MicroRNA‐125a promotes resistance to BRAF inhibitors through suppression of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway

Melanoma patients with BRAF^V600E‐mutant tumors display striking responses to BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi); however, almost all invariably relapse with drug‐resistant disease. Here, we report that microRNA‐125a (miR‐125a) expression is upregulated in human melanoma cells and patient tissues upon acquisition of BRAFi resistance. We show that miR‐125a induction confers resistance to BRAF^V600E melanoma cells to BRAFi by directly suppressing pro‐apoptotic components of the intrinsic apoptosis pathway, including BAK1 and MLK3. Apoptotic suppression and prolonged survival favor reactivation of the MAPK and AKT pathways by drug‐resistant melanoma cells. We demonstrate that miR‐125a inhibition suppresses the emergence of resistance to BRAFi and, in a subset of resistant melanoma cell lines, leads to partial drug resensitization. Finally, we show that miR‐125a upregulation is mediated by TGFβ signaling. In conclusion, the identification of this novel role for miR‐125a in BRAFi resistance exposes clinically relevant mechanisms of melanoma cell survival that can be exploited therapeutically.     

AEBP1 upregulation confers acquired resistance to BRAF (V600E) inhibition in melanoma

An activating BRAF (V600E) kinase mutation occurs in approximately half of melanomas. Recent clinical studies have demonstrated that vemurafenib (PLX4032) and dabrafenib, potent and selective inhibitors of mutant v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF), exhibit remarkable activities in patients with V600 BRAF mutant melanomas. However, acquired drug resistance invariably develops after the initial treatment. Identification of acquired resistance mechanisms may inform the development of new therapies that elicit long-term responses of melanomas to BRAF inhibitors. Here we report that increased expression of AEBP1 (adipocyte enhancer-binding protein 1) confers acquired resistance to BRAF inhibition in melanoma. AEBP1 is shown to be highly upregulated in PLX4032-resistant melanoma cells because of the hyperactivation of the PI3K/Akt-cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) signaling pathway. This upregulates AEBP1 expression and thus leads to the activation of NF-κB via accelerating IκBa degradation. In addition, inhibition of the PI3K/Akt-CREB-AEBP1-NF-κB pathway greatly reverses the PLX4032-resistant phenotype of melanoma cells. Furthermore, increased expression of AEBP1 is validated in post-treatment tumors in patients with acquired resistance to BRAF inhibitor. Therefore, these results reveal a novel PI3K/Akt-CREB-AEBP1-NF-κB pathway whose activation contributes to acquired resistance to BRAF inhibition, and suggest that this pathway, particularly AEBP1, may represent a novel therapeutic target for treating BRAF inhibitor-resistant melanoma.     

Targeted BRAF Inhibition Impacts Survival in Melanoma Patients with High Levels of Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling

Unprecedented clinical responses have been reported in advanced stage metastatic melanoma patients treated with targeted inhibitors of constitutively activated mutant BRAF, which is present in approximately half of all melanomas. We and others have previously observed an association of elevated nuclear β-catenin with improved survival in molecularly-unselected melanoma patients. This study sought to determine whether levels of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in melanoma tumors prior to treatment might predict patient responses to BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi). We performed automated quantification of β-catenin immunohistochemical expression in pretreatment BRAF-mutant tumors from 32 BRAFi-treated melanoma patients. Unexpectedly, patients with higher nuclear β-catenin in their tumors did not exhibit the survival advantage previously observed in molecularly-unselected melanoma patients who did not receive BRAFi. In cultured melanoma cells treated with long-term BRAFi, activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling is markedly inhibited, coinciding with a loss of the enhancement of BRAFi-induced apoptosis by WNT3A observed in BRAFi-naïve cells. Together, these observations suggest that long-term treatment with BRAFi can impact the interaction between BRAF/MAPK and Wnt/β-catenin signaling to affect patient outcomes. Studies with larger patient cohorts are required to determine whether nuclear β-catenin expression correlates with clinical responses to BRAFi and to specific mechanisms of acquired resistance to BRAFi. Understanding these pathway interactions will be necessary to facilitate efforts to individualize therapies for melanoma patients.     

MiR‐29 mediates TGFβ1‐induced extracellular matrix synthesis through activation of PI3K‐AKT pathway in human lung fibroblasts

TGFβ1 is very important in the synthesis and degradation of extracellular matrix, and also in the mediation of human lung fibroblasts proliferation, and miR‐29 plays an important role in this process. To explore the interactions of miR‐29 family members and TGFβ1, the effects of transforming growth factor TGFβ1 on the expression of miR‐29 and whether miR‐29 is involved in pro‐survival signaling pathways mediated by TGFβ1 were examined in human lung fibroblasts. Treatment of the human embryonic lung fibroblast cell line IMR90 with TGFβ1 caused a decrease in expression of miR‐29a/b/c by real‐time PCR analysis. TGFβ1 stimulation increased cell proliferation, colony formation and up‐regulated expression of COL1A1; transfecting with miR‐29a/b/c mimics reverse TGFβ1‐induced phenotype changes in IMR90 cells. Western blot analyses showed that TGFβ1 treatment unchanged total protein expression levels of PI3K or AKT, but the expression levels of p‐PI3K, p‐AKT, and COL1A1 were increased; and miR‐19a/b/c mimics interfering blocked phosphorylation of PI3K or AKT and decreased expression of COL1A1 after TGFβ1 treatment. The results indicate that TGFβ1 beta uses the PI3k‐Akt pathway in these embryonic fibroblasts and miR29 blocks this activation pathway. It indicates a novel biological function of the PI3K‐Akt pathway in IMR90. Elevated expression of miR‐29 may play an important role in the pathogenesis of diseases related to fibrogenic reactions in human lung fibroblasts. J. Cell. Biochem. 114: 1336–1342, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Reversing melanoma cross-resistance to BRAF and MEK inhibitors by co-targeting the AKT/mTOR pathway

Background

The sustained clinical activity of the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib (PLX4032/RG7204) in patients with BRAF^V600 mutant melanoma is limited primarily by the development of acquired resistance leading to tumor progression. Clinical trials are in progress using MEK inhibitors following disease progression in patients receiving BRAF inhibitors. However, the PI3K/AKT pathway can also induce resistance to the inhibitors of MAPK pathway.

Methodology/Principal Findings

The sensitivity to vemurafenib or the MEK inhibitor AZD6244 was tested in sensitive and resistant human melanoma cell lines exploring differences in activation-associated phosphorylation levels of major signaling molecules, leading to the testing of co-inhibition of the AKT/mTOR pathway genetically and pharmacologically. There was a high degree of cross-resistance to vemurafenib and AZD6244, except in two vemurafenib-resistant cell lines that acquired a secondary mutation in NRAS. In other cell lines, acquired resistance to both drugs was associated with persistence or increase in activity of AKT pathway. siRNA-mediated gene silencing and combination therapy with an AKT inhibitor or rapamycin partially or completely reversed the resistance.

Conclusions/Significance

Primary and acquired resistance to vemurafenib in these in vitro models results in frequent cross resistance to MEK inhibitors, except when the resistance is the result of a secondary NRAS mutation. Resistance to BRAF or MEK inhibitors is associated with the induction or persistence of activity within the AKT pathway in the presence of these drugs. This resistance can be potentially reversed by the combination of a RAF or MEK inhibitor with an AKT or mTOR inhibitor. These combinations should be available for clinical testing in patients progressing on BRAF inhibitors.     

MiR‐3116 sensitizes glioma cells to temozolomide by targeting FGFR1 and regulating the FGFR1/PI3K/AKT pathway

Glioma is a brain tumour that is often diagnosed, and temozolomide (TMZ) is a common chemotherapeutic drug used in glioma. Yet, resistance to TMZ is a chief hurdle towards curing the malignancy. The current work explores the pathways and involvement of miR‐3116 in the TMZ resistance. miR‐3116 and FGFR1 mRNA were quantified by real‐time PCR in malignant samples and cell lines. Appropriate assays were designed for apoptosis, viability, the ability to form colonies and reporter assays to study the effects of the miR‐3116 or FGFR1. The involvement of PI3K/AKT signalling was assessed using Western blotting. Tumorigenesis was evaluated in an appropriate xenograft mouse model in vivo. This work revealed that the levels of miR‐3116 dipped in samples resistant to TMZ, while increased miR‐3116 caused an inhibition of the tumour features mentioned above to hence augment TMZ sensitivity. miR‐3116 was found to target FGFR1. When FGFR1 was overexpressed, resistance to TMZ was augmented and reversed the sensitivity caused by miR‐3116. Our findings further confirmed PI3K/AKT signalling pathway is involved in this action. In conclusion, miR‐3116 sensitizes glioma cells to TMZ through FGFR1 downregulation and the PI3K/AKT pathway inactivation. Our results provide a strategy to overcome TMZ resistance in glioma treatment.     

lncRNA HCG11 regulates cell progression by targeting miR‐543 and regulating AKT/mTOR pathway in prostate cancer

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a common cancer worldwide, which mostly occurs in males over the age of 50. Accumulating evidence have determined that long non‐coding RNA/microRNA (lncRNA/miRNA) axis plays a critical role in cell progression of cancers, including PCa. However, the pathogenesis of PCa has not been fully indicated. In this study, quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction was used to detect the expression of HCG11 and miR‐543. Western blot was applied to measure the protein expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen, cleavage‐caspase 3 (cle‐caspase 3), N‐cadherin, E‐cadherin, GAPDH, P‐AKT, AKT, p‐mTOR, and mTOR. 3‐(4,5‐Dimethylthiazol‐2‐yl)‐2,5‐diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), transwell invasion, and transwell migration assay were used to detect cell proliferation, invasion, and migration, respectively. The function and mechanism of lncRNA HCG11 were confirmed in PCa cell and xenograft mice models. Luciferase assay indicated that miR‐543 was a target miRNA of HCG11. Further investigation revealed that overexpression of HCG11 inhibited cell proliferation, invasion, and migration, whereas induced cell apoptosis by regulating miR‐543 expression in vitro and in vivo. More than that, lncRNA HCG11 inhibited phosphoinositide‐3 kinase/protein kinaseB (PI3K/AKT) signaling pathway to suppress PCa progression. Our data showed the overexpression of HGC11‐inhibited PI3K/AKT signaling pathway by downregulating miR‐543 expression, resulting in the suppression of cell growth in PCa. This finding proved a new regulatory network in PCa and provided a novel therapeutic target of PCa.     

Metabolic imaging using hyperpolarized 13C‐pyruvate to assess sensitivity to the B‐Raf inhibitor vemurafenib in melanoma cells and xenografts

Nearly all melanoma patients with a BRAF‐activating mutation will develop resistance after an initial clinical benefit from BRAF inhibition (BRAFi). The aim of this work is to evaluate whether metabolic imaging using hyperpolarized (HP) ¹³C pyruvate can serve as a metabolic marker of early response to BRAFi in melanoma, by exploiting the metabolic effects of BRAFi. Mice bearing human melanoma xenografts were treated with the BRAFi vemurafenib or vehicle. In vivo HP ¹³C magnetic resonance spectroscopy was performed at baseline and 24 hours after treatment to evaluate changes in pyruvate‐to‐lactate conversion. Oxygen partial pressure was measured via electron paramagnetic resonance oximetry. Ex vivo qRT‐PCR, immunohistochemistry and WB analysis were performed on tumour samples collected at the same time‐points selected for in vivo experiments. Similar approaches were applied to evaluate the effect of BRAFi on sensitive and resistant melanoma cells in vitro, excluding the role of tumour microenvironment. BRAF inhibition induced a significant increase in the HP pyruvate‐to‐lactate conversion in vivo, followed by a reduction of hypoxia. Conversely, the conversion was inhibited in vitro, which was consistent with BRAFi‐mediated impairment of glycolysis. The paradoxical increase of pyruvate‐to‐lactate conversion in vivo suggests that such conversion is highly influenced by the tumour microenvironment.     

Trans‐3,5,4´‐trimethoxystilbene reduced gefitinib resistance in NSCLCs via suppressing MAPK/Akt/Bcl‐2 pathway by upregulation of miR‐345 and miR‐498

Despite initial dramatic efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR‐TKIs) in EGFR‐mutant lung cancer patients, subsequent emergence of acquired resistance is almost inevitable. Resveratrol and its derivatives have been found to exert some effects on EGFR‐TKI resistance in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We screened several NSCLC cell lines with gefitinib resistance by MTT assay and analysed the miR‐345/miR‐498 expression levels. NSCLC cells were pre‐treated with a resveratrol derivative, trans‐3,5,4‐trimethoxystilbene (TMS) and subsequently challenged with gefitinib treatment. The changes in apoptosis and miR‐345/miR‐498 expression were analysed by flow cytometry and q‐PCR respectively. The functions of miR‐345/miR‐498 were verified by CCK‐8 assay, cell cycle analysis, dual‐luciferase reporter gene assay and immunoblotting analysis. Our results showed that the expression of miR‐345 and miR‐498 significantly decreased in gefitinib resistant NSCLC cells. TMS pre‐treatment significantly upregulated the expression of miR‐345 and miR‐498 increasing the sensitivity of NSCLC cells to gefitinib and inducing apoptosis. MiR‐345 and miR‐498 were verified to inhibit proliferation by cell cycle arrest and regulate the MAPK/c‐Fos and AKT/Bcl‐2 signalling pathways by directly targeting MAPK1 and PIK3R1 respectively. The combination of TMS and gefitinib promoted apoptosis also by miR‐345 and miR‐498 targeting the MAPK/c‐Fos and AKT/Bcl‐2 signalling pathways. Our study demonstrated that TMS reduced gefitinib resistance in NSCLCs via suppression of the MAPK/Akt/Bcl‐2 pathway by upregulation of miR‐345/498. These findings would lay the theoretical basis for the future study of TMS for the treatment of EGFR‐TKI resistance in NSCLCs.     

Impact of combined mTOR and MEK inhibition in uveal melanoma is driven by tumor genotype

Uveal melanomas possess activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) pathways. MAPK activation occurs via somatic mutations in the heterotrimeric G protein subunits GNAQ and GNA11 for over 70% of tumors and less frequently via V600E BRAF mutations. In this report, we describe the impact of dual pathway inhibition upon uveal melanoma cell lines with the MEK inhibitor selumetinib (AZD6244/ARRY-142886) and the ATP-competitive mTOR kinase inhibitor AZD8055. While synergistic reductions in cell viability were observed with AZD8055/selumetinib in both BRAF and GNAQ mutant cell lines, apoptosis was preferentially induced in BRAF mutant cells only. In vitro apoptosis assay results were predictive of in vivo drug efficacy as tumor regressions were observed only in a BRAF mutant xenograft model, but not GNAQ mutant model. We went on to discover that GNAQ promotes relative resistance to AZD8055/selumetinib-induced apoptosis in GNAQ mutant cells. For BRAF mutant cells, both AKT and 4E-BP1 phosphorylation were modulated by the combination; however, decreasing AKT phosphorylation alone was not sufficient and decreasing 4E-BP1 phosphorylation was not required for apoptosis. Instead, cooperative mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2) and MEK inhibition resulting in downregulation of the pro-survival protein MCL-1 was found to be critical for combination-induced apoptosis. These results suggest that the clinical efficacy of combined MEK and mTOR kinase inhibition will be determined by tumor genotype, and that BRAF mutant malignancies will be particularly susceptible to this strategy.     

Role of VEGFR‐1 in melanoma acquired resistance to the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib

The vascular endothelial growth factor receptor‐1 (VEGFR‐1) is a tyrosine kinase receptor frequently expressed in melanoma. Its activation by VEGF‐A or placental growth factor (PlGF) promotes tumour cell survival, migration and invasiveness. Moreover, VEGFR‐1 stimulation contributes to pathological angiogenesis and induces recruitment of tumour‐associated macrophages. Since melanoma acquired resistance to BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) has been associated with activation of pro‐angiogenic pathways, we have investigated VEGFR‐1 involvement in vemurafenib resistance. Results indicate that human melanoma cells rendered resistant to vemurafenib secrete greater amounts of VEGF‐A and express higher VEGFR‐1 levels compared with their BRAFi‐sensitive counterparts. Transient VEGFR‐1 silencing in susceptible melanoma cells delays resistance development, whereas in resistant cells it increases sensitivity to the BRAFi. Consistently, enforced VEGFR‐1 expression, by stable gene transfection in receptor‐negative melanoma cells, markedly reduces sensitivity to vemurafenib. Moreover, melanoma cells expressing VEGFR‐1 are more invasive than VEGFR‐1 deficient cells and receptor blockade by a specific monoclonal antibody (D16F7 mAb) reduces extracellular matrix invasion triggered by VEGF‐A and PlGF. These data suggest that VEGFR‐1 up‐regulation might contribute to melanoma progression and spreading after acquisition of a drug‐resistant phenotype. Thus, VEGFR‐1 inhibition with D16F7 mAb might be a suitable adjunct therapy for VEGFR‐1 positive tumours with acquired resistance to vemurafenib.     

Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) Hyperactivation and Enhanced NRAS Expression Drive Acquired Vemurafenib Resistance in V600E BRAF Melanoma Cells

Although targeting the V600E activating mutation in the BRAF gene, the most common genetic abnormality in melanoma, has shown clinical efficacy in melanoma patients, response is, invariably, short lived. To better understand mechanisms underlying this acquisition of resistance to BRAF-targeted therapy in previously responsive melanomas, we induced vemurafenib resistance in two V600E BRAF+ve melanoma cell lines, A375 and DM443, by serial in vitro vemurafenib exposure. The resulting approximately 10-fold more vemurafenib-resistant cell lines, A375rVem and D443rVem, had higher growth rates and showed differential collateral resistance to cisplatin, melphalan, and temozolomide. The acquisition of vemurafenib resistance was associated with significantly increased NRAS levels in A375rVem and D443rVem, increased activation of the prosurvival protein, AKT, and the MAPKs, ERK, JNK, and P38, which correlated with decreased levels of the MAPK inhibitor protein, GSTP1. Despite the increased NRAS, whole exome sequencing showed no NRAS gene mutations. Inhibition of all three MAPKs and siRNA-mediated NRAS suppression both reversed vemurafenib resistance significantly in A375rVem and DM443rVem. Together, the results indicate a mechanism of acquired vemurafenib resistance in V600E BRAF+ve melanoma cells that involves increased activation of all three human MAPKs and the PI3K pathway, as well as increased NRAS expression, which, contrary to previous reports, was not associated with mutations in the NRAS gene. The data highlight the complexity of the acquired vemurafenib resistance phenotype and the challenge of optimizing BRAF-targeted therapy in this disease. They also suggest that targeting the MAPKs and/or NRAS may provide a strategy to mitigate such resistance in V600E BRAF+ve melanoma.     

Receptor tyrosine kinases in cancer escape from BRAF inhibitors

The BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) induce anti-tumor responses in nearly 60% of patients with advanced ^V600BRAF-mutant melanomas but only 5% of patients with ^V600BRAF-mutant colorectal carcinomas. Earlier studies of how a subset of melanoma that initially responds to BRAFi but later acquires drug resistance pointed to the importance of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) in drug escape. In a pair of recent reports, this RTK-mediated mechanism of acquired BRAFi resistance in melanoma is re-surfacing in the context of innate or primary BRAFi resistance in ^V600BRAF-mutant colorectal carcinomas, suggesting potential upfront therapeutic strategies to prevent BRAFi resistance.^V600BRAF mutations are found in >50% of melanomas, nearly 100% of hairy cell leukemias but smaller subsets of more common human malignancies (e.g., colorectal, thyroid)¹. The in-human “druggability” of mutant BRAF has been best demonstrated in metastatic BRAF mutant melanomas using the novel small-molecule BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) PLX4032/vemurafenib, producing survival benefits². Early clinical results of BRAFi in colorectal carcinoma, however, were disappointing, with only 5% of patients (1 of 21 patients) experiencing a partial response and 19% of patients (4 of 21 patients) experiencing minor responses³. This difference in the clinical results (melanoma vs. colorectal carcinoma) may relate less to their ontological origins but more to alternative states of a dynamic and plastic survival signaling network.The majority of BRAF mutant melanomas responds to BRAFi rapidly but acquires drug resistance within a median time of 6-7 months. The specific mechanisms of acquired BRAFi resistance are variegated but fall under two core pathways: 1) reactivation of RAF-MEK-ERK MAPK signaling, and 2) activation of MAPK-redundant signaling via the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK)-PI3K-AKT pathway, which is parallel but interconnected to the MAPK pathway. MAPK reactivation can occur via NRAS activating mutations⁴, COT overexpression⁵, ^V600BRAF alternative splicing⁶, ^V600BRAF amplification⁷, and MEK1 activating mutation^8,9. MAPK-redundant signaling via RTK overexpression has been shown to result in AKT activation and RAS-CRAF-MEK signaling, bypassing mutant BRAF^4,10,11. The repertoire of RTK overexpressed appears restricted but shares a common pattern of PDGFRβ and EGFR overexpression, at least in melanoma cell lines with acquired resistance to vemurafenib⁴. It is unclear at present how this overexpression of a select number of wild-type RTKs contributes to the molecular details of survival pathway redundancy and cooperativity. Nevertheless, understanding how melanomas acquire BRAFi resistance via core pathways may shed key insights into mechanisms of innate BRAFi resistance in multiple malignancies. Hence, it came as not a complete surprise that a pair of papers published recently implicated RTKs in innate BRAFi resistance in colorectal cancer cell lines^12,13. Both studies pointed to EGFR activation and downstream signaling as a key component to innate BRAFi resistance, at least in a majority of colorectal carcinoma (CRC) cell lines examined.Corcoran et al.¹² showed that BRAF mutant CRC cell lines, in contrast to BRAF mutant melanoma cell lines, displayed innate resistance to growth inhibition by vemurafenib. An important clue implicating RTK involvement in innate vemurafenib resistance of BRAF mutant CRC cell lines came from the observation that p-ERK recovery occurred soon (hours to days) after vemurafenib treatment, unlike the kinetics of p-ERK recovery in BRAF mutant melanoma cell lines. This relatively rapid recovery of p-ERK post vemurafenib treatment in CRC cell lines is akin to that in melanoma cell lines with acquired BRAFi resistance driven by RTK overexpresion¹⁰. Corcoran et al. then traced this propensity for early p-ERK recovery to vemurafenib treatment (24 h)-dependent enhancement of (activated) RAS-GTP levels and MEK activity, parallel to elevated RAS-GTP levels in melanoma cell lines with RTK-driven, acquired BRAFi resistance⁴. In phospho-RTK arrays, they determined that the p-EGFR level (among others such as p-c-MET and p-IGF1R levels) was elevated in CRC cell lines relative to those in melanoma cells. Vemurafenib treatment (24 h) did not significantly enhance the p-EGFR level (but did elevate the p-IGFR1 level). Elevated p-EGFR levels in BRAF mutant CRC cell lines were correlated with elevated total EGFR levels (i.e., overexpressed compared with BRAF mutant melanoma cell lines). Thus, several observations correlated with innate BRAFi resistance in CRC cell lines: RTK (mostly consistently EGFR) overexpression (at baseline); upregulation of activation-associated phosphorylation of RTKs (at baseline); and upregulation of RAS-GTP levels (in response to BRAFi treatment). Curiously, although EGFR is highly phosphorylated at baseline, the RAS-GTP levels only rose in response to vemurafenib treatment.Corcoran et al. further showed that small-molecule EGFR inhibitors (EGFRi) could downregulate, partially or completely, the RAS-GTP level induced by vemurafenib treatment. The combination of vemurafenib (BRAFi) and gefitnib (EGFRi) could synergistically reduce p-ERK levels and the net growth inhibition of most but not all CRC cell lines studied, suggesting that survival in some CRC cell lines may also depend on other RTKs and downstream signaling (e.g., AKT). Consistently, the combination of vemurafenib and erlotinib (EGFRi) stabilized the growth of, but did not cause significant regression of, CRC xenografts. Simultaneous inhibition or genetic knockdown of multiple RTKs was not explored, leaving unresolved the issue of how multiple RTKs may potentially play cooperative survival roles at baseline or in response to kinase inhibitor therapy.Prahallad et al.¹³ also compared CRC and melanoma cell lines and showed that EGFR expression is generally higher in CRC cell lines. Vemurafenib treatment (6 h) of the WiDr CRC cell line led to an induction in p-EGFR and p-AKT levels, concomitant with the expected suppression of p-MEK and p-ERK. MEK inhibition, by AZD6244 treatment, similarly led to the rebound phosphorylation of EGFR. Based on earlier literature showing that the ERK kinase phosphorylates Cdc25c, activating its phosphatase activity, and that Cdc25c can dephosphorylate EGFR, Prahallad et al. went on to show that Cdc25c knockdown mimicked vemurafenib treatment in inducing p-EGFR levels. As predicted, vemurafenib treatment of CRC cell line inhibited Cdc25c phosphorylation at a key threonine (Thr 48), which was previously demonstrated to be a key event for its phosphatase activity. Addition of an EGFRi (cetuximab or gefitnib) to the BRAFi vemurafenib treatment downregulated the baseline level of p-ERK and the BRAFi-induced p-AKT level (but not the baseline p-AKT level). Moreover, addition of an EGFRi sensitized CRC cell lines to growth inhibition by vemurafenib in vitro but did not induce tumor regression in vivo, again suggesting incomplete survival signaling blockade. Accordingly, it has been shown that the effect of vemurafenib in shrinking CRC tumor xenografts was enhanced by combining with an AKT inhibitor (MK-2206)¹⁴. Moreover, in this study, the addition of vemurafenib to erlotinib treatment also resulted in increased anti-tumor activity and improved survival in xenograft models. It should be pointed out that Prahallad et al. did not formally assess BRAFi and EGFRi synergy, nor did they examine the diversity of RTK overexpression/activity and its contribution to downstream survival signaling (e.g., AKT).These works, along with prior studies^4,10, highlight the importance of expression and activity level of RTKs as a key sensitivity determinant of BRAFi resistance in BRAF mutant cancer cell lines (Figure 1). An important question remains as to whether the diversity of RTK overexpression and/or upregulation participates in and contributes to the full BRAFi resistance phenotype. A recent study afforded us a systems-wide view of the RTKinome reprogramming in response to MEK inhibition in the so-called triple-negative breast cancer cell lines¹⁵. The balance of the MAPK vs. RTK network signaling may be dynamically influenced by kinase inhibitors targeting RAF or MEK. This daunting diversity of RTK expression/activity may corner us into abandoning a combination of RTK inhibitors (already approved for clinical usage) with a BRAF inhibitor. Instead, we might need to resort to downstream pathway inhibitors not yet approved for clinical usage (e.g., an inhibitor of MEK with an inhibitor of the PI3K-AKT-mTORC1/2 axis) before we have a chance to corner BRAF mutant cancers into death.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Upregulation of receptor tyrosine kinase(s) (RTKs) as a key sensitivity determinant of BRAFi resistance in BRAF mutant cancer cell lines. (A) In BRAF mutant melanoma cell lines, RTKs are generally expressed at very low levels and contribute minimally to survival signaling, resulting in a strong addiction to mutant BRAF signaling and sensitivity to BRAFi. When BRAF mutant melanoma cell lines acquire BRAFi resistance, they upregulate the expression and activity of PDGFRb and other RTKs, resulting in reactivation of MEK-ERK as well as MAPK-redundant PI3K-AKT survival signaling. (B) In BRAF mutant colorectal carcinoma (CRC) cell lines, EGFR and other RTKs are upregulated by overexpression and some level of activation, resulting in MAPK-redundant survival signaling and conferring innate or primary BRAFi resistance. Treatment of CRC cell lines wth a BRAF or a MEK inhibitor can further activate EGFR and potentially other RTKs and stimulate GTP-RAS levels, consolidating innate BRAFi resistance. Red denotes mutated protein (e.g., BRAF); gray symbols denote weak signaling or interactions; multiplicity of protein symbols denotes overexpression; P in blue denotes activation-associated phosphorylation.     

Long non‐coding RNA deleted in lymphocytic leukaemia 1 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression by sponging miR‐133a to regulate IGF‐1R expression

Long non‐coding RNA (lncRNA) deleted in lymphocytic leukaemia 1 (DLEU1) was reported to be involved in the occurrence and development of multiple cancers. However, the exact expression, biological function and underlying mechanism of DLEU1 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain unclear. In this study, real‐time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT‐PCR) in HCC tissues and cell lines revealed that DLEU1 expression was up‐regulated, and the increased DLEU1 was closely associated with advanced tumour‐node‐metastasis stage, vascular metastasis and poor overall survival. Function experiments showed that knockdown of DLEU1 significantly inhibited HCC cell proliferation, colony formation, migration and invasion, and suppressed epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) process via increasing the expression of E‐cadherin and decreasing the expression of N‐cadherin and Vimentin. Luciferase reporter gene assay and RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) assay demonstrated that DLEU1 could sponge miR‐133a. Moreover, miR‐133a inhibition significantly reversed the suppression effects of DLEU1 knockdown on HCC cells. Besides, we found that silenced DLEU1 significantly decreased insulin‐like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF‐1R) expression (a target of miR‐133a) and its downstream signal PI3K/AKT pathway in HCC cells, while miR‐133a inhibitor partially reversed this trend. Furthermore, DLEU1 knockdown impaired tumour growth in vivo by regulating miR‐133a/IGF‐1R axis. Collectively, these findings indicate that DLEU1 promoted HCC progression by sponging miR‐133a to regulate IGF‐1R expression. Deleted in lymphocytic leukaemia 1/miR‐133a/IGF‐1R axis may be a novel target for treatment of HCC.     

BRAFV600E Negatively Regulates the AKT Pathway in Melanoma Cell Lines

Cross-feedback activation of MAPK and AKT pathways is implicated as a resistance mechanism for cancer therapeutic agents targeting either RAF/MEK or PI3K/AKT/mTOR. It is thus important to have a better understanding of the molecular resistance mechanisms to improve patient survival benefit from these agents. Here we show that BRAFV600E is a negative regulator of the AKT pathway. Expression of BRAFV600E in NIH3T3 cells significantly suppresses MEK inhibitor (RG7167) or mTORC1 inhibitor (rapamycin) induced AKT phosphorylation (pAKT) and downstream signal activation. Treatment-induced pAKT elevation is found in BRAF wild type melanoma cells but not in a subset of melanoma cell lines harboring BRAFV600E. Knock-down of BRAFV600E in these melanoma cells elevates basal pAKT and downstream signals, whereas knock-down of CRAF, MEK1/2 or ERK1/2 or treatment with a BRAF inhibitor have no impact on pAKT. Mechanistically, we show that BRAFV600E interacts with rictor complex (mTORC2) and regulates pAKT through mTORC2. BRAFV600E is identified in mTORC2 after immunoprecipitation of rictor. Knock-down of rictor abrogates BRAFV600E depletion induced pAKT. Knock-down of BRAFV600E enhances cellular enzyme activity of mTORC2. Aberrant activation of AKT pathway by PTEN loss appears to override the negative impact of BRAFV600E on pAKT. Taken together, our findings suggest that in a subset of BRAFV600E melanoma cells, BRAFV600E negatively regulates AKT pathway in a rictor-dependent, MEK/ERK and BRAF kinase-independent manner. Our study reveals a novel molecular mechanism underlying the regulation of feedback loops between the MAPK and AKT pathways.     

MicroRNA‐351 eases insulin resistance and liver gluconeogenesis via the PI3K/AKT pathway by inhibiting FLOT2 in mice of gestational diabetes mellitus

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is known as different degree glucose intolerance that is initially identified during pregnancy. MicroRNAs (miRs) may be a potential candidate for treatment of GDM. Herein, we suggested that miR‐351 could be an inhibitor in the progression of GDM via the phosphoinositide 3‐kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K/AKT) pathway. Microarray analysis was used to identify differentially expressed genes and predict miRs regulating flotillin 2 (FLOT2). Target relationship between miR‐351 and FLOT2 was verified. Gestational diabetes mellitus mice were treated with a series of mimic, inhibitor and small interfering RNA to explore the effect of miR‐351 on insulin resistance (IR), cell apoptosis in pancreatic tissues and liver gluconeogenesis through evaluating GDM‐related biochemical indexes, as well as expression of miR‐351, FLOT2, PI3K/AKT pathway‐, IR‐ and liver gluconeogenesis‐related genes. MiR‐351 and FLOT2 were reported to be involved in GDM. FLOT2 was the target gene of miR‐351. Gestational diabetes mellitus mice exhibited IR and liver gluconeogenesis, up‐regulated FLOT2, activated PI3K/AKT pathway and down‐regulated miR‐351 in liver tissues. Additionally, miR‐351 overexpression and FLOT2 silencing decreased the levels of FLOT2, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase, glucose‐6‐phosphatase, fasting blood glucose, fasting insulin, total cholesterol, triglyceride, glyeosylated haemoglobin and homeostasis model of assessment for IR index (HOMA‐IR), extent of PI3K and AKT phosphorylation, yet increased the levels of HOMA for islet β‐cell function, HOMA for insulin sensitivity index and glucose transporter 2 expression, indicating reduced cell apoptosis in pancreatic tissues and alleviated IR and liver gluconeogenesis. Our results reveal that up‐regulation of miR‐351 protects against IR and liver gluconeogenesis by repressing the PI3K/AKT pathway through regulating FLOT2 in GDM mice, which identifies miR‐351 as a potential therapeutic target for the clinical management of GDM.     

PTEN regulates IGF‐1R‐mediated therapy resistance in melanoma

Inhibition of the mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway is a major advance in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. However, its therapeutic success is limited by the rapid emergence of drug resistance. The insulin‐like growth factor‐1 receptor (IGF‐1R) is overexpressed in melanomas developing resistance toward the BRAF^V600 inhibitor vemurafenib. Here, we show that hyperactivation of BRAF enhances IGF‐1R expression. In addition, the phosphatase activity of PTEN as well as heterocellular contact to stromal cells increases IGF‐1R expression in melanoma cells and enhances resistance to vemurafenib. Interestingly, PTEN‐negative melanoma cells escape IGF‐1R blockade by decreased expression of the receptor, implicating that only in melanoma patients with PTEN‐positive tumors treatment with IGF‐1R inhibitors would be a suitable strategy to combat therapy resistance. Our data emphasize the crosstalk and therapeutic relevance of microenvironmental and tumor cell‐autonomous mechanisms in regulating IGF‐1R expression and by this sensitivity toward targeted therapies.     

Secondary c‐Kit mutations confer acquired resistance to RTK inhibitors in c‐Kit mutant melanoma cells

Activation of the c‐Kit receptor tyrosine kinase is rare in melanoma, but occurs in 20‐40% of melanoma arising on mucosal membranes, acral skin and skin with chronic sun‐induced damage. Many activating c‐Kit mutations have been shown to be highly sensitive to imatinib mesylate, although the majority of patients with c‐Kit mutant melanoma eventually progress on this inhibitor. We examined acquired resistance to imatinib and the newer generation inhibitor nilotinib in resistant c‐kit mutant melanoma sublines. Four imatinib‐resistant and six nilotinib‐resistant sublines had acquired additional, secondary c‐Kit mutations. The secondary A829P c‐Kit mutation rendered cells resistant to imatinib, but did not suppress the activity of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors nilotinib and dasatinib. Sublines with an additional T670I c‐Kit mutation showed resistance to imatinib, nilotinib and dasatinib, but responded to sunitinib. The concurrent inhibition of the MAPK and PI3K pathways was also effective at promoting apoptosis in the parent and derived resistant sublines. Our data provide a rationale for treating patients with melanoma progressing on imatinib or nilotinib with alternative RTK inhibitors or inhibitors targeting the MAPK and PI3K signalling cascades.     

microRNA‐1914, which is regulated by lncRNA DUXAP10, inhibits cell proliferation by targeting the GPR39‐mediated PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in HCC

Increasing studies have confirmed that abnormally expressed microRNAs (miRNAs) take part in the carcinogenesis as well as the aggravation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, little information is currently available about miR‐1914 in HCC. Here, we first confirmed that miR‐1914 inhibition in HCC cell lines and tumour specimens correlates with tumour size and histological grade. In a series of functional experiments, miR‐1914 inhibited tumour proliferation and colony formation, resulting in cell cycle arrest and increased apoptosis. Moreover, miR‐1914 mediated its functional effects by directly targeting GPR39 in HCC cells, leading to PI3K/AKT/mTOR repression. Restoring GPR39 expression incompletely counteracted the physiological roles of miR‐1914 in HCC cells. In addition, down‐regulation of AKT phosphorylation inhibited the effects of miR‐1914 in HCC. Furthermore, the overexpression of lncRNA DUXAP10 negatively correlated with the expression of miR‐1914 in HCC; thus, lncRNA DUXAP10 regulated miR‐1914 expression and modulated the GPR39/PI3K/AKT‐mediated cellular behaviours. In summary, the present study demonstrated for the first time that lncRNA DUXAP10–regulated miR‐1914 plays a functional role in inhibiting HCC progression by targeting GPR39‐mediated PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, and this miRNA represents a novel therapeutic target for patients with HCC.