Novel analogues of neuropeptide Y with a preference for the Y1-receptor.

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is one of the most abundant neuropeptides in the mammalian brain and acts in humans via at least three receptor subtypes: Y1, Y2, and Y5. Whereas selective agonists and antagonists are known for the Y2- and Y5-receptors, the Y1-receptor still lacks a highly selective agonist. This work presents the first NPY-based analogues with Y1-receptor preference and agonistic properties. Furthermore, the importance of specific amino acids of NPY for binding to the Y-receptor subtypes is presented. Amongst the analogues tested, [Phe7,Pro34]pNPY (where pNPY is porcine neuropeptide Y) showed the most significant Y1-receptor preference (> 1 : 3000-fold), with subnanomolar affinity to the Y1-receptor, and Ki values of approximately 30 nM for the Y2- and Y5-subtype, respectively. Variations of position 6, especially [Arg6,Pro34]pNPY and variations within positions 20-23 of NPY were found to result in further analogues with significant Y1-receptor preference (1 : 400-1 : 2000). In contrast, cyclo S-S [Cys20,Cys24]pNPY was found to be a highly selective ligand at the Y2-receptor, binding only threefold less efficiently than NPY. Analogues containing variations of positions 31 and 32 showed highly reduced affinity to the Y1-receptor, while binding to the Y5-receptor was affected less. Inhibition of cAMP-accumulation of selected peptides with replacements within position 20-23 of NPY showed preserved agonistic properties. The NPY analogues tested give insights into ligand-receptor interaction of NPY at the Y1-, Y2- and Y5-receptor and contribute to our understanding of subtype selectivity. Furthermore, the Y1-receptor-preferring peptides are novel tools that will provide insight into the physiological role of the Y1-receptor.     

2-36[K4,RYYSA(19-23)]PP a novel Y5-receptor preferring ligand with strong stimulatory effect on food intake

Members of the neuropeptide Y (NPY) family regulate many physiological processes via interaction with at least four functional, pharmacologically distinct Y-receptors. However, selective antagonists developed for several subtypes have not been useful in defining particular Y-receptor functions in vivo. To identify critical residues within members of the NPY family required for Y-receptor subtype-selectivity we have determined the contribution of each residue within NPY to receptor binding by replacing them with L-alanine. In a second study, chimeric peptides where single or stretches of residues were interchanged between members of the NPY family were generated and tested in radioligand binding studies. Overall, substituted alanine analogues exhibited similar orders of affinities at each Y-receptor subtype with no obvious subtype-selectivity. Residues of particular interest are Leu30 which exhibited selectivity for the Y4-receptor, whereas Asp16 does not appear to play any role in ligand binding. Several chimeric peptides, e.g., [K4]pancreatic polypeptide ([K4]PP) and [RYYSA(19-23)]PP clearly showed higher affinity at the Y4 and Y5 subtypes compared to the Y1 and Y2 subtypes. In addition, the transfer of a proline residue from position 14 to 13 in peptide YY decreases its affinity at the Y1-, Y4- and Y5-receptors but is unchanged at the Y2 subtype. Combining these results, and with the help of molecular modelling, second generation chimeras were designed. The most significant improvement was achieved in chimera 2-36[K4,RYYSA(19-23)]PP where the affinity for the Y5 subtype increased by ninefold over that from NPY. Several of these compounds were also tested for their ability to stimulate food intake in a rat model. Interestingly, again 2-36[K4,RYYSA(19-23)]PP showed the most dramatic effect with a major increase on food intake over a range of doses compared to NPY suggesting a possible synergistic effect of several Y-receptors on feeding behaviour.     

Y-receptor affinity modulation by the design of pancreatic polypeptide/neuropeptide Y chimera led to Y(5)-receptor ligands with picomolar affinity

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) and pancreatic polypeptide (PP) bind to the Y-receptors with very different affinities: NPY has high affinity for the receptors Y(1), Y(2) and Y(5), while PP binds only to Y(4)-receptor with picomolar affinity. By exchanging of specific amino acid positions between the two peptides, we developed 38 full-length PP/NPY chimeras with binding properties that are completely different from those of the two native ligands. Pig NPY (pNPY) analogs containing the segment 19-23 from human PP (hPP) bound to the Y-receptors with much lower affinity than NPY itself. The affinity of the hPP analog containing the pNPY segments 1-7 and 19-23 was comparable to that of pNPY at the Y(1)- and Y(5)-receptor subtypes, and to that of hPP at the Y(4)-receptor. Furthermore, the presence of the segments 1-7 from chicken PP (cPP) and 19-23 from pNPY within the hPP sequence led to a ligand with IC(50) of 40 pM at the Y(5)-receptor. This is the most potent Y(5)-receptor ligand known so far, with 15-fold higher affinity than NPY.     

Molecular characterization of the human neuropeptide Y Y2-receptor.

Five neuropeptide Y receptors, the Y1-, Y2-, Y4-, Y5- and y6-subtypes, have been cloned, which belong to the rhodopsin-like G-protein-coupled, 7-transmembrane helix-spanning receptors and bind the 36-mer neuromodulator NPY (neuropeptide Y) with nanomolar affinity. In this study, the Y2-receptor subtype expressed in a human neuroblastoma cell line (SMS-KAN) and in transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO-hY2) was characterized on the protein level by using photoaffinity labeling and antireceptor antibodies. Two photoactivatable analogues of NPY were synthesized, in which a Tyr residue was substituted by the photoreactive amino acid 4-(3-trifluoromethyl)-3H-diazirin-3-ylphenylalanine ((Tmd)Phe), [Nalpha-biotinyl-Ahx2,(Tmd)Phe36]NPY (Tmd36), and the Y2-receptor subtype selective [Nalpha-biotinyl-Ahx2,Ahx5-24,(Tmd)Phe27]N PY (Tmd27). Both analogues were labeled with [3H]succinimidyl-propionate at Lys4 and bind to the Y2-receptor with affinity similar to that of the native ligand. A synthetic fragment of the second (E2) extracellular loop was used to generate subtype selective antireceptor antibodies against the Y2-receptor. Photoaffinity labeling of the receptor followed by SDS-PAGE and detection of bound radioactivity and SDS-PAGE of solubilized receptors and subsequent Western blotting revealed the same molecular masses. Two proteins correspondingly have been detected for each cell line with molecular masses of 58 +/- 4 and 50 +/- 4 kDa, respectively.     

Molecular characterization of the ligand–receptor interaction of the neuropeptide Y family

Neuropeptide Y (NPY), peptide YY (PYY) and pancreatic polypeptide (PP) belong to the NPY hormone family and activate a class of receptors called the Y‐receptors, and also belong to the large superfamily of the G‐protein coupled receptors. Structure–affinity and structure–activity relationship studies of peptide analogs, combined with studies based on site‐directed mutagenesis and anti‐receptor antibodies, have given insight into the individual characterization of each receptor subtype relative to its interaction with the ligand, as well as to its biological function. A number of selective antagonists at the Y₁‐receptor are available whose structures resemble that of the C‐terminus of NPY. Some of these compounds, like BIBP3226, BIBO3304 and GW1229, have recently been used for in vivo investigations of the NPY‐induced increase in food intake. Y₂‐receptor selective agonists are the analog cyclo‐(28/32)‐Ac‐[Lys²⁸‐Glu³²]‐(25–36)‐pNPY and the TASP molecule containing two units of the NPY segment 21–36. Now the first antagonist with nanomolar affinity for the Y₂‐receptor is also known, BIIE0246. So far, the native peptide PP has been shown to be the most potent ligand at the Y₄‐receptor. However, by the design of PP/NPY chimera, some analogs have been found that bind not only to the Y₄‐, but also to the Y₅‐receptor with subnanomolar affinities, and are as potent as NPY at the Y₁‐receptor. For the characterization of the Y₅‐receptor in vitro and in vivo, a new class of highly selective agonists is now available. This consists of analogs of NPY and of PP/NPY chimera which all contain the motif Ala³¹‐Aib³². This motif has been shown to induce a 3₁₀‐helical turn in the region 28–31 of NPY and is suggested to be the key motif for high Y₅‐receptor selectivity. The results of feeding experiments in rats treated with the first highly specific Y₅‐receptor agonists support the hypothesis that this receptor plays a role in the NPY‐induced stimulation of food intake. In conclusion, the selective compounds for the different Y‐receptor subtypes known so far are promising tools for a better understanding of the physiological properties of the hormones of the NPY family and related receptors. Copyright © 2000 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

The first selective agonist for the neuropeptide YY5 receptor increases food intake in rats

The first Y(5) receptor-selective analog of neuropeptide Y (NPY), [Ala(31),Aib(32)]NPY, has been developed and biologically characterized. Using competition binding assays on cell lines that express different Y receptors, we determined the affinity of this analog to be 6 nm at the human Y(5) receptor, >500 nm at the Y(1) and Y(2) receptors, and >1000 nm at the Y(4) receptor. Activity studies performed in vitro using a cAMP enzyme immunoassay, and in vivo using food intake studies in rats, showed that the peptide acted as an agonist. Further peptides obtained by the combination of the Ala(31)-Aib(32) motif with chimeric peptides containing segments of NPY and pancreatic polypeptide displayed the same selectivity and even higher affinity (up to 0.2 nm) for the Y(5) receptor. In vivo administration of the new Y(5) receptor-selective agonists significantly stimulated feeding in rats. The NMR solution structures of NPY and [Ala(31),Aib(32)]NPY showed a different conformation in the C-terminal region, where the alpha-helix of NPY was substituted by a more flexible, 3(10)-helical turn structure.     

Determination of affinity and activity of ligands at the human neuropeptide Y Y4 receptor by flow cytometry and aequorin luminescence

Fluorescence-labeled neuropeptide Y (NPY) has been used in flow cytometric binding assays for the determination of affinity constants of NPY Y1, Y2, and Y5 receptor ligands. Because the binding of fluorescent NPY is insufficient for competition studies at the human Y4 receptor (hY4R), we replaced Glu-4 in hPP with Lys for the derivatization with cyanine-5. Because cy5-[K(4)]hPP has high affinity (Kd 5.6 nM) to the hY4R, it was used as a probe in a flow cytometric binding assay. Specific binding of cy5-[K(4)]hPP to hY4R was visualized by confocal microscopy. The hY(4)R, the chimeric G protein G(qi5) and mitochondrially targeted apoaequorin were stably coexpressed in CHO cells. Aequorin luminescence was quantified in a microplate reader and by a CCD camera. By application of these methods 3-cyclohexyl-N-[(3-1H-imidazol-4-ylpropylamino)(imino)methyl]propanamide (UR-AK49) was discovered as the first nonpeptidic Y4R antagonist (pKi 4.17), a lead to be optimized in terms of potency and selectivity.     

Receptor subtype-specific docking of Asp6.59 with C-terminal arginine residues in Y receptor ligands

Y receptors (YRs) are G protein-coupled receptors whose Y(1)R, Y(2)R, and Y(5)R subtypes preferentially bind neuropeptide Y (NPY) and peptide YY, whereas mammalian Y(4)Rs show a higher affinity for pancreatic polypeptide (PP). Comparison of YR orthologs and paralogs revealed Asp(6.59) to be fully conserved throughout all of the YRs reported so far. By replacing this conserved aspartic acid residue with alanine, asparagine, glutamate, and arginine, we now show that this residue plays a crucial role in binding and signal transduction of NPY/PP at all YRs. Sensitivity to distinct replacements is, however, receptor subtype-specific. Next, we performed a complementary mutagenesis approach to identify the contact site of the ligand. Surprisingly, this conserved residue interacts with two different ligand arginine residues by ionic interactions; although in Y(2)R and Y(5)R, Arg(33) is the binding partner of Asp(6.59), in Y(1)R and Y(4)R, Arg(35) of human PP and NPY interacts with Asp(6.59). Furthermore, Arg(25) of PP and NPY is involved in ligand binding only at Y(2)R and Y(5)R. This suggests significant differences in the docking of YR ligands between Y(1/4)R and Y(2/5)R and provides new insights into the molecular binding mode of peptide agonists at GPCRs. Furthermore, the proposed model of a subtype-specific binding mode is in agreement with the evolution of YRs.     

Novel chemically modified analogues of neuropeptide Y for tumor targeting

The successful use of peptides as potential radiopharmaceuticals essentially requires the modification of the bioactive peptide hormones to introduce chelators for radiolabeling. In this study, four Y 1/Y 2 receptor-selective NPY analogues with different receptor subtype specificities have been investigated. For in vitro studies, the cold metal surrogate was used. Gallium and indium complexes were introduced by using 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid as bifunctional chelator. The peptides were synthesized by solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS), the chelator was coupled either at the N-terminus or at the N(epsilon) side chain of Lys(4) of the resin-bound peptide, and the labeling was performed in solution after cleavage. Competitive binding assays showed high binding affinity of the receptor-selective analogues at NPY receptor expressing cells. To test internalization of the novel peptide analogues and the metabolic stability in human blood plasma, the corresponding 5(6)-carboxyfluorescein (CF) analogues were prepared and investigated. One of the most promising analogues, the Y 1-receptor selective [Lys(DOTA)(4), Phe(7), Pro(34)]NPY was labeled with (111)In and injected into nude mice that bear MCF-7 breast cancer xenografts, and biodistribution studies were performed. In vitro and in vivo studies suggest that receptor-selective analogues of NPY have promising characteristics for future applications in nuclear medicine for breast tumor diagnosis and therapy.     

Structure-activity relationship of a series of diaminoalkyl substituted benzimidazole as neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor antagonists

A series of benzimidazoles (4) was synthesized and evaluated in vitro as potent and selective NPY Y1 receptor antagonists. Substitution of the piperidine nitrogen of 4 with appropriate R groups resulted in compounds with more than 80-fold higher affinity at the Y receptor compared to the parent compound 5 (R = H). The most potent benzimidazole in this series was 21 (Ki = 0.052 nM).     

GPC receptors and not ligands decide the binding mode in neuropeptide Y multireceptor/multiligand system

Many G protein-coupled receptors belong to families of different receptor subtypes, which are recognized by a variety of distinct ligands. To study such a multireceptor/multiligand system, we investigated the Y-receptor family. This family consists of four G protein-coupled Y receptors in humans (hY 1R, hY 2R, hY 4R, and hY 5R) and is activated by the so-called NPY hormone family, which itself consists of three native peptide ligands named neuropeptide Y (NPY), pancreatic polypeptide (PP), and peptide YY (PYY). The hY 5R shows high affinity for all ligands, although for PP binding, the affinity is slightly decreased. As a rational explanation, we suggest that Tyr (27) is lost as a contact point between PP and the hY 5R in contrast to NPY or PYY. Furthermore, several important residues for ligand binding were identified by the first extensive mutagenesis study of the hY 5R. Using a complementary mutagenesis approach, we were able to discover a novel interaction point between hY 5R and NPY. The interaction between NPY(Arg (25)) and hY 5R(Asp (2.68)) as well as between NPY(Arg (33)) and hY 5R(Asp (6.59)) is maintained in the binding of PYY and PP to hY 5R but different to the PP-hY 4R and NPY-hY 1R contact points. Therefore, we provide evidence that the receptor subtype and not the pre-orientated conformation of the ligand at the membrane decides the binding mode. Furthermore, the first hY 5R model was set up on the basis of the crystal structure of bovine rhodopsin. We can show that most of the residues identified to be critical for ligand binding are located within the now postulated binding pocket.     

Design of the Y1-receptor-selective cyclic peptide based on the C-terminal sequence of neuropeptide Y.

We designed four cyclic peptides which are mimics of the C-terminal region of human neuropeptide Y (NPY) on the basis of the structural model of NPY. One of these cyclic peptides, c[D-Cys29-L-Cys34]NPY Ac-29-36 (YM-42454), exhibited significantly higher affinity for the Y1-receptor than the corresponding C-terminal linear fragment, NPY Ac-28-36. Interestingly, YM-42454 showed binding affinity for the Y1-receptor in spite of the lack of the N-terminal sequence of NPY, whereas it did not show any binding affinity for the Y2-receptor. This conformationally restricted Y1-selective peptide would provide some insights into the bioactive conformation of the C-terminal region of NPY.     

A Y2 receptor mimetic aptamer directed against neuropeptide Y.

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a 36-amino acid neuropeptide that exerts its activity by at least five different receptor subtypes that belong to the family of G-protein-coupled receptors. We isolated an aptamer directed against NPY from a nuclease-resistant RNA library. Mapping experiments with N-terminally, C-terminally, and centrally truncated analogues of NPY revealed that the aptamer recognizes the C terminus of NPY. Individual replacement of the four arginine residues at positions 19, 25, 33, and 35 by l-alanine showed that arginine 33 is essential for binding. The aptamer does not recognize pancreatic polypeptide, a highly homologous Y4 receptor-specific peptide of the gut. Furthermore, the affinity of the aptamer to the Y5 receptor-selective agonist [Ala(31),Aib(32)]NPY and the Y1/Y5 receptor-binding peptide [Leu(31),Pro(34)]NPY was considerably reduced, whereas Y2 receptor-specific NPY mutants were bound well by the aptamer. Accordingly, the NPY epitope was recognized by the Y2 receptor, and the aptamer was highly similar. This Y2 receptor mimicking effect was further confirmed by competition binding studies. Whereas the aptamer competed with the Y2 receptor for binding of [(3)H]NPY with high affinity, a low affinity displacement of [(3)H]NPY was observed at the Y1 and the Y5 receptors. Consequently, competition at the Y2 receptor occurred with a considerably lower K(i) value compared with the Y1 and Y5 receptors. These results indicate that the aptamer mimics the binding of NPY to the Y2 receptor more closely than to the Y1 and Y5 receptors.     

Comparison of antibodies directed against receptor segments of NPY-receptors

The Y1-, Y2-, Y4- and Y5-receptor, which belong to the rhodopsin-like G-protein coupled, 7 transmembrane helix spanning receptors, bind the 36-mer neuromodulator NPY (neuropeptide Y) with nanomolar affinity. Synthetic fragments of the second (E2) and third (E3) extracellular loop were used to generate subtype selective anti-receptor antibodies against the Y-receptors. As investigated on intact receptors by ELISA and on solubilized receptors by SDS-PAGE and subsequent Western blotting, subtype selectivity was only partly achieved. Nevertheless, selectivity can be obtained by using several antisera in combination. These antibodies represent tools for molecular mass determination, receptor purification by affinity chromatography with antibody-columns and receptor localization studies.     

Modeling of Neuropeptide Receptors Y1, Y4, Y5, and Docking Studies with Neuropeptide Antagonist Analogues: Implications for Selectivity

Abstract Neuropeptide Y (NPY), receptors belong to the G-protein coupled receptor superfamily. NPY mediates several physiological responses, such as blood pressure, food intake, sedation. These actions of NPY are mediated by six receptor subtypes denoted as Y(1)-Y(5) and y(6). Modeling of receptor subtypes and binding site identification is an important step in developing new therapeutic agents. We have attempted to model the three NPY receptor types, Y1, Y4, and Y5 using homology modeling and threading methods. The models are consistent with previously reported experimental evidence. To understand the interaction and selectivity of NPY analogues with different neuropeptide receptors, docking studies of two neuropeptide analogues (BVD10 and BVD15) with receptors Y1 and Y4 were carried out. Results of the docking studies indicated that the interaction of ligands BVD10 and BVD15 with Y1 and Y4 receptors are different. These results were evaluated for selectivity of peptide analogues BVD10 and BVD15 towards the receptors.     

Modeling of neuropeptide receptors Y1, Y4, Y5, and docking studies with neuropeptide antagonist

Neuropeptide Y (NPY), receptors belong to the G-protein coupled receptor superfamily. NPY mediates several physiological responses, such as blood pressure, food intake, sedation. These actions of NPY are mediated by six receptor subtypes denoted as Y1-Y5 and y6. Modeling of receptor subtypes and binding site identification is an important step in developing new therapeutic agents. We have attempted to model the three NPY receptor types, Y1, Y4, and Y5 using homology modeling and threading methods. The models are consistent with previously reported experimental evidence. To understand the interaction and selectivity of NPY analogues with different neuropeptide receptors, docking studies of two neuropeptide analogues (BVD10 and BVD15) with receptors Y1 and Y4 were carried out. Results of the docking studies indicated that the interaction of ligands BVD10 and BVD15 with Y1 and Y4 receptors are different. These results were evaluated for selectivity of peptide analogues BVD10 and BVD15 towards the receptors.     

Determination of Affinity and Activity of Ligands at the Human Neuropeptide Y Y4 Receptor by Flow Cytometry and Aequorin Luminescence

Fluorescence-labeled neuropeptide Y (NPY) has been used in flow cytometric binding assays for the determination of affinity constants of NPY Y₁, Y₂, and Y₅ receptor ligands. Because the binding of fluorescent NPY is insufficient for competition studies at the human Y₄ receptor (hY₄R), we replaced Glu-4 in hPP with Lys for the derivatization with cyanine-5. Because cy5-[K⁴]hPP has high affinity (K_d 5.6 nM) to the hY₄R, it was used as a probe in a flow cytometric binding assay. Specific binding of cy5-[K⁴]hPP to hY₄R was visualized by confocal microscopy. The hY₄R, the chimeric G protein G_qi5 and mitochondrially targeted apoaequorin were stably coexpressed in CHO cells. Aequorin luminescence was quantified in a microplate reader and by a CCD camera. By application of these methods 3-cyclohexyl-N-[(3-1H-imidazol-4-ylpropylamino)(imino)methyl]propanamide (UR-AK49) was discovered as the first nonpeptidic Y₄R antagonist (pK_i 4.17), a lead to be optimized in terms of potency and selectivity.     

Modeling of Neuropeptide Receptors Y1, Y4, Y5, and Docking Studies with Neuropeptide Antagonist Analogues: Implications for Selectivity

Abstract

Neuropeptide Y (NPY), receptors belong to the G-protein coupled receptor superfamily. NPY mediates several physiological responses, such as blood pressure, food intake, sedation. These actions of NPY are mediated by six receptor subtypes denoted as Y₁-Y₅ and y₆. Modeling of receptor subtypes and binding site identification is an important step in developing new therapeutic agents. We have attempted to model the three NPY receptor types, Y1, Y4, and Y5 using homology modeling and threading methods. The models are consistent with previously reported experimental evidence. To understand the interaction and selectivity of NPY analogues with different neuropeptide receptors, docking studies of two neuropeptide analogues (BVD10 and BVD15) with receptors Y1 and Y4 were carried out. Results of the docking studies indicated that the interaction of ligands BVD10 and BVD15 with Y1 and Y4 receptors are different. These results were evaluated for selectivity of peptide analogues BVD10 and BVD15 towards the receptors.     

Pharmacological characterization of cloned chicken neuropeptide Y receptors Y1 and Y5

The neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptor subtypes Y1 and Y5 are involved in the regulation of feeding and several other physiological functions in mammals. To increase our understanding of the origin and mechanisms of the complex NPY system, we report here the cloning and pharmacological characterization of receptors Y1 and Y5 in the first non-mammal, chicken (Gallus gallus). The receptors display 80-83% and 64-72% amino acid sequence identity, respectively, with their mammalian orthologues. The three endogenous ligands NPY, peptide YY (PYY) and pancreatic polypeptide (PP) have similar affinities as in mammals, i.e. NPY and PYY have subnanomolar affinity for both receptors whereas chicken PP bound with nanomolar affinity to Y5 but not to Y1. A notable difference to mammalian receptor subtypes is that the Y1 antagonist SR120819A does not bind chicken Y1, whereas BIBP3226 does. The Y5 antagonist CGP71863A binds to the chicken Y5 receptor. Anatomically, both Y1 and Y5 have high mRNA expression levels in the infundibular nucleus which is the homologous structure of the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus in mammals. These results suggest that some of the selective Y1 and Y5 antagonists developed in mammals can be used to study appetite regulation in chicken.     

Potent and selective tools to investigate neuropeptide Y receptors in the central and peripheral nervous systems: BIB03304 (Y1) and CGP71683A (Y5)

We have evaluated 3 newly developed neuropeptide Y receptor antagonists in various in vitro binding and bioassays: BIBO3304 (Y1), T4[NPY33-36]4 (Y2), and CGP71683A (Y5). In rat brain homogenates, BIBO3304 competes for the same population of [125I][Leu31,Pro34] peptide YY (PYY) binding sites (75%) as BIBP3226, but with a 10 fold greater affinity (IC50 of 0.2 +/- 0.04 nM for BIBO3304 vs. 2.4 +/- 0.07 nM for BIBP3226),while CGP71683A has high affinity for 25% of specific [125I][Leu31,Pro34]PYY binding sites. Both BIBO3304 and CGP71683A (at 1.0 microM) were unable to compete for a significant proportion of specific [125I]PYY3-36/Y2 sites. The purported Y2 antagonist T4[NPY33-36]4 competed against [125I]PYY3-36 binding sites with an affinity of 750 nM. These results were confirmed in HEK 293 cells transfected with either the rat Y1, Y2, Y4, or Y5 receptor cDNA. BIBO3304, but not CGP71683A, competed with high affinity for [125I][Leu31,Pro34]PYY binding sites in HEK 293 cells transfected with the rat Y1 receptor cDNA, whereas the reverse profile was observed upon transfection with the rat Y5 receptor cDNA. Additionally, both molecules were inactive at Y2 and Y4 receptor subtypes expressed in HEK 293 cells. Receptor autoradiographic studies revealed the presence of [125I][Leu31,Pro34]PYY/BIBO3304-insensitive sites in the rat brain as reported previously for BIBP3226. Finally, the selective antagonistic properties of BIBO3304 were demonstrated in a Y1 bioassay (rabbit saphenous vein; pA2 value of 9.04) while being inactive in Y2 (rat vas deferens) and Y4 (rat colon) bioassays. These results confirm the high affinity and selectivity of BIBO3304 and CGP71683A for the Y1 and Y5 receptor subtypes, respectively, while the purported Y2 antagonist, T4[NPY33-36]4 possesses rather low affinity for this receptor.