Crop uptake and leaching losses of15N labelled fertilizer nitrogen in relation to waterlogging of clay and sandy loam soils

Summary Ammonium nitrate fertilizer, labelled with¹⁵N, was applied in spring to winter wheat growing in undisturbed monoliths of clay and sandy loam soil in lysimeters; the rates of application were respectively 95 and 102 kg N ha⁻¹ in the spring of 1976 and 1975. Crops of winter wheat, oilseed rape, peas and barley grown in the following 5 or 6 years were treated with unlabelled nitrogen fertilizer at rates recommended for maximum yields. During each year of the experiments the lysimeters were divided into treatments which were either freelydrained or subjected to periods of waterlogging. Another labelled nitrogen application was made in 1980 to a separate group of lysimeters with a clay soil and a winter wheat crop to study further the uptake of nitrogen fertilizer in relation to waterlogging. In the first growing season, shoots of the winter wheat at harvest contained 46 and 58% of the fertilizer nitrogen applied to the clay and sandy loam soils respectively. In the following year the crops contained a further 1–2% of the labelled fertilizer, and after 5 and 6 years the total recoveries of labelled fertilizer in the crops were 49 and 62% on the clay and sandy loam soils respectively. In the first winter after the labelled fertilizer was applied, less than 1% of the fertilizer was lost in the drainage water, and only about 2% of the total nitrogen (mainly nitrate) in the drainage water from both soils was derived from the fertilizer. Maximum annual loss occurred the following year but the proportion of tracer nitrogen in drainage was nevertheless smaller. Leaching losses over the 5 and 6 years from the clay and sandy loam soil were respectively 1.3 and 3.9% of the original application. On both soils the percentage of labelled nitrogen to the total crop nitrogen content was greater after a period of winter waterlogging than for freely-drained treatments. This was most marked on the clay soil; evidence points to winter waterlogging promoting denitrification and the consequent loss of soil nitrogen making the crop more dependent on spring fertilizer applications.     

Availability of the residual nitrogen from a single application of 15N-labelled fertilizer to subsequent crops in a long-term continuous barley experiment

In an earlier paper we presented data from an experiment in which nitrogen-15-labelled fertilizer was applied in spring to barley on the Rothamsted long-term Spring Barley Experiment, at rates of 48, 96 or 144 kg N ha^–1. A substantial proportion (between 28 and 39%) of this ¹⁵N remained in the soil (0–70 cm) and stubble at harvest, mostly in organic form. The present paper follows the fate of this `residual' <sup>15</sup>N over the following 2 years. Small amounts of `residual' ¹⁵N were recovered in the following two spring barley crops; 8% in the first and 3% in the second. The overall loss of `residual' <sup>15</sup>N (i.e. `residual' ¹⁵N not recovered in crops and soil to a depth of 70 cm) over the 2 years was 23%. This is equivalent to just 8% of the total ¹⁵N originally applied. There was surprisingly little difference in the behaviour of the `residual' ¹⁵N in soils containing very different quantities of soil organic matter.     

Crop uptake and leaching of 15N applied in ruminant slurry with selectively labelled faeces and urine fractions

Two animal slurries either labelled with ¹⁵N in the urine or in the faeces fraction, were produced by feeding a sheep with unlabelled and ¹⁵N-labelled hay and collecting faeces and urine separately. The slurries were applied (12 g total N ^-2) to a coarse sand and a sandy loam soil confined in lysimeters and growing spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L). Reference lysimeters without slurry were supplied with¹⁵ NH₄ ¹⁵NO³ corresponding to the inorganic N applied with the slurries (6 g N m^-2). In the second year, all lysimeters received unlabelled mineral fertilizer (6 g N m^-2) and grew spring barley. N harvested in the two crops (grain + straw) and the loss of nitrate by leaching were determined. ¹⁵N in the urine fraction was less available for crop uptake than mineral fertilizer ¹⁵N. The first barley crop on the sandy loam removed 49% of the ¹⁵N applied in mineral fertilizer and 36% of that applied with urine. The availability of fertilizer ¹⁵N (36%) and urine¹⁵ N (32%) differed less on the coarse sand. Of the¹⁵ N added with the faeces fraction, 12–14% was taken up by the barley crop on the two soils. N mineralized from faeces compensated for the reduced availability of urine N providing a similar or higher crop N uptake in manured lysimeters compared with mineral fertilized ones.About half of the total N uptake in the first crop originated from the N applied either as slurry or mineral fertilizer. The remaining N was derived from the soil N pool. Substantially smaller but similar proportions of¹⁵ N from faeces, urine and fertilizer were found in the second crop. The similar recoveries indicated a slow mineralization rate of the residual faeces N since more faeces was left in the soil after the first crop.More N was lost by leaching from manured lysimeters but as a percentage of N applied, losses were similar to those from mineral fertilizer. During the first and second winter, 3–5% and 1–3%, respectively, of the ¹⁵N in slurry and mineral fertilizer was leached as nitrate. Thus slurry N applied in spring just before sowing did not appear to be more prone to loss by nitrate leaching than N given in mineral fertilizer. Slurry N accounted for a higher proportion of the N leached, however, because more N was added in this treatment.     

Nitrogen assimilation in field-grown winter wheat: Direct measurements of nitrate reduction in roots using15N

Summary Nitrate fertiliser labelled with¹⁵N was applied to a field grown crop of winter wheat. Uptake and assimilation of fertiliser nitrate was studied by monitoring the appearance of labelled nitrate and labelled amino acids in the xylem sap. Shortly after applying¹⁵N-nitrate to the soil about 30 per cent of recently absorbed¹⁵N was in the reduced form, indicating that roots of cereal crops can make a substantial contribution in reducing nitrate. Seasonal changes in crop growth andin vivo NRA are also described.     

Immobilisation, remineralisation and residual effects in subsequent crops of dairy cattle slurry nitrogen compared to mineral fertiliser nitrogen

About 50–60% of dairy cattle slurry nitrogen is ammonium N. Part of the ammonium N in cattle slurry is immobilised due to microbial decomposition of organic matter in the slurry after application to soil. The immobilisation and the remineralisation influence the fertiliser value of slurry N and the amount of organic N that is retained in soil. The immobilisation and the remineralisation of 15 N-labelled dairy cattle slurry NH₄-N were studied through three growing seasons after spring application under temperate conditions. Effects of slurry distribution (mixing, layer incorporation, injection, surface-banding) and extra litter straw in the slurry on the plant utilisation of labelled NH₄-N from slurry were studied and compared to the utilisation of ¹⁵N-labelled mineral fertiliser. The initial immobilisation of slurry N was influenced by the slurry distribution in soil. More N was immobilised when the slurry was mixed with soil. Surface-banding of slurry resulted in significant volatilisation losses and less residual ¹⁵N in soil. Much more N was immobilised after slurry incorporation than after mineral fertiliser application. After 2.5 years the recovery of labelled N in soil (0–25 cm) was 46% for slurry mixed with soil, 42% for injected slurry, 22% for surface-banded slurry and 24% for mineral fertiliser N. The total N uptake in a ryegrass cover crop was 5–10 kg N/ha higher in the autumn after spring-application of cattle slurry (100–120 kg NH₄-N/ha) compared to the mineral fertiliser N reference, but the immobilised slurry N (labelled N) only contributed little to the extra N uptake in the autumn. Even in the second autumn after slurry application there was an extra N uptake in the cover crop (0–10 kg N/ha). The residual effect of the cattle slurry on spring barley N uptake was insignificant in the year after slurry application (equivalent to 3% of total slurry N). Eighteen months after application, 13% of the residual ¹⁵N in soil was found in microbial biomass whether it derived from slurry or mineral fertiliser, but the remineralisation rate (% crop removal of residual ¹⁵N) was higher for fertiliser- than for slurry-derived N, except after surface-banding. Extra litter straw in the slurry had a negligible influence on the residual N effects in the year after application. It is concluded that a significant part of the organic N retained in soil after cattle slurry application is derived from immobilised ammonium N, but already a few months after application immobilised N is stabilised and only slowly released. The immobilised N has negligible influence on the residual N effect of cattle slurry in the first years after slurry application, and mainly contributes to the long-term accumulation of organic N in soil together with part of the organic slurry N. Under humid temperate conditions the residual N effects of the manure can only be optimally utilised when soil is also covered by plants in the autumn, because a significant part of the residual N is released in the autumn, and there is a higher risk of N leaching losses on soils that receive cattle slurry regularly compared to soils receiving only mineral N fertilisers.     

Fate of 15N-labelled fertilizer applied to spring barley grown on soils of contrasting nutrient status

An experiment with ¹⁵N-labelled fertilizer was superimposed on the Rothamsted Hoosfield Spring Barley Experiment, started in 1852. Labelled ¹⁵NH₄ ¹⁵NO₃ was applied in spring at (nominal) rates of 0, 48, 96 and 144 kg N ha^-1. The labelled fertilizer was applied to microplots located within four treatments of the original experiment: that receiving farmyard manure (FYM) annually, that receiving inorganic nutrients (PK) annually and to two that were deficient in nutrients: applications were made in two successive years, but to different areas within these original treatments. Maximum yields in 1986 (7.1 t grain ha^-1) were a little greater than in 1987. In 1987, microplots on the FYM and PK treatments gave similar yields, provided enough fertilizer N was applied, but in 1986 yields on the PK treatment were always less than those on the FYM treatment, no matter how much fertilizer N was applied. In plots with adequate crop nutrients, about 51% of the labelled N was present in above-ground crop and weed at harvest, about 30% remained in the top 70 cm of soil (mostly in the 0–23 cm layer) and about 19% was unaccounted for, all irrespective of the rate of N application and of the quantity of inorganic N in the soil at the time of application. Less than 4% of the added fertilizer N was present in inorganic form in the soil at harvest, confirming results from comparable experiments with autumn-sown cereals in south-east England. Thus, in this experiment there is no evidence that a spring-sown cereal is more likely to leave unused fertilizer in the soil than an autumn-sown one. With trace applications (ca. 2 kg N ha^-1) more labelled N was retained in the soil and less was in the above-ground crop. Where P and K were deficient, yields were depressed, a smaller proportion of the labelled fertilizer N was present in the above-ground crop at harvest and more remained in the soil.Although the percentage uptake of labelled N was similar across the range of fertilizer N applications, the uptake of total N fell off at the higher N rates, particularly on the FYM treatment. This was reflected in the appearance of a negative Added Nitrogen Interaction (ANI) at the highest rate of application. Fertilizer N blocked the uptake of soil N, particularly from below 23 cm, once the capacity of the crop to take up N was exceeded. Denitrification and leaching were almost certainly insufficient to account for the 19% loss of spring-added N across the whole range of N applications and other loss processes must also have contributed.     

Alfalfa response to elevated atmospheric CO2 varies with the symbiotic rhizobial strain

Increased atmospheric CO₂ was shown to affect a variety of physiological processes in plants, including photosynthesis and growth with repercussions on crop yield and nutritive value. Perennial alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) is a sustainable crop with a deep root system, living in symbiosis with rhizobium for nitrogen (N) fixation. The objective of the project was to determine the combined effects of elevated CO₂ and rhizobial strains on photosynthesis, growth, N fixation, and nutritive value of alfalfa, and on soil microflora. Alfalfa inoculated with two different strains of rhizobia (Sinorhizobium meliloti strains A2 and NRG34) was grown 2 months at day/night temperatures of 22/17°C under either 400 (near ambient) or 800 (elevated) μmol mol⁻¹ of CO₂. The photosynthetic response of alfalfa to elevated CO₂ differed according to the rhizobial strain. At the end of the experiment, elevated CO₂ stimulated photosynthetic rates by 50% in plants associated with A2 but there was no significant increase in plants nodulated with NRG34. Nitrogenase activity (+38%) and shoot growth (+60%) were stimulated under 800 μmol mol⁻¹ of CO₂ for alfalfa inoculated with both strains. Root dry weight was significantly higher at 800 μmol mol⁻¹ of CO₂ only with strain A2. Fibre concentration decreased in response to elevated atmospheric CO₂ in alfalfa inoculated with strain A2 resulting in plant material with greater nutritive value when inoculated with A2 compared to NRG34. In the soil, elevated CO₂ increased the proportion of fungi in the microbial community while decreasing Gram⁻ bacteria. For alfalfa inoculated with rhizobial strain A2, photosynthetic rates, nitrogenase activity, and growth were all stimulated by increased atmospheric CO₂ compared to less consistently positive responses to elevated CO₂ when inoculated with NRG34. Our results show that it is possible to identify rhizobial strains to improve plant performance under predicted future CO₂ concentrations with no negative effect on nutritive value. The Canadian Government’s right to retain a non-exclusive, royalty-free license in and to any copyright is acknowledged.     

Mineralization of organically bound nitrogen in soil as influenced by plant growth and fertilization

Summary A loam soil containing an organic fraction labelled with¹⁵N was used for pot experiments with spring barley, rye-grass and clover. The organically bound labelled N was mineralized at a rate corresponding to a half-life of about 9 years. Fertilization with 106 and 424 kgN/ha of unlabelled N in the form of KNO₃ significantly increased uptake of labelled N from the soil in barley and the first harvest of rye-grass crops. The fertilized plants removed all the labelled NH₄ and NO₃ present in the soil, whereas the unfertilized plants removed only about 80%. The second, third and fourth harvests of the unfertilized rye-grass took up more labelled N than the fertilized rye-grass. The total uptake in the four harvests was similar whether the plants were fertilized or not. Application of KCl to barley plants in amounts equivalent to that of KNO₃ resulted in a small but insignificant increase in uptake of labelled N. The uptake of labelled N in the first harvest of clover which was not fertilized but inoculated with Rhizobium was similar to that of the fully fertilized rye-grass indicating that the biological fixation of N had the same effect as addition of N-fertilizer. N uptake in the following harvests was lower and the total uptake by four harvests of clover was similar to that of rye-grass. There was no indication that fertilization with KNO₃ accelerated the mineralization of the organically bound labelled N. The observed apparent ‘priming effect’ of the fertilizer on the uptake of labelled N was compensated by subsequent crops and harvests, and it seems to arise from a more thorough search of the soil volume by a better developed root system of the fertilized plants.     

Residual nitrogen contribution from grain legumes to succeeding wheat and rape and related microbial process

The residual N contribution from faba bean (Vicia faba L.), pea (Pisum sativum L.) and white lupin (Lupinus albus L.) to microbial biomass and subsequent wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) was studied in a greenhouse experiment. The grain legumes were ¹⁵N labelled in situ with a stem feeding method before incorporated into the soil, which enables the determination of N rhizodeposition. Wheat and rape were subsequently grown on the soil containing the grain legume residues (incl. ¹⁵N-labelled rhizodeposits) and were harvested either twice at flowering and at maturity or once at maturity, respectively. The average total N uptake of the subsequent crops was influenced by the legume used as precrop and was determined by the residue N input and the N₂-fixation capacity of the legume species. The succeeding crops recovered 8.6–12.1% of the residue N at maturity. Similar patterns were found for the microbial biomass, which recovered 8.2–10.6% of the residue N. Wheat and rape recovered about the same amount of residue N. The absolute contribution of soil derived N to the subsequent crops was similar in all treatments and averaged 149 mg N pot^–1 at maturity. At flowering 17–23% of the residue derived N was recovered in the subsequent wheat and in the microbial biomass; 70% of the residue N was recovered in the microbial biomass in the flowering stage and decreased to about 50% at maturity. In contrast, the recovery in wheat and rape constituted only 30% at flowering and increased to 50% at maturity in all treatments, indicating that the residual N uptake by the subsequent wheat was apparently supplied by mobilisation of residue N temporarily immobilised in the microbial biomass.     

The partitioning of fertilizer-N between soil and crop: Comparison of ammonium and nitrate applications

Field experiments were carried out in 1987 on winter wheat crops grown on three types of soil. ¹⁵N-labelled urea, ¹⁵NH₄NO₃ or NH₄ ¹⁵NO₃ (80 kg N ha^-1) was applied at tillering. The soils (chalky soil, hydromorphic loamy soil, sandy clay soil) were chosen to obtain a range of nitrogen dynamics, particularly nitrification. Soil microbial N immobilization and crop N uptake were measured at five dates. Shortly after fertilizer application (0–26 days), the amount of N immobilized in soil were markedly higher with labelled urea or ammonium than that with nitrate in all soils. During the same period, crop ¹⁵N uptake occurred preferentially at the expense of nitrate. Nitrification differed little between soils, the rates were 2.0 to 4.7 kg N ha^-1 day^-1 at 9°C daily mean temperature. The differences in immobilization and uptake had almost disappeared at flowering and harvest. ¹⁵N recovery in soil and crop varied between 50 and 100%. Gaseous losses probably occurred by volatilization in the chalky soil and denitrification in the hydromorphic loamy soil. These losses affected the NH₄ ⁺ and NO₃ ^- pools differently and determined the partitioning of fertilizer-N between immobilization and absorption.     

Turnover of residual 15N-labelled fertilizer N in soil following harvest of oilseed rape (t Brassica napus L.)

We studied the fate of ¹⁵N-labelled fertilizer nitrogen in a sandy loam soil after harvest of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L. cv. Ceres) given 100 or 200 kg N ha^-1 in spring, with or without irrigation. Our main objective was to quantify the temporal variations of the soil mineral N, the extractable soil organic N and soil microbial biomass N, and fertilizer derived N in these pools during autumn and winter. Nitrogen use efficiency of the oilseed rape crop varied from 47% of applied N in the 100N, irrigated treatment to 34% in the 200N, non-irrigated treatment. However, only in the latter treatment did we find significantly higher fertilizer derived soil mineral N than in the three other treatments which all had low soil mineral N contents at the first sampling after harvest (8 days after stubble tillage). Between 31% and 42% of the applied N could not be accounted for in the harvested plants or 0-15 cm soil layer at this first sampling. Over the following autumn and winter none of the remaining fertilizer derived soil N was lost from the 0–5 cm depth, but from the 5–15 cm depth a marked proportion of N derived from fertilizer was lost, probably by leaching. Negligible amounts of fertilizer derived extractable soil organic and mineral N (<1 kg N ha^-1, 0-15 cm) were found in all treatments after the first sampling.Soil microbial biomass N was not significantly affected by treatments and showed only small temporal variability (±11% of the mean 76 kg N ha^-1, 0- 15 cm depth). Surprisingly, the average amount of soil microbial biomass N derived from fertilizer was significantly affected by the treatments, with the extremes being 5.5 and 3.1 kg N ha^-1 in the 200N, non-irrigated and 100N, irrigated treatments, respectively. Also, the estimated exponential decay rate of microbial biomass N derived from fertilizer, differed greatly (2 fold) between these two treatments, indicating highly different microbial turnover rates in spite of the similar total microbial biomass N values. In studies utilising ¹⁵N labelling to estimate turnover rates of different soil organic matter pools this finding is of great importance, because it may question the assumption that turnover rates are not affected by the insertion of the label.     

Turnover of15N-labelled urea in various rotations of groundnut sorghum and pigeon pea crops

Summary A field experiment on N turnover in rotations of groundnut, sorghum and pigeonpea crops was conducted in an Indian Alfisol during 1978–80.¹⁵N-labelled urea N was applied @ 40 kg ha^–1 in 1978. In the first year, the groundnut utilized 19.5% of the applied labelled N, sorghum 25.5%, and pigeon pea 10.3%. More fertilizer N was removed through weeding than by crop uptake in sorghum and pigeon pea. The fertilizer N left behind in soil upto 40 cm depth was 44.4% in groundnut plots, 35.1% in sorghum plots and 40.1% in pigeon pea plots.The uptake in 1979 of the residual fertilizer N in the soil was 8.9% in sorghum, 8.3% in groundnut and 2.8% in pigeon pea. In 1980, it declined to less than 2% for pigeon pea and groundnut and to about 4% for sorghum.A balance sheet drawn at the end of each rotation showed that about 51.3% of the applied labelled N was accounted for in groundnut-sorghum-pigeon pea rotation, 70.9% in sorghumpigeon pea-groundnut, and 43.5% in pigeon pea-groundnut-sorghum.     

Estimates of the residual nitrogen benefit of groundnut to maize in Northeast Thailand

Four cultivars of groundnut were grown in upland soil in Northeast Thailand to study the residual benefit of the stover to a subsequent maize crop. An N-balance estimate of the total residual N in the maize supplied by the groundnut was made. In addition three independent estimates were made of the residual benefits to maize when the groundnut stover was returned to the land and incorporated. The first estimate (Estimate 1) was an N-balance estimate. A dual labelling approach was used where ¹⁵N-labelled stover was added to unlabelled microplots (Estimate 2) or unlabelled stover was added to ¹⁵N-labelled soil microplots (Estimate 3). The nodulating groundnut cultivars fixed between 59–64% of their nitrogen (as estimated by the ¹⁵N isotope dilution method using non-nodulating groundnut as a non-fixing reference) producing between 100 and 130 kg N ha^-1 in their stover. Although the following maize crop suffered from drought stress, maize grain N and dry weights were up to 80% and 65% greater respectively in the plots where the stover was returned as compared with the plots where the stover was removed. These benefits were comparable with applications of 75 kg N ha^-1 nitrogen in the form of urea. The total residual N estimates of the contribution of the nodulated groundnut to the maize ranged from 16.4–27.5 kg N ha^-1. Estimates of the residual N supplied by the stover and fallen leaves ranged from 11.9–21.3 kg N ha^-1 using the N-balance method (Estimate 1), from 6.3–9.6 kg N ha^-1 with the labelled stover method (Estimate 2) and from 0–11.4 kg N ha^-1 with the labelled soil method. There was closest agreement between the two ¹⁵N based estimates suggesting that apparent added nitrogen interactions in these soils may not be important and that N balance estimates can overestimate the residual N in crops following legumes, even in very poor soils. This work also indicates the considerable ability of local groundnut cultivars to fix atmospheric nitrogen and the potential benefits from returning and incorporating legume residues to the soil in the upland cropping systems of Northeast Thailand. The applicability of the ¹⁵N methodology used here and possible reasons for the discrepancies between estimates 1, 2 and 3 are discussed.     

Relationship between rate of crop growth at date of fertiliser N application and fate of fertiliser N applied to winter wheat

To investigate the relationship between the timing of fertiliser N applications and the N use efficiency of wheat, three field experiments with ¹⁵N were set up on winter wheat, on three different soils in France. Different crop N demands on the day of fertiliser application were obtained by varying either crop densities or date of fertiliser application. Labelled ¹⁵NH₄ ¹⁵NO₃ was applied at tillering and during stem elongation. The ¹⁵N recovered from plant and soil at different dates after ¹⁵N addition and at maturity of wheat was measured. The fate of fertiliser N was rapidly determined, most of the fertiliser N accumulated in the wheat at maturity having been taken up within a few days of application. ¹⁵N recovery by the crop at final harvest (%) varied greatly (19–55% N applied) according to crop density, soil type and date of application. It was linearly related to the instantaneous crop growth rate calculated at the day of ¹⁵N application. The amount of fertiliser N immobilised in the soil was constant at 20 kg N ha⁻¹, for all soil types and crop densities. Because residual mineral ¹⁵N in the soil at harvest was negligible and immobilisation was constant, the level of total ¹⁵N measured in the different N pools (soil+plant) reflected the% ¹⁵N uptake by the plant. There was consequently a negative linear relationship between the percentage of ¹⁵N not recovered for measurement, and crop growth rate (i.e. crop N demand) at date of fertiliser application. These results suggest that crop N demand at the time of N application determines the ability of the crop to compete for N with other processes, and may be a major factor determining the division of N between soil and crop. This revised version was published online in June 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Comparative effects of organic and inorganic nitrogen sources applied to a flooded soil on rice yield and availability of N

A pot experiment was conducted to study the effect of organic and inorganic nitrogen (N) sources on the yield and N uptake of rice from applied and native soil-N. The residual effect of these N sources on a succeeding wheat crop was also studied. Organic N was applied in the form of ¹⁵N-labelled Sesbania aculeata L., a legume, and inorganic N in the form of ¹⁵N-labelled ammonium sulphate. The two sources were applied to the soil separately or together at the time of transplanting rice. Recovery of N by rice from both the applied sources was quite low but both sources caused significant increases in biomass and N yield of rice. Maximum increase was recorded in soil treated with organic N. The residual value of the two materials as source of N for wheat was not significant; the wheat took up only a small fraction of the N initially applied. Loss of N occurred from both applied N sources, the losses being more from inorganic N. Both applied N sources caused a substantial increase in the availability of soil-N to rice and wheat; most of this increase was due to organic N and was attributed to the so-called ‘priming’ effect or ANI (added nitrogen interaction) of the applied material.     

Fate of 15N-labelled nitrogen fertilizer applied to kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) vines

The fate of ¹⁵N-labelled ammonium fertilizer applied once to six-year-old field-grown kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa Hayward) vines was measured over three years. The three main treatments were nitrogen (N) applied singularly at 100 or 200 kg N ha^–1 in early spring (two weeks before bud burst) or split with 100 kg N ha^–1 (unlabelled) in early spring and 100 kg N ha^–1 (¹⁵N-labelled) ten weeks later. All N treatments were applied to vines with a history of either 50 or 200 kg N ha^–1 yr^–1. For three years after ¹⁵n application, components of the vines and soil (0–600 mm depth) were sampled at harvest in late autumn and the N and ¹⁵N contents determined.By the first harvest, all plant uptake of ¹⁵N had occurred and this represented 48–53% of the ¹⁵N applied. There was no significant effect of current N fertilizer treatment or of N history on ¹⁵N recovery by vines. Removal of ¹⁵N in harvested fruit was small at 5–6% in the first year and 8% over 3 years. After 2–3 years, most plant ¹⁵N occurred in the roots and this component declined only slowly over time. In contrast, there was a large temporal decline in ¹⁵N in above-ground plant components due to the annual removal in leaf fall and pruning. An associated experiment showed that when ¹⁵N-labelled prunings and leaves were mulched and returned to the soil, only about 9% was recovered by plants within 2 years. Almost all remaining mulched material had been immobilised into the soil organic N.In all treatments, about 20% of the added ¹⁵N remained in soil at the first harvest. This was almost entirely in organic fractions (<0.4% in inorganic N) and mostly in the surface 150-mm layer. The ¹⁵N content in soil changed little over time (from 20 to 17% between the first and third harvests respectively) and indicated that most of the N had been immobilised into stable humus forms.     

Growing vetches (Vicia villosa Roth) in irrigated cotton systems: inputs of fixed N, N fertiliser savings and cotton productivity

We compared symbiotic N₂ fixation by winter forage legumes (clovers, medics and vetches) using the ¹⁵N natural abundance technique in three experiments. Vetches (Vicia spp.) were the most productive legumes, and woollypod vetch fixed (shoot+root) up to 265 kg N ha^–1 (mean 227 kg N ha^–1) during a 4–5 months period over winter and early spring. Balansa and Berseem clovers, and Gama medic were highly productive in the first experiment, but fixed significantly less N than woollypod vetch in the second experiment. A 6-year study (1997–2003) compared cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) systems with and without vetch, or with faba beans (Vicia faba L.) to assess the effects of these crops on cotton production. Woollypod vetch was grown either between annual cotton crops, or between wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) and cotton crops. Vetch added 230 kg N ha^–1 (174 kg fixed N ha^–1) to the soil when incorporated as a green manure. Faba bean shoot residues and nodulated roots contributed 108 kg fixed N ha^–1 to the soil, following the removal of 80 kg N ha^–1 in the harvested seed (meaned over three crops). Lablab (Lablab purpureus L. – summer-growing and irrigated) added 277 kg N ha^–1 (244 kg fixed N ha^–1) before incorporation as a green manure in the first year of the experiment. The economic optimum N fertiliser rate for each cropping system was determined every second year when all systems were sown to cotton. Cotton following cotton required 105 kg fertiliser N ha^–1, but only 40 kg N ha^–1 when vetch was grown between each cotton crop. Cotton following wheat required 83 kg fertiliser N ha^–1 but no N fertiliser was needed when vetch was grown after wheat (the highest yielding system). Cotton following faba beans also required no N fertiliser. The vetch-based systems became more N fertile over the course of the experiment and produced greater lint yields than the comparative non-legume systems, and required less N fertiliser. While no cash flow was derived from growing vetch, economic benefits accrued from enhanced cotton yields, reduced N fertiliser requirements and improved soil fertility. These findings help explain the rotational benefits of vetches observed in other regions of the world.     

Transformation of15N-labelled urea and its modified forms in tropical wetland rice culture

Summary The fate of 100 kg N ha^–1 applied as¹⁵N-urea and its modified forms was followed in 4 successive field-grown wetland rice crops in a vertisol. The first wet season crop recovered about 27 to 36.6% of the applied N depending upon the N source. In subsequent seasons the average uptake was very small and it gradually decreased from 1.4 to 0.5 kg N ha^–1 although about 18 to 20, 12 to 17 and 14 to 18 kg ha^–1 residual fertilizer N was available in the root zone after harvest of first, second and third crops, respectively. The average uptake of the residual fertilizer N was only 7.6% in the second crop and it decreased to 4.5% in the third and to 3.2% in the fourth crop although all these crops were adequately fertilized with unlabelled urea. The basal application of neem coated urea was more effective in controlling the leaching loss of labelled NH₄+NO₃–N than split application of uncoated urea. In the first 3 seasons in which¹⁵N was detectable, the loss of fertilizer N through leaching as NH₄+NO₃–N amounted to 0.5 kg ha^–1 from neem-coated urea, 1.5 kg from split urea and 4.1 kg from coal tar-coated urea. At the end of 4 crops, most of the labelled fertilizer N (about 69% on average) was located in the upper 0–20 cm soil layer showing very little movement beyond this depth. In the profile sampled upto 60 cm depth, totally about 13.8 kg labelled fertilizer N ha^–1 from neem-coated urea, 12.7 kg from coal-tar coated urea, and 11.8 kg from split urea were recovered. The average recovery of labelled urea-N in crops and soil during the entire experimental period ranged between 42 and 51%. After correcting for leaching losses, the remaining 47 to 56% appeared to have been lost through ammonia volatilization and denitrification.     

The contribution of nitrogen by promiscuous soybeans to maize based cropping the moist savanna of Nigeria

Agronomic results indicate that maize grain yields generally are higher when the crop is planted following soybean than in continuous maize cultivation in the moist savanna agroecological zones of West Africa. Many factors have been hypothesized to explain this phenomenon, including enhanced N availability and the so-called `rotational effect'. There is, however, hardly any quantitative information on the residual N benefits of promiscuous soybeans to subsequent cereal crops grown in rotation with soybean. Three IITA promiscuous soybean breeding lines and two Brazilian soybean lines were grown in 1994 and 1995 at Mokwa in the southern Guinea savanna, Nigeria, to quantify the nitrogen contribution by soybeans to a succeeding crop of maize grown in rotation with soybean for two consecutive years, 1996 and 1997 using two methods of introducing ¹⁵N into soil (fresh ¹⁵N labelling and its residual ¹⁵N) and three maize cultivars (including one cultivar with high N use efficiency) used as reference plants. The nodulating soybeans fixed between 44 and 103 kg N ha^–1 of their total N and had an estimated net N balance input from fixation following grain harvest ranging from –8 to 43 kg N ha^–1. Results in 1996 and in 1997 showed that maize growing after soybean had significantly higher grain yield (1.2 – 2.3-fold increase compared to maize control) except for maize cultivar Oba super 2 (8644-27) (a N-efficient hybrid). The ¹⁵N isotope dilution method was able to estimate N contribution by promiscuous soybeans to maize only in the first succeeding maize crop grown in 1996 but not in the second maize crop in 1997. The first crop of maize grown after soybean accumulated an average between 10 and 22 kg N ha^–1 from soybean residue, representing 17–33% of the soybean total N ha^–1. The percentage ¹⁵N derived from residue recovery in maize grown after maize was influenced by the maize cultivars. Maize crop grown after the N-efficient hybrid cultivar Oba Super 2 (844-27) had similar ¹⁵N values similar to maize grown after soybeans, confirming the ability of this cultivar to use N efficiently in low N soil due to an efficient N translocation ability. The maize crop in 1997 grown after maize had lower ¹⁵N enrichment than that grown in soybean plots, suggesting that soybean residues contributed a little to soil available N and to crop N uptake by the second maize crop. The differential mineralization and immobilization turnover of maize and soybean residues in these soils may be important and N contribution estimates in longer term rotation involving legumes and cereals may be difficult to quantify using the ¹⁵N labelling approaches. Therefore alternative methods are required to measure N release from organic residues in these cropping systems.     

The fate of labelled15N urea and ammonium nitrate applied to a winter wheat crop

Labelled urea or ammonium nitrate was applied to winter wheat growing on a loamy soil in Northern France. Two applications of fertilizer were given: 50 kg N ha^–1 at tillering (early March) and 110 kg N ha^–1 at the beginning of stem elongation (mid-April). The kinetics of urea hydrolysis, nitrification of ammonium and the disappearance of inorganic nitrogen were followed at frequent intervals. Inorganic nitrogen soon disappeared, mainly immobilized by soil microflora and absorbed by the crop. Net immobilization of fertilizer N occured at a very similar rate for urea and ammonium nitrate. Maximum immobilization (16 kg N ha¹) was found at harvest for the first dressing and at anthesis for the second dressing (23 kg N ha¹). During the nitrification period, the labelled ammonium pool was immobilized two to three times faster than the labelled nitrate pool. No significant net¹⁵N remineralization was found during the growth cycle.The actual denitrification and volatilization losses were probably more important than indicated from calculations made by extrapolation of fluxes measured over short intervals. However microbial immobilization was the most important of the processes which compete with plant uptake for nitrogen.