Photoaffinity probes for serotonin and histamine receptors. Synthesis and characterization of two azide analogues of ketanserin

Two azide analogues of ketanserin (6- and 7-azido-3-[2- [4-(4-fluorobenzoyl)-1-piperidinyl]ethyl]-2, 4(1H,3H)-quinazolinedione) were synthesized and tested as possible photoaffinity probes for serotonin-S2 and histamine-H1 receptors. In reversible binding experiments, the azides showed high affinity for both receptor types. When membrane preparations were incubated with nanomolar concentrations of 7-azidoketanserin and subsequently irradiated with UV light, both serotonin and histamine receptors became irreversibly blocked. This irreversible binding was dependent on azide concentrations and time of irradiation and did not change in the presence of the scavenger p-aminobenzoic acid. In contrast, irreversible blockade at low concentrations of 6-azidoketanserin was only obtained for histamine receptors. However, this blockade was abolished by addition of the scavenger p-aminobenzoic acid indicating that it was not due to a real photoaffinity mechanism. In the rat prefrontal cortex, irreversible blocking of serotonin receptors with 7-azidoketanserin could be inhibited by serotonin agonists or antagonists but not by histaminergic compounds. On the contrary, in the guinea pig cerebellum, inactivation of histamine receptors could be inhibited by histamine antagonists and histamine itself but not by serotonergic compounds. This provides a way for differential photolabeling of either of these receptors.     

Identification of a histamine H4 receptor on human eosinophils--role in eosinophil chemotaxis

Eosinophils are recruited to sites of inflammation via the action of a number of chemical mediators, including PAF, leukotrienes, eotaxins, ECF-A and histamine. Although many of the cell-surface receptors for these mediators have been identified, histamine-driven chemotaxis has not been conclusively attributed to any of the three known histamine receptor subtypes, suggesting the possibility of a 4th histamine-responsive receptor on eosinophils. We have identified and cloned a novel G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), termed Pfi-013, from an IL-5 stimulated eosinophil cDNA library which is homologous to the human histamine H3 receptor, both at the sequence and gene structure level. Expression data indicates that Pfi-013 is predominantly expressed in peripheral blood leukocytes, with lower expression levels in spleen, testis and colon. Ligand-binding studies using Pfi-013 expressed in HEK-293Galpha15 cells, demonstrates specific binding to histamine with a Kd of 3.28 +/- 0.76 nM and possesses a unique rank order of potency against known histaminergic compounds in a competitive ligand-binding assay (histamine > clobenpropit > iodophenpropit > thioperamide > R-alpha-methylhistamine > cimetidine > pyrilamine). We have therefore termed this receptor human histamine H4. Chemotaxis studies on isolated human eosinophils have confirmed that histamine is chemotactic and that agonists of the known histamine receptors (H1, H2, and H3) do not induce such a response. Furthermore, studies employing histamine-receptor antagonists have shown an inhibition of chemotaxis only by the H3 antagonists clobenpropit and thioperamide. Since these compounds are also antagonists of hH4 we postulate that the receptor mediating histaminergic chemotaxis is this novel histamine H4 receptor.     

CCK2 receptor antagonists: pharmacological tools to study the gastrin-ECL cell-parietal cell axis

Gastrin-recognizing CCK2 receptors are expressed in parietal cells and in so-called ECL cells in the acid-producing part of the stomach. ECL cells are endocrine/paracrine cells that produce and store histamine and chromogranin A (CGA)-derived peptides, such as pancreastatin. The ECL cells are the principal cellular transducer of the gastrin-acid signal. Activation of the CCK2 receptor results in mobilization of histamine (and pancreastatin) from the ECL cells with consequent activation of the parietal cell histamine H2 receptor. Thus, release of ECL-cell histamine is a key event in the process of gastrin-stimulated acid secretion. The oxyntic mucosal histidine decarboxylase (HDC) activity and the serum pancreastatin concentration are useful markers for the activity of the gastrin-ECL cell axis. Powerful and selective CCK2 receptor antagonits have been developed from a series of benzodiazepine compounds. These agents are useful tools to study how gastrin controls the ECL cells. Conversely, the close control of ECL cells by gastrin makes the gastrin-ECL cell axis well suited for evaluating the antagonistic potential of CCK2 receptor antagonists with the ECL-cell HDC activity as a notably sensitive and reliable parameter. The CCK2 receptor antagonists YF476, YM022, RP73870, JB93182 and AG041R were found to cause prompt inhibition of ECL-cell histamine and pancreastatin secretion and synthesis. The circulating pancreastatin concentration is raised, was lowered when the action of gastrin on the ECL cells was blocked by the CCK2 receptor antagonists. These effects were associated with inhibition of gastrin-stimulated acid secretion. In addition, sustained receptor blockade was manifested in permanently decreased oxyntic mucosal HDC activity, histamine concentration and HDC mRNA and CGA mRNA concentrations. CCK2 receptor blockade also induced hypergastrinemia, which probably reflects the impaired gastric acid secretion (no acid feedback inhibition of gastrin release). Upon withdrawal of the CCK2 receptor antagonists, their effects on the ECL cells were readily reversible. In conclusion, gastrin mobilizes histamine from the ECL cells, thereby provoking the parietal cells to secrete acid. While CCK2 receptor blockade prevents gastrin from evoking acid secretion, it is without effect on basal and vagally stimulated acid secretion. We conclude that specific and potent CCK2 receptor antagonists represent powerful tools to explore the functional significance of the ECL cells.     

Effects of two novel non-peptide antagonists at the rabbit bradykinin B2 receptor

Large species differences have been previously observed in the pharmacology of bradykinin (BK) B2 receptor antagonists. We investigated the effect of two novel non-peptide antagonists, compound 9 (a benzodiazepine peptidomimetic related to icatibant) and the thiosemicarbazide bradyzide on the rabbit B2 receptor (contractility of the jugular vein, competition of [3H]BK binding to a B2 receptor-green fluorescent protein (B2R-GFP) conjugate, subcellular distribution of B2R-GFP). While compound 9 is about 9000-fold less potent than icatibant, it shares with the latter peptide drug a selective, insurmountable and largely irreversible antagonist behavior against BK and the capacity to translocate B2R-GFP from the membrane into the cells. Bradyzide, reportedly very potent at rodent B2 receptors, was a competitive and reversible antagonist of moderate potency at the rabbit B2 receptor (contractility pA2 6.84, binding competition IC50 5 nM). The C-terminal region of icatibant, reproduced by compound 9, is likely to be important in the non-equilibrium behavior of icatibant. Bradyzide, a non-peptide antagonist developed on different structural grounds, is competitive at the rabbit B2 receptor.     

H2 antihistamines augment antigen-induced histamine release from human basophils in vitro

H2 antihistamines, including cimetidine, burimamide, metiamide, and tiotidine, consistently augmented antigen-induced histamine release from human basophils in vitro when control histamine release was less than 20% of total. This effect was specific to the H2-receptor blocking activity of these drugs: equivalent degrees of receptor blockade by four different H2 antihistamines resulted in equipotent enhancement; H1-receptor antagonists did not alter histamine release; and aminoguanidine and amodiaquine, agents that inhibit histamine metabolism but do not block H2 receptors, did not enhance histamine release. Cimetidine did not enhance release when present a) when basophils were "activated" but did not release histamine ("first stage"), or b) when basophils were no longer susceptible to histamine inhibition ("second stage"). Thus, H2 antagonists enhanced histamine release by blocking the capacity of released histamine to act on H2 receptors to inhibit release. Because it is likely that only small percentages of histamine are released in vivo, it is possible that H2 antihistamines amplify the inflammatory process by blocking the inhibitory effects of the released histamine.     

Reaction of [3H]meproadifen mustard with membrane-bound Torpedo acetylcholine receptor

The Torpedo nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) contains a binding site for aromatic amine noncompetitive antagonists that is distinct from the binding site for agonists and competitive antagonists. To characterize the location and function of this allosteric antagonist site, an alkylating analog of meproadifen has been synthesized, 2-(chloroethylmethylamino)-ethyl-2, 2-diphenylpentanoate HCl (meproadifen mustard). Reaction of [3H]meproadifen mustard with AChR-rich membrane suspensions resulted in specific incorporation of label predominantly into the AChR alpha-subunit with minor incorporation into the beta-subunit. Specific labeling required the presence of high concentration of agonist and was inhibited by reversible noncompetitive antagonists including proadifen, meproadifen, perhydrohistrionicotoxin (HTX), and tetracaine when present at concentrations consistent with the binding affinity of these compounds for the allosteric antagonist site. No specific alkylation of the AChR alpha-subunit was detected in the absence of agonist, or in the presence of the partial agonist phenyltrimethylammonium or the competitive antagonists, d-tubocurarine, gallamine triethiodide, or decamethonium. Reaction with 35 microM meproadifen mustard for 70 min in the presence of carbamylcholine produced no alteration in the concentration of [3H]ACh-binding sites, but decreased by 38 +/- 4% the number of allosteric antagonist sites as measured by [3H]HTX binding. This decrease was not observed when the alkylation reaction was blocked by the presence of HTX. These results lead us to conclude that meproadifen mustard alkylates the allosteric antagonist site in the Torpedo AChR and that part of that site is associated with the AChR alpha-subunit.     

Molecular cloning of the human histamine H2 receptor.

We utilized the technique of polymerase chain reaction with oligonucleotide primers based upon the nucleotide sequence of the canine H2 histamine receptor gene which we recently isolated to clone its human homologue. Transfection of a construct of this gene in Colo-320 DM cells led to the expression of a receptor that bound to [methyl-3H] tiotidine and was linked to 3',5'cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) generation in response to histamine. Both cAMP generation and [methyl-3H] tiotidine binding were inhibited with the H2 histamine receptor selective antagonist cimetidine but not diphenhydramine or thioperamide which are, respectively, H1 and H3 histamine receptor antagonists. These data confirm that we have successfully cloned a novel gene encoding the human H2 histamine receptor.     

The histamine H4 receptor mediates allergic airway inflammation by regulating the activation of CD4+ T cells

Histamine is an important inflammatory mediator that is released in airways during an asthmatic response. However, current antihistamine drugs are not effective in controlling the disease. The discovery of the histamine H4 receptor (H4R) prompted us to reinvestigate the role of histamine in pulmonary allergic responses. H4R-deficient mice and mice treated with H4R antagonists exhibited decreased allergic lung inflammation, with decreases in infiltrating lung eosinophils and lymphocytes and decreases in Th2 responses. Ex vivo restimulation of T cells showed decreases in IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, IL-6, and IL-17 levels, suggesting that T cell functions were disrupted. In vitro studies indicated that blockade of the H4R on dendritic cells leads to decreases in cytokine and chemokine production and limits their ability to induce Th2 responses in T cells. This work suggests that the H4R can modulate allergic responses via its influence on T cell activation. The study expands the known influences of histamine on the immune system and highlights the therapeutic potential of H4R antagonists in allergic conditions.     

Effect of histamine receptor agonists and antagonists on the uterine vasculature

Histamine H1 and H2 receptors are known to exist in uterine smooth muscle; however, neither receptor has been clearly identified in the uterine vasculature. In the present study, 12 nonpregnant ewes were chronically instrumented with catheters in the carotid artery, jugular vein, uterine arteries, and electromagnetic flow probes on the uterine arteries for continuous measurement of uterine blood flow. Dose response curves were determined for bolus injections of Histamine (1-10 micrograms), the H1 receptor agonist 2PEA (10-100 micrograms), and the H2 receptor agonist Dimaprit (30-300 micrograms) before H1 receptor blockade with pyrilamine, following H1 receptor blockade, and following H2 receptor blockade with metiamide. Uterine vasodilator responses to histamine and 2PEA were essentially abolished by pyrilamine, while responses to dimaprit were not altered. Following addition of metiamide, responses to histamine were reduced further and responses to dimaprit were abolished. Baseline uterine blood flow was not altered by either H1 or H2 receptor blockade or their combination. Intraarterial bolus injections of the mast cell histamine-releasing compound 48/80 (100-1000 micrograms) had no effect on uterine blood flow. These experiments demonstrate that the uterine vasculature of the ovine contains almost exclusively H1 receptors, does not contain compound 48/80 sensitive mast cells and is not dependent upon endogenous histamine to maintain blood flow.     

Reexamination of carbodiimide as a possible affinity label for the acetylcholine receptor at the frog neuromuscular junction

Summary The effects of a water-soluble carbodiimide were examined at the frog neuromuscular junction. Acetylcholine sensitivity was measured using a fluid electrode technique and intracellular recording of miniature end-plate potentials. The carbodiimide blocked synaptic sensitivity by a reversible, curare-like action. Irreversible blockade was also observed, probably due to covalent binding. The conditions of reaction and irreversibility suggest that several different residues may be attacked. The inability of cholinergic antagonists to protect the receptor from attack indicates that nonspecific sites, and not the acetylcholine binding site, are involved.     

Histamine modulation of human neutrophil oxidative metabolism, locomotion, degranulation, and membrane potential changes

Previous reports have suggested that histamine modulates neutrophil chemotaxis, but this has not been observed by all laboratories. We have re-addressed this controversial point and demonstrate that histamine and H1- and H2-receptor-specific agonists cause limited inhibition of chemotaxis while stimulating chemokinesis. Furthermore, using the chemoattractant N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (f-met-leu-phe) as a stimulus, we demonstrate that histamine and H1/H2 agonists inhibit f-met-leu-phe-stimulated changes in membrane potential (monitored with the cyanine dye dipentyloxacarbocyanine), superoxide anion production (cytochrome c reduction), hydrogen peroxide formation (scopoletin fluorescence), and degranulation of granule contents (lysozyme and beta-glucuronidase) in a dose-dependent manner but have no effect on neutrophil functions stimulated by the secretagogues phorbol myristate acetate or A23187. All inhibitory effects of histamine and the H1/H2 agonists are reversed in a competitive manner by the H2 antagonist cimetidine. In addition, structure-activity studies using H1 and H2 receptor agonists and antagonists indicate that a single site with specificity for both H1 and H2 analogue structures modulates the various f-met-leu-phe-stimulated functions studied. Kinetic studies demonstrate that the inhibitory effects of histamine on neutrophil function are only observed when histamine is added before f-met-leu-phe and that inhibition occurs within 10 to 20 sec of histamine addition, does not persist after its removal, and is reversed by addition of cimetidine 10 to 20 sec before stimulation with f-met-leu-phe. Although the inhibitory effects of histamine are exerted early in the sequence of PMN activation by f-met-leu-phe, histamine does not affect the binding or internalization of f-met-leu-[3H]phe. The ability of histamine to modify the variety of neutrophil responses demonstrated in this report suggests an important and direct role for histamine in the regulation of inflammatory reactions in acute allergic settings or other disease states in which histamine release may occur.     

Further characterization of the receptors involved in the positive inotropic effect of histamine on rabbit papillary muscle

The effects of histamine on the force of contraction and calcium-dependent action potentials were studied in rabbit ventricular papillary muscles. The positive inotropic effect of histamine seems to be dependent on stimulation of H1 and H2 receptors. The H1 antagonist chlorpheniramine produced a competitive blockade of the positive inotropic effects of histamine. Cimetidine produced a competitive blockade, which was apparent only after blockade of H1 receptors. Histamine increased the maximum upstroke velocity of slow action potentials. This effect can be entirely accounted for by stimulation of H2 receptors. The phosphodiesterase inhibitor 3-isobutyl-methyl-xanthine potentiated the H2 receptor mediated effects of histamine on the force of contraction and slow action potentials. We conclude that rabbit ventricular muscle possesses both H1 and H2 receptors that mediate the positive inotropic effect of histamine. The H2-mediated effect seems to be causally related to an increase in the calcium slow inward current and is probably linked to an enhanced cellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate content. The mechanism of the H1-mediated positive inotropic effect remains unknown.     

Combined H1 and H2 receptor blockade attenuates the cardiovascular effects of high dose atracurium in rabbits

Large doses of atracurium (1.5 mg/kg) (six times the ED95) have been reported to provide adequate conditions for rapid sequence endotracheal intubation within 60 seconds in humans. However, this dose can result in significant histamine release and systemic hypotension. We therefore studied the efficacy of histamine receptor blockade in attenuating this response. Four groups of five rabbits were pretreated as follows: Group I--control, Group II--H1 blockade (1 mg/kg diphenhydramine), Group III--H2 blockade (cimetidine 4 mg/kg), and Group IV--H1 and H2 blockade (diphenhydramine 1 mg/kg and cimetidine 4 mg/kg). All rabbits were anesthetized and then 1.8 mg/kg (six times the rabbit ED95) atracurium was administered. Group I rabbits experienced a decrease in MAP of 12.2 mmHg after one minute, a change that was significantly greater than Group IV in which MAP decreased by 0.8 mmHg (p less than 0.001). H1 or H2 receptor blockade alone was associated with intermediate changes in MAP not significantly different from control. We conclude that combined H1 and H2 receptor blockade attenuates the cardiovascular effects associated with large doses of atracurium in the rabbit and that this combination of antagonist drugs might have similar effectiveness in humans.     

Bronchial vasodilation by histamine in sheep: characterization of receptor subtype.

Histamine has been shown to mediate features of pulmonary allergic reactions including increased tracheobronchial blood flow. To determine whether the increase in blood flow was due to stimulation of H1- or H2-histamine receptors, we gave histamine base (0.1 micrograms/kg iv) or histamine dihydrochloride as an aerosol (10 breaths of 0.5% "low dose" or 5% "high dose") before and after H1- or H2-receptor antagonists. Blood velocity in the common bronchial branch of the bronchoesophageal artery (Vbr) was continuously measured using a chronically implanted Doppler flow probe. Pretreatment with H2-receptor antagonists cimetidine, ranitidine, or metiamide did not affect the increase in Vbr induced by intravenous histamine [106 +/- 45% (SD)]. Addition of the H1-receptor antagonists diphenhydramine or chlorpheniramine, however, reduced the Vbr response to 16 +/- 22, 21 +/- 28, 23 +/- 23, and 37 +/- 32% of the unblocked responses (P less than 0.05) when intravenous histamine was given at 3, 10, 20, and 30 min, respectively, after the H1 antagonist. At 40, 50, and 60 min the H1-receptor blockade appeared to attenuate, but subsequent continuous infusion of chlorpheniramine (2 mg.kg-1.min-1) then blocked the histamine response for 60 min. Low-dose histamine aerosol did not change mean arterial or pulmonary arterial pressures, cardiac output, or arterial blood gases but increased Vbr transiently from 15.2 +/- 3.4 to 37.6 +/- 8.4 (SE) cm/s. After chlorpheniramine, the Vbr response to histamine, 16.3 +/- 2.2 to 22.6 +/- 3.6 cm/s, was significantly reduced (P less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effects of H1 and H2 receptor antagonists on Tetrahymena.

In Tetrahymena pyriformis the phagocytotic rate increases in response to histamine, but neither the H1 antagonist phenindamine nor the H2 antagonist metiamide stimulate phagocytosis. The H1 antagonist counteracts the effect of histamine, whereas the H2 antagonist does not. The histamine receptor of Tetrahymena is of H1-type, since it cannot distinguish between histamine and antagonists which are closely related to it chemically. It does, however, distinguish between histamine and the chemically unrelated H1 antagonist, phenindamine. The H2 antagonist does not interact with the receptor.     

Interaction of active compounds from Aegle marmelos CORREA with histamine-1 receptor

The aim of this study is to determine the affinity of six active compounds of Aegle Marmelos Correa, they are (E, R)-Marmin, skimmianine, (S)-aegeline, aurapten, zeorin, and dustanin as antihistamines in histamine H1 receptor in comparison to cetirizin, diphenhydramine and chlorpheniramine as ligands comparison. Previously, in the in vitro study marmin obviously antagonized the histamine H1 receptor in a competitive manner. Methods: molecular docking to determine the interaction of ligand binding to its receptor. Lower docking score indicates more stable binding to that protein. Results: Marmin, skimmianine, aegeline, aurapten, zeorin, and dustanin were potential to develop as antihistamine agents, especially as histamine H1 receptor antagonists by interacting with amino acid residues, Asp107, Lys179, Lys191, Asn198, and Trp428 of histamine H1 receptor. Conclusions: Based on molecular docking, Amino acid residues involved in ligand protein interactions were Asp107, Lys179, Lys191, Asn198, and Trp428.     

Histamine protects against NMDA-induced necrosis in cultured cortical neurons through H receptor/cyclic AMP/protein kinase A and H receptor/GABA release pathways

Using histamine and the H3 receptor antagonist thioperamide, the roles of histamine receptors in NMDA-induced necrosis were investigated in rat cultured cortical neurons. Within 3 h of intense NMDA insult, most neurons died by necrosis. Histamine reversed the neurotoxicity in a concentration-dependent manner and showed peak protection at a concentration of 10(-7) m. This protection was antagonized by the H2 receptor antagonists cimetidine and zolantidine but not by the H1 receptor antagonists pyrilamine and diphenhydramine. In addition, the selective H2 receptor agonist amthamine mimicked the protection by histamine. This action was prevented by cimetidine but not by pyrilamine. 8-Bromo-cAMP also mimicked the effect of histamine. In contrast, both the adenylyl cyclase inhibitor 9-(tetrahydro-2-furanyl)-9H-purine-6-amine and the cAMP-dependent protein kinase inhibitor N-[2-(p-bromocinnamylamino) ethyl]-5-isoquinolinesulfonamide reversed the protection by histamine. Thioperamide also attenuated NMDA-induced excitotoxicity, which was reversed by the H3 receptor agonist (R)-alpha-methylhistamine but not by pyrilamine and cimetidine. In addition, the protection by thioperamide was inhibited by the GABA(A) receptor antagonists picrotoxin and bicuculline. Further study demonstrated that the protection by thioperamide was due to increased GABA release in NMDA-stimulated samples. These results indicate that not only the H2 receptor/cAMP/cAMP-dependent protein kinase pathway but also the H3 receptor/GABA release pathway can attenuate NMDA-induced neurotoxicity.     

Characterization of monoclonal antibodies to the beta-adrenergic antagonist alprenolol as models of the receptor binding site

Antibodies to receptor ligands have been valuable in understanding the nature of receptor-ligand interactions. We have developed four monoclonal antibodies to the beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist alprenolol by immunizing A/J mice with (-)-alprenolol coupled to keyhole limpet hemocyanin. The antisera from these mice displayed specific [3H]dihydroalprenolol ([3H]DHA) binding that was inhibited by alprenolol, propranolol, and isoproterenol. Somatic cell fusion of spleen cells from the immunized mice to SP2/0 myeloma cells, followed by limited dilution subcloning, resulted in the isolation of four hybridomas (1B7, 5B7, 5D9, and 2G9) demonstrating three different classes of ligand binding characteristics. 1B7 had the highest binding affinity for antagonists based on Scatchard analysis (Kd [125I]- CYP = 1.4 X 10(-10) M; Kd [3H]DHA = 6.5 X 10(-9) M), and was the only antibody to demonstrate agonist-inhibition of [3H]DHA binding. Ki values computed from competitive inhibition curves of [3H]DHA binding to 1B7 resulted in a rank order of potency similar to that of beta-2-adrenergic receptors: (-)-propranolol greater than acebutolol amine greater than isoproterenol greater than (+)-propranolol greater than epinephrine greater than norepinephrine. 5B7 and 5D9 exemplified a second class of antibody. This pair had lower antagonist binding affinities (Kd [3H]DHA = 2 X 10(-8) M and 2.5 X 10(-7) M, respectively) and was stereoselective in binding receptor antagonists: (-)-propranolol greater than (+)-propranolol greater than acebutolol amine. Agonist inhibition of [3H]DHA binding to these antibodies could only be observed at very high concentrations (greater than 10(-4) M agonist), and was not dose-dependent. Finally, the class of anti-alprenolol monoclonal antibodies represented by 2G9 had the lowest antagonist binding affinity of all (IC50 alprenolol = 1 X 10(-5) M), did not demonstrate ligand stereoselectivity, and did not recognize agonists. We propose that antibodies raised against beta-adrenergic receptor ligands demonstrating stereoselective agonist binding will also demonstrate high affinity antagonist binding, and that they will closely parallel the binding characteristics of the receptor. According to this "agonist best-fit hypothesis," anti-idiotypic antibodies raised against the binding site of these idiotypes might contain true mirror images of the beta-adrenergic receptor binding site.     

组胺H3受体研究进展

组胺H3受体作为突触前自身受体和异身受体,广泛分布于中枢和外周组织,抑制组胺的释放和合成,调节多种神经递质的释放,组胺H3受体是G蛋白偶联受体家族成员,激活后由G蛋白介导,通过调控N型Ca^2 通道,产生生物学效应,组胺H3受体在中枢和外周器官有着重要的生理功能,对心功能,胃酸分泌,觉醒的睡眠,认知和记忆,惊厥抽搐等都有调节作用。     

Effects of hormones (calcitonin, GIP) and pharmacological antagonists (ranitidine and famotidine) on isolated rat parietal cells

The rationale for the present study was to compare calcitonin and gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) versus two histamine H2 receptor antagonists with respect to their potency of inhibiting parietal cell functions. Adenylate cyclase activity and acid production ([14C]aminopyrine uptake) of isolated rat parietal cells were stimulated by histamine. At 10(-7) and 10(-6) mol/l, calcitonin and GIP reduced the response to histamine by 10-20% following noncompetitive kinetics. Ranitidine and famotidine (MK 208) inhibited the response to histamine by about 50% at 10(-7)-10(-6) mol/l, and at 10(-5) mol/l abolished the histamine effect. On a molar basis famotidine turned out to be 6 times more potent than ranitidine. Both antagonists revealed competitive kinetics. Our data suggest direct inhibition of the parietal cells by the tested compounds which were shown to interfere at the adenylate cyclase cAMP system or at the histamine H2 receptor. However, compared to the histamine H2 receptor antagonists, hormonal inhibition is less pronounced and mediated by a different mechanism.