Ordered water structure around a B-DNA dodecamer: A quantitative study

The crystal structure of the double-helical B-DNA dodecamer of sequence C-G-C-G-A-A-T-T-C-G-C-G has been solved and refined independently in three forms: (1) the parent sequence at room temperature; (2) the same sequence at 16 K; and (3) the 9-bromo variant C-G-C-G-A-A-T-T^BrC-G-C-G at 7 °C in 60% (v/v) 2-methyl-2.4-pentanediol. The latter two structures show extensive hydration along the phosphate backbone, a feature that was invisible in the native structure because of high temperature factors (indicating thermal or static disorder) of the backbone atoms. Sixty-five solvent peaks are associated with the phosphate backbone, or an average of three per phosphate group. Nineteen other molecules form a first shell of hydration to base edge N and O atoms within the major groove, and 36 more are found in upper hydration layers. The latter tend to occur in strings or clusters spanning the major groove from one phosphate group to another. A single spermine molecule also spans the major groove. In the minor groove, the zig-zag spine of hydration that we believe to be principally responsible for stabilizing the B form of DNA is found in all three structures. Upper level hydration in the minor groove is relatively sparse, and consists mainly of strings of water molecules extending across the groove, with few contacts to the spine below. Sugar O-1′ atoms are closely associated with water molecules, but these are chiefly molecules in the spine, so the association may reflect the geometry of the minor groove rather than any intrinsic attraction of O-1′ atoms for hydration. The phosphate O-3′ and O-5′ atoms within the backbone chain are least hydrated of all, although no physical or steric impediment seems to exist that would deny access to these oxygen atoms by water molecules.     

Solvent-accessible surfaces of nucleic acids

Static solvent-accessible surface areas were calculated for DNA and RNA double helices of varied conformation, composition and sequence, for the single helix of poly(rC), and for a transfer RNA. The results show that for DNA and RNA double helices, two thirds of the water-accessible surface area become buried on double helix formation; phosphate oxygens retain near maximal exposure while the bases are 80% buried. Transfer RNA exposes slightly less surface per residue than does double-helical RNA, despite the presence of several additional “modified” groups, all of which are exposed significantly.When a probe corresponding to a single water molecule is used, both the total and atom type exposures are very similar for A-DNA and B-DNA, although marked differences appear in the major and minor groove exposures between the two conformations. For a given base-pair, the accessible surface area buried upon double-helical stacking is nearly constant (within 5%) for different sequences of neighboring base-pairs.For probes larger than single water molecules, there exist considerable differences in the total and atom type exposures of A-DNA and B-DNA. Conformational transitions between the A-DNA and B-DNA helical forms can thus be related to differences in the accessible areas for “structured” water, or a secondary hydration shell, rather than to interactions with individual water molecules of the primary hydration shell. The base-composition dependence of DNA helical conformation can be explained in terms of the opposing effects of thymine methyl groups of A · T base-pairs and the amino groups of G · C base-pairs upon the solvent within the grooves.The area calculations show that primarily the major groove of B-DNA and the minor groove of A-DNA have sufficient accessible surface area to be recognized by a probe size corresponding to the side-chains of amino acids.     

Structure of the B-DNA decamer C-C-A-A-C-G-T-T-G-G and comparison with isomorphous decamers C-C-A-A-G-A-T-T-G-G and C-C-A-G-G-C-C-T-G-G

The crystal structure of the DNA decamer C-C-A-A-C-G-T-T-G-G has been solved to a resolution of 1.4 A, and is compared with the 1.3 A structure of C-C-A-A-G-A-T-T-G-G and the 1.6 A structure of C-C-A-G-G-C-C-T-G-G. All three decamers crystallize isomorphously in space group C2 with five base-pairs per asymmetric unit, and with decamer double helices stacked atop one another along the c axis in a manner that closely approximates a continuous B helix. This efficient stacking probably accounts for the high resolution of the crystal data. Comparison of the three decamers reveals the following. (1) Minor groove width is more variable than heretofore realized. Regions of A.T base-pairs tend to be narrower than average, although two successive A.T base-pairs alone may not be sufficient to produce narrowing. The minor groove is wider in regions where BII phosphate conformations are opposed diagonally across the groove. (2) Narrow regions of minor groove exhibit a zig-zag spine of hydration, as was first seen in C-G-C-G-A-A-T-T-C-G-C-G, whereas wide regions show two ribbons of water molecules down the walls, connecting base edge N or O with sugar O-4' atoms. Regions of intermediate groove width may accommodate neither pattern of hydration well, and may exhibit a less regular pattern of hydration. (3) Base-pair stacking is virtually identical at equivalent positions in the three decamers. The unconnected step from the top of one decamer helix to the bottom of the next helix is a normal helix step in all respects, except for the absence of connecting phosphate groups. (4) BII phosphate conformation require the unstacking of the two bases linked by the phosphate, but do not necessarily follow as an inevitable consequence of unstacking. They have an influence on minor groove width as noted in point (1) above. (5) Sugar ring pseudorotation P and main-chain torsion angle delta show an excellent correlation as given by the equation: delta = 40 degrees cos (P + 144 degrees) + 120 degrees. Although centered around C-2'-endo, the conformations in these B-DNA helices are distributed broadly from C-3'-exo to O-4'-endo, unlike the tighter clustering around C-3'-endo observed in A-DNA oligomer structures.     

Binding of Hoechst 33258 to the minor groove of B-DNA

An X-ray crystallographic structure analysis has been carried out on the complex between the antibiotic and DNA fluorochrome Hoechst 33258 and a synthetic B-DNA dodecamer of sequence C-G-C-G-A-A-T-T-C-G-C-G. The drug molecule, which can be schematized as: phenol-benzimidazole-benzimidazole-piperazine, sits within the minor groove in the A-T-T-C region of the DNA double helix, displacing the spine of hydration that is found in drug-free DNA. The NH groups of the benzimidazoles make bridging three-center hydrogen bonds between adenine N-3 and thymine O-2 atoms on the edges of base-pairs, in a manner both mimicking the spine of hydration and calling to mind the binding of the auti-tumor drug netropsin. Two conformers of Hoechst are seen in roughly equal populations, related by 180 degrees rotation about the central benzimidazole-benzimidazole bond: one form in which the piperazine ring extends out from the surface of the double helix, and another in which it is buried deep within the minor groove. Steric clash between the drug and DNA dictates that the phenol-benzimidazole-benzimidazole portion of Hoechst 33258 binds only to A.T regions of DNA, whereas the piperazine ring demands the wider groove characteristic of G.C regions. Hence, the piperazine ring suggests a possible G.C-reading element for synthetic DNA sequence-reading drug analogs.     

Binding of an antitumor drug to DNA, Netropsin and C-G-C-G-A-A-T-T-BrC-G-C-G

The antitumor antibiotic netropsin has been co-crystallized with a double-helical B-DNA dodecanucleotide of sequence: C-G-C-G-A-A-T-T-BrC-G-C-G, and the structure of the complex has been solved by X-ray diffraction at a resolution of 2.2 A. The structure has been refined independently by Jack-Levitt and Hendrickson-Konnert least-squares methods, leading to a final residual error of 0.257 by the Jack-Levitt approach (0.211 for two-sigma data) or 0.248 by the Hendrickson-Konnert approach, with no significant difference between refined structures. The netropsin molecule displaces the spine of hydration and fits snugly within the minor groove in the A-A-T-T center. It widens the groove slightly and bends the helix axis back by 8 degrees, but neither unwinds nor elongates the double helix. The drug molecule is held in place by amide NH hydrogen bonds that bridge adenine N-3 and thymine O-2 atoms, exactly as with the spine of hydration. The requirement of A X T base-pairs in the binding site arises because the N-2 amino group of guanine would demand impermissibly close contacts with netropsin. It is proposed that substitution of imidazole for pyrrole in netropsin should create a family of "lexitropsins" capable of reading G X C-containing base sequences.     

DNA curvature does not require bifurcated hydrogen bonds or pyrimidine methyl groups.

Short tracts of the homopolymer dA.dT confer intrinsic curvature on the axis of the DNA double helix. This phenomenon is assumed to be a consequence of such tracts adopting a stable B'-DNA conformation that is distinct from B-form structure normally assumed by other DNA sequences. The more stable B' structure of dA.dT tracts has been attributed to several possible stabilizing factors: (1) optimal base stacking interactions consequent upon the high propeller twist, (2) bifurcated hydrogen bonds between adjacent dA.dT base-pairs, (3) stacking interactions involving the dT methyl groups, and finally (4) a putative spine of ordered water molecules in the minor groove. DNA oligodeoxynucleotides have been synthesized that enable these hypotheses to be tested; of particular interest is the combination of effects due to bifurcation (2) and methylation of the pyrimidines nucleotides (3). The data indicate that neither bifurcated hydrogen bonds nor pyrimidine methyl groups nor both are essential for DNA curvature. The data further suggest that the influence of the minor groove spine of hydration on the B'-formation is small. The experiments favor the hypothesis that base stacking interactions are the dominant force in stabilizing the B'-form structure.     

Exocyclic groups in the minor groove influence the backbone conformation of DNA

Exocyclic groups in the minor groove of DNA modulate the affinity and positioning of nucleic acids to the histone protein. The addition of exocyclic groups decreases the formation of this protein–DNA complex, while their removal increases nucleosome formation. On the other hand, recent theoretical results show a strong correlation between the B_I/B_II phosphate backbone conformation and the hydration of the grooves of the DNA. We performed a simulation of the d(CGCGAATTCGCG)₂ Drew Dickerson dodecamer and one simulation of the d(CGCIAATTCGCG)₂ dodecamer in order to investigate the influence of the exocyclic amino group of guanine. The removal of the amino group introduces a higher intrinsic flexibility to DNA supporting the suggestions that make the enhanced flexibility responsible for the enlarged histone complexation affinity. This effect is attributed to changes in the destacking interactions of both strands of the DNA. The differences in the hydration of the minor groove could be the explanation of this flexibility. The changed hydration of the minor groove also leads to a different B_I/B_II substate pattern. Due to the fact that the histone preferentially builds contacts with the backbone of the DNA, we propose an influence of these B_I/B_II changes on the nucleosome formation process. Thus, we provide an additional explanation for the enhanced affinity to the histone due to removal of exocyclic groups. In terms of B_I/B_II we are also able to explain how minor groove binding ligands could affect the nucleosome assembly without disrupting the structure of DNA.     

Solvation of the left-handed hexamer d(5BrC-G-5BrC-G-5 BrC-G) in crystals grown at two temperatures

Crystals of the hexadeoxyoligomer d(5BrC-G-5BrC-G-5BrC-G) were grown at different temperatures (5 degrees C, 18 degrees C and 37 degrees C) in the absence of divalent cations. The crystals grown at 5 degrees C did not diffract X-rays, while those grown at 18 degrees C and 37 degrees C did. The oligomer adopts the left-handed ZI conformation in both crystals. The main difference resides in a more extensive hydration shell in the crystal grown at high temperature than in the crystal grown at low temperature. The high-temperature crystal displays a spine of hydration running deep in the minor groove and linking exocyclic O-2 atoms of the pyrimidine rings. In both crystalline forms, a hydrated sodium ion bound to the N-7 of a guanine ring was found. Strings of water molecules bridging phosphate anionic oxygen atoms are found along the backbone. The absolute values of the propeller-twist are also different in both structures although the values of the twist are very similar. The results point to the importance of the crystallization conditions when analysing fine structural details like solvation properties of oligomers.     

Monte-Carlo Simulation of DNA Duplex Hydration. B and B′ Conformations of Poly(dA) · Poly(dT) Have Different Hydration Shells

Abstract

Monte-Carlo simulation of poly(dA) · poly(dT) hydration by 30 water molecules per nucleotide pair has been performed. Two B-family conformations, both with a 36° helical twist but with different minor groove widths, were considered. One conformation is Arnott's standard B form, the other one is specific for poly(dA) · poly(dT) B′ form with a narrowed minor groove. The mean energies and the mean numbers of water-water and water-DNA hydrogen bonds are close for the two conformations. Nevertheless, the hydration shell of the B' form differs drastically from that of the standard B form. The water arrangement in the minor groove of the B′ form resembles the spine of hydration in the central part of Dickerson's dodecamer d(CGCGAATTCGCG). No such spine is formed in the hydration shell of the usual B form with a wider minor groove. In this conformation water bridges between adenine N3 or thymine O2 and oxygen of the sugar ring of the neighbouring nucleotide along the chain can be formed (“strings” in Dickerson's decamer d(CCAAGATTGG)).     

Differences in melting behavior between homopolymers and copolymers of DNA: Role of nonbonded forces for GC and the role of the hydration spine and premelting transition for AT

Melting measurements of the mono-base-pair DNA polymers showed that the melting temperature T_m of the B-DNA homopolymer poly (dA ) · poly (dT) is higher than that of the copolymer poly [d(A-T)]. On the other hand, the T_mof the B-DNA homopolymer poly (dG) · poly (dC) is lower than that of the copolymer poly [d (G-C)]. From a structural point of view, the cross-strand base-stacking interaction in a DNA homopolymer is weaker than that in a DNA copolymer with the same base pair. One would then expect that all the DNA homopolymers are less stable than the copolymer with the same base pair. We find that the inversion of the melting order seen in the AT mono-base-pair DNA polymers is caused by the enhanced thermal stability of poly (dA) · poly (dT) from a well-defined spine of hydration attached to its minor groove. In this paper we employ the modified self-consistent phonon theory to calculate base-pair opening probabilities of four B-DNA polymers: poly(dA)-poly(dT), poly(dG) · poly(dC), poly[d(A-T)], and poly[d(G-C)] at temperatures from room temperature through the melting regions. Our calculations show that the spine of hydration can give the inverted melting order of the AT polymers as compared to the GC polymers in fair agreement with experimental measurements. Our calculated hydration spine disruption behavior in poly(dA) · poly(dT) at premelting temperatures is also in agreement with experimentally observed premelting transitions in poly (dA) · poly (dT). The work is in a sense a test of the validity of our models of nonbonded interactions and spine of hydration interactions. We find we have to develop the concept of a strained bond to fit observations in poly (dA) · poly(dT). The strained-bond concept also explains the otherwise anomalous stability of the hydration chain. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Helix geometry and hydration in an A-DNA tetramer: IC-C-G-G

The DNA oligomer of sequence IC-C-G-G has been synthesized, and its X-ray crystal structure solved at a resolution of 2.0 A, using anomalous scattering from iodines in phase analysis: 48 cycles of Jack-Levitt restrained least-squares refinement resulted in a residual error of 19.9% over all data, or 16.5% for two-sigma data. Two double-helical tetramers stack in the crystal to form a continuous octamer, except for the two missing phosphate connections across the center. The octamer has a mean helix rotation of 33.7 degrees (10.7 base-pairs per turn), rise of 2.87 A, mean inclination angle of base-pairs of 14 degrees, and mean base-pair propeller twist of +16.3 degrees. Local variations in both helix rotation and base plane roll angles, including those across the center of the octamer, are as predicted from base sequence by sum functions sigma 1 and sigma 2. The three known DNA octamers: IC-C-G-G/IC-C-G-G, G-G-T-A-T-A-C-C and G-G-C-C-G-G-C-C, make up a graded series in this order, with monotonically changing structural parameters. An exhaustive comparison of torsion angle correlations among the known A helices confirms some structural expectations and reveals some new features. 86 water molecules have been located per double-helical IC-C-G-G tetramer (the asymmetric unit), of which 451/2 per tetramer lie within a first hydrogen-bonded shell of hydration. No ordered water structure is observed comparable to the minor groove spine of hydration in B-DNA.     

Bh-DNA: Variations of the Poly[d(A)] · Poly[d(T)] Structure within the Framework of the Fibre Diffraction Studies

Abstract

A refinement of the recent results for poly[d(A)] · poly[d(T)] (Alexeev et al., J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 4, 989 (1987)) involving additional parameters of the base-pair structure and of the sugar- phosphate backbone expands the conformational potential of this polynucleotide of the B type to include the possibility of bifurcated hydrogen bonds of the kind recently discovered in crystalline deoxyoligonucleotide with lone d(A)_n · d(T)_n stretch (Nelson et al., Nature 330, 221 (1987)).

Still, analysis of the available data and energy calculations do not seem to indicate that the bifurcated H-bonds are a crucial factor responsible for the anomalous structure of the d(A)_n · d(T)_n sequence. The unique structural properties of poly [d(A)] · poly[d(T)] can hardly be explained without taking into account its interactions with the double-layer hydration spine in the minor groove. In view of the hydration mechanism stabilizing poly [d(A)] · poly [d(T)] and of the polynucleotide's heteronomous prehistory (Arnott et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 11, 4141 (1983)) we suggest that this B-type structure be called B_h.     

Life: Self-Directing with Unlimited Variability on Self-Speeding

Abstract

The crystal structure of the deoxyoctamer d(G-G-^Br U-A-^BrU-A-C-C) was refined to a resolution of 1.7Å using combined diffractometer and synchrotron data. The analysis was carried out independently in two laboratories using different procedures. Although the final results are identical the comparison of the two approaches highlights potential problems in the refinement of oligonucleotides when only limited data are available.

As part of the analysis the positions of 84 solvent molecules in the asymmetric unit were established. The DNA molecule is highly solvated, particularly the phosphate-sugar backbone and the functional groups of the bases. The major groove contains, in the central ^BrU-A-^BrU-A region, a ribbon of water molecules forming closed pentagons with shared edges. These water molecules are linked to the base O and N atoms and to the solvent chains connecting the O-1 phosphate oxygen atoms on each strand. The minor groove is also extensively hydrated with a continuous network in the central region and other networks at each end. The pattern of hydration is briefly compared with that observed in the crystal structure of a B-dodecamer.     

1 A crystal structures of B-DNA reveal sequence-specific binding and groove-specific bending of DNA by magnesium and calcium

The 1 A resolution X-ray crystal structures of Mg(2+) and Ca(2+) salts of the B-DNA decamers CCAACGTTGG and CCAGCGCTGG reveal sequence-specific binding of Mg(2+) and Ca(2+) to the major and minor grooves of DNA, as well as non-specific binding to backbone phosphate oxygen atoms. Minor groove binding involves H-bond interactions between cross-strand DNA base atoms of adjacent base-pairs and the cations' water ligands. In the major groove the cations' water ligands can interact through H-bonds with O and N atoms from either one base or adjacent bases, and in addition the softer Ca(2+) can form polar covalent bonds bridging adjacent N7 and O6 atoms at GG bases. For reasons outlined earlier, localized monovalent cations are neither expected nor found.Ultra-high atomic resolution gives an unprecedented view of hydration in both grooves of DNA, permits an analysis of individual anisotropic displacement parameters, and reveals up to 22 divalent cations per DNA duplex. Each DNA helix is quite anisotropic, and alternate conformations, with motion in the direction of opening and closing the minor groove, are observed for the sugar-phosphate backbone. Taking into consideration the variability of experimental parameters and crystal packing environments among these four helices, and 24 other Mg(2+) and Ca(2+) bound B-DNA structures, we conclude that sequence-specific and strand-specific binding of Mg(2+) and Ca(2+) to the major groove causes DNA bending by base-roll compression towards the major groove, while sequence-specific binding of Mg(2+) and Ca(2+) in the minor groove has a negligible effect on helix curvature. The minor groove opens and closes to accommodate Mg(2+) and Ca(2+) without the necessity for significant bending of the overall helix.The program Shelxdna was written to facilitate refinement and analysis of X-ray crystal structures by Shelxl-97 and to plot and analyze one or more Curves and Freehelix output files.     

Water and ion binding around r(UpA)12 and d(TpA)12 oligomers--comparison with RNA and DNA (CpG)12 duplexes

The structural and dynamic properties of the water and ion first coordination shell of the r(A-U) and d(A-T) base-pairs embedded within the r(UpA)12 and d(TpA)12 duplexes are described on the basis of two 2.4 ns molecular dynamics simulations performed in a neutralizing aqueous environment with 0.25 M added KCl. The results are compared to previous molecular dynamics simulations of the r(CpG)12 and d(CpG)12 structures performed under similar conditions. It can be concluded that: (i) RNA helices are more rigid than DNA helices of identical sequence, as reflected by the fact that RNA duplexes keep their initial A-form shape while DNA duplexes adopt more sequence-specific shapes. (ii) Around these base-pairs, the water molecules occupy 21 to 22 well-defined hydration sites, some of which are partially occupied by potassium ions. (iii) These hydration sites are occupied by an average of 21.9, 21.0, 20.1, and 19.8 solvent molecules (water and ions) around the r(G=C), r(A-U), d(G=C), and d(A-T) pairs, respectively. (iv) From a dynamic point of view, the stability of the hydration shell is the strongest for the r(G=C) pairs and the weakest for the d(A-T) pairs. (v) For RNA, the observed long-lived hydration patterns are essentially non-sequence dependent and involve water bridges located in the deep groove and linking OR atoms of adjacent phosphate groups. Maximum lifetimes are close to 400 ps. (vi) In contrast, for DNA, long-lived hydration patterns are sequence dependent and located in the minor groove. For d(CpG)12, water bridges linking the (G)N3 and (C)O2 with the O4' atoms of adjacent nucleotides with 400 ps maximum lifetimes are characterized while no such bridges are observed for d(TpA)12. (vii) Potassium ions are observed to bind preferentially to deep/major groove atoms at RpY steps, essentially d(GpC), r(GpC), and r(ApU), by forming ion-bridges between electronegative atoms of adjacent base-pairs. On average, about half an ion is observed per base-pair. Positive ion-binding determinants are related to the proximity of two or more electronegative atoms. Negative binding determinants are associated with the electrostatic and steric hindrance due to the proximity of electropositive amino groups and neutral methyl groups. Potassium ions form only transient contacts with phosphate groups.     

What drives proteins into the major or minor grooves of DNA?

The energetic profiles of a significant number of protein-DNA systems at 20 °C reveal that, despite comparable Gibbs free energies, association with the major groove is primarily an enthalpy-driven process, whereas binding to the minor groove is characterized by an unfavorable enthalpy that is compensated by favorable entropic contributions. These distinct energetic signatures for major versus minor groove binding are irrespective of the magnitude of DNA bending and/or the extent of binding-induced protein refolding. The primary determinants of their different energetic profiles appear to be the distinct hydration properties of the major and minor grooves; namely, that the water in the A+T-rich minor groove is in a highly ordered state and its removal results in a substantial positive contribution to the binding entropy. Since the entropic forces driving protein binding into the minor groove are a consequence of displacing water ordered by the regular arrangement of polar contacts, they cannot be regarded as hydrophobic.     

DNA B to D transition can be explained in terms of hydration economy of the minor groove atoms

Adjacent phosphate oxygen atoms in A and Z-DNA are located much closer together than in the B form and can be hydrated more economically due to the formation of water bridges between them, whereas in the B form phosphates are hydrated individually. This principle of hydration economy of phosphate groups discovered by Saenger and colleagues could not be applied to the B-D transition, which, like the B-A and B-Z transitions, occurs in a situation of water deficiency, because the distances between adjacent phosphates of individual polynucleotide chains in the D form are not much different from B-DNA. It follows from our calculations of B and D-DNA accessibility to solvent performed by the method of Lee & Richards, and from a simulation of solvent structure near DNA, that there is an economy of hydration only for the minor groove atoms. This feature and some experimental data can explain why only a limited range of sequences consisting of A.T or I.C pairs undergo the transition to the D form. The conformational transition in DNAs with such sequences to a poly[d(A]).poly[d(T])-like conformation (Bh-DNA), which is accompanied by a narrowing of the minor groove, can be explained in the same way. Calculations suggest that in the D-form minor groove of different A-T or I-C DNAs there is a double-layer hydration spine similar to that observed by Drew & Dickerson in the A-T tract of the d(C-G-C-G-A-A-T-T-C-G-C-G) dodecamer. The B-D and B-Bh transitions in A + T-rich DNAs can have biological implications, e.g. they can facilitate DNA bending upon the interaction with proteins.     

Amide protein exchange and surface conformation of the basic pancreatic trypsin inhibitor in solution. Studies with two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance

Dickerson and his colleagues have described the structure of the DNA dodecamer C-G-C-G-A-A-T-T-C-G-C-G in the B form at a level that shows clearly several aspects of some base sequence-dependent departures from the ideal, regular helical structure of B-DNA. I argue that the detailed conformation is a consequence of simple steric repulsive forces between purine bases in consecutive base-pairs but on opposite backbones. These repulsions are a consequence of the “propeller twist” of the base-pairs, together with the larger size of the purine bases, and they may occur in either the major or the minor groove. The argument is conducted in terms of the structural mechanics of a deformable elastic system. These repulsive forces between the base-pairs are resisted by stresses in the helical backbones, which may be studied quantitatively via the variation in torsion angles δ along the backbones, at the points where the sugar rings are connected. There is also a correlation between the cross-chain purine repulsions and the perturbations in helical twist angle between successive base-pairs. The work suggests some comments on the proposed “alternating B” form, the Z form and the A form of DNA.     

Atomic-resolution crystal structures of B-DNA reveal specific influences of divalent metal ions on conformation and packing.

Crystal structures of B-form DNA have provided insights into the global and local conformational properties of the double helix, the solvent environment, drug binding and DNA packing. For example, structures of the duplex with sequence CGCGAATTCGCG, the Dickerson-Drew dodecamer (DDD), established a unique geometry of the central A-tract and a hydration spine in the minor groove. However, our knowledge of the various interaction modes between metal ions and DNA is very limited and almost no information exists concerning the origins of the different effects on DNA conformation and packing exerted by individual metal ions.Crystallization of the DDD duplex in the presence of Mg(2+)and Ca(2+)yields different crystal forms. The structures of the new Ca(2+)-form and isomorphous structures of oligonucleotides with sequences GGCGAATTCGCG and GCGAATTCGCG were determined at a maximum resolution of 1.3 A. These and the 1.1 A structure of the DDD Mg(2+)-form have revealed the most detailed picture yet of the ionic environment of B-DNA. In the Mg(2+)and Ca(2+)-forms, duplexes in the crystal lattice are surrounded by 13 magnesium and 11 calcium ions, respectively.Mg(2+)and Ca(2+)generate different DNA crystal lattices and stabilize different end-to-end overlaps and lateral contacts between duplexes, thus using different strategies for reducing the effective repeat length of the helix to ten base-pairs. Mg(2+)crystals allow the two outermost base-pairs at either end to interact laterally via minor groove H-bonds, turning the 12-mer into an effective 10-mer. Ca(2+)crystals, in contrast, unpair the outermost base-pair at each end, converting the helix into a 10-mer that can stack along its axis. This reduction of a 12-mer into a functional 10-mer is followed no matter what the detailed nature of the 5'-end of the chain: C-G-C-G-A-ellipsis, G-G-C-G-A-ellipsis, or a truncated G-C-G-A-ellipsis Rather than merely mediating close contacts between phosphate groups, ions are at the origin of many well-known features of the DDD duplex structure. A Mg(2+)coordinates in the major groove, contributing to kinking of the duplex at one end. While Ca(2+)resides in the minor groove, coordinating to bases via its hydration shell, two magnesium ions are located at the periphery of the minor groove, bridging phosphate groups from opposite strands and contracting the groove at one border of the A-tract.