Cotranslation of activated mutant p53 with wild type drives the wild-type p53 protein into the mutant conformation

Activating mutations of p53 promote tumor progression. The mutant protein adopts a characteristic conformation, which lacks the growth suppressor function of wild-type p53. We show that mutant p53 can drive cotranslated wild-type p53 into the mutant conformation: a similar effect in vivo would block wild-type suppressor function with dominant negative effect. The cotranslational effect of mutant p53 on wild-type conformation depends upon interaction between nascent polypeptides and oligomerization of the full-length proteins. We also show that oligomers of p53 proteins can be induced to change conformation in a cooperative manner. Cell growth stimulation induces a similar conformational change in p53, and our present results indicate that this may involve allosteric regulation.     

Hsp90 is essential for restoring cellular functions of temperature-sensitive p53 mutant protein but not for stabilization and activation of wild-type p53: implications for cancer therapy

Several signaling pathways that monitor the dynamic state of the cell converge on the tumor suppressor p53. The ability of p53 to process these signals and exert a dynamic downstream response in the form of cell cycle arrest and/or apoptosis is crucial for preventing tumor development. This p53 function is abrogated by p53 gene mutations leading to alteration of protein conformation. Hsp90 has been implicated in regulating both wild-type and mutant p53 conformations, and Hsp90 antagonists are effective for the therapy of some human tumors. Using cell lines that contain human tumor-derived temperature-sensitive p53 mutants we show that Hsp90 is required for both stabilization and reactivation of mutated p53 at the permissive temperature. A temperature decrease to 32 degrees C causes conversion to a protein conformation that is capable of inducing expression of MDM2, leading to reduction of reactivated p53 levels by negative feedback. Mutant reactivation is enhanced by simultaneous treatment with agents that stabilize the reactivated protein and is blocked by geldanamycin, a specific inhibitor of Hsp90 activity, indicating that Hsp90 antagonist therapy and therapies that act to reactivate mutant p53 will be incompatible. In contrast, Hsp90 is not required for maintaining wild-type p53 or for stabilizing wild-type p53 after treatment with chemotherapeutic agents, indicating that Hsp90 therapy might synergize with conventional therapies in patients with wild-type p53. Our data demonstrate the importance of the precise characterization of the interaction between p53 mutants and stress proteins, which may shed valuable information for fighting cancer via the p53 tumor suppressor pathway.     

The promise and obstacle of p53 as a cancer therapeutic agent

p53 is a tumor suppressor gene that is mutated in greater than 50% of human cancers. The action of p53 as a tumor suppressor involves inhibition of cell proliferation through cell cycle arrest and/or apoptosis. Loss of p53 function therefore allows the uncontrolled proliferation associated with cancerous cells. While design of most anti-cancer agents has focused on targeting and inactivating cancer promoting targets, such as oncogenes, recent attention has been given to restoring the lost activity of tumor suppressor genes. Because the loss of p53 function is so prevalent in human cancer, this protein is an ideal candidate for such therapy. Several gene therapeutic strategies have been employed in the attempt to restore p53 function to cancerous cells. These approaches include introduction of wild-type p53 into cells with mutant p53; the use of small molecules to stabilize mutant p53 in a wild-type, active conformation; and the introduction of agents to prevent degradation of p53 by proteins that normally target it. In addition, because mutant p53 has oncogenic gain of function activity, several approaches have been investigated to selectively target and kill cells harboring mutant p53. These include the introduction of mutant viruses that cause cell death only in cells with mutant p53 and the introduction of a gene that, in the absence of functional p53, produces a toxic product. Many obstacles remain to optimize these strategies for use in humans, but, despite these, restoration of p53 function is a promising anti-cancer therapeutic approach.     

Mutant p53R175H upregulates Twist1 expression and promotes epithelial–mesenchymal transition in immortalized prostate cells

A mutation within one allele of the p53 tumor suppressor gene can inactivate the remaining wild-type allele in a dominant-negative manner and in some cases can exert an additional oncogenic activity, known as mutant p53 ‘gain of function'' (GOF). To study the role of p53 mutations in prostate cancer and to discriminate between the dominant-negative effect and the GOF activity of mutant p53, we measured, using microarrays, the expression profiles of three immortalized prostate epithelial cultures expressing wild-type, inactivated p53 or mutated p53. Analysis of these gene expression profiles showed that both inactivated p53 and p53^R175H mutant expression resulted in the upregulation of cell cycle progression genes. A second group, which was upregulated exclusively by mutant p53^R175H, was predominantly enriched in developmental genes. This group of genes included the Twist1, a regulator of metastasis and epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT). Twist1 levels were also elevated in metastatic prostate cancer-derived cell line DU145, in immortalized lung fibroblasts and in a subset of lung cancer samples, all in a mutant p53-dependent manner. p53^R175H mutant bearing immortalized epithelial cells showed typical features of EMT, such as higher expression of mesenchymal markers, lower expression of epithelial markers and enhanced invasive properties in vitro. The mechanism by which p53^R175H mutant induces Twist1 expression involves alleviation of the epigenetic repression. Our data suggest that Twist1 expression might be upregulated following p53 mutation in cancer cells.     

Gain of function properties of mutant p53 proteins at the mitotic spindle cell cycle checkpoint

Mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene locus predispose human cells to chromosomal instability. This is due in part to interference of mutant p53 proteins with the activity of the mitotic spindle and postmitotic cell cycle checkpoints. Recent data demonstrates that wild type p53 is required for postmitotic checkpoint activity, but plays no role at the mitotic spindle checkpoint. Likewise, structural dominant p53 mutants demonstrate gain-of-function properties at the mitotic spindle checkpoint and dominant negative properties at the postmitotic checkpoint. At mitosis, mutant p53 proteins interfere with the control of the metaphase-to-anaphase progression by up-regulating the expression of CKs1, a protein that mediates activatory phosphorylation of the anaphase promoting complex (APC) by Cdc2. Cells that carry mutant p53 proteins overexpress CKs1 and are unable to sustain APC inactivation and mitotic arrest. Thus, mutant p53 gain-of-function at mitosis constitutes a key component to the origin of chromosomal instability in mutant p53 cells.     

Mutant p53 exerts oncogenic effects through microRNAs and their target gene networks

MicroRNAs are potent regulators of gene expression and modulate multiple cellular processes including proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. A number of microRNAs have been shown to be regulated by p53, the most frequently mutated gene in human cancer. It is has been demonstrated that some mutant p53 proteins not only lose tumor suppressor activity, but also acquire novel oncogenic functions that are independent of wild-type p53. In this review, we highlight recent evidences suggesting that some mutant p53 proteins regulate the expression of specific microRNAs to gain oncogenic functions and identify a gene network regulated by the microRNAs downstream of mutant p53.     

p53 mutants without a functional tetramerisation domain are not oncogenic

p53 is altered in about 50 % of cancers. Most of the p53 mutants have lost the wild-type tumour suppressor activity but show oncogenic properties. The majority of the p53 alterations are missense mutations of residues located in its DNA binding domain (DBD). Only a few mutations concern residues in its tetramerisation domain (TD). However, the study of mutant proteins identified in tumors that do not form tetramers has shown that they have lost the wild-type activity like most of the p53 DBD mutants. Here, we show that two of such mutant proteins, Arg342Pro and Leu344Pro are not dominant negative and do not stimulate the expression of a reporter gene under the control of the multi-drug resistance gene-1 (MDR-1). This suggests that to be oncogenic, p53 mutants need to form tetramers. Accordingly, the dominant negative effect and the ability of a tetrameric mutant protein, Asp281Gly, to stimulate the MDR-1 promoter are abolished when its TD is rendered non-functional by the mutation of leucine 344 to a proline residue. These results suggest that mutations in the TD, are less selected in tumors than mutations in the DBD because they do not lead to oncogenic proteins.     

Mutant p53 tumor suppressor alleles release ras-induced cell cycle growth arrest.

Overexpression of an activated ras gene in the rat embryo fibroblast line REF52 results in growth arrest at either the G1/S or G2/M boundary of the cell cycle. Both the DNA tumor virus proteins simian virus 40 large T antigen and adenovirus 5 E1a are able to rescue ras induced lethality and cooperate with ras to fully transform REF52 cells. In this report, we present evidence that the wild-type activity of the tumor suppressor gene p53 is involved in the negative growth regulation of this model system. p53 genes encoding either a p53Val-135 or p53Pro-193 mutation express a highly stable p53 protein with a conformation-dependent loss of wild-type activity and the ability to eliminate any endogenous wild-type p53 activity in a dominant negative manner. In cotransfection assays, these mutant p53 genes are able to rescue REF52 cells from ras-induced growth arrest, resulting in established cell lines which express elevated levels of the ras oncoprotein and show morphological transformation. Full transformation, as assayed by tumor formation in nude mice, is found only in the p53Pro-193-plus-ras transfectants. These cells express higher levels of the ras protein than do the p53Val-135-plus-ras-transfected cells. Transfection of REF52 cells with ras alone or a full-length genomic wild-type p53 plus ras results in growth arrest and lethality. Therefore, the selective event for p53 inactivation or loss during tumor progression may be to overcome a cell cycle restriction induced by oncogene overexpression (ras). These results suggest that a normal function of p53 may be to mediate negative growth regulation in response to ras or other proliferative inducing signals.     

Change in oligomerization specificity of the p53 tetramerization domain by hydrophobic amino acid substitutions.

The tumor suppressor function of the wild-type p53 protein is transdominantly inhibited by tumor-derived mutant p53 proteins. Such transdominant inhibition limits the prospects for gene therapy approaches that aim to introduce wild-type p53 into cancer cells. The molecular mechanism for transdominant inhibition involves sequestration of wild-type p53 subunits into inactive wild-type/mutant hetero-tetramers. Thus, p53 proteins, whose oligomerization specificity is altered so they cannot interact with tumor-derived mutant p53, would escape transdominant inhibition. Aided by the known three-dimensional structure of the p53 tetramerization domain and by trial and error we designed a novel domain with seven amino acid substitutions in the hydrophobic core. A full-length p53 protein bearing this novel domain formed homo-tetramers and had tumor suppressor function, but did not hetero-oligomerize with tumor-derived mutant p53 and resisted transdominant inhibition. Thus, hydrophobic core residues influence the oligomerization specificity of the p53 tetramerization domain.     

Biogenesis of p53 involves cotranslational dimerization of monomers and posttranslational dimerization of dimers. Implications on the dominant negative effect.

Precisely how mutant p53 exerts a dominant negative effect over wild type p53 has been an enigma. To understand how wild type and mutant p53 form hetero-oligomers, we studied p53 biogenesis in vitro. We show here that p53 dimers are formed cotranslationally (on the polysome), whereas tetramers are formed posttranslationally (by the dimerization of dimers in solution). Coexpression of wild type and mutant p53 therefore results in 50% of the p53 generated being heterotetramers comprised of a single species: wild type dimer/mutant dimer. Using hot spot mutants of p53 and a variety of natural target sites, we show that all wild type/mutant heterotetramers manifest impaired DNA binding activity. This impairment is not due to the mutant dimeric subunit inhibiting association of the complex with DNA but rather due to the lack of significant contribution (positive cooperativity) from the mutant partner. For all heterotetramers, bias in binding is particularly pronounced against those sequences in genes responsible for apoptosis rather than cell growth arrest. These results explain the molecular basis of p53 dominant negative effect and suggest a functional role in the regulation of p53 tetramerization.     

Tumor suppressor p53: analysis of wild-type and mutant p53 complexes.

It has been suggested that the dominant effect of mutant p53 on tumor progression may reflect the mutant protein binding to wild-type p53, with inactivation of suppressor function. To date, evidence for wild-type/mutant p53 complexes involves p53 from different species. To investigate wild-type/mutant p53 complexes in relation to natural tumor progression, we sought to identify intraspecific complexes, using murine p53. The mutant phenotype p53-246(0) was used because this phenotype is immunologically distinct from wild-type p53-246+ and thus permits immunological analysis for wild-type/mutant p53 complexes. The p53 proteins were derived from genetically defined p53 cDNAs expressed in vitro and also from phenotypic variants of p53 expressed in vivo. We found that the mutant p53 phenotype was able to form a complex with the wild type when the two p53 variants were cotranslated. When mixed in their native states (after translation), the wild-type and mutant p53 proteins did not exhibit any binding affinity for each other in vitro. Under identical conditions, complexes of wild-type human and murine p53 proteins were formed. For murine p53, both the wild-type and mutant p53 proteins formed high-molecular-weight complexes when translated in vitro. This oligomerization appeared to involve the carboxyl terminus, since truncated p53 (amino acids 1 to 343) did not form complexes. We suggest that the ability of the mutant p53 phenotype to complex with wild type during cotranslation may contribute to the transforming function of activated mutants of p53 in vivo.     

The transforming and suppressor functions of p53 alleles: effects of mutations that disrupt phosphorylation, oligomerization and nuclear translocation.

Mutant p53 alleles that have a recessive phenotype in human tumors can, in cooperation with an activated H-ras gene, transform rat embryo fibroblasts (REFs). Mutant p53 proteins differ from wild type, and from each other in conformation, localization and transforming potential. Missense mutations in codons 143, 175 and 275 confer strong transforming potential. A serine 135 p53 mutant has an intermediate transforming potential, while the histidine codon 273 allele transforms weakly, if at all. In contrast to the wild type p53 gene, mutant p53 alleles with strong transforming ability cannot suppress the transformation of REFs by other oncogenes. The His273 allele retains partial suppressor function in this assay. The relevance of p53 oligomerization, phosphorylation and nuclear translocation to the transforming potential of mutant p53 and to wild type p53 suppressor function were examined. The inability of mutant p53 polypeptides to form homodimers correlates with loss of transforming function. Monomeric variants of wild type p53 protein, however, retain the ability to suppress focus formation. Phosphorylation of serine residues 315 and 392 is not required for the transforming function of mutant p53, nor is serine 315 required for suppressor function when these alleles are constitutively expressed in REF assays. Nuclear translocation-defective mutant and wild type p53 proteins retain transforming and suppressor function in REF assays.     

A conformation hypothesis for the suppressor and promoter functions of p53 in cell growth control and in cancer.

Cancer is a genetic disease caused by defective control of cell proliferation. As cancer cells divide, the genetic defect is inherited by each daughter cell, leading to tumour development with possible progression to malignancy. The identification of those genes linked with cancer is essential for our understanding of the regulation of cell proliferation and for the therapeutic management of cancer cell growth. Recent studies have revealed that p53 is the most commonly affected gene in human cancer. It is a single copy gene and functions in the regulation of cell proliferation. Mutation of p53 is linked with tumour development, and this may involve abnormal functioning of mutant p53 protein. A mutant allele of p53 is functionally temperature-sensitive and can promote or suppress cell proliferation. The tertiary structure of the mutant protein is also sensitive to temperature and adopts promoter and suppressor forms of p53. A conformation model for the functioning of p53 proposes that wild-type p53 is induced to change from suppressor to promoter form during the cell growth response. This model predicts that any mutation that deregulates the normal control of p53 conformation may lead to cancer.     

Wild-type p53 inhibits protein kinase CK2 activity

The growth suppressor protein p53 and the protein kinase CK2 are both implicated in cellular growth regulation. We previously found that p53 binds to protein kinase CK2 via its regulatory beta-subunit. In the present study, we analyzed the consequences of the binding of p53 to CK2 for the enzymatic activity of CK2 in vitro and in vivo. We found that the carboxy-terminus of p53 which is a potent transforming agent stimulated CK2 activity whereas full length wild-type p53 which is a growth suppressor inhibited the activity of protein kinase CK2. Inhibition of protein kinase CK2 by p53 was dose-dependent and was seen for various CK2 substrates. Experiments with heat-denatured p53 and the conformational mutant p53(R175H) revealed that an intact conformation of p53 seemed to be necessary. Transfection of wild-type and of mutant p53 into p53-/- cells showed that the inhibition of p53 on CK2 activity was also detectable in intact cells and specific for wild-type p53 indicating that the growth suppressing function of p53 might at least be partially achieved by down-regulation of protein kinase CK2.