Heparan sulphate proteoglycans are involved in the lipoprotein lipase-mediated enhancement of the cellular binding of very low density and low density lipoproteins.

We found that LPL enhances the binding to HepG2 cells and fibroblasts of both VLDL and apoE free LDL. In the presence of 1.7 micrograms/ml of purified bovine LPL, the binding of LDL and VLDL was up to 60 fold increased as compared to the control binding. In addition, LPL enhances the binding in LDL-receptor negative fibroblasts to the same extent as it does in normal fibroblasts. The presence of 10 mM of EGTA could not prevent the LPL-mediated enhancement of the binding of both LDL and VLDL to fibroblasts, indicating that the binding is calcium independent. Furthermore, up- and down regulation of the LDL receptor did not influence the binding of these lipoproteins in the presence of LPL. Strikingly, we found that the enhancing effect of LPL on the binding of LDL and VLDL to HepG2 cells could be abolished by preincubation of the cells with heparinase, suggesting that heparan sulphate proteoglycans are involved in the LPL-mediated stimulation. We hypothesize that the enhancement of the cellular binding of LDL and VLDL in the presence of LPL is caused by an LPL-bridging between proteoglycans present on the plasma membrane and the lipoproteins, and that the LDL receptor and LRP are not involved.     

Low density lipoprotein uptake: holoparticle and cholesteryl ester selective uptake.

Low density lipoproteins (LDL) contain apolipoprotein B-100 and are cholesteryl ester-rich, triglyceride-poor macromolecules, arising from the lipolysis of very low density lipoproteins. This review will describe the receptors responsible for uptake of whole LDL particles (holoparticle uptake), and the selective uptake of LDL cholesteryl ester. The LDL-receptor mediates the internalization of whole LDL through an endosomal-lysosomal pathway, leading to complete degradation of LDL. Increasing LDL-receptor expression by pharmacological intervention efficiently reduces blood LDL concentrations. The lipolysis stimulated receptor and LDL-receptor related protein may also lead to complete degradation of LDL in presence of free fatty acids and apolipoprotein E- or lipase-LDL complexes, respectively. Selective uptake of LDL cholesteryl ester has been demonstrated in the liver, especially in rodents and humans. This activity brings five times more LDL cholesteryl ester than the LDL-receptor to human hepatoma cells, suggesting that it is a physiologically significant pathway. The lipoprotein binding site of HepG2 cells mediates this process and recognizes all lipoprotein classes. Scavenger receptor class B type I and CD36, which mediate the selective uptake of high density lipoprotein cholesteryl ester, are potentially involved in LDL cholesteryl ester selective uptake, since they both bind LDL with high affinity. It is not known whether they are identical to the uncloned lipoprotein binding site and if the selective uptake of LDL cholesteryl ester produces a less atherogenic particle. If this is verified, pharmacological up-regulation of LDL cholesteryl ester selective uptake may become another therapeutic approach for reducing blood LDL-cholesterol levels and the risk of atherosclerosis.     

Role of low density lipoprotein receptor-dependent and -independent sites in binding and uptake of chylomicron remnants in rat liver

The role of the low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor in the binding of chylomicron remnants to liver membranes and in their uptake by hepatocytes was assessed using a monospecific polyclonal antibody to the LDL receptor of the rat liver. The anti-LDL receptor antibody inhibited the binding and uptake of chylomicron remnants and LDL by the poorly differentiated rat hepatoma cell HTC 7288C as completely as did unlabeled lipoproteins. The antireceptor antibody, however, decreased binding of chylomicron remnants to liver membranes from normal rats by only about 10%. This was true for intact membranes and for solubilized reconstituted membranes and with both a crude membrane fraction as well as with purified sinusoidal membranes. Further, complete removal of the LDL receptor from solubilized membranes by immunoprecipitation with antireceptor antibody only decreased remnant binding to the reconstituted supernatant by 10% compared to solubilized, nonimmunoprecipitated membranes. Treatment of rats with ethinyl estradiol induced an increase in remnant binding by liver membranes. All of the increased binding could be inhibited by the antireceptor antibody. The LDL receptor-independent remnant binding site was not EDTA sensitive and was not affected by ethinyl estradiol treatment. LDL receptor-independent remnant binding was competed for by beta-VLDL = HDLc greater than rat LDL greater than human LDL (where VLDL is very low density lipoprotein, and HDL is high density lipoprotein). There was weak and incomplete competition by apoE-free HDL, probably due to removal of apoE from the remnant. The LDL receptor-independent remnant-binding site was also present in membranes prepared from isolated hepatocytes and had the same characteristics as the site on membranes prepared from whole liver. In contrast, when chylomicron remnants were incubated with a primary culture of rat hepatocytes, the anti-LDL receptor antibody prevented specific cell association by 84% and degradation of chylomicron remnants completely. Based on these studies, we conclude that although binding of chylomicron remnants to liver cell membranes is not dependent on the LDL receptor, their intact uptake by hepatocytes is.     

Purification and characterization of two high-density-lipoprotein-binding proteins from rat and human liver.

Newly absorbed retinol is transported in association with chylomicrons and their remnants. In addition, after intake of high doses of retinol, significant amounts are also found in low-density lipoprotein (LDL). As both chylomicron remnants and LDL may be taken up by cells via the LDL receptor, and retinoids inhibit proliferation of some leukaemic cells, we have studied the uptake of retinol in leukaemic cells via the LDL-receptor pathway. HL-60 cells contain saturable binding sites for LDL. The binding of LDL to its receptor has a dissociation constant of about 3.2 x 10(-9) M, and the number of receptors per cell was calculated to be about 2700. Uptake of 125I-LDL by HL-60 cells was increased 2-fold by preincubating the cells with mevinolin. The presence of specific receptors for LDL on HL-60 cells was further confirmed by the finding that exogenous LDL cholesterol was able to up-regulate the ACAT (acyl-CoA: cholesterol acyltransferase) activity of HL-60 cells. We then tested the uptake of retinyl ester in leukaemic cells via the LDL-receptor pathway. HL-60 cells were incubated with LDL or chylomicron remnants labelled with [3H]retinyl palmitate. Uptake of retinyl ester associated with both LDL and chylomicron remnants was observed. Furthermore, the presence of excess LDL decreased the uptake by 75-100%, supporting the hypothesis that the uptake of retinyl ester occurred via the LDL receptor in HL-60 cells.     

Lipolytic remnants of human VLDL produced in vitro. Effect of HDL levels in the lipolysis mixtures on the apoCs to apoE ratio and metabolic properties of VLDL core remnants

To determine the role of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) as an acceptor of lipolytic surface remnants of very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) in the metabolism of VLDL core remnants, we examined the effect of HDL levels in the VLDL lipolysis mixture on 1) the morphology and the apoCs to E ratio in VLDL core remnants and 2) the metabolic properties of VLDL core remnants in human hepatoma cell line HepG2 and human hepatocytes in the primary culture. Normolipidemic VLDL was lipolyzed in vitro by purified bovine milk lipoprotein lipase (LpL) in a lipolysis mixture containing a physiologic level of VLDL and albumin (30 mg VLDL-cholesterol (CH)/dl and 6% albumin) in the absence and presence of either a low HDL level (VLDL-CH:HDL-CH = 3:1) or a high HDL level (VLDL-CH:HDL-CH = 1:4). Lipolysis of VLDL in either the absence or presence of HDL resulted in the hydrolysis of >85% of VLDL-triglycerides (TG) and the conversion of VLDL into smaller and denser particles. In the absence of HDL, heterogeneous spherical particles with numerous surface vesicular materials were produced. In the presence of low or high HDL, spherical particles containing some or no detectable vesicular surface components were produced. The apoCs to apoE ratios, as determined by densitometric scanning of the SDS polyacrylamide gradient gel, were 2.89 in control VLDL and 2.27, 0.91, and 0.22 in VLDL core remnants produced in the absence and in the presence of low and high HDL levels, respectively. In vitro lipolysis of VLDL markedly increased binding to HepG2 cells at 4 degrees C and internalization and degradation by human hepatocytes in primary culture at 37 degrees C. However, the HDL-mediated decrease in the apoCs to apoE ratio had a minimal effect on binding, internalization, and degradation of VLDL core remnants by HepG2 cells and human hepatocytes in primary culture. In order to determine whether HepG2 bound VLDL and VLDL core remnants are deficient in apoCs, (125)I-labeled VLDL and VLDL core remnants were added to HepG2 culture medium at 4 degrees C. The bound particles were released by heparin, and the levels of (125)I-labeled apoCs and apoE, relative to apoB, in the released particles were examined. When compared with those initially added to culture medium, the VLDL and VLDL core remnants released from HepG2 cells had a markedly increased (113%) level of apoE and a reduced (30-39%), but not absent, level of apoCs. We conclude that apoCs, as a minimum structural and/or functional component of VLDL and VLDL core remnants, may not have an inhibitory effect on the binding of VLDL or VLDL core remnants to hepatic apoE receptors.     

Binding of low-density lipoprotein and chylomicron remnants to the hepatic low-density lipoprotein receptor of dogs, rats and rabbits demonstrated by ligand blotting. Failure to detect a distinct chylomicron-remnant-binding protein by ligand blotting

In this paper, human low-density lipoprotein (LDL), rat chylomicron remnants and very-low-density lipoproteins of beta-mobility from cholesterol-fed rabbits (beta VLDL) have been shown to bind strongly to a protein present in solubilised liver membranes of rats, rabbits and dogs by ligand blotting with biotin-modified lipoproteins. This binding protein was identified as the LDL-receptor on several criteria. First, binding of the lipoproteins to the receptor was saturable and Ca2+-dependent; secondly, the apparent relative molecular mass of the binding protein (ranging from 128,000 in the rabbit, 145,000 in the rat to 147,000 in the dog) was similar to that of the purified bovine LDL receptor. Finally, binding activity was greatly increased in the livers of rats treated with oestrogen in pharmacological doses and absent from the liver of Watanabe heritable hyperlipidaemic (WHHL) rabbits that have a genetic defect in the LDL receptor. Some binding was also observed to a high-molecular-mass protein present in solubilised liver membranes of rats and rabbits, which, in rabbits at least, shared antigenic determinants with rabbit apoB and was not likely to be related to the LDL receptor as it was present in equal amounts in normal and WHHL rabbits. No evidence was obtained for a specific chylomicron remnant binding protein, distinct from the LDL receptor, whose activity could be detected in solubilised liver membranes by ligand blotting although a variety of solubilisation and fractionation conditions were employed.     

The very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) receptor – a peripheral lipoprotein receptor for remnant lipoproteins into fatty acid active tissues

The VLDL (very low density lipoprotein) receptor is a member of the LDL (low density lipoprotein) receptor family. The VLDL receptor binds apolipoprotein (apo) E but not apo B, and is expressed in fatty acid active tissues (heart, muscle, adipose) and macrophages abundantly. Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) modulates the binding of triglyceride (TG)-rich lipoprotein particles to the VLDL receptor. By the unique ligand specificity, VLDL receptor practically appeared to function as IDL (intermediate density lipoprotein) and chylomicron remnant receptor in peripheral tissues in concert with LPL. In contrast to LDL receptor, the VLDL receptor expression is not down regulated by lipoproteins. Recently several possible functions of the VLDL receptor have been reported in lipoprotein metabolism, atherosclerosis, obesity/insulin resistance, cardiac fatty acid metabolism and neuronal migration. The gene therapy of VLDL receptor into the LDL receptor knockout mice liver showed a benefit effect for lipoprotein metabolism and atherosclerosis. Further researches about the VLDL receptor function will be needed in the future.     

Disparities in the interaction of rat and human lipoproteins with cultured rat fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells. Requirements for homology for receptor binding activity

This study characterizes the interactions of various rat and human lipoproteins with the lipoprotein cell surface receptors of rat and human cells. Iodinated rat very low density lipoproteins (VLDL), rat chylomicron remnants, rat low density lipoproteins (LDL), and rat high density lipoproteins containing predominantly apoprotein E (HDL1) bound to high affinity cell surface receptors of cultured rat fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells. Rat VLDL and chylomicron remnants were most avidly bound; the B-containing LDL and the E-containing HDL1 displayed lesser but similar binding. Rat HDL (d = 1.125 to 1.21) exhibited weak receptor binding; however, after recentrifugation to remove apoprotein E, they were devoid of binding activity. Competitive binding studies at 4 degrees C confirmed these results for normal lipoproteins and indicated that VLDL (B-VLDL), LDL, and HDLc (cholesterol-rich HDL1) isolated from hypercholesterolemic rats had increased affinity for the rat receptors compared with their normal counterparts, the most pronounced change being in the LDL. The cell surface receptor pathway in rat fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells resembled the system described for human fibroblasts as follows: 1) lipoproteins containing either the B or E apoproteins interacted with the receptors; 2) receptor binding activity was abolished by acetoacetylation or reductive methylation of a limited number of lysine residues of the lipoproteins; 3) receptor binding initiated the process of internalization and degradation of the apo-B- and apo-E-containing lipoproteins; 4) the lipoprotein cholesterol was re-esterified as determined by [14C]oleate incorporation into the cellular cholesteryl esters; and 5) receptor-mediated uptake (receptor number) was lipoprotein cholesterol. An important difference between rat and human fibroblasts was the inability of human LDL to interact with the cell surface receptors of rat fibroblasts. Rat lipoproteins did, however, react with human fibroblasts. Furthermore, the rat VLDL were the most avidly bound of the rat lipoproteins to rat fibroblasts. When the direct binding of 125I-VLDL was subjected to Scatchard analysis, the very high affinity of rat VLDL was apparent (Kd = 1 X 10(-11) M). Moreover, compared with data for rat LDL, the data suggested each VLDL particle bound to four to nine lipoprotein receptors. This multiple receptor binding could explain the enhanced binding affinity of the rat VLDL. The Scatchard plot of rat 125I-VLDL revealed a biphasic binding curve in rat and human fibroblast cells and in rat smooth muscle cells, suggesting two populations of rat VLDL. These results indicate that rat cells have a receptor pathway similar to, but not identical with, the LDL pathway of human cells. Since human LDL bind poorly to rat cell receptors on cultured rat fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells, metabolic studies using human lipoproteins in rats must be interpreted cautiously.     

Very low density lipoprotein binding to cultured aortic endothelium

Because of very low density lipoprotein's (VLDL) potential atherogenicity and the demonstration that VLDL can bind to other cells, we examined the interaction of human VLDL with cultured porcine aortic endothelium. The lipoprotein-cell interaction had many properties similar to those seen with the binding of a ligand to a cell surface receptor. It was time and temperature dependent, saturable, and reversible. Scatchard analysis of competition data suggested that there may be more than one class of binding site. The affinity of the low affinity site was similar to that for low density lipoprotein (LDL). Also, the capacity of endothelial cells to bind VLDL was similar to that for LDL, when related to apo B (i.e., particle) concentration. Not only was unlabelled VLDL able to compete for VLDL binding sites, but so was LDL and high density lipoprotein (HDL). The maximal competition either by LDL or by HDL was less than that by VLDL. The maximal competition by HDL was more than by LDL. The VLDL binding was dependent on Ca2+. It was not changed by the content of lipoprotein in the medium in which cells were grown prior to the binding studies. These observations suggest that VLDL binding to endothelial cells is similar in some respects, but not in all, to the binding of LDL. Comparison of the data with endothelial cells to previous data with adipocytes also indicated differences between the interaction of these two cell types with VLDL. It is possible that this binding process may be involved in the formation of atherogenic remnants of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins on the endothelial surface of large blood vessels.     

LDL and cAMP cooperate to regulate the functional expression of the LRP in rat ovarian granulosa cells

Rat ovarian granulosa rely heavily on lipoprotein-derived cholesterol for steroidogenesis, which is principally supplied by the LDL receptor- and scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI)-mediated pathways. In this study, we characterized the hormonal and cholesterol regulation of another member of the LDL receptor superfamily, low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP), and its role in granulosa cell steroidogenesis. Coincubation of cultured granulosa cells with LDL and N6,O2'-dibutyryl adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (Bt2cAMP) greatly increased the mRNA/protein levels of LRP. Bt2cAMP and Bt2cAMP plus human hLDL also enhanced SR-BI mRNA levels. However, there was no change in the expression of receptor-associated protein, a chaperone for LRP, or another lipoprotein receptor, LRP8/apoER2, in response to Bt2cAMP plus hLDL, whereas the mRNA expression of LDL receptor was reduced significantly. The induced LRP was fully functional, mediating increased uptake of its ligand, alpha2-macroglobulin. The level of binding of another LRP ligand, chylomicron remnants, did not increase, although the extent of remnant degradation that could be attributed to the LRP doubled in cells with increased levels of LRP. The addition of lipoprotein-type LRP ligands such as chylomicron remnants and VLDL to the incubation medium significantly increased the progestin production under both basal and stimulated conditions. In summary, our studies demonstrate a role for LRP in lipoprotein-supported ovarian granulosa cell steroidogenesis.     

Selective uptake of cholesteryl esters from various classes of lipoproteins by HepG2 cells.

Selective uptake of cholesteryl esters (CE) from lipoproteins by cells has been extensively studied with high density lipoproteins (HDL). It is only recently that such a mechanism has been attributed to intermediate and low density lipoproteins (IDL and LDL). Here, we compare the association of proteins and CE from very low density lipoproteins (VLDL), IDL, LDL and HDL3 to HepG2 cells. These lipoproteins were either labelled in proteins with 125I or in CE with 3H-cholesteryl oleate. We show that, at any lipoprotein concentration, protein association to the cells is significantly smaller for IDL, LDL, and HDL3 than CE association, but not for VLDL. At a concentration of 20 microg lipoprotein/mL, these associations reveal CE-selective uptake in the order of 2-, 4-, and 11-fold for IDL, LDL, and HDL3, respectively. These studies reveal that LDL and HDL3 are good selective donors of CE to HepG2 cells, while IDL is a poor donor and VLDL is not a donor. A significant inverse correlation (r2 = 0.973) was found between the total lipid/protein ratios of the four classes of lipoproteins and the extent of CE-selective uptake by HepG2 cells. The fate of 3H-CE of the two best CE donors (LDL and HDL3) was followed in HepG2 cells after 3 h of incubation. Cells were shown to hydrolyze approximately 25% of the 3H-CE of both lipoproteins. However, when the cells were treated with 100 microM of chloroquine, a lysosomotropic agent, 85 and 40% of 3H-CE hydrolysis was lost for LDL and HDL3, respectively. The fate of LDL and HDL3-CE in HepG2 cells deficient in LDL-receptor was found to be the same, indicating that the portion of CE hydrolysis sensitive to chloroquine is not significantly linked to LDL-receptor activity. Thus, in HepG2 cells, the magnitude of CE-selective uptake is inversely correlated with the total lipid/protein ratios of the lipoproteins and CE-selective uptake from the two best CE donors (LDL and HDL3) appears to follow different pathways.     

Uptake of chylomicron remnants causes cholesterol accumulation in cultured human arterial smooth muscle cells

Chylomicron remnants (Sf greater than 100) were prepared by treating human chylomicrons (Sf greater than 400) with human post heparin plasma. Chylomicron remnants recovered after 70-80% of chylomicron triacylglycerol was hydrolyzed, suppressed LDL-receptor activity and increased cell cholesterol esterification to the same extent as did LDL when added to cultured human arterial smooth muscle cells at an equal cholesterol concentration. Cell cholesterol mass increased 36% after incubation with 25 micrograms LDL cholesterol/ml and 35% with 25 micrograms chylomicron-remnant cholesterol/ml. Addition of 30 microM chloroquine plus LDL or chylomicron remnants further increased cholesterol content of cells (74% and 87%, respectively) and caused a significant rise in cell esterified cholesterol (344% and 369%, respectively). Cholesterol content per unit of apolipoprotein B mass of remnants was 2-3-fold higher than that of LDL. Therefore, if lipoprotein particles were added at equivalent apolipoprotein B mass chylomicron remnants increased cell cholesterol content and cholesterol esterification and suppressed LDL receptor activity significantly more than did LDL. This suggests that an additional determinant, presumably apolipoprotein E, is important for receptor recognition of chylomicron remnants. These results may be relevant to the delivery of chylomicron-derived cholesterol to arterial cells proposed as a feature of atherogenesis.     

Effects of chylomicron remnants and beta-VLDL on the class and composition of newly secreted lipoproteins by HepG2 cells

The regulation of lipoprotein secretion in the cell line HepG2 was studied. HepG2 cells were preincubated with chylomicron remnants (triglyceride- and cholesterol-rich) or with beta very low density lipoproteins (beta-VLDL) (cholesterol-rich). The medium was removed and the cells were incubated for and additional 24 hr in a lipoprotein-free medium that contained either [2-3H]glycerol or DL-[2-3H]mevalonate. Cells and media were harvested, and lipoproteins were separated and fractionated. The mass and radioactivity of the lipids in cells and in the lipoproteins were measured. The activities of cellular acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT) and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase were also determined. Preincubation with chylomicron remnants induced an increase in cellular triglyceride and stimulated both HMG-CoA reductase and ACAT. Preincubation with beta-VLDL induced an increase in cellular free and esterified cholesterol, inhibited HMG-CoA reductase and stimulated ACAT. Although the absolute amount of VLDL is small, chylomicron remnants induced large relative increases in the amount of triglyceride and phospholipid secreted in VLDL and decreases in the amount of triglyceride secreted in low density (LDL) and high density (HDL) lipoproteins as well as a decrease in the amount of phospholipid secreted in HDL. In contrast, preincubation with beta-VLDL did not affect triglyceride secretion, but markedly stimulated the amount of phospholipid secreted in HDL. Comparison of the mass of glycerolipid actually secreted with that calculated from the cellular specific activity suggested that glycerolipids are secreted from single, rapidly equilibrating pools. Cholesterol and cholesteryl ester secretion were affected differently. Preincubation with chylomicron remnants increased the amount of free cholesterol secreted in both VLDL and LDL, but did not alter cholesteryl ester secretion. Preincubation with beta-VLDL increased free cholesterol secretion in all lipoprotein fractions and increased cholesteryl ester secretion in VLDL and LDL, but not HDL. Comparison of isotope and mass data suggested that the cholesteryl ester secreted came primarily from a preformed, rather than an newly synthesized, pool. In summary, these data provide insight to the mechanism whereby a liver cell regulates the deposition of exogenous lipid.     

Low density lipoprotein-receptor plays a major role in the binding of very low density lipoproteins and their remnants on HepG2 cells.

The binding to HepG2 cells of very low density lipoproteins (VLDL) and their remnants (IDL) was alternatively, in the past, attributed to the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLr) or to an apoE-specific receptor. In order to resolve this issue, we have compared the binding of those lipoproteins labelled with iodine-125 to normal and LDLr deficient HepG2 cells. Those deficient cells were obtained by a constitutive antisense strategy and their LDLr level is 14% the level of normal HepG2 cells. By saturation curve analysis, we show that VLDL and IDL bind to high and low affinity sites on cells. The low affinity binding was eliminated by conducting the assay in presence of a 200-fold excess of HDL3 respective to the concentrations of 125I-labelled VLDL and IDL. For 125I-VLDL high affinity binding to normal HepG2 cells, we found a dissociation constant (Kd) of 21.2 +/- 3.7 micrograms prot./ml (S.E., N = 5) and a maximal binding capacity (Bmax) of 0.0312 +/- 0.0063 microgram prot./mg cell prot, while we have measured a Kd of 5.3 +/- 0.8 and a Bmax of 0.0081 +/- 0.0014 with LDLr deficient cells. This indicates that LDLr is responsible for 74% of VLDL binding to HepG2 cells and that the non-LDLr high affinity receptor has a higher affinity for VLDL than LDLr. A 53% loss of 125I-IDL binding capacity was measured with LDLr deficient cells compared with normal cells (Bmax: 0.028 +/- 0.005 versus 0.059 +/- 0.006), while no significant statistical difference was found between affinities. The study shows that the LDLr is almost the only contributor in VLDL binding, while it shares IDL binding capacity with another high affinity receptor. The physiological importance of LDLr is confirmed by an almost equivalent loss of IDL and VLDL degradation in LDLr deficient cells.     

Receptor-dependent uptake of human chylomicron remnants by cultured skin fibroblasts

Human chylomicrons were isolated from plasma from a subject with familial hypertriglyceridemia and converted to chylomicron remnants by incubation with postheparin plasma. The interaction of these apolipoprotein E-containing, cholesterol-rich human chylomicron remnants with cultured skin fibroblasts was studied. Chylomicron remnants were internalized by skin fibroblasts as a unit, mainly via the low density lipoprotein (LDL)-receptor pathway, resulting in increased cell cholesterol content. After entering the fibroblast, chylomicron remnants stimulated cholesterol esterification, suppressed 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase activity, and down-regulated LDL receptor activity similar to the action of LDL. As a function of increasing lipolysis, remnant particles were progressively more effectively taken up by skin fibroblasts, despite a decrease in the apolipoprotein E content per lipoprotein particle. Remnant particles produced after hydrolysis of 70 to 80% of chylomicron triglyceride increased cell cholesterol content to an amount nearly identical to that observed with LDL when the two lipoproteins were incubated at an equal cholesterol concentration. However, when incubated on the basis of equal particle number, chylomicron remnants were 2 to 3 times more effective than LDL in delivering cholesterol to the cells. These results suggest that chylomicron remnants play a role in the regulation of postabsorptive cholesterol homeostasis in nonhepatic cells, and possibly in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis.     

Quantitative fluorescence imaging reveals point of release for lipoproteins during LDLR-dependent uptake

The LDL receptor (LDLR) supports efficient uptake of both LDL and VLDL remnants by binding lipoprotein at the cell surface, internalizing lipoprotein through coated pits, and releasing lipoprotein in endocytic compartments before returning to the surface for further rounds of uptake. While many aspects of lipoprotein binding and receptor entry are well understood, it is less clear where, when, and how the LDLR releases lipoprotein. To address these questions, the current study employed quantitative fluorescence imaging to visualize the uptake and endosomal processing of LDL and the VLDL remnant β-VLDL. We find that lipoprotein release is rapid, with most release occurring prior to entry of lipoprotein into early endosomes. Published biochemical studies have identified two mechanisms of lipoprotein release: one that involves the β-propeller module of the LDLR and a second that is independent of this module. Quantitative imaging comparing uptake supported by the normal LDLR or by an LDLR variant incapable of β-propeller-dependent release shows that the β-propeller-independent process is sufficient for release for both lipoproteins but that the β-propeller process accelerates both LDL and β-VLDL release. Together these findings define where, when, and how lipoprotein release occurs and provide a generalizable methodology for visualizing endocytic handling in situ.     

Lipoprotein lipase- and hepatic triglyceride lipase- promoted very low density lipoprotein degradation proceeds via an apolipoprotein E-dependent mechanism

Apolipoprotein E (apoE) is the primary recognition signal on triglyceride-rich lipoproteins responsible for interacting with low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors and LDL receptor-related protein (LRP). It has been shown that lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and hepatic triglyceride lipase (HTGL) promote receptor-mediated uptake and degradation of very low density lipoproteins (VLDL) and remnant particles, possibly by directly binding to lipoprotein receptors. In this study we have investigated the requirement for apoE in lipase-stimulated VLDL degradation. We compared binding and degradation of normal and apoE-depleted human VLDL and apoE knockout mouse VLDL in human foreskin fibroblasts. Surface binding at 37 degrees C of apoE knockout VLDL was greater than that of normal VLDL by 3- and 40-fold, respectively, in the presence of LPL and HTGL. In spite of the greater stimulation of surface binding, lipase-stimulated degradation of apoE knockout mouse VLDL was significantly lower than that of normal VLDL (30, 30, and 80%, respectively, for control, LPL, and HTGL treatments). In the presence of LPL and HTGL, surface binding of apoE-depleted human VLDL was, respectively, 40 and 200% of normal VLDL whereas degradation was, respectively, 25 and 50% of normal VLDL. LPL and HTGL stimulated degradation of normal VLDL in a dose-dependent manner and by a LDL receptor-mediated pathway. Maximum stimulation (4-fold) was seen in the presence LPL (1 microgram/ml) or HTGL (3 microgram/ml) in lovastatin-treated cells. On the other hand, degradation of apoE-depleted VLDL was not significantly increased by the presence of lipases even in lovastatin-treated cells. Surface binding of apoE-depleted VLDL to metabolically inactive cells at 4 degrees C was higher in control and HTGL-treated cells, but unchanged in the presence of LPL. Degradation of prebound apoE-depleted VLDL was only 35% as efficient as that of normal VLDL. Surface binding of apoE knockout or apoE-depleted VLDL was to heparin sulfate proteoglycans because it was completely abolished by heparinase treatment. However, apoE appears to be a primary determinant for receptor-mediated VLDL degradation.Our studies suggest that overexpression of LPL or HTGL may not protect against lipoprotein accumulation seen in apoE deficiency.     

Immunoblotting and ligand blotting of the low-density lipoprotein receptor of human liver, HepG2 cells and HeLa cells

Low-density lipoprotein receptors from adult human liver and the human hepatoblastoma cell line HepG2 were analyzed by polyacrylamide electrophoresis in SDS followed by immuno- and ligand blotting. In both liver and HepG2 we detected a protein band with apparent relative molecular mass of 130 kDa, which is similar to that of the LDL receptor in fibroblasts. In addition we showed that HeLa cells also possess this LDL-receptor protein.     

Characterization of the estrogen-induced lipoprotein receptor of rat liver

The ethinyl estradiol-induced lipoprotein receptor of rat liver was purified and characterized. Liver membranes were prepared from ethinyl estradiol-treated rats, solubilized, and subjected to DEAE chromatography. A fraction with a high specific activity for low density lipoprotein (LDL) binding was isolated and used to immunize mice. Hybridomas were prepared from their spleen cells, and a clone that secreted an IgG antibody, which cross-reacted with an ethinyl estradiol-induced protein of the same molecular weight as the bovine adrenal LDL receptor, was expanded. This antibody, designated P1B3, immunoprecipitated the induced lipoprotein receptor. P1B3 was used to purify the receptor, and a polyclonal antibody was raised against the pure protein. This antibody recognized a protein of similar molecular weight in rat liver, adult dog liver, and human skin fibroblasts, thus demonstrating that the induced rat lipoprotein receptor was related to the LDL receptor of other species. This receptor is present in normal rat liver, and its content is reduced by feeding an atherogenic diet, but not by feeding a diet containing 0.5% cholesterol. Moreover, cholestyramine supplementation of the diet did not induce the receptor on liver membranes. The polyclonal antibody could prevent the binding of LDL to liver membranes from control or ethinyl estradiol-treated rats. It decreased chylomicron remnant binding to membranes from ethinyl estradiol-treated membranes, but did not affect chylomicron remnant binding to liver membranes of untreated rats, a result compatible with the existence of a distinct receptor for these latter particles. The amount of LDL receptor-independent, specific remnant binding was the same in both control and ethinyl estradiol-treated rats. This is consistent with the concept that the remnant receptor is not regulated by this treatment. Based on the above, we conclude that the ethinyl estradiol-induced lipoprotein receptor of rat liver is biochemically and immunologically similar to the LDL receptor of other species. It is present on the liver of normal adult rats and could account for LDL as well as beta VLDL and HDLc removal. Although it may contribute to chylomicron remnant removal, there appears to be a second unrelated receptor or process which recognizes this lipoprotein.     

Catabolism of human low density lipoproteins by human hepatoma cell line HepG2

The mechanism of hepatic catabolism of human low density lipoproteins (LDL) by human-derived hepatoma cell line HepG2 was studied. The binding of 125I-labeled LDL to HepG2 cells at 4 degrees C was time dependent and inhibited by excess unlabeled LDL. The specific binding was predominant at low concentrations of 125I-labeled LDL (less than 50 micrograms protein/ml), whereas the nonsaturable binding prevailed at higher concentrations of substrate. The cellular uptake and degradation of 125I-labeled LDL were curvilinear functions of substrate concentration. Preincubation of HepG2 cells with unlabeled LDL caused a 56% inhibition in the degradation of 125I-labeled LDL. Reductive methylation of unlabeled LDL abolished its ability to compete with 125I-labeled LDL for uptake and degradation. Chloroquine (50 microM) and colchicine (1 microM) inhibited the degradation of 125I-labeled LDL by 64% and 30%, respectively. The LDL catabolism by HepG2 cells suppressed de novo synthesis of cholesterol and enhanced cholesterol esterification; this stimulation was abolished by chloroquine. When tested at a similar content of apolipoprotein B, very low density lipoproteins (VLDL), LDL and high density lipoproteins (HDL) inhibited the catabolism of 125I-labeled LDL to the same degree, indicating that in HepG2 cells normal LDL are most probably recognized by the receptor via apolipoprotein B. The current study thus demonstrates that the catabolism of human LDL by HepG2 cells proceeds in part through a receptor-mediated mechanism.