Multiple factors insulate Msh2-Msh6 mismatch repair activity from defects in Msh2 domain I

DNA mismatch repair (MMR) is a highly conserved mutation avoidance mechanism that corrects DNA polymerase misincorporation errors. In initial steps in MMR, Msh2-Msh6 binds mispairs and small insertion/deletion loops, and Msh2-Msh3 binds larger insertion/deletion loops. The msh2Δ1 mutation, which deletes the conserved DNA-binding domain I of Msh2, does not dramatically affect Msh2-Msh6-dependent repair. In contrast, msh2Δ1 mutants show strong defects in Msh2-Msh3 functions. Interestingly, several mutations identified in patients with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer map to domain I of Msh2; none have been found in MSH3. To understand the role of Msh2 domain I in MMR, we examined the consequences of combining the msh2Δ1 mutation with mutations in two distinct regions of MSH6 and those that increase cellular mutational load (pol3-01 and rad27). These experiments reveal msh2Δ1-specific phenotypes in Msh2-Msh6 repair, with significant effects on mutation rates. In vitro assays demonstrate that msh2Δ1-Msh6 DNA binding is less specific for DNA mismatches and produces an altered footprint on a mismatch DNA substrate. Together, these results provide evidence that, in vivo, multiple factors insulate MMR from defects in domain I of Msh2 and provide insights into how mutations in Msh2 domain I may cause hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer.     

Mispair-specific Recruitment of the Mlh1-Pms1 Complex Identifies Repair Substrates of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2-Msh3 Complex

DNA mismatch repair is initiated by either the Msh2-Msh6 or the Msh2-Msh3 mispair recognition heterodimer. Here we optimized the expression and purification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2-Msh3 and performed a comparative study of Msh2-Msh3 and Msh2-Msh6 for mispair binding, sliding clamp formation, and Mlh1-Pms1 recruitment. Msh2-Msh3 formed sliding clamps and recruited Mlh1-Pms1 on +1, +2, +3, and +4 insertion/deletions and CC, AA, and possibly GG mispairs, whereas Msh2-Msh6 formed mispair-dependent sliding clamps and recruited Mlh1-Pms1 on 7 of the 8 possible base:base mispairs, the +1 insertion/deletion mispair, and to a low level on the +2 but not the +3 or +4 insertion/deletion mispairs and not on the CC mispair. The mispair specificity of sliding clamp formation and Mlh1-Pms1 recruitment but not mispair binding alone correlated best with genetic data on the mispair specificity of Msh2-Msh3- and Msh2-Msh6-dependent mismatch repair in vivo. Analysis of an Msh2-Msh6/Msh3 chimeric protein and mutant Msh2-Msh3 complexes showed that the nucleotide binding domain and communicating regions but not the mispair binding domain of Msh2-Msh3 are responsible for the extremely rapid dissociation of Msh2-Msh3 sliding clamps from DNA relative to that seen for Msh2-Msh6, and that amino acid residues predicted to stabilize Msh2-Msh3 interactions with bent, strand-separated mispair-containing DNA are more critical for the recognition of small +1 insertion/deletions than larger +4 insertion/deletions.     

Dominant Saccharomyces cerevisiae msh6 mutations cause increased mispair binding and decreased dissociation from mispairs by Msh2-Msh6 in the presence of ATP

A previous study described four dominant msh6 mutations that interfere with both the Msh2-Msh6 and Msh2-Msh3 mismatch recognition complexes (Das Gupta, R., and Kolodner, R. D. (2000) Nat. Genet. 24, 53-56). Modeling predicted that two of the amino acid substitutions (G1067D and G1142D) interfere with protein-protein interactions at the ATP-binding site-associated dimer interface, one (S1036P) similarly interferes with protein-protein interactions and affects the Msh2 ATP-binding site, and one (H1096A) affects the Msh6 ATP-binding site. The ATPase activity of the Msh2-Msh6-G1067D and Msh2-Msh6-G1142D complexes was inhibited by GT, +A, and +AT mispairs, and these complexes showed increased binding to GT and +A mispairs in the presence of ATP. The ATPase activity of the Msh2-Msh6-S1036P complex was inhibited by a GT mispair, and it bound the GT mispair in the presence of ATP, whereas its interaction with insertion mispairs was unchanged compared with the wild-type complex. The ATPase activity of the Msh2-Msh6-H1096A complex was generally attenuated, and its mispair-binding behavior was unaffected. These results are in contrast to those obtained with the wild-type Msh2-Msh6 complex, which showed mispair-stimulated ATPase activity and ATP inhibition of mispair binding. These results indicate that the dominant msh6 mutations cause more stable binding to mispairs and suggest that there may be differences in how base base and insertion mispairs are recognized.     

EXO1 and MSH6 are high-copy suppressors of conditional mutations in the MSH2 mismatch repair gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Msh2p, a central component in mismatch repair, forms a heterodimer with Msh3p to repair small insertion/deletion mismatches and with Msh6p to repair base pair mismatches and single-nucleotide insertion/deletion mismatches. In haploids, a msh2Delta mutation is synthetically lethal with pol3-01, a mutation in the Poldelta proofreading exonuclease. Six conditional alleles of msh2 were identified as those that conferred viability in pol3-01 strains at 26 degrees but not at 35 degrees. DNA sequencing revealed that mutations in several of the msh2(ts) alleles are located in regions with previously unidentified functions. The conditional inviability of two mutants, msh2-L560S pol3-01 and msh2-L910P pol3-01, was suppressed by overexpression of EXO1 and MSH6, respectively. Partial suppression was also observed for the temperature-sensitive mutator phenotype exhibited by msh2-L560S and msh2-L910P strains in the lys2-Bgl reversion assay. High-copy plasmids bearing mutations in the conserved EXO1 nuclease domain were unable to suppress msh2-L560S pol3-01 conditional lethality. These results, in combination with a genetic analysis of msh6Delta pol3-01 and msh3Delta pol3-01 strains, suggest that the activity of the Msh2p-Msh6p heterodimer is important for viability in the presence of the pol3-01 mutation and that Exo1p plays a catalytic role in Msh2p-mediated mismatch repair.     

Functional Studies and Homology Modeling of Msh2-Msh3 Predict that Mispair Recognition Involves DNA Bending and Strand Separation

The Msh2-Msh3 heterodimer recognizes various DNA mispairs, including loops of DNA ranging from 1 to 14 nucleotides and some base-base mispairs. Homology modeling of the mispair-binding domain (MBD) of Msh3 using the related Msh6 MBD revealed that mismatch recognition must be different, even though the MBD folds must be similar. Model-based point mutation alleles of Saccharomyces cerevisiae msh3 designed to disrupt mispair recognition fell into two classes. One class caused defects in repair of both small and large insertion/deletion mispairs, whereas the second class caused defects only in the repair of small insertion/deletion mispairs; mutations of the first class also caused defects in the removal of nonhomologous tails present at the ends of double-strand breaks (DSBs) during DSB repair, whereas mutations of the second class did not cause defects in the removal of nonhomologous tails during DSB repair. Thus, recognition of small insertion/deletion mispairs by Msh3 appears to require a greater degree of interactions with the DNA conformations induced by small insertion/deletion mispairs than with those induced by large insertion/deletions that are intrinsically bent and strand separated. Mapping of the two classes of mutations onto the Msh3 MBD model appears to distinguish mispair recognition regions from DNA stabilization regions.The DNA mismatch repair (MMR) pathway recognizes and repairs mispaired and damaged bases in DNA, which primarily result from replication errors but which also result from recombination and chemical damage to DNA and DNA precursors (16, 22). Repairing mispairs improves the overall fidelity of DNA replication and is important for genome stability (24). Inherited defects in MMR are responsible for most cases of Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer [HNPCC]), and furthermore, the epigenetic silencing of one of the genes involved in MMR, MLH1, underlies most cases of sporadic MMR-defective cancer (19, 29).MMR is initiated by the recognition of base-base mismatches or insertion/deletion mispairs. In bacteria, the homodimeric MutS complex directly binds mispairs, bending the mispair-containing DNA by almost 60 degrees and shifting one of the mispaired bases, such as the thymidine base from G-T or +T mispairs, out of the DNA base stack (17). The mispaired base is stabilized by π stacking with a conserved phenylalanine (17, 26, 26a). DNA binding induces a functional asymmetry to the MutS complex; one subunit directly recognizes the mispair via a mispair-binding domain (MBD), whereas the MBD of the second subunit is primarily involved in nonspecific backbone interactions (17, 26a).In eukaryotes, mitotic MMR utilizes two heterodimeric complexes of MutS homologs: Msh2-Msh6 and Msh2-Msh3 (5, 16, 23, 41). In these asymmetric heterodimers, Msh6 and Msh3 directly recognize the mispair via their MBDs, whereas the Msh2 subunit appears to be functionally equivalent to the MutS subunit that nonspecifically binds the DNA backbone. In wild-type cells, the Msh2-Msh6 heterodimer is thought to primarily recognize and act in the repair of base-base mispairs and small 1- or 2-nucleotide insertion/deletions (12, 16, 20-24). The crystal structure of human Msh2-Msh6 revealed that mispair recognition by Msh6 shares many details with Escherichia coli MutS, including the π-stacking phenylalanine (17, 26a, 39). In contrast, in wild-type cells the Msh2-Msh3 heterodimer is thought to primarily recognize and act in the repair of insertions and deletions from 1 to 14 nucleotides in size (11, 20, 21, 27, 33, 37, 40), although we have previously shown that Msh2-Msh3 also recognizes some base-base mispairs with a preference for those that have weak hydrogen bonding (13). Msh2-Msh3 is also targeted to sites of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), potentially before a branched recombination intermediate is formed, where it acts in the processing of 3′ single-stranded tails (10, 28, 36).While no structural information for any Msh3 homolog is available, several lines of evidence suggest that mispairs are recognized by Msh2-Msh3 in a substantially different way than mispairs are recognized by MutS and Msh2-Msh6. First, Msh3 lacks the conserved π-stacking phenylalanine present in both MutS and Msh6, which is required for MMR by these proteins in vivo (9, 18). In contrast, mutagenesis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh3 residue located at the position equivalent to that of the phenylalanine conserved in MutS and Msh6 (K158, called K187 prior to the identification of the correct start codon [13]) caused only a modest MMR defect (18). Second, when other conserved residues and predicted DNA-backbone-contacting residues in S. cerevisiae Msh3 were mutated to alanine, only msh3-R247A (previously called msh3-R276A) caused a significant defect in the repair of 1-, 2-, and 4-nucleotide-long insertion/deletion mispairs (18).Despite these differences, the Msh3 MBD is likely related to the MBD of Msh6 and MutS. Replacement of the Msh6 MBD with the Msh3 MBD generated a functional chimera possessing Msh3 substrate specificity (32). Moreover, combining the msh3-K158A mutation with K160A gave rise to an msh3 mutant with an MMR defect greater than that for either single mutant alone (18). This double mutant caused a loss of specificity for mispaired DNA (18). Together these data indicate not only that mispair specificity is determined by the Msh3 MBD but also that the critical region of the Msh3 MBD mediating mispair recognition likely overlaps the same region as the MBDs of MutS and Msh6, even if the nature of the recognition is different. We have therefore used homology modeling and site-directed mutagenesis to gain insight into how Msh3 recognizes a diverse array of mispairs.     

Spontaneous frameshift mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: accumulation during DNA replication and removal by proofreading and mismatch repair activities

The msh6 mismatch repair gene of Schizosaccharomyces pombe was cloned, sequenced, and inactivated. Strains bearing all combinations of inactivated msh6, msh2, and swi4 (the S. pombe MSH3 ortholog) alleles were tested for their defects in mitotic and meiotic mismatch repair. Mitotic mutation rates were similarly increased in msh6 and msh2 mutants, both for reversion of a base-base substitution as well as of an insertion of one nucleotide in a mononucleotide run. Tetrad analysis and intragenic two-factor crosses revealed that meiotic mismatch repair was affected in msh6 to the same extent as in msh2 background. In contrast, loss of Swi4 likely did not cause a defect in mismatch repair, but rather resulted in reduced recombination frequency. Consistently, a mutated swi4 caused a two- to threefold reduction of recombinants in intergenic crosses, while msh2 and msh6 mutants were not significantly different from wild type. In summary, our study showed that Msh6 plays the same important role as Msh2 in the major mismatch repair pathway of S. pombe, while Swi4 rather functions in recombination.     

Specialized mismatch repair function of Glu339 in the Phe-X-Glu motif of yeast Msh6

The major eukaryotic mismatch repair (MMR) pathway requires Msh2-Msh6, which, like Escherichia coli MutS, binds to and participates in repair of the two most common replication errors, single base-base and single base insertion-deletion mismatches. For both types of mismatches, the side chain of E. coli Glu38 in a conserved Phe-X-Glu motif interacts with a mismatched base. The Ovarepsilon of Glu38 forms a hydrogen bond with either the N7 of purines or the N3 of pyrimidines. We show here that changing E. coli Glu38 to alanine results in nearly complete loss of repair of both single base-base and single base deletion mismatches. In contrast, a yeast strain with alanine replacing homologous Glu339 in Msh6 has nearly normal repair for insertion-deletion and most base-base mismatches, but is defective in repairing base-base mismatches characteristic of oxidative stress, e.g. 8-oxo-G.A mismatches. The results suggest that bacterial MutS and yeast Msh2-Msh6 differ in how they recognize and/or process replication errors involving undamaged bases, and that Glu339 in Msh6 may have a specialized role in repairing mismatches containing oxidized bases.     

Contribution of Msh2 and Msh6 subunits to the asymmetric ATPase and DNA mismatch binding activities of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2-Msh6 mismatch repair protein

Previous analyses of both Thermus aquaticus MutS homodimer and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2-Msh6 heterodimer have revealed that the subunits in these protein complexes bind and hydrolyze ATP asymmetrically, emulating their asymmetric DNA binding properties. In the MutS homodimer, one subunit (S1) binds ATP with high affinity and hydrolyzes it rapidly, while the other subunit (S2) binds ATP with lower affinity and hydrolyzes it at an apparently slower rate. Interaction of MutS with mismatched DNA results in suppression of ATP hydrolysis at S1-but which of these subunits, S1 or S2, makes specific contact with the mismatch (e.g., base stacking by a conserved phenylalanine residue) remains unknown. In order to answer this question and to clarify the links between the DNA binding and ATPase activities of each subunit in the dimer, we made mutations in the ATPase sites of Msh2 and Msh6 and assessed their impact on the activity of the Msh2-Msh6 heterodimer (in Msh2-Msh6, only Msh6 makes base specific contact with the mismatch). The key findings are: (a) Msh6 hydrolyzes ATP rapidly, and thus resembles the S1 subunit of the MutS homodimer, (b) Msh2 hydrolyzes ATP at a slower rate, and thus resembles the S2 subunit of MutS, (c) though itself an apparently weak ATPase, Msh2 has a strong influence on the ATPase activity of Msh6, (d) Msh6 binding to mismatched DNA results in suppression of rapid ATP hydrolysis, revealing a "cis" linkage between its mismatch recognition and ATPase activities, (e) the resultant Msh2-Msh6 complex, with both subunits in the ATP-bound state, exhibits altered interactions with the mismatch.     

Mismatch recognition-coupled stabilization of Msh2-Msh6 in an ATP-bound state at the initiation of DNA repair

Mismatch repair proteins correct errors in DNA via an ATP-driven process. In eukaryotes, the Msh2-Msh6 complex recognizes base pair mismatches and small insertion/deletions in DNA and initiates repair. Both Msh2 and Msh6 proteins contain Walker ATP-binding motifs that are necessary for repair activity. To understand how these proteins couple ATP binding and hydrolysis to DNA binding/mismatch recognition, the ATPase activity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2-Msh6 was examined under pre-steady-state conditions. Acid-quench experiments revealed that in the absence of DNA, Msh2-Msh6 hydrolyzes ATP rapidly (burst rate = 3 s(-1) at 20 degrees C) and then undergoes a slow step in the pathway that limits catalytic turnover (k(cat) = 0.1 s(-1)). ATP is hydrolyzed similarly in the presence of fully matched duplex DNA; however, in the presence of a G:T mismatch or +T insertion-containing DNA, ATP hydrolysis is severely suppressed (rate = 0.1 s(-1)). Pulse-chase experiments revealed that Msh2-Msh6 binds ATP rapidly in the absence or in the presence of DNA (rate = 0.1 microM(-1) s(-1)), indicating that for the Msh2-Msh6.mismatched DNA complex, a step after ATP binding but before or at ATP hydrolysis is the rate-limiting step in the pathway. Thus, mismatch recognition is coupled to a dramatic increase in the residence time of ATP on Msh2-Msh6. This mismatch-induced, stable ATP-bound state of Msh2-Msh6 likely signals downstream events in the repair pathway.     

Different Roles of Eukaryotic MutS and MutL Complexes in Repair of Small Insertion and Deletion Loops in Yeast

DNA mismatch repair greatly increases genome fidelity by recognizing and removing replication errors. In order to understand how this fidelity is maintained, it is important to uncover the relative specificities of the different components of mismatch repair. There are two major mispair recognition complexes in eukaryotes that are homologues of bacterial MutS proteins, MutSα and MutSβ, with MutSα recognizing base-base mismatches and small loop mispairs and MutSβ recognizing larger loop mispairs. Upon recognition of a mispair, the MutS complexes then interact with homologues of the bacterial MutL protein. Loops formed on the primer strand during replication lead to insertion mutations, whereas loops on the template strand lead to deletions. We show here in yeast, using oligonucleotide transformation, that MutSα has a strong bias toward repair of insertion loops, while MutSβ has an even stronger bias toward repair of deletion loops. Our results suggest that this bias in repair is due to the different interactions of the MutS complexes with the MutL complexes. Two mutants of MutLα, pms1-G882E and pms1-H888R, repair deletion mispairs but not insertion mispairs. Moreover, we find that a different MutL complex, MutLγ, is extremely important, but not sufficient, for deletion repair in the presence of either MutLα mutation. MutSβ is present in many eukaryotic organisms, but not in prokaryotes. We suggest that the biased repair of deletion mispairs may reflect a critical eukaryotic function of MutSβ in mismatch repair.     

ATP binding and hydrolysis by Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2–Msh3 are differentially modulated by mismatch and double-strand break repair DNA substrates

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Msh2–Msh3-mediated mismatch repair (MMR) recognizes and targets insertion/deletion loops for repair. Msh2–Msh3 is also required for 3′ non-homologous tail removal (3′NHTR) in double-strand break repair. In both pathways, Msh2–Msh3 binds double-strand/single-strand junctions and initiates repair in an ATP-dependent manner. However, we recently demonstrated that the two pathways have distinct requirements with respect to Msh2–Msh3 activities. We identified a set of aromatic residues in the nucleotide binding pocket (FLY motif) of Msh3 that, when mutated, disrupted MMR, but left 3′NHTR largely intact. One of these mutations, msh3Y942A, was predicted to disrupt the nucleotide sandwich and allow altered positioning of ATP within the pocket. To develop a mechanistic understanding of the differential requirements for ATP binding and/or hydrolysis in the two pathways, we characterized Msh2–Msh3 and Msh2–msh3Y942A ATP binding and hydrolysis activities in the presence of MMR and 3′NHTR DNA substrates. We observed distinct, substrate-dependent ATP hydrolysis and nucleotide turnover by Msh2–Msh3, indicating that the MMR and 3′NHTR DNA substrates differentially modify the ATP binding/hydrolysis activities of Msh2–Msh3. Msh2–msh3Y942A retained the ability to bind DNA and ATP but exhibited altered ATP hydrolysis and nucleotide turnover. We propose that both ATP and structure-specific repair substrates cooperate to direct Msh2–Msh3-mediated repair and suggest an explanation for the msh3Y942A separation-of-function phenotype.     

Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH2-MSH3 and MSH2-MSH6 complexes display distinct requirements for DNA binding domain I in mismatch recognition

In eukaryotic mismatch repair (MMR) MSH2-MSH6 initiates the repair of base-base and small insertion/deletion mismatches while MSH2-MSH3 repairs larger insertion/deletion mismatches. Here, we show that the msh2Delta1 mutation, containing a complete deletion of the conserved mismatch recognition domain I of MSH2, conferred a separation of function phenotype with respect to MSH2-MSH3 and MSH2-MSH6 functions. Strains bearing the msh2Delta1 mutation were nearly wild-type in MSH2-MSH6-mediated MMR and in suppressing recombination between DNA sequences predicted to form mismatches recognized by MSH2-MSH6. However, these strains were completely defective in MSH2-MSH3-mediated MMR and recombination functions. This information encouraged us to analyze the contributions of domain I to the mismatch binding specificity of MSH2-MSH3 in genetic and biochemical assays. We found that domain I in MSH2 contributed a non-specific DNA binding activity while domain I of MSH3 appeared important for mismatch binding specificity and for suppressing non-specific DNA binding. These observations reveal distinct requirements for the MSH2 DNA binding domain I in the repair of DNA mismatches and suggest that the binding of MSH2-MSH3 to mismatch DNA involves protein-DNA contacts that appear very different from those required for MSH2-MSH6 mismatch binding.     

Biochemical characterization of the interaction between the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH2-MSH6 complex and mispaired bases in DNA.

The interaction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH2-MSH6 complex with mispaired bases was analyzed using gel mobility shift assays and surface plasmon resonance methods. Under equilibrium binding conditions, MSH2-MSH6 bound to homoduplex DNA with a K(d) of 3.9 nM and bound oligonucleotide duplexes containing T:G, +1, +2, +4, and +10 insertion/deletion loop (IDL) mispairs with K(d) values of 0.20, 0.25, 11, 3.2, and 0.55 nM, respectively. Competition binding experiments using 65 different substrates revealed a 10-fold range in mispair discrimination. In general, base-base mispairs and a +1 insertion/deletion mispair were recognized better than intermediate sized insertion/deletion mispairs of 2-8 bases. Larger IDL mispairs (>8 bases) were recognized almost as well as the +1 IDL mispair. Recognition of mispairs by MSH2-MSH6 was influenced by sequence context, with the 6-nucleotide region surrounding the mispair being primarily responsible for influencing mispair recognition. Effects of sequences as far away as 15 nucleotides were also observed. Differential effects of ATP on the stability of MSH2-MSH6-mispair complexes suggested that base-base mispairs and the smaller IDL mispairs were recognized by a different binding mode than larger IDL mispairs, consistent with genetic experiments indicating that MSH2-MSH6 functions primarily in the repair of base-base and small IDL mispairs.     

Asymmetric recognition of DNA local distortion. Structure-based functional studies of eukaryotic Msh2-Msh6

Crystal structures of bacterial MutS homodimers bound to mismatched DNA reveal asymmetric interactions of the two subunits with DNA. A phenylalanine and glutamate of one subunit make mismatched base-specific interactions, and residues of both subunits contact the DNA backbone surrounding the mismatched base, but asymmetrically. A number of amino acids in MutS that contact the DNA are conserved in the eukaryotic Msh2-Msh6 heterodimer. We report here that yeast strains with amino acids substituted for residues inferred to interact with the DNA backbone or mismatched base have elevated spontaneous mutation rates consistent with defective mismatch repair. Purified Msh2-Msh6 with substitutions in the conserved Phe(337) and Glu(339) in Msh6 thought to stack or hydrogen bond, respectively, with the mismatched base do have reduced DNA binding affinity but normal ATPase activity. Moreover, wild-type Msh2-Msh6 binds with lower affinity to mismatches with thymine replaced by difluorotoluene, which lacks the ability to hydrogen bond. The results suggest that yeast Msh2-Msh6 interacts asymmetrically with the DNA through base-specific stacking and hydrogen bonding interactions and backbone contacts. The importance of these contacts decreases with increasing distance from the mismatch, implying that interactions at and near the mismatch are important for binding in a kinked DNA conformation.     

Regulation of mitotic homeologous recombination in yeast. Functions of mismatch repair and nucleotide excision repair genes

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologs of the bacterial mismatch repair proteins MutS and MutL correct replication errors and prevent recombination between homeologous (nonidentical) sequences. Previously, we demonstrated that Msh2p, Msh3p, and Pms1p regulate recombination between 91% identical inverted repeats, and here use the same substrates to show that Mlh1p and Msh6p have important antirecombination roles. In addition, substrates containing defined types of mismatches (base-base mismatches; 1-, 4-, or 12-nt insertion/deletion loops; or 18-nt palindromes) were used to examine recognition of these mismatches in mitotic recombination intermediates. Msh2p was required for recognition of all types of mismatches, whereas Msh6p recognized only base-base mismatches and 1-nt insertion/deletion loops. Msh3p was involved in recognition of the palindrome and all loops, but also had an unexpected antirecombination role when the potential heteroduplex contained only base-base mismatches. In contrast to their similar antimutator roles, Pms1p consistently inhibited recombination to a lesser degree than did Msh2p. In addition to the yeast MutS and MutL homologs, the exonuclease Exo1p and the nucleotide excision repair proteins Rad1p and Rad10p were found to have roles in inhibiting recombination between mismatched substrates.     

Mlh2 Is an Accessory Factor for DNA Mismatch Repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the essential mismatch repair (MMR) endonuclease Mlh1-Pms1 forms foci promoted by Msh2-Msh6 or Msh2-Msh3 in response to mispaired bases. Here we analyzed the Mlh1-Mlh2 complex, whose role in MMR has been unclear. Mlh1-Mlh2 formed foci that often colocalized with and had a longer lifetime than Mlh1-Pms1 foci. Mlh1-Mlh2 foci were similar to Mlh1-Pms1 foci: they required mispair recognition by Msh2-Msh6, increased in response to increased mispairs or downstream defects in MMR, and formed after induction of DNA damage by phleomycin but not double-stranded breaks by I-SceI. Mlh1-Mlh2 could be recruited to mispair-containing DNA in vitro by either Msh2-Msh6 or Msh2-Msh3. Deletion of MLH2 caused a synergistic increase in mutation rate in combination with deletion of MSH6 or reduced expression of Pms1. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that the S. cerevisiae Mlh2 protein and the mammalian PMS1 protein are homologs. These results support a hypothesis that Mlh1-Mlh2 is a non-essential accessory factor that acts to enhance the activity of Mlh1-Pms1.     

Separation-of-Function Mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH2 That Confer Mismatch Repair Defects but Do Not Affect Nonhomologous-Tail Removal during Recombination

Yeast Msh2p forms complexes with Msh3p and Msh6p to repair DNA mispairs that arise during DNA replication. In addition to their role in mismatch repair (MMR), the MSH2 and MSH3 gene products are required to remove 3' nonhomologous DNA tails during genetic recombination. The mismatch repair genes MSH6, MLH1, and PMS1, whose products interact with Msh2p, are not required in this process. We have identified mutations in MSH2 that do not disrupt genetic recombination but confer a strong defect in mismatch repair. Twenty-four msh2 mutations that conferred a dominant negative phenotype for mismatch repair were isolated. A subset of these mutations mapped to residues in Msh2p that were analogous to mutations identified in human nonpolyposis colorectal cancer msh2 kindreds. Approximately half of the these MMR-defective mutations retained wild-type or nearly wild-type activity for the removal of nonhomologous DNA tails during genetic recombination. The identification of mutations in MSH2 that disrupt mismatch repair without affecting recombination provides a first step in dissecting the Msh-effector protein complexes that are thought to play different roles during DNA repair and genetic recombination.     

Visualization of eukaryotic DNA mismatch repair reveals distinct recognition and repair intermediates

DNA mismatch repair (MMR) increases replication fidelity by eliminating mispaired bases resulting from replication errors. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, mispairs are primarily detected by the Msh2-Msh6 complex and corrected following recruitment of the Mlh1-Pms1 complex. Here, we visualized functional fluorescent versions of Msh2-Msh6 and Mlh1-Pms1 in living cells. We found that the Msh2-Msh6 complex is an S phase component of replication centers independent of mispaired bases; this localized pool accounted for 10%-15% of MMR in wild-type cells but was essential for MMR in the absence of Exo1. Unexpectedly, Mlh1-Pms1 formed nuclear foci that, although dependent on Msh2-Msh6 for formation, rarely colocalized with Msh2-Msh6 replication-associated foci. Mlh1-Pms1 foci increased when the number of mispaired bases was increased; in contrast, Msh2-Msh6 foci were unaffected. These findings suggest the presence of replication machinery-coupled and -independent pathways for mispair recognition by Msh2-Msh6, which direct formation of superstoichiometric Mlh1-Pms1 foci that represent sites of active MMR.     

Control of GT repeat stability in Schizosaccharomyces pombe by mismatch repair factors

The mismatch repair (MMR) system ensures genome integrity by removing mispaired and unpaired bases that originate during replication. A major source of mutational changes is strand slippage in repetitive DNA sequences without concomitant repair. We established a genetic assay that allows measuring the stability of GT repeats in the ade6 gene of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. In repair-proficient strains most of the repeat variations were insertions, with addition of two nucleotides being the most frequent event. GT repeats were highly destabilized in strains defective in msh2 or pms1. In these backgrounds, mainly 2-bp insertions and 2-bp deletions occurred. Surprisingly, essentially the same high mutation rate was found with mutants defective in msh6. In contrast, a defect in swi4 (a homologue of Msh3) caused only slight effects, and instability was not further increased in msh6 swi4 double mutants. Also inactivation of exo1, which encodes an exonuclease that has an MMR-dependent function in repair of base-base mismatches, caused only slightly increased repeat instability. We conclude that Msh2, Msh6, and Pms1 have an important role in preventing tract length variations in dinucleotide repeats. Exo1 and Swi4 have a minor function, which is at least partially independent of MMR.     

Interaction between the Msh2 and Msh6 Nucleotide-binding Sites in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2-Msh6 Complex

Indirect evidence has suggested that the Msh2-Msh6 mispair-binding complex undergoes conformational changes upon binding of ATP and mispairs, resulting in the formation of Msh2-Msh6 sliding clamps and licensing the formation of Msh2-Msh6-Mlh1-Pms1 ternary complexes. Here, we have studied eight mutant Msh2-Msh6 complexes with defective responses to nucleotide binding and/or mispair binding and used them to study the conformational changes required for sliding clamp formation and ternary complex assembly. ATP binding to the Msh6 nucleotide-binding site results in a conformational change that allows binding of ATP to the Msh2 nucleotide-binding site, although ATP binding to the two nucleotide-binding sites appears to be uncoupled in some mutant complexes. The formation of Msh2-Msh6-Mlh1-Pms1 ternary complexes requires ATP binding to only the Msh6 nucleotide-binding site, whereas the formation of Msh2-Msh6 sliding clamps requires ATP binding to both the Msh2 and Msh6 nucleotide-binding sites. In addition, the properties of the different mutant complexes suggest that distinct conformational states mediated by communication between the Msh2 and Msh6 nucleotide-binding sites are required for the formation of ternary complexes and sliding clamps.