidence suggesting that the IFN-induced cellular antiviral response is able to distinguish and selectively accelerate the decay of HBV replication-competent nucleocapsids but not empty capsids in a proteasome-dependent manner. Our findings provide a basis for further studies toward better understanding of IFN′s antiviral mechanism, which might ultimately lead to the development of strategies to improve the efficacy of IFN therapy of chronic hepatitis B.     

Early Innate Recognition of Herpes Simplex Virus in Human Primary Macrophages Is Mediated via the MDA5/MAVS-Dependent and MDA5/MAVS/RNA Polymerase III-Independent Pathways

Innate recognition of viruses is mediated by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) triggering expression of antiviral interferons (IFNs) and proinflammatory cytokines. In mice, Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) and TLR9 as well as intracellular nucleotide-sensing pathways have been shown to recognize herpes simplex virus (HSV). Here, we describe how human primary macrophages recognize early HSV infection via intracellular pathways. A number of inflammatory cytokines, IFNs, and IFN-stimulated genes were upregulated after HSV infection. We show that early recognition of HSV and induction of IFNs and inflammatory cytokines are independent of TLR2 and TLR9, since inhibition of TLR2 using TLR2 neutralizing antibodies did not affect virus-induced responses and the macrophages were unresponsive to TLR9 stimulation. Instead, HSV recognition involves intracellular recognition systems, since induction of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and IFNs was dependent on virus entry and replication. Importantly, expression of IFNs was strongly inhibited by small interfering RNA (siRNA) knockdown of MAVS, but this MAVS-dependent IFN induction occurred independently of the recently discovered polymerase III (Pol III)/RIG-I DNA sensing system. In contrast, induction of TNF-α was largely independent of MAVS, suggesting that induction of inflammatory cytokines during HSV infection proceeds via a novel pathway. Transfection with ODN2006, a broad inhibitor of intracellular nucleotide recognition, revealed that nucleotide-sensing systems are employed to induce both IFNs and TNF-α. Finally, using siRNA knockdown, we found that MDA5, but not RIG-I, was the primary mediator of HSV recognition. Thus, innate recognition of HSV by human primary macrophages occurs via two distinct intracellular nucleotide-sensing pathways responsible for induction of IFNs and inflammatory cytokine expression, respectively.Virus recognition is essential for activation of innate antiviral immune defense and the subsequent induction of acquired immunity. Conserved pathogen motifs, termed pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), are recognized by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). Virus-recognizing PRRs include Toll-like receptors (TLRs), RIG-I-like receptors (RLRs), and a number of intracellular DNA receptors. Several TLRs have been attributed roles in the recognition of virus. TLR2 and TLR4 recognize viral surface structures (3, 6, 18, 31), TLR3 recognizes double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) (2), and TLR7/8 and TLR9 function as signaling receptors for viral single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) (8, 11, 21) and CpG DNA (12, 20), respectively.Within the cell, cytoplasmic RLRs RIG-I and MDA5 both recognize accumulation of virus-derived dsRNA; in addition, RIG-I recognizes 5′-triphosphated RNA (14, 27, 39, 40). In addition to the RLRs, a number of receptors recognize foreign DNA. Presently, three DNA receptors have been identified: Z-DNA binding protein 1 (ZBP-1, or DAI) (36) and RNA polymerase III (Pol III) (1, 4) both mediate interferon (IFN) and cytokine production, whereas the AIM2 inflammasome is involved in caspase 1 activation in response to cytoplasmic dsDNA (13).Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) and HSV-2 are two closely related human DNA viruses associated with a number of serious diseases, including orofacial infections, encephalitis, and genital infections (34). Macrophages play an important role in the first line of defense against viral infection via production of IFNs, cytokines, and chemokines that regulate the progress of the virus infection and activate and support appropriate defense mechanisms (9, 10, 24).TLR2, TLR3, and TLR9 have been identified as mediators of proinflammatory cytokine production during HSV infections. TLR2 mediates an overzealous inflammatory cytokine response following HSV-1 infection in mice, promoting mononuclear cell infiltration of the brain and development of encephalitis (18). TLR3 mediates type I and III IFN production in human fibroblasts (41). TLR9 recognizes genomic DNA from HSV-1 and HSV-2 in murine plasmacytoid dendritic cells (DCs) (17, 20) and mediates tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and CCL5 production in murine macrophages (22). Both TLR2 and TLR9 mediate recognition of HSV and cytokine production in murine conventional DCs (35). HSV is recognized by an RLR/MAVS-dependent mechanism in murine macrophages and mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) (5, 29, 30). Recent data suggest that RNA Pol III mediates IFN production following HSV-1 infection and transfection with HSV-1 DNA in macrophage-like RAW 264.7 cells (4). Finally, murine L929 fibroblast-like cells are moderately inhibited in their ability to produce IFN after HSV-1 infection when ZBP-1 is knocked down (19, 36). Thus, several PRRs have been reported to recognize HSV-1 in murine cells and different cell lines, but the pathways responsible for sensing this virus in human primary macrophages and their impact on cytokine expression have not previously been described.In this work, we investigate the recognition pathways underlying HSV-induced cytokine and chemokine expression in human primary macrophages. We demonstrate that HSV-1-induced IFN and cytokine expression is independent of TLR2 and TLR9 but highly dependent on virus replication and intracellular nucleotide recognition systems. Specifically, induction of IFNs is dependent on MAVS and MDA5, whereas TNF-α is induced by a novel intracellular nucleotide-sensing system.     

Lambda Interferon Renders Epithelial Cells of the Respiratory and Gastrointestinal Tracts Resistant to Viral Infections

Virus-infected cells secrete a broad range of interferons (IFN) which confer resistance to yet uninfected cells by triggering the synthesis of antiviral factors. The relative contributions of the various IFN subtypes to innate immunity against virus infections remain elusive. IFN-α, IFN-β, and other type I IFN molecules signal through a common, universally expressed cell surface receptor, whereas type III IFN (IFN-λ) uses a distinct cell-type-specific receptor complex for signaling. Using mice lacking functional receptors for type I IFN, type III IFN, or both, we found that IFN-λ plays an important role in the defense against several human pathogens that infect the respiratory tract, such as influenza A virus, influenza B virus, respiratory syncytial virus, human metapneumovirus, and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus. These viruses were more pathogenic and replicated to higher titers in the lungs of mice lacking both IFN receptors than in mice with single IFN receptor defects. In contrast, Lassa fever virus, which infects via the respiratory tract but primarily replicates in the liver, was not influenced by the IFN-λ receptor defect. Careful analysis revealed that expression of functional IFN-λ receptor complexes in the lung and intestinal tract is restricted to epithelial cells and a few other, undefined cell types. Interestingly, we found that SARS coronavirus was present in feces from infected mice lacking receptors for both type I and type III IFN but not in those from mice lacking single receptors, supporting the view that IFN-λ contributes to the control of viral infections in epithelial cells of both respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts.The interferon (IFN) system represents a major element of the innate immune response against viral infections (10, 13, 14). Virus-induced IFN is a complex mixture of biologically active molecules, which includes type I and type III IFN. Type I IFN consists of 14 different IFN-α subtypes in the mouse as well as IFN-β, IFN-κ, IFN-ɛ, and limitin, which all signal through the same universally expressed cell surface receptor complex (IFNAR) (30). Type III IFN includes IFN-λ1, IFN-λ2, and IFN-λ3 (21, 28), of which only the latter two are encoded by genes that are expressed in the mouse (22). Type III IFN uses a distinct receptor complex (IL28R) for signaling (21, 28), which appears to be expressed on only a few cell types, including epithelial cells (29). Binding of type I IFN and type III IFN to their cognate receptor complexes triggers signaling cascades that result in the activation of a large number of genes, many of which encode antiviral proteins (10, 32). Type I IFN and type III IFN trigger highly similar gene expression profiles in responsive cells, suggesting that both IFN types might serve similar functions. However, it has to date been largely unclear to which extent IFN-λ might contribute to innate immunity.Using knockout mouse strains that lack receptors for type I IFN (IFNAR1^0/0), type III IFN (IL28Rα^0/0), or both (IFNAR1^0/0IL28Rα^0/0), we have recently shown that IFN-λ contributes to resistance against influenza A virus (FLUAV) (26). Here, we used the same mouse strains to investigate the relative contribution of IFN-λ in resistance against additional viral pathogens that infect the respiratory and gastrointestinal tract and to visualize IFN-λ-responsive cells. We found that the double-knockout mice showed enhanced susceptibility to various viruses that primarily replicate in lung epithelial cells. Our analysis further revealed that epithelial cells of both lung and gastrointestinal tracts can strongly respond to IFN-λ and that IFN-λ inhibited the replication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) in both lung and gastrointestinal tracts.