Distinct roles for sequences upstream of and downstream from Physarum editing sites

RNAs in the mitochondria of Physarum polycephalum contain nonencoded nucleotides that are added during RNA synthesis. Essentially all steady-state RNAs are accurately and fully edited, yet the signals guiding these precise nucleotide insertions are presently unknown. To localize the regions of the template that are required for editing, we constructed a series of chimeric templates that substitute varying amounts of DNA either upstream of or downstream from C insertion sites. Remarkably, all sequences necessary for C addition are contained within ∼9 base pairs on either side of the insertion site. In addition, our data strongly suggest that sequences within this critical region affect different steps in the editing reaction. Template alterations upstream of an editing site influence nucleotide selection and/or insertion, while downstream changes affect editing site recognition and templated extension from the added, unpaired nucleotide. The data presented here provide the first evidence that individual regions of the DNA template play discrete mechanistic roles and represent a crucial initial step toward defining the source of the editing specificity in Physarum mitochondria. In addition, these findings have mechanistic implications regarding the potential involvement of the mitochondrial RNA polymerase in the editing reaction.     

RNA editing of the col mRNA throughout the life cycle of Physarum polycephalum

Editing of RNA via the insertion, deletion or substitution of genetic information affects gene expression in a variety of systems. Previous characterization of the Physarum polycephalum cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (col) mRNA revealed that both nucleotide insertions and base substitutions occur during the maturation of this mitochondrial message. Both types of editing are known to be developmentally regulated in other systems, including mammals and trypanosomatids. Here we show that the col mRNA present in Physarum mitochondria is edited via specific nucleotide insertions and C to U conversions at every stage of the life cycle. Primer extension sequencing of the RNA indicates that this editing is both accurate and efficient. Using a sensitive RT-PCR assay to monitor the extent of editing at individual sites of C insertion, we estimate that greater than 98% of the steady-state amount of col mRNA is edited throughout the Physarum developmental cycle.     

RNA editing of the col mRNA throughout the life cycle of Physarum polycephalum

Editing of RNA via the insertion, deletion or substitution of genetic information affects gene expression in a variety of systems. Previous characterization of the Physarum polycephalum cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (col) mRNA revealed that both nucleotide insertions and base substitutions occur during the maturation of this mitochondrial message. Both types of editing are known to be developmentally regulated in other systems, including mammals and trypanosomatids. Here we show that the col mRNA present in Physarum mitochondria is edited via specific nucleotide insertions and C to U conversions at every stage of the life cycle. Primer extension sequencing of the RNA indicates that this editing is both accurate and efficient. Using a sensitive RT-PCR assay to monitor the extent of editing at individual sites of C insertion, we estimate that greater than 98% of the steady-state amount of col mRNA is edited throughout the Physarum developmental cycle.     

Discovery of new genes and deletion editing in Physarum mitochondria enabled by a novel algorithm for finding edited mRNAs

Gene finding is complicated in organisms that exhibit insertional RNA editing. Here, we demonstrate how our new algorithm Predictor of Insertional Editing (PIE) can be used to locate genes whose mRNAs are subjected to multiple frameshifting events, and extend the algorithm to include probabilistic predictions for sites of nucleotide insertion; this feature is particularly useful when designing primers for sequencing edited RNAs. Applying this algorithm, we successfully identified the nad2, nad4L, nad6 and atp8 genes within the mitochondrial genome of Physarum polycephalum, which had gone undetected by existing programs. Characterization of their mRNA products led to the unanticipated discovery of nucleotide deletion editing in Physarum. The deletion event, which results in the removal of three adjacent A residues, was confirmed by primer extension sequencing of total RNA. This finding is remarkable in that it comprises the first known instance of nucleotide deletion in this organelle, to be contrasted with nearly 500 sites of single and dinucleotide addition in characterized mitochondrial RNAs. Statistical analysis of this larger pool of editing sites indicates that there are significant biases in the 2 nt immediately upstream of editing sites, including a reduced incidence of nucleotide repeats, in addition to the previously identified purine-U bias.     

Distinct functions of two RNA ligases in active Trypanosoma brucei RNA editing complexes

Trypanosome RNA editing is a unique U insertion and U deletion process that involves cycles of pre-mRNA cleavage, terminal U addition or U removal, and religation. This editing can occur at massive levels and is directed by base pairing of trans-acting guide RNAs. Both U insertion and U deletion cycles are catalyzed by a single protein complex that contains only seven major proteins, band I through band VII. However, little is known about their catalytic functions, except that band IV and band V are RNA ligases and genetic analysis indicates that the former is important in U deletion. Here we establish biochemical approaches to distinguish the individual roles of these ligases, based on their distinctive ATP and pyrophosphate utilization. These in vitro analyses revealed that both ligases serve in RNA editing. Band V is the RNA editing ligase that functions very selectively to seal in U insertion (IREL), while band IV is the RNA editing ligase needed to seal in U deletion (DREL). In combination with our earlier findings about the cleavage and the U-addition/U-removal steps of U deletion and U insertion, these results show that all three steps of these editing pathways exhibit major differences and suggest that the editing complex could have physically separate regions for U deletion and U insertion.     

An in vitro system for the editing of apolipoprotein B mRNA

A novel form of RNA editing generates two forms of apolipoprotein B (apo-B) mRNA by converting C at nucleotide 6666 to U or a U-like base. We have established an in vitro system for the editing of apo-B mRNA using synthetic RNAs and S100 extracts from rat hepatoma cells. Editing was detected by a sensitive primer extension assay and confirmed by DNA sequencing. The in vitro editing activity is specific and sensitive to proteinase K. Apo-B100 RNAs were synthesized in vitro from deletion mutants spanning nucleotide 6666. Synthetic RNAs containing 2383, 483, and 55 nucleotides of apo-B mRNA sequence were edited in vitro with similar efficiency, but an RNA containing 26 nucleotides was not edited.     

Insertional editing in mitochondria of Physarum

RNA produced from a number of genes on the mitochondrial (mt) DNA of Physarum polycephalum have nucleotides inserted at specific sites in their sequence. These insertions are spaced at approximately 25 nucleotide intervals and create open reading frames in mRNA and functional structure in tRNAs and rRNAs. Although most of the insertions at a site are single cytidines; single uridines and certain dinucleotides containing adenosine and guanosine as well as cytidine and uridine are also occasionally inserted at certain sites. This mixed nucleotide insertional RNA editing is unique among currently characterized editing systems.     

RNA editing: complexity and complications

RNA editing in Trypanosomatids creates functional mitochondrial mRNAs by extensive uridylate (U) insertion and deletion as specified by small guide RNAs (gRNAs). Editing is catalysed by the multiprotein editosome. Over 20 of its protein components have been identified and additional proteins are likely to function in editing and its regulation. The functions of only a few editosome proteins have been determined. Surprisingly, there are related pairs or sets of editosome proteins, and insertion and deletion editing appear to be functionally and perhaps spatially separate. A model for the editosome is proposed, which has a catalysis domain with separate sectors for insertion and deletion editing. It also contains domains for anchor duplex and upstream RNA binding, which position the sequence to be edited in the catalysis domain.