PTEN regulates IGF‐1R‐mediated therapy resistance in melanoma

Inhibition of the mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway is a major advance in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. However, its therapeutic success is limited by the rapid emergence of drug resistance. The insulin‐like growth factor‐1 receptor (IGF‐1R) is overexpressed in melanomas developing resistance toward the BRAF^V600 inhibitor vemurafenib. Here, we show that hyperactivation of BRAF enhances IGF‐1R expression. In addition, the phosphatase activity of PTEN as well as heterocellular contact to stromal cells increases IGF‐1R expression in melanoma cells and enhances resistance to vemurafenib. Interestingly, PTEN‐negative melanoma cells escape IGF‐1R blockade by decreased expression of the receptor, implicating that only in melanoma patients with PTEN‐positive tumors treatment with IGF‐1R inhibitors would be a suitable strategy to combat therapy resistance. Our data emphasize the crosstalk and therapeutic relevance of microenvironmental and tumor cell‐autonomous mechanisms in regulating IGF‐1R expression and by this sensitivity toward targeted therapies.     

Expression of insulin‐like growth factor‐1 receptor in metastatic uveal melanoma and implications for potential autocrine and paracrine tumor cell growth

We investigated the importance of the insulin‐like growth factor‐1 receptor (IGF‐1R) in hepatic metastases of uveal melanoma. The expression pattern of IGF‐1R in archival tissue samples of hepatic metastasis from 24 patients was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. All the samples of hepatic metastases stained positive for IGF‐1R. To investigate the biological role of IGF‐1R on the growth of metastatic uveal melanoma, a long‐term cell line obtained from a hepatic metastasis (TJU‐UM001) was evaluated. TJU‐UM001 expressed cell surface IGF‐1R (>90%) and proliferated in response to exogenous and endogenous insulin‐like growth factor‐1 (IGF‐1). Correlatively, anti‐IGF‐1R antibody completely blocked IGF‐1‐induced growth of TJU‐UM001 cells. IGF‐1 preferentially induced phosphorylation of Akt (S473) in quiescent TJU‐UM001 cells, and this was blocked by anti‐IGF‐1R antibody. This study suggests that autocrine and paracrine mechanisms underlie IGF‐1‐induced growth of metastatic uveal melanoma and underscore the potential benefit of IGF‐1 or IGF‐1R antagonism in treatment for metastatic uveal melanoma.     

An Integrin Binding-defective Mutant of Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 (R36E/R37E IGF1) Acts as a Dominant-negative Antagonist of the IGF1 Receptor (IGF1R) and Suppresses Tumorigenesis but Still Binds to IGF1R

Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF1) is a major therapeutic target for cancer. We recently reported that IGF1 directly binds to integrins (αvβ3 and α6β4) and induces ternary complex formation (integrin-IGF1-IGF1 receptor (IGF1R)) and that the integrin binding-defective mutant of IGF1 (R36E/R37E) is defective in signaling and ternary complex formation. These findings predict that R36E/R37E competes with WT IGF1 for binding to IGF1R and inhibits IGF signaling. Here, we described that excess R36E/R37E suppressed cell viability increased by WT IGF1 in vitro in non-transformed cells. We studied the effect of R36E/R37E on viability and tumorigenesis in cancer cell lines. We did not detect an effect of WT IGF1 or R36E/R37E in cancer cells under anchorage-dependent conditions. However, under anchorage-independent conditions, WT IGF1 enhanced cell viability and induced signals, whereas R36E/R37E did not. Notably, excess R36E/R37E suppressed cell viability and signaling induced by WT IGF1 under anchorage-independent conditions. Using cancer cells stably expressing WT IGF1 or R36E/R37E, we determined that R36E/R37E suppressed tumorigenesis in vivo, whereas WT IGF1 markedly enhanced it. R36E/R37E suppressed the binding of WT IGF1 to the cell surface and the subsequent ternary complex formation induced by WT IGF1. R36E/R37E suppressed activation of IGF1R by insulin. WT IGF1, but not R36E/R37E, induced ternary complex formation with the IGF1R/insulin receptor hybrid. These findings suggest that 1) IGF1 induces signals under anchorage-independent conditions and that 2) R36E/R37E acts as a dominant-negative inhibitor of IGF1R (IGF1 decoy). Our results are consistent with a model in which ternary complex formation is critical for IGF signaling.     

Regulation of insulin resistance by targeting the insulin‐like growth factor 1 receptor with microRNA‐122‐5p in hepatic cells

Insulin resistance (IR) is a common etiology of type 2 diabetes (T2D) defined by a state of decreased reactivity to insulin in multiple organs, such as the liver. This study aims to investigate how microRNA‐122‐5p (miR‐122) regulates the hepatic IR in vitro. We first found that the miR‐122 level was upregulated in the liver of rats fed with a high‐fat diet and injected with streptozotocin (T2D rats), while the expression level of insulin‐like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF‐1R), a potential target of miR‐122, was downregulated in the diabetic liver. In vitro, glucosamine‐induced IR was introduced in HepG2 hepatic cells, and the levels of miR‐122 and IGF‐1R were further assessed. An increase of miR‐122 level and a decrease of IGF‐IR level were observed in IR hepatic cells, which was the same as that in the diabetic liver. Results of the luciferase reporter assay validated IGF‐1R as a direct target of miR‐122. Moreover, in IR HepG2 cells, antagonizing miR‐122 with its specific inhibitor enhanced glucose uptake and suppressed the expression of glucose 6‐phosphatase and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase, two key enzymes in regulating gluconeogenesis. Such alterations induced by the miR‐122 inhibitor in IR hepatic cells were impaired when IGF‐1R was simultaneously knocked down. In addition, the PI3K/Akt pathway was deactivated in IR cells, and then reactivated with miR‐122 inhibitor transfection. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that miR‐122 is able to regulate IR in hepatic cells by targeting IGF‐1R.     

Pristimerin attenuates cell proliferation of uveal melanoma cells by inhibiting insulin‐like growth factor‐1 receptor and its downstream pathways

Uveal melanoma (UM) has a high mortality rate due to liver metastasis. The insulin‐like growth factor‐1 receptor (IGF‐1R) is highly expressed in UM and has been shown to be associated with hepatic metastases. Targeting IGF signalling may be considered as a promising approach to inhibit the process of metastatic UM cells. Pristimerin (PRI) has been demonstrated to inhibit the growth of several cancer cells, but its role and underlying mechanisms in the IGF‐1‐induced UM cell proliferation are largely unknown. The present study examined the anti‐proliferative effect of PRI on UM cells and its possible role in IGF‐1R signalling transduction. MTT and clonogenic assays were used to determine the role of PRI in the proliferation of UM cells. Flow cytometry was performed to detect the effect of PRI on the cell cycle distribution of UM cells. Western blotting was carried out to assess the effects of PRI and IGF‐1 on the IGF‐1R phosphorylation and its downstream targets. The results indicated that IGF‐1 promoted the UM cell proliferation and improved the level of IGF‐1R phosphorylation, whereas PRI attenuated the effect of IGF‐1. Interestingly, PRI could not only induce the G1 phase accumulation and reduce the G2 phase induced by IGF‐1, but also could stimulate the expression of p21 and inhibit the expression of cyclin D1. Besides, PRI could attenuate the phosphorylations of Akt, mTOR and ERK1/2 induced by IGF‐1. Furthermore, the molecular docking study also demonstrated that PRI had potential inhibitory effects on IGF‐1R. Taken together, these results indicated that PRI could inhibit the proliferation of UM cells through down‐regulation of phosphorylated IGF‐1R and its downstream signalling.     

lncRNA NR2F1‐AS1 promotes breast cancer angiogenesis through activating IGF‐1/IGF‐1R/ERK pathway

Long non‐coding RNAs (lncRNAs) take various effects in cancer mostly through sponging with microRNAs (miRNAs). lncRNA NR2F1‐AS1 is found to promote tumour progression in hepatocellular carcinoma, endometrial cancer and thyroid cancer. However, the role of lncRNA NR2F1‐AS1 in breast cancer angiogenesis remains unknown. In this study, we found lncRNA NR2F1‐AS1 was positively related with CD31 and CD34 in breast cancer through Pearson's correlation analysis, while lncRNA NR2F1‐AS1 transfection promoted human umbilical vascular endothelial cell (HUVEC) tube formation. In breast cancer cells, lncRNA NR2F1‐AS1 enhanced the HUVEC proliferation, tube formation and migration ability through tumour‐conditioned medium (TCM). In zebrafish model, lncRNA NR2F1‐AS1 increased the breast cancer cell‐related neo‐vasculature and subsequently promoted the breast cancer cell metastasis. In mouse model, lncRNA NR2F1‐AS1 promoted the tumour vessel formation, increased the micro vessel density (MVD) and then induced the growth of primary tumour. Mechanically, lncRNA NR2F1‐AS1 increased insulin‐like growth factor‐1 (IGF‐1) expression through sponging miRNA‐338‐3p in breast cancer cells and then activated the receptor of IGF‐1 (IGF‐1R) and extracellular signal‐regulated kinase (ERK) pathway in HUVECs. These results indicated that lncRNA NR2F1‐AS1 could promote breast cancer angiogenesis through IGF‐1/IGF‐1R/ERK pathway.     

Effects of insulin and insulin‐like growth factor 1 on osteoblast proliferation and differentiation: differential signalling via Akt and ERK

Insulin and insulin‐like growth factor 1 (IGF‐1) are evolutionarily conserved hormonal signalling molecules, which influence a wide array of physiological functions including metabolism, growth and development. Using genetic mouse studies, both insulin and IGF‐1 have been shown to be anabolic agents in osteoblasts and bone development primarily through the activation of Akt and ERK signalling pathways. In this study, we examined the temporal signalling actions of insulin and IGF‐1 on primary calvarial osteoblast growth and differentiation. First, we observed that the IGF‐1 receptor expression decreases whereas insulin receptor expression increases during osteoblast differentiation. Subsequently, we show that although both insulin and IGF‐1 promote osteoblast differentiation and mineralization in vitro, IGF‐1, but not insulin, can induce osteoblast proliferation. The IGF‐1‐induced osteoblast proliferation was mediated via both MAPK and Akt pathways because the IGF‐1‐mediated cell proliferation was blocked by U0126, an MEK/MAPK inhibitor, or LY294002, a PI3‐kinase inhibitor. Osteocalcin, an osteoblast‐specific protein whose expression corresponds with osteoblast differentiation, was increased in a dose‐ and time‐dependent manner after insulin treatment, whereas it was decreased with IGF‐1 treatment. Moreover, insulin treatment dramatically induced osteocalcin promoter activity, whereas IGF‐1 treatment significantly inhibited it, indicating direct effect of insulin on osteocalcin synthesis. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Central insulin‐like growth factor‐1 (IGF‐1) restores whole‐body insulin action in a model of age‐related insulin resistance and IGF‐1 decline

Low insulin‐like growth factor‐1 (IGF‐1) signaling is associated with improved longevity, but is paradoxically linked with several age‐related diseases in humans. Insulin‐like growth factor‐1 has proven to be particularly beneficial to the brain, where it confers protection against features of neuronal and cognitive decline. While aging is characterized by central insulin resistance in the face of hyperinsulinemia, the somatotropic axis markedly declines in older humans. Thus, we hypothesized that increasing IGF‐1 in the brain may prove to be a novel therapeutic alternative to overcome central insulin resistance and restore whole‐body insulin action in aging. Utilizing hyperinsulinemic‐euglycemic clamps, we show that old insulin‐resistant rats with age‐related declines in IGF‐1 level demonstrate markedly improved whole‐body insulin action, when treated with central IGF‐1, as compared to central vehicle or insulin (P < 0.05). Furthermore, central IGF‐1, but not insulin, suppressed hepatic glucose production and increased glucose disposal rates in aging rats (P < 0.05). Taken together, IGF‐1 action in the brain and periphery provides a ‘balance’ between its beneficial and detrimental actions. Therefore, we propose that strategies aimed at ‘tipping the balance’ of IGF‐1 action centrally are the optimal approach to achieve healthy aging and longevity in humans.     

Long non‐coding RNA deleted in lymphocytic leukaemia 1 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression by sponging miR‐133a to regulate IGF‐1R expression

Long non‐coding RNA (lncRNA) deleted in lymphocytic leukaemia 1 (DLEU1) was reported to be involved in the occurrence and development of multiple cancers. However, the exact expression, biological function and underlying mechanism of DLEU1 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain unclear. In this study, real‐time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT‐PCR) in HCC tissues and cell lines revealed that DLEU1 expression was up‐regulated, and the increased DLEU1 was closely associated with advanced tumour‐node‐metastasis stage, vascular metastasis and poor overall survival. Function experiments showed that knockdown of DLEU1 significantly inhibited HCC cell proliferation, colony formation, migration and invasion, and suppressed epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) process via increasing the expression of E‐cadherin and decreasing the expression of N‐cadherin and Vimentin. Luciferase reporter gene assay and RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) assay demonstrated that DLEU1 could sponge miR‐133a. Moreover, miR‐133a inhibition significantly reversed the suppression effects of DLEU1 knockdown on HCC cells. Besides, we found that silenced DLEU1 significantly decreased insulin‐like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF‐1R) expression (a target of miR‐133a) and its downstream signal PI3K/AKT pathway in HCC cells, while miR‐133a inhibitor partially reversed this trend. Furthermore, DLEU1 knockdown impaired tumour growth in vivo by regulating miR‐133a/IGF‐1R axis. Collectively, these findings indicate that DLEU1 promoted HCC progression by sponging miR‐133a to regulate IGF‐1R expression. Deleted in lymphocytic leukaemia 1/miR‐133a/IGF‐1R axis may be a novel target for treatment of HCC.     

GRK2 negatively regulates IGF‐1R signaling pathway and cyclins' expression in HepG2 cells

G protein coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) plays a central role in the regulation of a variety of important signaling pathways. Alternation of GRK2 protein level and activity casts profound effects on cell physiological functions and causes diseases such as heart failure, rheumatoid arthritis, and obesity. We have previously reported that overexpression of GRK2 has an inhibitory role in cancer cell growth. To further examine the role of GRK2 in cancer, in this study, we investigated the effects of reduced protein level of GRK2 on insulin‐like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF‐1R) signaling pathway in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) HepG2 cells. We created a GRK2 knockdown cell line using a lentiviral vector mediated expression of GRK2 specific short hairpin RNA (shRNA). Under IGF‐1 stimulation, HepG2 cells with reduced level of GRK2 showed elevated total IGF‐1R protein expression as well as tyrosine phosphorylation of receptor. In addition, HepG2 cells with reduced level of GRK2 also demonstrated increased tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS1 at the residue 612 and increased phosphorylation of Akt, indicating a stronger activation of IGF‐1R signaling pathway. However, HepG2 cells with reduced level of GRK2 did not display any growth advantage in culture as compared with the scramble control cells. We further detected that reduced level of GRK2 induced a small cell cycle arrest at G2/M phase by enhancing the expression of cyclin A, B1, and E. Our results indicate that GRK2 has contrasting roles on HepG2 cell growth by negatively regulating the IGF‐1R signaling pathway and cyclins' expression. J. Cell. Physiol. 228: 1897–1901, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

RNAi‐mediated silencing of insulin receptor substrate‐4 enhances actinomycin D‐ and tumor necrosis factor‐α‐induced cell death in hepatocarcinoma cancer cell lines

Insulin receptor substrate‐4 (IRS‐4) transmits signals from the insulin‐like growth factor receptor (IGF‐IR) and the insulin receptor (IR) to the PI3K/AKT and the ERK1/2 pathways. IRS‐4 expression increases dramatically after partial hepatectomy and plays an important role in HepG2 hepatoblastoma cell line proliferation/differentiation. In human hepatocarcinoma, IRS‐4 overexpression has been associated with tumor development. Herein, we describe the mechanism whereby IRS‐4 depletion induced by RNA interference (siRNA) sensitizes HepG2 cells to treatment with actinomycin D (Act D) and combined treatment with Act D plus tumor necrosis factor‐α (TNF‐α). Similar results have been obtained in HuH 7 and Chang cell lines. Act D therapy drove the cells to a mitochondrial‐dependent apoptotic program involving cytochrome c release, caspase 3 activation, PARP fragmentation and DNA laddering. TNF‐α amplifies the effect of Act D on HepG2 cell apoptosis increasing c‐jun N‐terminal kinase (JNK) activity, IκB‐α proteolysis and glutathione depletion. IRS‐4 depleted cells that were treated with Act D showed an increase in cytochrome c release and procaspase 3 and PARP proteolysis with respect to control cells. The mechanism involved in IRS‐4 action is independent of Akt, IκB kinase and JNK. IRS‐4 down regulation, however, decreased γ‐glutamylcysteine synthetase content and cell glutathione level in the presence of Act D plus TNF‐α. These results suggest that IRS‐4 protects HepG2 cells from oxidative stress induced by drug treatment. J. Cell. Biochem. 108: 1292–1301, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Nandrolone and stanozolol induce leydig cell tumor proliferation through an estrogen‐dependent mechanism involving IGF‐I system

Several substances such as anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS), peptide hormones like insulin‐like growth factor‐I (IGF‐I), aromatase inhibitors and estrogen antagonists are offered via the Internet, and are assumed without considering the potential deleterious effects that can be caused by their administration. In this study we aimed to determine if nandrolone and stanozolol, two commonly used AAS, could have an effect on Leydig cell tumor proliferation and if their effects could be potentiated by the concomitant use of IGF‐I. Using a rat Leydig tumor cell line, R2C cells, as experimental model we found that nandrolone and stanozolol caused a dose‐dependent induction of aromatase expression and estradiol (E2) production. When used in combination with IGF‐I they were more effective than single molecules in inducing aromatase expression. AAS exhibited estrogenic activity and induced rapid estrogen receptor (ER)‐dependent pathways involving IGF1R, AKT, and ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Inhibitors for these kinases decreased AAS‐dependent aromatase expression. Up‐regulated aromatase levels and related E2 production increased cell proliferation as a consequence of increased cyclin E expression. The observation that ER antagonist ICI182,780 was also able to significantly reduce ASS‐ and AAS + IGF‐induced cell proliferation, confirmed a role for estrogens in AAS‐dependent proliferative effects. Taken together these data clearly indicate that the use of high doses of AAS, as it occurs in doping practice, enhances Leydig cell proliferation, increasing the risk of tumor development. This risk is higher when AAS are used in association with IGF‐I. To our knowledge this is the first report directly associating AAS and testicular cancer. J. Cell. Physiol. 227: 2079–2088, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Insulin-like growth factor 2 enhances insulinogenic differentiation of human eyelid adipose stem cells via the insulin receptor

Objectives: Previously, we have isolated stem cells (HEAC) from human eyelid adipose tissue and functionally differentiated them into insulin‐secreting cells. In the present study, we examined whether insulin family members might influence insulinogenic differentiation of HEAC. Materials and methods: Following culture in differentiation media containing insulin family member or not, cells were examined for gene expression, protein expression and, particularly, insulin and C‐peptide secretion, in response to high glucose challenge. Using antibodies against the specific receptor, target receptor mediating effect of the insulin family member was investigated. Results: Insulin treatment during culture had little effect on either insulin or C‐peptide secretion from HEAC, against high glucose challenge after culture. However, insulin‐like growth factor (IGF) 1 treatment decreased both secretions, and interestingly, IGF2 greatly increased the secretions. HEAC treated with IGF2 had strong expression of Pdx1, Isl1, Pax6 and PC1/3 genes, and distinct staining after insulin and C‐peptide antibodies, and dithizone. IGF2‐enhanced insulinogenic differentiation was totally blocked by antibody against insulin receptor (IR), but not by anti‐IGF1 receptor (IGF1R). Differentiated HEAC expressed both IR and IGF1R genes, whereas they expressed neither IGF2 nor IGF2R genes. Conclusions: From these results, it is suggested that IGF1 might inhibit insulinogenic differentiation of HEAC, whereas IGF2 enhances differentiation, and that enhancement of IGF2 appeared to be mediated via IR.