Family study designs in the age of genome-wide association studies: experience from the Framingham Heart Study

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The past year has seen the publication of many genome-wide association studies, most of which are case-control studies. These publications are at the forefront of current research into the examination of genetic effects for numerous diseases, including diabetes, heart disease and cancer. Over the past 25 years the tour de force of genetics research has been in family studies, using segregation, linkage and association analyses. Are these approaches now passé? Here we discuss the role of family studies in modern genetics research, using results from the Framingham Heart Study as examples. RECENT FINDINGS: Family studies permit both linkage and association analyses. Importantly, family-based association tests that consider transmission of genetic variants within a family provide important information on the genetic etiology of disease traits and avoid the potential of false-positive findings due to population substructure. SUMMARY: Family-based study designs continue to contribute much to the modern era of genome-wide association studies.     

Analysis of survival data from case-control family studies

In case-control family studies with survival endpoint, age of onset of diseases can be used to assess the familial aggregation of the disease and the relationship between the disease and genetic or environmental risk factors. Because of the retrospective nature of the case--control study, methods for analyzing prospectively collected correlated failure time data do not apply directly. In this article, we propose a semiparametric quasi-partial-likelihood approach to simultaneously estimate the effect of covariates on the age of onset and the association of ages of onset among family members that does not require specification of the baseline marginal distribution. We conducted a simulation study to evaluate the performance of the proposed approach and compare it with the existing semiparametric ones. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed approach has better performance in terms of consistency and efficiency. We illustrate the methodology using a subset of data from the Washington Ashkenazi Study.     

A Gaussian copula approach for the analysis of secondary phenotypes in case-control genetic association studies

In many case-control genetic association studies, a set of correlated secondary phenotypes that may share common genetic factors with disease status are collected. Examination of these secondary phenotypes can yield valuable insights about the disease etiology and supplement the main studies. However, due to unequal sampling probabilities between cases and controls, standard regression analysis that assesses the effect of SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) on secondary phenotypes using cases only, controls only, or combined samples of cases and controls can yield inflated type I error rates when the test SNP is associated with the disease. To solve this issue, we propose a Gaussian copula-based approach that efficiently models the dependence between disease status and secondary phenotypes. Through simulations, we show that our method yields correct type I error rates for the analysis of secondary phenotypes under a wide range of situations. To illustrate the effectiveness of our method in the analysis of real data, we applied our method to a genome-wide association study on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), where "cases" are defined as individuals with extremely high HDL-C level and "controls" are defined as those with low HDL-C level. We treated 4 quantitative traits with varying degrees of correlation with HDL-C as secondary phenotypes and tested for association with SNPs in LIPG, a gene that is well known to be associated with HDL-C. We show that when the correlation between the primary and secondary phenotypes is >0.2, the P values from case-control combined unadjusted analysis are much more significant than methods that aim to correct for ascertainment bias. Our results suggest that to avoid false-positive associations, it is important to appropriately model secondary phenotypes in case-control genetic association studies.     

A Novel Approach for Identifying Causal Models of Complex Diseases from Family Data

Causal models including genetic factors are important for understanding the presentation mechanisms of complex diseases. Familial aggregation and segregation analyses based on polygenic threshold models have been the primary approach to fitting genetic models to the family data of complex diseases. In the current study, an advanced approach to obtaining appropriate causal models for complex diseases based on the sufficient component cause (SCC) model involving combinations of traditional genetics principles was proposed. The probabilities for the entire population, i.e., normal–normal, normal–disease, and disease–disease, were considered for each model for the appropriate handling of common complex diseases. The causal model in the current study included the genetic effects from single genes involving epistasis, complementary gene interactions, gene–environment interactions, and environmental effects. Bayesian inference using a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm (MCMC) was used to assess of the proportions of each component for a given population lifetime incidence. This approach is flexible, allowing both common and rare variants within a gene and across multiple genes. An application to schizophrenia data confirmed the complexity of the causal factors. An analysis of diabetes data demonstrated that environmental factors and gene–environment interactions are the main causal factors for type II diabetes. The proposed method is effective and useful for identifying causal models, which can accelerate the development of efficient strategies for identifying causal factors of complex diseases.     

Inheritance of acute appendicitis: familial aggregation and evidence of polygenic transmission.

We explored familiality as well as the heritability and possible mode(s) of inheritance of acute appendicitis in childhood and early adolescence. Our case-control study showed that a positive family history for reported appendectomy was significantly more frequent in families of 80 consecutive patients eventually proved to have histopathologic acute appendicitis than in families of surgical controls matched for sex, age, and number of siblings. The relative risk was 10.0 (95% confidence limits 4.7-21.4). The pattern of familial aggregation was further supported by the fact that the age-standardized morbidity ratio was four times greater among family members of cases than among controls. We then applied the unified mixed model of segregation analysis, as implemented in the computer program POINTER, to a new set of 100 multigenerational pedigrees of children with histopathologically confirmed acute appendicitis that were broken down into 674 nuclear families. Age-specific morbidity risk and lifetime incidence of acute appendicitis were estimated from relatives of controls matched for age and sex to probands. Complex segregation analysis supported a polygenic or multifactorial model with a total heritability of 56%. There was no evidence to support a major gene, although a rare gene could not be ruled out as the cause of a small proportion of cases. Specific studies to address genetic and environmental factors in this serious disease seem worthwhile; but, for now, a positive family history of appendicitis might join other evidence leading to improved clinical recognition of acute appendicitis.     

A knowledge-based method for association studies on complex diseases

Complex disorders are a class of diseases whose phenotypic variance is caused by the interplay of multiple genetic and environmental factors. Analyzing the complexity underlying the genetic architecture of such traits may help develop more efficient diagnostic tests and therapeutic protocols. Despite the continuous advances in revealing the genetic basis of many of complex diseases using genome-wide association studies (GWAS), a major proportion of their genetic variance has remained unexplained, in part because GWAS are unable to reliably detect small individual risk contributions and to capture the underlying genetic heterogeneity. In this paper we describe a hypothesis-based method to analyze the association between multiple genetic factors and a complex phenotype. Starting from sets of markers selected based on preexisting biomedical knowledge, our method generates multi-marker models relevant to the biological process underlying a complex trait for which genotype data is available. We tested the applicability of our method using the WTCCC case-control dataset. Analyzing a number of biological pathways, the method was able to identify several immune system related multi-SNP models significantly associated with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Crohn's disease (CD). RA-associated multi-SNP models were also replicated in an independent case-control dataset. The method we present provides a framework for capturing joint contributions of genetic factors to complex traits. In contrast to hypothesis-free approaches, its results can be given a direct biological interpretation. The replicated multi-SNP models generated by our analysis may serve as a predictor to estimate the risk of RA development in individuals of Caucasian ancestry.     

Haplotype association analyses in resources of mixed structure using Monte Carlo testing

Background  

Genomewide association studies have resulted in a great many genomic regions that are likely to harbor disease genes. Thorough interrogation of these specific regions is the logical next step, including regional haplotype studies to identify risk haplotypes upon which the underlying critical variants lie. Pedigrees ascertained for disease can be powerful for genetic analysis due to the cases being enriched for genetic disease. Here we present a Monte Carlo based method to perform haplotype association analysis. Our method, hapMC, allows for the analysis of full-length and sub-haplotypes, including imputation of missing data, in resources of nuclear families, general pedigrees, case-control data or mixtures thereof. Both traditional association statistics and transmission/disequilibrium statistics can be performed. The method includes a phasing algorithm that can be used in large pedigrees and optional use of pseudocontrols.     

Powerful multilocus tests of genetic association in the presence of gene-gene and gene-environment interactions

In modern genetic epidemiology studies, the association between the disease and a genomic region, such as a candidate gene, is often investigated using multiple SNPs. We propose a multilocus test of genetic association that can account for genetic effects that might be modified by variants in other genes or by environmental factors. We consider use of the venerable and parsimonious Tukey's 1-degree-of-freedom model of interaction, which is natural when individual SNPs within a gene are associated with disease through a common biological mechanism; in contrast, many standard regression models are designed as if each SNP has unique functional significance. On the basis of Tukey's model, we propose a novel but computationally simple generalized test of association that can simultaneously capture both the main effects of the variants within a genomic region and their interactions with the variants in another region or with an environmental exposure. We compared performance of our method with that of two standard tests of association, one ignoring gene-gene/gene-environment interactions and the other based on a saturated model of interactions. We demonstrate major power advantages of our method both in analysis of data from a case-control study of the association between colorectal adenoma and DNA variants in the NAT2 genomic region, which are well known to be related to a common biological phenotype, and under different models of gene-gene interactions with use of simulated data.     

Case-control and case-only designs with genotype and family history data: estimating relative risk, residual familial aggregation, and cumulative risk

In case-control studies of inherited diseases, participating subjects (probands) are often interviewed to collect detailed data about disease history and age-at-onset information in their family members. Genotype data are typically collected from the probands, but not from their relatives. In this article, we introduce an approach that combines case-control analysis of data on the probands with kin-cohort analysis of disease history data on relatives. Assuming a marginally specified multivariate survival model for joint risk of disease among family members, we describe methods for estimating relative risk, cumulative risk, and residual familial aggregation. We also describe a variation of the methodology that can be used for kin-cohort analysis of the family history data from a sample of genotyped cases only. We perform simulation studies to assess performance of the proposed methodologies with correct and mis-specified models for familial aggregation. We illustrate the proposed methodologies by estimating the risk of breast cancer from BRCA1/2 mutations using data from the Washington Ashkenazi Study.     

catmap: Case-control And TDT Meta-Analysis Package

Background  

Risk for complex disease is thought to be controlled by multiple genetic risk factors, each with small individual effects. Meta-analyses of several independent studies may be helpful to increase the ability to detect association when effect sizes are modest. Although many software options are available for meta-analysis of genetic case-control data, no currently available software implements the method described by Kazeem and Farrall (2005), which combines data from independent family-based and case-control studies.     

Developing Genetic Epidemiological Models to Predict Risk for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in High-Risk Population of China

To date, the only established model for assessing risk for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) relies on the sero-status of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). By contrast, the risk assessment models proposed here include environmental risk factors, family history of NPC, and information on genetic variants. The models were developed using epidemiological and genetic data from a large case-control study, which included 1,387 subjects with NPC and 1,459 controls of Cantonese origin. The predictive accuracy of the models were then assessed by calculating the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC). To compare the discriminatory improvement of models with and without genetic information, we estimated the net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination index (IDI). Well-established environmental risk factors for NPC include consumption of salted fish and preserved vegetables and cigarette smoking (in pack years). The environmental model alone shows modest discriminatory ability (AUC = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.66, 0.70), which is only slightly increased by the addition of data on family history of NPC (AUC = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.68, 0.72). With the addition of data on genetic variants, however, our model’s discriminatory ability rises to 0.74 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.76). The improvements in NRI and IDI also suggest the potential usefulness of considering genetic variants when screening for NPC in endemic areas. If these findings are confirmed in larger cohort and population-based case-control studies, use of the new models to analyse data from NPC-endemic areas could well lead to earlier detection of NPC.     

Robust trend tests for genetic association in case-control studies using family data

We studied a trend test for genetic association between disease and the number of risk alleles using case-control data. When the data are sampled from families, this trend test can be adjusted to take into account the correlations among family members in complex pedigrees. However, the test depends on the scores based on the underlying genetic model and thus it may have substantial loss of power when the model is misspecified. Since the mode of inheritance will be unknown for complex diseases, we have developed two robust trend tests for case-control studies using family data. These robust tests have relatively good power for a class of possible genetic models. The trend tests and robust trend tests were applied to a dataset of Genetic Analysis Workshop 14 from the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism.     

Prediction model for knee osteoarthritis based on genetic and clinical information

Introduction  

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common bone and joint disease influenced by genetic and environmental factors. Recent association studies have uncovered the genetic factors behind OA, its susceptibility genes, which would enable us to predict disease occurrence based on genotype information. However, most previous studies have evaluated the effects of only a single susceptibility gene, and hence prediction based on such information is not as reliable. Here, we constructed OA-prediction models based on genotype information from a case-control association study and tested their predictability.     

Testing Hardy-Weinberg proportions in a frequency-matched case-control genetic association study

In case-control genetic association studies, cases are subjects with the disease and controls are subjects without the disease. At the time of case-control data collection, information about secondary phenotypes is also collected. In addition to studies of primary diseases, there has been some interest in studying genetic variants associated with secondary phenotypes. In genetic association studies, the deviation from Hardy-Weinberg proportion (HWP) of each genetic marker is assessed as an initial quality check to identify questionable genotypes. Generally, HWP tests are performed based on the controls for the primary disease or secondary phenotype. However, when the disease or phenotype of interest is common, the controls do not represent the general population. Therefore, using only controls for testing HWP can result in a highly inflated type I error rate for the disease- and/or phenotype-associated variants. Recently, two approaches, the likelihood ratio test (LRT) approach and the mixture HWP (mHWP) exact test were proposed for testing HWP in samples from case-control studies. Here, we show that these two approaches result in inflated type I error rates and could lead to the removal from further analysis of potential causal genetic variants associated with the primary disease and/or secondary phenotype when the study of primary disease is frequency-matched on the secondary phenotype. Therefore, we proposed alternative approaches, which extend the LRT and mHWP approaches, for assessing HWP that account for frequency matching. The goal was to maintain more (possible causative) single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the sample for further analysis. Our simulation results showed that both extended approaches could control type I error probabilities. We also applied the proposed approaches to test HWP for SNPs from a genome-wide association study of lung cancer that was frequency-matched on smoking status and found that the proposed approaches can keep more genetic variants for association studies.     

A method for the assessment of disease associations with single-nucleotide polymorphism haplotypes and environmental variables in case-control studies

The rough draft of the human genome map has been used to identify most of the functional genes in the human genome, as well as to identify nucleotide variations, known as "single-nucleotide polymorphisms" (SNPs), in these genes. By use of advanced biotechnologies, researchers are beginning to genotype thousands of SNPs from biological samples. Among the many possible applications, one of them is the study of SNP associations with complex human diseases, such as cancers or coronary heart diseases, by using a case-control study design. Through the gathering of environmental risk factors and other lifestyle factors, such a study can be effectively used to investigate interactions between genes and environmental factors in their associations with disease phenotype. Earlier, we developed a method to statistically construct individuals' haplotypes and to estimate the distribution of haplotypes of multiple SNPs in a defined population, by use of estimating-equation techniques. Extending this idea, we describe here an analytic method for assessing the association between the constructed haplotypes along with environmental factors and the disease phenotype. This method is also robust to the model assumptions and is scalable to a large number of SNPs. Asymptotic properties of estimations in the method are proved theoretically and are tested for finite sample sizes by use of simulations. To demonstrate the use of the method, we applied it to assess the possible association between apolipoprotein CIII (six coding SNPs) and restenosis by using a case-control data set. Our analysis revealed two haplotypes that may reduce the risk of restenosis.     

Semiparametric maximum likelihood methods for analyzing genetic and environmental effects with case-control mother-child pair data

Summary Case-control mother-child pair design represents a unique advantage for dissecting genetic susceptibility of complex traits because it allows the assessment of both maternal and offspring genetic compositions. This design has been widely adopted in studies of obstetric complications and neonatal outcomes. In this work, we developed an efficient statistical method for evaluating joint genetic and environmental effects on a binary phenotype. Using a logistic regression model to describe the relationship between the phenotype and maternal and offspring genetic and environmental risk factors, we developed a semiparametric maximum likelihood method for the estimation of odds ratio association parameters. Our method is novel because it exploits two unique features of the study data for the parameter estimation. First, the correlation between maternal and offspring SNP genotypes can be specified under the assumptions of random mating, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, and Mendelian inheritance. Second, environmental exposures are often not affected by offspring genes conditional on maternal genes. Our method yields more efficient estimates compared with the standard prospective method for fitting logistic regression models to case-control data. We demonstrated the performance of our method through extensive simulation studies and the analysis of data from the Jerusalem Perinatal Study.     

Evaluation of candidate genes in case-control studies: a statistical method to account for related subjects

Traditional case-control studies provide a powerful and efficient method for evaluation of association between candidate genes and disease. The sampling of cases from multiplex pedigrees, rather than from a catchment area, can increase the likelihood that genetic cases are selected. However, use of all the related cases without accounting for their biological relationship can increase the type I error rate of the statistical test. To overcome this problem, we present an analysis method that is used to compare genotype frequencies between cases and controls, according to a trend in proportions as the dosage of the risk allele increases. This method uses the appropriate variance to account for the correlated family data, thus maintaining the correct type I error rate. The magnitude of the association is estimated by the odds ratio, with the variance of the odds ratio also accounting for the correlated data. Our method makes efficient use of data collected from multiplex families and should prove useful for the analysis of candidate genes among families sampled for linkage studies. An application of our method, to family data from a prostate cancer study, is presented to illustrate the method's utility.     

Recognition of genetic factors influencing the progression of hepatitis C : potential for personalized therapy

Infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major cause of chronic liver disease. Hepatic fibrosis may develop in subjects with chronic HCV infection, culminating in cirrhosis and an increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. The rate of development of fibrosis varies substantially between individuals; while it is influenced by a number of demographic and environmental factors, these account for only a small proportion of the variability.There are no clinical markers or tests that predict the rate of fibrosis progression in an individual subject. Thus, there has been increasing interest in the influence of host genetic factors on the rate of disease progression, and whether a genetic signature can be developed to reliably identify individuals at risk of severe disease. Numerous case-control, candidate gene, allele-association studies have examined the relationship between host single nucleotide polymorphisms or other genetic mutations and fibrosis in patients with chronic HCV infection. However, these studies have generally been irreproducible and disappointing. As seen with genetic studies for other diseases, small study cohorts and poor study design have contributed to limited meaningful findings. The successful determination of genetic signatures for fibrosis progression in chronic HCV will require multicenter collaborations using genome-wide association studies, with large, phenotypically well-defined sample sets. While these studies will require a significant financial commitment, a successful outcome offers the potential for personalized therapy and better patient management.     

复杂疾病全基因组关联研究进展——遗传统计分析

2005年, Science杂志首次报道了有关人类年龄相关性黄斑变性的全基因组关联研究, 此后有关肥胖、2型糖尿病、冠心病、阿尔茨海默病等一系列复杂疾病的全基因组关联研究被陆续报道, 这一阶段被称为人类全基因组关联研究的第一次浪潮。文章分别介绍了全基因组关联研究统计分析的方法、软件和应用实例; 比较了关联分析中多重检验的P值调整方法, 包括Bonferroni、递减的Bonferroni校正法、模拟运算法和控制错误发现率的方法; 还讨论了人群混杂对关联分析结果可能产生的影响及原理, 以及全基因组关联研究中控制人群混杂的方法的研究进展和应用实例。在全基因组关联研究的第一次浪潮中, 应用经典的遗传统计方法发现了许多基因-表型之间的关联并且能够对这些关联做出解释, 其中包括许多基因组中的未知基因和染色体区域。然而, 全基因组关联研究的继续发展需要进一步阐述基因组内基因之间相互作用、基因-基因之间的复杂作用网络与环境因素的相互作用在复杂疾病发生中的作用, 现有的统计分析方法肯定不能满足需要, 开发更为高级的统计分析方法势在必行。最后, 文章还给出了全基因组关联研究统计分析软件的相关网站信息。     

Complex segregation analysis reveals a multigene model for lung cancer

Lung cancer risk is largely attributed to tobacco exposure, but genetic predisposition also plays an etiologic role. Several studies have investigated the involvement of genetic predisposition in lung cancer aggregation in affected families, although with inconsistent results. Some studies have provided evidence for Mendelian inheritance, whereas others have suggested that environmental models are most appropriate for lung cancer aggregation in families. To examine the genetic basis of lung cancer, we performed segregation analysis on 14,378 individuals from 1,561 lung cancer case families, allowing for the effects of smoking, sex, and age. Both a Mendelian decreasing model and a Mendelian codominant model were found to be the best fitting models for susceptibility. However, when we modeled age-of-onset, all Mendelian models and the environmental model were rejected suggesting that multiple genetic factors (possibly multiple genetic loci and interactions) contribute to the age-of-onset of lung cancer. The results provide evidence that multiple genetic factors contribute to lung cancer and may act as a guide in further studies to localize susceptibility genes in lung cancer.