Base-excision repair and beyond—A short summary attributed to scientific achievements of Tomas Lindahl,Nobel Prize Laureate in Chemistry 2015

正Tomas Lindahl contributed his scientific career to unveiling fundamental mechanisms of DNA decay and repair.He made several ground-breaking discoveries on genome instability,novel DNA repair activities and pathways,and disease association.The 2015 Nobel Prize in Chemistry was awarded jointly to Tomas Lindahl,Paul Modrich and Aziz Sancar for their mechanistic studies of DNA repair.Their findings were     

Flexibility in the order of action and in the enzymology of the nuclease, polymerases, and ligase of vertebrate non-homologous DNA end joining： relevance to cancer, aging, and the immune system

Nonhomologous DNA end joining （NHEJ） is the primary pathway for repair of double-strand DNA breaks in human cells and in multicellular eukaryotes. The causes of double-strand breaks often fragment the DNA at the site of damage, resulting in the loss of information there. NHEJ does not restore the lost information and may resect additional nucleotides during the repair process. The ability to repair a wide range of overhang and damage configurations reflects the flexibility of the nuclease, polymerases, and ligase of NHEJ. The flexibility of the individual components also explains the large number of ways in which NHEJ can repair any given pair of DNA ends. The loss of information locally at sites of NHEJ repair may contribute to cancer and aging, but the action by NHEJ ensures that entire segments of chromosomes are not lost.     

That's A Scientist Should Do——A Dialog with Tomas Lindahl

正Dr Tomas Lindahl is a world-renowned scientist specialized in cancer research,in particular,DNA repair [1].In 2015,he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry jointly with Dr Paul L.Modrich and Dr Aziz Sancar ‘‘for mechanistic studies of DNA repair"(https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/2015/press-release/)[2].During his recent visits in China,besides delivering lectures,Tomas also attended a couple of group meetings with students and PIs.He actively interacted with the audience,not only on topics relating to DNA repair,but also on how to do science and beyond.We presented this special report based on recordings.     

Homologous recombination in DNA repair and DNA damage tolerance

Homologous recombination （HR） comprises a series of interrelated pathways that function in the repair of DNA double-stranded breaks （DSBs） and interstrand crosslinks （ICLs）. In addition, recombination provides critical support for DNA replication in the recovery of stalled or broken replication forks, contributing to tolerance of DNA damage. A central core of proteins, most critically the RecA homolog Rad51, catalyzes the key reactions that typify HR： homology search and DNA strand invasion. The diverse functions of recombination are reflected in the need for context-specific factors that perform supplemental functions in conjunction with the core proteins. The inability to properly repair complex DNA damage and resolve DNA replication stress leads to genomic instability and contributes to cancer etiology. Mutations in the BRCA2 recombination gene cause predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer as well as Fanconi anemia, a cancer predisposition syndrome characterized by a defect in the repair of DNA interstrand crosslinks. The cellular functions of recombination are also germane to DNA-based treatment modalities of cancer, which target replicating cells by the direct or indirect induction of DNA lesions that are substrates for recombination pathways. This review focuses on mechanistic aspects of HR relating to DSB and ICL repair as well as replication fork support.     

My Journey to DNA Repair

I completed my medical studies at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm but have always been devoted to basic research. My longstanding interest is to understand fundamental DNA repair mechanisms in the fields of cancer therapy, inherited human genetic disorders and ancient DNA. I initially measured DNA decay, including rates of base loss and cytosine deamination. I have discovered several important DNA repair proteins and determined their mechanisms of action. The discovery of uracil-DNA glycosylase defined a new category of repair enzymes with each specialized for different types of DNA damage. The base excision repair pathway was first reconstituted with human proteins in my group. Cell-free analysis for mammalian nucleotide excision repair of DNA was also developed in my laboratory. I found multiple distinct DNA ligases in mammalian cells, and led the first genetic and biochemical work on DNA ligases Ⅰ, and Ⅳ. I discovered the mammalian exonucleases DNase Ⅲ (TREX1) and IV (FEN1). Interestingly, expression of TREX1 was altered in some human autoimmune diseases. I also showed that the mutagenic DNA adduct O6-methylguanine (O6 mG) is repaired without removing the guanine from DNA, identifying a surprising mechanism by which the methyl group is transferred to a residue in the repair protein itself. A further novel process of DNA repair discovered by my research group is the action of AlkB as an iron-dependent enzyme carrying out oxidative demethylation.     

The role of NBS1 in DNA double strand break repair, telomere stability, and cell cycle checkpoint control

The genomes of eukaryotic cells are under continuous assault by environmental agents and endogenous metabolic byproducts. Damage induced in DNA usually leads to a cascade of cellular events, the DNA damage response. Failure of the DNA damage response can lead to development of malignancy by reducing the efficiency and fidelity of DNA repair. The NBS1 protein is a component of the MRE11/RAD50/NBS 1 complex （MRN） that plays a critical role in the cellular response to DNA damage and the maintenance of chromosomal integrity. Mutations in the NBS1 gene are responsible for Nijmegen breakage syndrome （NBS）, a hereditary disorder that imparts an increased predisposition to development of malignancy. The phenotypic characteristics of cells isolated from NBS patients point to a deficiency in the repair of DNA double strand breaks. Here, we review the current knowledge of the role of NBS1 in the DNA damage response. Emphasis is placed on the role of NBS1 in the DNA double strand repair, modulation of the DNA damage sensing and signaling, cell cycle checkpoint control and maintenance oftelomere stability.     

Structure and mechanism for DNA lesion recognition

A fundamental question in DNA repair is how a lesion is detected when embedded in millions to billions of normal base pairs. Extensive structural and functional studies reveal atomic details of DNA repair protein and nucleic acid interactions. This review summarizes seemingly diverse structural motifs used in lesion recognition and suggests a general mechanism to recognize DNA lesion by the poor base stacking. After initial recognition of this shared structural feature of lesions, different DNA repair pathways use unique verification mechanisms to ensure correct lesion identification and removal.     

Development of Novel Visual-Plus Quantitative Analysis Systems for Studying DNA Double-Strand Break Repairs in Zebrafish

The use of reporter systems to analyze DNA double-strand break(DSB) repairs,based on the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) and meganuclease such as I-Sce I,is usually carried out with cell lines.In this study,we developed three visual-plus quantitative assay systems for homologous recombination(HR),non-homologous end joining(NHEJ) and single-strand annealing(SSA) DSB repair pathways at the organismal level in zebrafish embryos.To initiate DNA DSB repair,we used two I-Sce I recognition sites in opposite orientation rather than the usual single site.The NHEJ,HR and SSA repair pathways were separately triggered by the injection of three corresponding I-Sce I-cut constructions,and the repair of DNA lesion caused by l-Sce I could be tracked by EGFP expression in the embryos.Apart from monitoring the intensity of green fluorescence,the repair frequencies could also be precisely measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction(qPCR).Analysis of DNA sequences at the DSB sites showed that NHEJ was predominant among these three repair pathways in zebrafish embryos.Furthermore,while HR and SSA reporter systems could be effectively decreased by the knockdown of rad51 and rad52,respectively,NHEJ could only be impaired by the knockdown of ligaseIV(lig4) when the NHEJ construct was cut by I-Sce I in vivo.More interestingly,blocking NHEJ with lig4-MO increased the frequency of HR,but decreased the frequency of SSA.Our studies demonstrate that the major mechanisms used to repair DNA DSBs are conserved from zebrafish to mammal,and zebrafish provides an excellent model for studying and manipulating DNA DSB repair at the organismal level.     

The key residue for SSB-RecO interaction is dispensable for Deinococcus radiodurans DNA repair in vivo

The RecFOR DNA repair pathway is one of the major RecA-dependent recombinatorial repair pathways in bacteria and plays an important role in double-strand breaks repair. RecO, one of the major recombination mediator proteins in the RecFOR pathway, has been shown to assist RecA loading onto single-stranded binding protein （SSB） coated single-stranded DNA （ssDNA）. However, it has not been characterized whether the protein-protein interaction between RecO and SSB contributes to that process in vivo. Here, we identified the residue arginine-121 of Deinococcus radiodurans RecO （drRecO-R121） as the key residue for RecO-SSB interaction. The substitution of drRecO-R121 with alanine greatly abolished the binding of RecO to SSB but not the binding to RecR. Meanwhile, SSB-coated ssDNA annealing activity was also compromised by the mutation of the residue of drRecO. However, the drRecO-R121A strain showed only modest sensitivity to DNA damaging agents. Taking these data together, arginine-121 of drRecO is the key residue for SSB-RecO interaction, which may not play a vital role in the SSB displacement and RecA loading process of RecFOR DNA repair pathway in vivo.     

DNA repair in neural cells: basic science and clinical implications

As one part of a distinguished scientific career, Dr. Bryn Bridges focused his attention on the issue of DNA damage and repair in stationary phase bacteria. His work in this area led to his interest in DNA repair and mutagenesis in another non-dividing cell population, the neurons in the mammalian nervous system. He has specifically taken an interest in the magnocellular neurons of the central nervous system, and the possibility that somatic mutations may be occurring in these neurons. As part of this special issue dedicated to Bryn Bridges upon his retirement, I will discuss the various DNA repair pathways known to be active in the nervous system. The importance of DNA repair to the nervous system is most graphically illustrated by the neurological abnormalities observed in patients with hereditary diseases associated with defects in DNA repair. I will consider the mechanisms underlying the neurological abnormalities observed in patients with four of these diseases: xeroderma pigmentosum (XP), Cockayne's syndrome (CS), ataxia telangectasia (AT) and AT-like disorder (ATLD). I will also propose a mechanism for one of the observations indicating that somatic mutation can occur in the magnocellular neurons of the aging rat brain. Finally, as a parallel to Bridges inquiry into how much DNA synthesis is going on in stationary phase bacteria, I will address the question of how much DNA synthesis in going on in neurons, and the implications of the answer to this question for recent studies of neurogenesis in adult mammals.     

Gene conversion adjacent to regions of double-strand break repair.

The repair of double-strand breaks and gaps can be studied in vegetative yeast cells by transforming the DNA with restriction enzyme-cut plasmids. Postulated models for this repair process require the formation of heteroduplex DNA on either side of the region of break or gap repair. We describe the use of restriction site mutations in the his3 gene to detect conversion events flanking but outside of a region of a double-strand break repair. The frequency with which a mutation was converted declined with increasing distance between the mutation and the edge of the gap repair region. The data are consistent with heteroduplex DNA tracts of at least several hundred base pairs adjacent to regions of double-strand break repair.     

Action of plasmid ColIb-P9 on the survival after ultraviolet irradiation and on the mutagenesis of the imiC, uvm, recL, uvrE and tif1 sfiA lexA spr mutants of Escherichia coli K-12 cells

To clarify the mechanisms whereby the ColIb-P9 plasmid affects DNA repair processes, its effect was studied in mutant Escherichia coli K-12 cells with altered mutagenesis and DNA repair. The plasmid was shown to protect umuC, uvm, recL and uvrE mutants after UV irradiation. The frequency of UV-induced his+ revertants increased in the presence of the plasmid in umuC, uvm and recL mutant cells. The ColIb-P9 plasmid completely restored the UV mutability and survival of umuC mutants. These results suggest that the ColIb-P9 plasmid may encode a product similar to that of the umuC gene. In the tif1 sfiA lexA spr mutant cells where SOS functions are constitutively expressed, the ColIb-P9 plasmid increased the number of his+ revertants several times. This suggests that the action of ColIb-P9 is probably brought about not via the derepression of the recA gene but at the subsequent stages of the recA+lexA+-dependent DNA error-prone repair.     

Untangling the crosstalk between BRCA1 and R-loops during DNA repair

R-loops are RNA:DNA hybrids assembled during biological processes but are also linked to genetic instability when formed out of their natural context. Emerging evidence suggests that the repair of DNA double-strand breaks requires the formation of a transient R-loop, which eventually must be removed to guarantee a correct repair process. The multifaceted BRCA1 protein has been shown to be recruited at this specific break-induced R-loop, and it facilitates mechanisms in order to regulate R-loop removal. In this review, we discuss the different potential roles of BRCA1 in R-loop homeostasis during DNA repair and how these processes ensure faithful DSB repair.     

Repair of 8-oxoG is slower in endogenous nuclear genes than in mitochondrial DNA and is without strand bias

DNA is vulnerable to the attack of certain oxygen radicals and one of the major DNA lesions formed is 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG), a highly mutagenic lesion that can mispair with adenine. The repair of 8-oxoG was studied by measuring the gene specific removal of 8-oxoG after treatment of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) fibroblasts with the photosensitizer Ro19-8022. This compound introduces 8-oxoG lesions, which can then be detected with the Escherichia coli formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (FPG). In this report we present gene specific repair analysis of endogenous genes situated in different important cellular regions and also the first analysis of strand specific DNA repair of 8-oxoG in an endogenous gene. We were not able to detect any preferential repair of transcribed genes compared to non-transcribed regions and we did not detect any strand-bias in the repair of the housekeeping gene, dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR). In vivo, mitochondrial DNA is highly exposed to reactive oxygen species (ROS), and we find that the repair of 8-oxoG is more efficient in the mitochondrial DNA than in the nuclear DNA.     

Viral Interference with DNA Repair by Targeting of the Single-Stranded DNA Binding Protein RPA

Correct repair of damaged DNA is critical for genomic integrity. Deficiencies in DNA repair are linked with human cancer. Here we report a novel mechanism by which a virus manipulates DNA damage responses. Infection with murine polyomavirus sensitizes cells to DNA damage by UV and etoposide. Polyomavirus large T antigen (LT) alone is sufficient to sensitize cells 100 fold to UV and other kinds of DNA damage. This results in activated stress responses and apoptosis. Genetic analysis shows that LT sensitizes via the binding of its origin-binding domain (OBD) to the single-stranded DNA binding protein replication protein A (RPA). Overexpression of RPA protects cells expressing OBD from damage, and knockdown of RPA mimics the LT phenotype. LT prevents recruitment of RPA to nuclear foci after DNA damage. This leads to failure to recruit repair proteins such as Rad51 or Rad9, explaining why LT prevents repair of double strand DNA breaks by homologous recombination. A targeted intervention directed at RPA based on this viral mechanism could be useful in circumventing the resistance of cancer cells to therapy.     

Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD53 (CHK2) but not CHK1 is required for double-strand break-initiated SCE and DNA damage-associated SCE after exposure to X rays and chemical agents

Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD53 (CHK2) and CHK1 control two parallel branches of the RAD9-mediated pathway for DNA damage-induced G(2) arrest. Previous studies indicate that RAD9 is required for X-ray-associated sister chromatid exchange (SCE), suppresses homology-directed translocations, and is involved in pathways for double-strand break repair (DSB) repair that are different than those controlled by PDS1. We measured DNA damage-associated SCE in strains containing two tandem fragments of his3, his3-Delta5' and his3-Delta3'::HOcs, and rates of spontaneous translocations in diploids containing GAL1::his3-Delta5' and trp1::his3-Delta3'::HOcs. DNA damage-associated SCE was measured after log phase cells were exposed to methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide (4-NQO), UV, X rays and HO-induced DSBs. We observed that rad53 mutants were defective in MMS-, 4-NQO, X-ray-associated and HO-induced SCE but not in UV-associated SCE. Similar to rad9 pds1 double mutants, rad53 pds1 double mutants exhibited more X-ray sensitivity than the single mutants. rad53 sml1 diploid mutants exhibited a 10-fold higher rate of spontaneous translocations compared to the sml1 diploid mutants. chk1 mutants were not deficient in DNA damage-associated SCE after exposure to DNA damaging agents or after DSBs were generated at trp1::his3-Delta5'his3-Delta3'::HOcs. These data indicate that RAD53, not CHK1, is required for DSB-initiated SCE, and DNA damage-associated SCE after exposure to X-ray-mimetic and UV-mimetic chemicals.     

Reminiscences of a long-time colleague and friend, Philip C. Hanawalt

Philip Hanawalt is a long time contributor to many areas of the DNA repair field. This article summarizes aspect of his relationship with the author over the past 36 years.     

Tip60: updates

The maintenance of genome integrity is essential for organism survival. Therefore, eukaryotic cells possess many DNA repair mechanisms in response to DNA damage. Acetyltransferase, Tip60, plays a central role in ATM and p53 activation which are involved in DNA repair. Recent works uncovered the roles of Tip60 in ATM and p53 activation and how Tip60 is recruited to double-strand break sites. Moreover, recent works have demonstrated the role of Tip60 in cancer progression. Here, we review the current understanding of how Tip60 activates both ATM and p53 in response to DNA damage and his new roles in tumorigenesis.