Comparative characterization of rep proteins from the helper-dependent adeno-associated virus type 2 and the autonomous goose parvovirus

Adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) are nonautonomous human parvoviruses in that they are dependent on helper functions supplied by other viruses or on genotoxic stimuli for conditions permissive for replication. In the absence of helper, AAV type 2 enters latency by integration into a specific site on human chromosome 19. This feature of AAV, in combination with a lack of pathogenicity, makes AAV an attractive candidate vector for human gene therapy. Goose parvovirus (GPV) is both autonomous and pathogenic yet is highly homologous to AAV. To address the molecular bases for the different viral lifestyles, we compare the AAV and GPV nonstructural proteins, Rep78 and Rep1, respectively. We find that Rep78 and Rep1 possess several biochemical activities in common, including (i) high-affinity DNA binding for sequences that constitute the minimal DNA replication origin; (ii) nucleoside triphosphate-dependent DNA helicase activity; and (iii) origin-specific replication of double-stranded linear DNA. These experiments also establish a specific 38-bp DNA sequence as the minimal GPV DNA replication origin. It is noteworthy that although the proposed Rep binding sites of GPV and AAV are highly similar, Rep1 and Rep78 show a high degree of specificity for their respective origins, in both binding and replication assays. One significant difference was observed; with the minimal replication origin in adenovirus-uninfected extracts, Rep78-mediated replication exhibited low processivity, as previously reported. In contrast, Rep1 efficiently replicated full-length template. Overall, our studies indicate that GPV Rep1 and AAV Rep78 support a comparable mode of replication. Thus, a comparison of the two proteins provides a model system with which to determine the contribution of Rep in the regulation of dependence and autonomy at the level of DNA replication.     

CRISPR Is an Optimal Target for the Design of Specific PCR Assays for Salmonella enterica Serotypes Typhi and Paratyphi A

Background

Serotype-specific PCR assays targeting Salmonella enterica serotypes Typhi and Paratyphi A, the causal agents of typhoid and paratyphoid fevers, are required to accelerate formal diagnosis and to overcome the lack of typing sera and, in some situations, the need for culture. However, the sensitivity and specificity of such assays must be demonstrated on large collections of strains representative of the targeted serotypes and all other bacterial populations producing similar clinical symptoms.

Methodology

Using a new family of repeated DNA sequences, CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats), as a serotype-specific target, we developed a conventional multiplex PCR assay for the detection and differentiation of serotypes Typhi and Paratyphi A from cultured isolates. We also developed EvaGreen-based real-time singleplex PCR assays with the same two sets of primers.

Principal findings

We achieved 100% sensitivity and specificity for each protocol after validation of the assays on 188 serotype Typhi and 74 serotype Paratyphi A strains from diverse genetic groups, geographic origins and time periods and on 70 strains of bacteria frequently encountered in bloodstream infections, including 29 other Salmonella serotypes and 42 strains from 38 other bacterial species.

Conclusions

The performance and convenience of our serotype-specific PCR assays should facilitate the rapid and accurate identification of these two major serotypes in a large range of clinical and public health laboratories with access to PCR technology. These assays were developed for use with DNA from cultured isolates, but with modifications to the assay, the CRISPR targets could be used in the development of assays for use with clinical and other samples.     

A dynamic stochastic model for DNA replication initiation in early embryos

Background

Eukaryotic cells seem unable to monitor replication completion during normal S phase, yet must ensure a reliable replication completion time. This is an acute problem in early Xenopus embryos since DNA replication origins are located and activated stochastically, leading to the random completion problem. DNA combing, kinetic modelling and other studies using Xenopus egg extracts have suggested that potential origins are much more abundant than actual initiation events and that the time-dependent rate of initiation, I(t), markedly increases through S phase to ensure the rapid completion of unreplicated gaps and a narrow distribution of completion times. However, the molecular mechanism that underlies this increase has remained obscure.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Using both previous and novel DNA combing data we have confirmed that I(t) increases through S phase but have also established that it progressively decreases before the end of S phase. To explore plausible biochemical scenarios that might explain these features, we have performed comparisons between numerical simulations and DNA combing data. Several simple models were tested: i) recycling of a limiting replication fork component from completed replicons; ii) time-dependent increase in origin efficiency; iii) time-dependent increase in availability of an initially limiting factor, e.g. by nuclear import. None of these potential mechanisms could on its own account for the data. We propose a model that combines time-dependent changes in availability of a replication factor and a fork-density dependent affinity of this factor for potential origins. This novel model quantitatively and robustly accounted for the observed changes in initiation rate and fork density.

Conclusions/Significance

This work provides a refined temporal profile of replication initiation rates and a robust, dynamic model that quantitatively explains replication origin usage during early embryonic S phase. These results have significant implications for the organisation of replication origins in higher eukaryotes.     

Infectivity of adeno-associated virus serotypes in mouse testis

Background

Recombinant adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) are emerging as favoured transgene delivery vectors for both research applications and gene therapy. In this context, a thorough investigation of the potential of various AAV serotypes to transduce specific cell types is valuable. Here, we rigorously tested the infectivity of a number of AAV serotypes in murine testis by direct testicular injection.

Results

We report the tropism of serotypes AAV2, 5, 8, 9 and AAVrh10 in mouse testis. We reveal unique infectivity of AAV2 and AAV9, which preferentially target intertubular testosterone-producing Leydig cells. Remarkably, AAV2 TM, a mutant for capsid designed to increase transduction, displayed a dramatic alteration in tropism; it infiltrated seminiferous tubules unlike wildtype AAV2 and transduced Sertoli cells. However, none of the AAVs tested infected spermatogonial cells.

Conclusions

In spite of direct testicular injection, none of the tested AAVs appeared to infect sperm progenitors as assayed by reporter expression. This lends support to the current view that AAVs are safe gene-therapy vehicles. However, testing the presence of rAAV genomic DNA in germ cells is necessary to assess the risk of individual serotypes.

     

The effect of DNA-dependent protein kinase on adeno-associated virus replication

Background

DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) is a DNA repair enzyme and plays an important role in determining the molecular fate of the rAAV genome. However, the effect this cellular enzyme on rAAV DNA replication remains elusive.

Methodology/Principal Findings

In the present study, we characterized the roles of DNA-PK on recombinant adeno-associated virus DNA replication. Inhibition of DNA-PK by a DNA-PK inhibitor or siRNA targeting DNA-PKcs significantly decreased replication of AAV in MO59K and 293 cells. Southern blot analysis showed that replicated rAAV DNA formed head-to-head or tail-to-tail junctions. The head-to-tail junction was low or undetectable suggesting AAV-ITR self-priming is the major mechanism for rAAV DNA replication. In an in vitro replication assay, anti-Ku80 antibody strongly inhibited rAAV replication, while anti-Ku70 antibody moderately decreased rAAV replication. Similarly, when Ku heterodimer (Ku70/80) was depleted, less replicated rAAV DNA were detected. Finally, we showed that AAV-ITRs directly interacted with Ku proteins.

Conclusion/Significance

Collectively, our results showed that that DNA-PK enhances rAAV replication through the interaction of Ku proteins and AAV-ITRs.     

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) type 5 Rep protein cleaves a unique terminal resolution site compared with other AAV serotypes

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) replication depends on two viral components for replication: the AAV nonstructural proteins (Rep) in trans, and inverted terminal repeat (ITR) sequences in cis. AAV type 5 (AAV5) is a distinct virus compared to the other cloned AAV serotypes. Whereas the Rep proteins and ITRs of other serotypes are interchangeable and can be used to produce recombinant viral particles of a different serotype, AAV5 Rep proteins cannot cross-complement in the packaging of a genome with an AAV2 ITR. In vitro replication assays indicated that the block occurs at the level of replication instead of at viral assembly. AAV2 and AAV5 Rep binding activities demonstrate similar affinities for either an AAV2 or AAV5 ITR; however, comparison of terminal resolution site (TRS) endonuclease activities showed a difference in specificity for the two DNA sequences. AAV2 Rep78 cleaved only a type 2 ITR DNA sequence, and AAV5 Rep78 cleaved only a type 5 probe efficiently. Mapping of the AAV5 ITR TRS identified a distinct cleavage site (AGTG TGGC) which is absent from the ITRs of other AAV serotypes. Comparison of the TRSs in the AAV2 ITR, the AAV5 ITR, and the AAV chromosome 19 integration locus identified some conserved nucleotides downstream of the cleavage site but little homology upstream.     

Establishment of an AAV reverse infection-based array

Background

The development of a convenient high-throughput gene transduction approach is critical for biological screening. Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors are broadly used in gene therapy studies, yet their applications in in vitro high-throughput gene transduction are limited.

Principal Findings

We established an AAV reverse infection (RI)-based method in which cells were transduced by quantified recombinant AAVs (rAAVs) pre-coated onto 96-well plates. The number of pre-coated rAAV particles and number of cells loaded per well, as well as the temperature stability of the rAAVs on the plates, were evaluated. As the first application of this method, six serotypes or hybrid serotypes of rAAVs (AAV1, AAV2, AAV5/5, AAV8, AAV25 m, AAV28 m) were compared for their transduction efficiencies using various cell lines, including BHK21, HEK293, BEAS-2BS, HeLaS3, Huh7, Hepa1-6, and A549. AAV2 and AAV1 displayed high transduction efficiency; thus, they were deemed to be suitable candidate vectors for the RI-based array. We next evaluated the impact of sodium butyrate (NaB) treatment on rAAV vector-mediated reporter gene expression and found it was significantly enhanced, suggesting that our system reflected the biological response of target cells to specific treatments.

Conclusions/Significance

Our study provides a novel method for establishing a highly efficient gene transduction array that may be developed into a platform for cell biological assays.     

Identification of Rep-Associated Factors in Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1-Induced Adeno-Associated Virus Type 2 Replication Compartments

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is a human parvovirus that replicates only in cells coinfected with a helper virus, such as adenovirus or herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1). We previously showed that nine HSV-1 factors are able to support AAV rep gene expression and genome replication. To elucidate the strategy of AAV replication in the presence of HSV-1, we undertook a proteomic analysis of cellular and HSV-1 factors associated with Rep proteins and thus potentially recruited within AAV replication compartments (AAV RCs). This study resulted in the identification of approximately 60 cellular proteins, among which factors involved in DNA and RNA metabolism represented the largest functional categories. Validation analyses indicated that the cellular DNA replication enzymes RPA, RFC, and PCNA were recruited within HSV-1-induced AAV RCs. Polymerase δ was not identified but subsequently was shown to colocalize with Rep within AAV RCs even in the presence of the HSV-1 polymerase complex. In addition, we found that AAV replication is associated with the recruitment of components of the Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 complex, Ku70 and -86, and the mismatch repair proteins MSH2, -3, and -6. Finally, several HSV-1 factors were also found to be associated with Rep, including UL12. We demonstrated for the first time that this protein plays a role during AAV replication by enhancing the resolution of AAV replicative forms and AAV particle production. Altogether, these analyses provide the basis to understand how AAV adapts its replication strategy to the nuclear environment induced by the helper virus.Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is a human parvovirus that is currently used as a gene transfer vector (14). AAV particles consist of a small icosahedral capsid protecting a single 4.7-kb single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) genome with two open reading frames, rep and cap, surrounded by inverted terminal repeats (ITRs). The ITRs are the only sequences required in cis for genome replication and packaging. The rep gene encodes four nonstructural Rep proteins: Rep78, -68, -52, and -40. The two larger isoforms, Rep78 and -68, have origin binding, helicase, and site-specific endonuclease activities and are involved in AAV gene expression and genome processing, including replication and site-specific integration (39). The two smaller Rep isoforms are not required for AAV DNA replication but are involved in the control of viral gene expression and packaging of viral DNA (30).When wild-type (wt) AAV infects a cell in the absence of a helper virus, it enters latency. Latent AAV genomes persist in cells either as episomes or as integrated genomes, preferentially at a specific locus (named AAVS1) on human chromosome 19. In most instances, no detectable viral gene expression or genome replication occurs unless the cell is co- or superinfected by a helper virus, such as adenovirus, herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), or HSV-2. Under these conditions, AAV replication and assembly take place in large intranuclear domains called replication compartments (RCs) that frequently colocalize with replication domains formed by the helper virus itself (81). The viral genome replicates by leading-strand synthesis and generates new ssDNA molecules by a strand displacement mechanism that occurs after strand- and site-specific cleavage of viral DNA by Rep78/68 within the ITRs (39).Studies conducted on the relationship between AAV and its helper viruses are important not only to identify helper activities that can be used to produce recombinant AAV vectors but also to understand how AAV adapts its replication strategy to the helper virus and to the nuclear environment in general. Adenovirus helper functions have historically been the first and most extensively studied functions. These studies have shown that adenovirus helps AAV by stimulating viral gene expression and by enhancing AAV genome replication, mostly indirectly (19). Indeed, early studies showed that the adenovirus polymerase (E2b) is dispensable for AAV replication (8) and that the viral DNA-binding protein (DBP), the product of the E2a gene, is able to modestly enhance the processivity of AAV genome replication in vitro (77). More recently, the adenovirus proteins E1b55k and E4orf6 were shown to stimulate AAV genome replication by degrading the cellular Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 (MRN) complex that restricts AAV genome replication during adenovirus coinfection (32). The concept that AAV genome replication can rely mostly, if not uniquely, on direct help from cellular factors was further strengthened by the demonstration that purified proteins such as replication protein A (RPA), replication factor C (RFC), proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), minichromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins, and DNA polymerase δ (Pol δ) were sufficient to replicate the AAV genome in vitro in the presence of Rep (40-41, 43). The involvement of these cellular proteins during AAV genome replication was also confirmed by the proteomic analysis of factors associated with Rep proteins during adenovirus-induced AAV replication (42).Interestingly, studies conducted on HSV-1 helper activities suggest that the strategy of AAV replication may vary depending on the helper virus. Indeed, previous studies showed that the HSV-1 helicase-primase (HP) complex (UL5/8/52) and DBP (ICP8) could replicate transfected AAV-2 plasmids (80) and that the helicase activity, but not primase activity, of the HP complex was required for this effect (62, 66). More recently, a comprehensive study of HSV-1 helper activities demonstrated that the HSV-1 immediate-early proteins ICP0, ICP4, and ICP22 could stimulate rep gene expression, probably by diminishing intrinsic antiviral effects (1, 18). In addition, the HSV-1 DNA polymerase encoded by UL30, along with its associated processivity factor (UL42), although not strictly required, was demonstrated to significantly increase AAV replication levels induced in the presence of the HP complex and ICP8. Interestingly, the HSV-1 HP complex, DBP, and polymerase were also shown to be sufficient to replicate AAV DNA in vitro in the presence of Rep proteins without any cellular protein (78). Altogether, these observations indicate that in the context of an HSV-1 coinfection, AAV relies extensively on viral activities provided by the helper that directly participate in AAV genome replication.To further elucidate the strategy of AAV replication in the presence of HSV-1, we undertook a proteomic analysis to identify the cellular and HSV-1 factors associated with Rep proteins and, consequently, potentially recruited within AAV RCs. To analyze Rep-associated proteins in the presence and absence of HSV-1 DNA replication, this analysis was performed using wt HSV-1 and an HSV-1 mutant in which the DNA polymerase encoded by the UL30 gene is absent (HSVΔUL30). This study resulted in the identification of approximately 60 cellular proteins, among which the largest functional categories corresponded to factors involved in DNA and RNA metabolism. Immunofluorescence analyses confirmed that in the presence of HSV-1, a basal set of cellular DNA replication enzymes, including RPA, RFC, and PCNA, was recruited within AAV RCs, with the exception of the MCM helicases. The cellular DNA polymerases, in particular Pol δ, were not identified by this analysis but subsequently were shown to be recruited in AAV RCs even in the presence of the HSV-1 polymerase complex. In addition, our results indicate that AAV replication induced by HSV-1 is associated with the recruitment of DNA repair factors, including components of the MRN complex, the Ku proteins, PARP-1, and factors of the mismatch repair (MMR) pathway. Finally, several HSV-1 proteins, most notably the UL12 protein, were also identified within AAV RCs. Our analyses confirmed the association between UL12 and Rep and demonstrated for the first time that this viral exonuclease plays a critical role during AAV replication by enhancing the formation of discrete AAV replicative forms and the production of AAV particles.Altogether, these results indicate that in the presence of HSV-1, AAV may replicate by using a basal set of cellular DNA replication enzymes but also relies extensively on HSV-1-derived proteins for its replication, including UL12, a newly discovered helper factor. These results suggest that AAV may be able to differentially adapt its replication strategy to the nuclear environment induced by the helper virus.     

The nuclease domain of adeno-associated virus rep coordinates replication initiation using two distinct DNA recognition interfaces

Integration into a particular location in human chromosomes is a unique property of the adeno-associated virus (AAV). This reaction requires the viral Rep protein and AAV origin sequences. To understand how Rep recognizes DNA, we have determined the structures of the Rep endonuclease domain separately complexed with two DNA substrates: the Rep binding site within the viral inverted terminal repeat and one of the terminal hairpin arms. At the Rep binding site, five Rep monomers bind five tetranucleotide direct repeats; each repeat is recognized by two Rep monomers from opposing faces of the DNA. Stem-loop binding involves a protein interface on the opposite side of the molecule from the active site where ssDNA is cleaved. Rep therefore has three distinct binding sites within its endonuclease domain for its different DNA substrates. Use of these different interfaces generates the structural asymmetry necessary to regulate later events in viral replication and integration.     

Amino-terminal domain exchange redirects origin-specific interactions of adeno-associated virus rep78 in vitro

The unique ability of adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV) to site-specifically integrate its genome into a defined sequence on human chromosome 19 (AAVS1) makes it of particular interest for use in targeted gene delivery. The objective underlying this study is to provide evidence for the feasibility of retargeting site-specific integration into selected loci within the human genome. Current models postulate that AAV DNA integration is initiated through the interactions of the products of a single viral open reading frame, REP, with sequences present in AAVS1 that resemble the minimal origin for AAV DNA replication. Here, we present a cell-free system designed to dissect the Rep functions required to target site-specific integration using functional chimeric Rep proteins derived from AAV Rep78 and Rep1 of the closely related goose parvovirus. We show that amino-terminal domain exchange efficiently redirects the specificity of Rep to the minimal origin of DNA replication. Furthermore, we establish that the amino-terminal 208 amino acids of Rep78/68 constitute a catalytic domain of Rep sufficient to mediate site-specific endonuclease activity.     

Complete in vitro reconstitution of adeno-associated virus DNA replication requires the minichromosome maintenance complex proteins

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) replicates its DNA exclusively by a leading-strand DNA replication mechanism and requires coinfection with a helper virus, such as adenovirus, to achieve a productive infection. In previous work, we described an in vitro AAV replication assay that required the AAV terminal repeats (the origins for DNA replication), the AAV Rep protein (the origin binding protein), and an adenovirus-infected crude extract. Fractionation of these crude extracts identified replication factor C (RFC), proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and polymerase δ as cellular enzymes that were essential for AAV DNA replication in vitro. Here we identify the remaining factor that is necessary as the minichromosome maintenance (MCM) complex, a cellular helicase complex that is believed to be the replicative helicase for eukaryotic chromosomes. Thus, polymerase δ, RFC, PCNA, and the MCM complex, along with the virally encoded Rep protein, constitute the minimal protein complexes required to reconstitute efficient AAV DNA replication in vitro. Interfering RNAs targeted to MCM and polymerase δ inhibited AAV DNA replication in vivo, suggesting that one or more components of the MCM complex and polymerase δ play an essential role in AAV DNA replication in vivo as well as in vitro. Our reconstituted in vitro DNA replication system is consistent with the current genetic information about AAV DNA replication. The use of highly conserved cellular replication enzymes may explain why AAV is capable of productive infection in a wide variety of species with several different families of helper viruses.     

Roles of adeno-associated virus Rep protein and human chromosome 19 in site-specific recombination

Adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV) is the only known eucaryotic virus capable of targeted integration in human cells. AAV integrates preferentially into human chromosome (ch) 19q13.3qter. The nonstructural proteins of AAV-2, Rep78 and Rep68, are essential for targeted integration. Rep78 and Rep68 are multifunctional proteins with diverse biochemical activities, including site-specific binding to AAV and ch-19 target sequences, helicase activity, and strand-specific, site-specific endonuclease activities. Both a Rep DNA binding element (RBE) and a nicking site essential for AAV replication present within the viral terminal repeats are also located on ch-19. Recently, identical RBE sequences have been identified at other locations in the human genome. This fact raises numerous questions concerning AAV targeted integration; specifically, how many RBE sequences are in the human genome? How does Rep discriminate between these and the ch-19 RBE sequence? Does Rep interact with all sites and, if so, how is targeted integration within a fixed time frame facilitated? To better characterize the role of Rep in targeted integration, we established a Rep-dependent filter DNA binding assay using a highly purified Rep-68 fusion protein. Electron microscopy (EM) analysis was also performed to determine the characteristics of the Rep-RBE interaction. Our results determined that the Rep affinity for ch-19 is not distinct compared to other RBEs in the human genome when utilizing naked DNA. In fact, a minimum-binding site (GAGYGAGC) efficiently associated with Rep, suggesting that as many as 2 × 10⁵ sites may exist. In addition, such sites also exist frequently in nonprimate mammalian genomes, although AAV integrates site specifically into primate genomes. EM analysis demonstrated that only one Rep-DNA complex was formed on ch-19 target DNA. Surprisingly, identically sized complexes were observed on all substrates containing a RBE sequence, but never on DNA lacking an RBE. Rep-DNA complexes involved a multimeric protein structure that spanned ca. 60 bp. Immunoprecipitation of AAV latently infected cells determined that 1,000 to 4,000 copies of Rep78 and Rep68 protein are expressed per cell. Comparison of the Rep association constant with those of established DNA binding proteins indicates that sufficient molecules of Rep are present to interact with all potential RBE sites. Moreover, Rep expression in the absence of AAV cis-acting substrate resulted in Rep-dependent amplification and rearrangement of the target sequence in ch-19. This result suggests that this locus is a hot spot for Rep-dependent recombination. Finally, we engineered mice to carry a single 2.7-kb human ch-19 insertion containing the AAV ch-19 target locus. Using cells derived from these mice, we demonstrated that this sequence was sufficient for site-specific recombination after infection with transducing vectors expressing Rep. This result indicates that any host factors required for targeting are conserved between human and mouse. Furthermore, the human ch-19 cis sequences and chromatin structure required for site-specific recombination are contained within this fragment. Overall, these results indicate that the specificity of targeted recombination to human ch-19 is not dictated by differential Rep affinities for RBE sites. Instead, specificity is likely dictated by human ch-19 sequences that serve as a Rep protein-mediated origin of replication, thus facilitating viral targeting through Rep-Rep interactions and host enzymes, resulting in site-specific recombination. Control of specificity is clearly dictated by the ch-19 sequences, since transfer of these sequences into the mouse genome are sufficient to achieve Rep-dependent site-specific integration.Adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV) contains a single-stranded DNA genome of approximately 4.7 kb (50) and is a member of the Parvoviridae family (3). AAV is unique among other eucaryotic DNA viruses in that it utilizes a biphasic lifecycle to persist in nature. In the presence of a helper virus, adenovirus (Ad) or herpesvirus, AAV will undergo a productive infection. In the absence of a helper virus, AAV will integrate preferentially (>70%) into chromosome (ch) 19q13.3qter (3, 35). The ability of this nonpathogenic DNA virus, or virus-derived vector systems, to integrate site specifically have made it an attractive candidate vector for human gene therapy (45).The AAV genome consists of two open reading frames (ORFs), which comprise the rep and cap genes, and 145-bp inverted terminal repeats (ITRs), which serve as the origins of replication (3, 35). The left ORF of AAV encodes four nonstructural proteins, Rep78, Rep68, Rep52, and Rep40. Extensive characterization of Rep78 and Rep68 in vitro has identified the following biochemical activities, DNA binding (18, 19), site-specific and strand-specific endonuclease activities (17, 19), and DNA-RNA and DNA-DNA helicase activities (17, 19, 59), all of which appear to be necessary for viral replication (15, 53). More importantly, Rep78 and Rep68 are required for mediating targeted integration (2, 43, 47, 51, 60).Though site-specific integration is dependent upon either of the two large Rep proteins, the AAV ITRs are the only cis elements required for integration (34, 44, 61). In the absence of Rep proteins, the virus will still integrate through the ITR sequence but randomly into the host genome (21, 56, 61). Although integration in the absence of the Rep proteins is random, virus-cell junctions are nearly identical to junctions formed during targeted integration (DNA microhomology at junctions, specific deletions of the ITR sequences, rearrangement of the chromosome locus, and head-to-tail virus concatemers) (41, 62). In fact, in vitro integration products generated using cellular extracts produced identical type junctions, demonstrating the essential role the ITRs play in viral integration (62). From this analysis, Yang et al. (62) concluded that both random and targeted integration are dependent upon a cellular recombination pathway, with the role of Rep facilitating integration at ch-19. To help account for AAV targeting, a nearly identical Rep binding element (RBE) and a nicking site (trs) to that present on the AAV ITR was identified on the ch19.13.3qter AAV integration sequence (23–25, 43, 46, 54, 57). It was also demonstrated that Rep68 could mediate complex formation between the AAV ITR and the ch-19 integration site in vitro (57). This led to a hypothesis that AAV may target integration by Rep-mediated complex formation between the AAV ITR and the ch19 integration site. However, since this observation subsequent data has demonstrated that Rep can bind to degenerate RBE sequences, (5, 32). In fact, computer analysis identified at least 15 genomic genes which contained RBE sites that bound to AAV Rep protein in vitro, all more efficient than the ch-19 sequence (58). These data raise the question as to how Rep can target ch-19 among other RBE sequences. Using an Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-based shuttle vector system carrying sequences from ch-19, Linden et al. demonstrated that the trs site was also critical for AAV site-specific integration (29, 30). When the trs site was not present, targeting was lost, even though the RBE was present. The present study suggested that both sequences were essential for site-specific integration (the RBE and the trs sequences). The probability of identifying a RBE with the correct proximity of a trs site would suggest a frequency of <6 × 10⁻¹¹/genome, thereby defining a unique sequence in the human genome (54). While these studies identify ch-19 cis elements required for AAV targeted integration and suggest why this reaction is specific, how Rep carries out this reaction remains unclear.Critical to any model of AAV Rep-mediated targeted integration is the ability to recognize the ch-19 target sequence among other potential RBE sequences. Though Rep can bind many degenerate sequences, the actual definition of what constitutes an RBE is somewhat unclear. Random oligonucleotide selection demonstrated that the RBE could be defined as an 8-bp sequence: 5′-GAGYGAGC-3′ (5). However, it was shown by methylation interference assays that the RBE was an 18-bp core sequence and that any mutation within this sequence would significantly affect Rep binding (42). Also, the report by Wonderling and Owens (58) demonstrated that the RBE oligonucleotides derived from the BLAST search contained mutations in this 18-bp core sequence but still bound better to the MBP-Rep68 than to the ch-19 RBE. Depending on the definition of an AAV RBE, the copy number present in the human genome (GAGYGAGC = 200,000 copies/genome, whereas 18-bp core = 1 copy/genome) could significantly impact the ability of Rep to identify its target locus.Based on the above information, the number of RBE sequences in the human genome, how Rep discriminates between these and the ch-19 target locus RBE sequence, and how Rep interacts with all sites and still facilitates targeted integration within a fixed time frame become of significant importance. In this study, we evaluated the role of alternative RBEs in the human genome and how these sequences might impact the ability of Rep to target the locus on ch-19. Using a filter-binding assay and a highly purified source of Rep68 protein, we established that genomic DNA will compete efficiently against a ch-19 target sequences. In this assay, a minimum Rep binding site of 8-bp in the context of large DNA fragments demonstrated competition, suggesting that as many as 200,000 potential binding sites may exist in the human genome. Filter-binding analysis of genomic DNA successfully retained ch-19 target sequences, as well as a cellular RBE identified by BLAST analysis, corroborating the competition results. Electron microscopy (EM) analysis was utilized to distinguish possible differences between Rep protein DNA interaction with ch-19 RBE compared to a minimum 8-bp RBE sequence. Identical multimeric Rep protein DNA complexes, which spanned about 60 bp, assembled on ch-19 target DNA, as well as a minimum RBE site, but never on heterologous DNA lacking these sequences. At a high Rep concentration, protein DNA looping structures were detected, but no evidence for paranemic structures were observed. In vivo analysis of Rep protein levels in a latent infection demonstrated approximately 1 to 4,000 copies/cell. Analysis of Rep expression in non-virus-infected cells demonstrated DNA rearrangement of the ch-19 target sequence, suggesting that this locus is a hot spot for Rep-induced DNA amplification and rearrangement that most likely influences AAV targeted integration. Finally, generation of an animal model carrying the human ch-19 sequence at the mouse hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) locus facilitated AAV Rep-mediated targeted integration and corroborates the importance of the ch-19 RBE-trs sequence.