Requirements for conversion of the Na(+)-driven flagellar motor of Vibrio cholerae to the H(+)-driven motor of Escherichia coli

Bacterial flagella are powered by a motor that converts a transmembrane electrochemical potential of either H(+) or Na(+) into mechanical work. In Escherichia coli, the MotA and MotB proteins form the stator and function in proton translocation, whereas the FliG protein is located on the rotor and is involved in flagellar assembly and torque generation. The sodium-driven polar flagella of Vibrio species contain homologs of MotA and MotB, called PomA and PomB, and also contain two other membrane proteins called MotX and MotY, which are essential for motor rotation and that might also function in ion conduction. Deletions in pomA, pomB, motX, or motY in Vibrio cholerae resulted in a nonmotile phenotype, whereas deletion of fliG gave a nonflagellate phenotype. fliG genes on plasmids complemented fliG-null strains of the parent species but not fliG-null strains of the other species. FliG-null strains were complemented by chimeric FliG proteins in which the C-terminal domain came from the other species, however, implying that the C-terminal part of FliG can function in conjunction with the ion-translocating components of either species. A V. cholerae strain deleted of pomA, pomB, motX, and motY became weakly motile when the E. coli motA and motB genes were introduced on a plasmid. Like E. coli, but unlike wild-type V. cholerae, motility of some V. cholerae strains containing the hybrid motor was inhibited by the protonophore carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone under neutral as well as alkaline conditions but not by the sodium motor-specific inhibitor phenamil. We conclude that the E. coli proton motor components MotA and MotB can function in place of the motor proteins of V. cholerae and that the hybrid motors are driven by the proton motive force.     

Hybrid Motor with H+- and Na+-Driven Components Can Rotate Vibrio Polar Flagella by Using Sodium Ions

The bacterial flagellar motor is a molecular machine that converts ion flux across the membrane into flagellar rotation. The coupling ion is either a proton or a sodium ion. The polar flagellar motor of the marine bacterium Vibrio alginolyticus is driven by sodium ions, and the four protein components, PomA, PomB, MotX, and MotY, are essential for motor function. Among them, PomA and PomB are similar to MotA and MotB of the proton-driven motors, respectively. PomA shows greatest similarity to MotA of the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides. MotA is composed of 253 amino acids, the same length as PomA, and 40% of its residues are identical to those of PomA. R. sphaeroides MotB has high similarity only to the transmembrane region of PomB. To examine whether the R. sphaeroides motor genes can function in place of the pomA and pomB genes of V. alginolyticus, we constructed plasmids including both motA and motB or motA alone and transformed them into missense and null pomA-paralyzed mutants of V. alginolyticus. The transformants from both strains showed restored motility, although the swimming speeds were low. On the other hand, pomB mutants were not restored to motility by any plasmid containing motA and/or motB. Next, we tested which ions (proton or sodium) coupled to the hybrid motor function. The motor did not work in sodium-free buffer and was inhibited by phenamil and amiloride, sodium motor-specific inhibitors, but not by a protonophore. Thus, we conclude that the proton motor component, MotA, of R. sphaeroides can generate torque by coupling with the sodium ion flux in place of PomA of V. alginolyticus.     

Coupling ion specificity of chimeras between H(+)- and Na(+)-driven motor proteins, MotB and PomB, in Vibrio polar flagella

We have shown that a hybrid motor consisting of proton-type Rhodobacter sphaeroides MotA and sodium-type VIBRIO: alginolyticus PomB, MotX and MotY, can work as a sodium-driven motor in VIBRIO: cells. In this study, we tried to substitute the B subunits, which contain a putative ion-binding site in the transmembrane region. Rhodobacter sphaeroides MotB did not work with either MotA or PomA in Vibrio cells. Therefore, we constructed chimeric proteins (MomB), which had N-terminal MotB and C-terminal PomB. MomB proteins, with the entire transmembrane region derived from the H(+)-type MotB, gave rise to an Na(+) motor with MotA. The other two MomB proteins, in which the junction sites were within the transmembrane region, also formed Na(+) motors with PomA, but were changed for Na(+) or Li(+) specificity. These results show that the channel part consisting of the transmembrane regions from the A and B subunits can interchange Na(+)- and H(+)-type subunits and this can affect the ion specificity. This is the first report to have changed the specificity of the coupling ions in a bacterial flagellar motor.     

Putative channel components for the fast-rotating sodium-driven flagellar motor of a marine bacterium.

The polar flagellum of Vibrio alginolyticus rotates remarkably fast (up to 1,700 revolutions per second) by using a motor driven by sodium ions. Two genes, motX and motY, for the sodium-driven flagellar motor have been identified in marine bacteria, Vibrio parahaemolyticus and V. alginolyticus. They have no similarity to the genes for proton-driven motors, motA and motB, whose products constitute a proton channel. MotX was proposed to be a component of a sodium channel. Here we identified additional sodium motor genes, pomA and pomB, in V. alginolyticus. Unexpectedly, PomA and PomB have similarities to MotA and MotB, respectively, especially in the predicted transmembrane regions. These results suggest that PomA and PomB may be sodium-conducting channel components of the sodium-driven motor and that the motor part consists of the products of at least four genes, pomA, pomB, motX, and motY. Furthermore, swimming speed was controlled by the expression level of the pomA gene, suggesting that newly synthesized PomA proteins, which are components of a force-generating unit, were successively integrated into the defective motor complexes. These findings imply that Na+-driven flagellar motors may have similar structure and function as proton-driven motors, but with some interesting differences as well, and it is possible to compare and study the coupling mechanisms of the sodium and proton ion flux for the force generation.     

Suppressor analysis of the MotB(D33E) mutation to probe bacterial flagellar motor dynamics coupled with proton translocation

MotA and MotB form the stator of the proton-driven bacterial flagellar motor, which conducts protons and couples proton flow with motor rotation. Asp-33 of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium MotB, which is a putative proton-binding site, is critical for torque generation. However, the mechanism of energy coupling remains unknown. Here, we carried out genetic and motility analysis of a slowly motile motB(D33E) mutant and its pseudorevertants. We first confirmed that the poor motility of the motB(D33E) mutant is due to neither protein instability, mislocalization, nor impaired interaction with MotA. We isolated 17 pseudorevertants and identified the suppressor mutations in the transmembrane helices TM2 and TM3 of MotA and in TM and the periplasmic domain of MotB. The stall torque produced by the motB(D33E) mutant motor was about half of the wild-type level, while those for the pseudorevertants were recovered nearly to the wild-type levels. However, the high-speed rotations of the motors under low-load conditions were still significantly impaired, suggesting that the rate of proton translocation is still severely limited at high speed. These results suggest that the second-site mutations recover a torque generation step involving stator-rotor interactions coupled with protonation/deprotonation of Glu-33 but not maximum proton conductivity.     

Assembly of motor proteins, PomA and PomB, in the Na+-driven stator of the flagellar motor

PomA and PomB are transmembrane proteins that form the stator complex in the sodium-driven flagellar motor of Vibrio alginolyticus and are believed to surround the rotor part of the flagellar motor. We constructed and observed green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusions of the stator proteins PomA and PomB in living cells to clarify how stator proteins are assembled and installed into the flagellar motor. We were able to demonstrate that GFP-PomA and GFP-PomB localized to a cell pole dependent on the presence of the polar flagellum. Localization of the GFP-fused stator proteins required their partner subunit, PomA or PomB, and the C-terminal domain of PomB, which has a peptidoglycan-binding motif. Each of the GFP-fused stator proteins was co-isolated with its partner subunit from detergent-solubilized membrane. From these lines of evidence, we have demonstrated that the stator proteins are incorporated into the flagellar motor as a PomA/PomB complex and are fixed to the cell wall via the C-terminal domain of PomB.     

Concerted effects of amino acid substitutions in conserved charged residues and other residues in the cytoplasmic domain of PomA, a stator component of Na+-driven flagella

PomA is a membrane protein that is one of the essential components of the sodium-driven flagellar motor in Vibrio species. The cytoplasmic charged residues of Escherichia coli MotA, which is a PomA homolog, are believed to be required for the interaction of MotA with the C-terminal region of FliG. It was previously shown that a PomA variant with neutral substitutions in the conserved charged residues (R88A, K89A, E96Q, E97Q, and E99Q; AAQQQ) was functional. In the present study, five other conserved charged residues were replaced with neutral amino acids in the AAQQQ PomA protein. These additional substitutions did not affect the function of PomA. However, strains expressing the AAQQQ PomA variant with either an L131F or a T132M substitution, neither of which affected motor function alone, exhibited a temperature-sensitive (TS) motility phenotype. The double substitutions R88A or E96Q together with L131F were sufficient for the TS phenotype. The motility of the PomA TS mutants immediately ceased upon a temperature shift from 20 to 42 degrees C and was restored to the original level approximately 10 min after the temperature was returned to 20 degrees C. It is believed that PomA forms a channel complex with PomB. The complex formation of TS PomA and PomB did not seem to be affected by temperature. Suppressor mutations of the TS phenotype were mapped in the cytoplasmic boundaries of the transmembrane segments of PomA. We suggest that the cytoplasmic surface of PomA is changed by the amino acid substitutions and that the interaction of this surface with the FliG C-terminal region is temperature sensitive.     

Electron cryomicroscopic visualization of PomA/B stator units of the sodium-driven flagellar motor in liposomes

A motor protein complex of the bacterial flagellum, PomA/B from Vibrio alginolyticus, was reconstituted into liposomes and visualized by electron cryomicroscopy. PomA/B is a sodium channel, composed of two membrane proteins, PomA and PomB, and converts ion flux to the rotation of the flagellar motor. Escherichia coli and Salmonella have a homolog called MotA/B, which utilizes proton instead of sodium ion. PomB and MotB have a peptidoglycan-binding motif in their C-terminal region, and therefore PomA/B and MotA/B are regarded as the stator. Energy filtering electron cryomicroscopy enhanced the image contrast of the proteins reconstituted into liposomes and showed that two extramembrane domains with clearly different sizes stick out of the lipid bilayers on opposite sides. Image analysis combined with gold labeling and deletion of the peptidoglycan-binding motif revealed that the longer one, approximately 70 A long, is likely to correspond to the periplasmic domain, and the other, about half size, to the cytoplasmic domain.     

Interaction of PomB with the third transmembrane segment of PomA in the Na+-driven polar flagellum of Vibrio alginolyticus

The marine bacterium Vibrio alginolyticus has four motor components, PomA, PomB, MotX, and MotY, responsible for its Na(+)-driven flagellar rotation. PomA and PomB are integral inner membrane proteins having four and one transmembrane segments (TMs), respectively, which are thought to form an ion channel complex. First, site-directed Cys mutagenesis was systematically performed from Asp-24 to Glu-41 of PomB, and the resulting mutant proteins were examined for susceptibility to a sulfhydryl reagent. Secondly, the Cys substitutions at the periplasmic boundaries of the PomB TM (Ser-38) and PomA TMs (Gly-23, Ser-34, Asp-170, and Ala-178) were combined. Cross-linked products were detected for the combination of PomB-S38C and PomA-D170C mutant proteins. The Cys substitutions in the periplasmic boundaries of PomA TM3 (from Met-169 to Asp-171) and the PomB TM (from Leu-37 to Ser-40) were combined to construct a series of double mutants. Most double mutations reduced the motility, whereas each single Cys substitution slightly affected it. Although the motility of the strain carrying PomA-D170C and PomB-S38C was significantly inhibited, it was recovered by reducing reagent. The strain with this combination showed a lower affinity for Na(+) than the wild-type combination. PomA-D148C and PomB-P16C, which are located at the cytoplasmic boundaries of PomA TM3 and the PomB TM, also formed the cross-linked product. From these lines of evidence, we infer that TM3 of PomA and the TM of PomB are in close proximity over their entire length and that cooperation between these two TMs is required for coupling of Na(+) conduction to flagellar rotation.     

Sodium‐powered stators of the bacterial flagellar motor can generate torque in the presence of phenamil with mutations near the peptidoglycan‐binding region

The bacterial flagellar motor powers the rotation that propels the swimming bacteria. Rotational torque is generated by harnessing the flow of ions through ion channels known as stators which couple the energy from the ion gradient across the inner membrane to rotation of the rotor. Here, we used error‐prone PCR to introduce single point mutations into the sodium‐powered Vibrio alginolyticus/Escherichia coli chimeric stator PotB and selected for motors that exhibited motility in the presence of the sodium‐channel inhibitor phenamil. We found single mutations that enable motility under phenamil occurred at two sites: (i) the transmembrane domain of PotB, corresponding to the TM region of the PomB stator from V. alginolyticus and (ii) near the peptidoglycan binding region that corresponds to the C‐terminal region of the MotB stator from E. coli. Single cell rotation assays confirmed that individual flagellar motors could rotate in up to 100 µM phenamil. Using phylogenetic logistic regression, we found correlation between natural residue variation and ion source at positions corresponding to PotB F22Y, but not at other sites. Our results demonstrate that it is not only the pore region of the stator that moderates motility in the presence of ion‐channel blockers.     

Characterization of the periplasmic region of PomB, a Na+-driven flagellar stator protein in Vibrio alginolyticus

The stator proteins PomA and PomB form a complex that couples Na⁺ influx to torque generation in the polar flagellar motor of Vibrio alginolyticus. This stator complex is anchored to an appropriate place around the rotor through a putative peptidoglycan-binding (PGB) domain in the periplasmic region of PomB (PomB_C). To investigate the function of PomB_C, a series of N-terminally-truncated and in-frame mutants with deletions between the transmembrane (TM) segment and the PGB domain of PomB was constructed. A PomB_C fragment consisting of residues 135 to 315 (PomB_C5) formed a stable homodimer and significantly inhibited the motility of wild-type cells when overexpressed in the periplasm. A fragment with an in-frame deletion (PomB_ΔL) of up to 80 residues retained function, and its overexpression with PomA impaired cell growth. This inhibitory effect was suppressed by a mutation at the functionally critical Asp (D24N) in the TM segment of PomB, suggesting that a high level of Na⁺ influx through the mutant stator causes the growth impairment. The overproduction of functional PomA/PomB_ΔL stators also reduced the motile fractions of the cells. That effect could be slightly relieved by a mutation (L168P) in the putative N-terminal α-helix that connects to the PGB domain without affecting the growth inhibition, suggesting that a conformational change of the region including the PGB domain affects stator assembly. Our results reveal common features of the periplasmic region of PomB/MotB and demonstrate that a flexible linker that contains a “plug” segment is important for the control of Na⁺ influx through the stator complex as well as for stator assembly.     

The Vibrio motor proteins, MotX and MotY, are associated with the basal body of Na-driven flagella and required for stator formation

The four motor proteins PomA, PomB, MotX and MotY, which are believed to be stator proteins, are essential for motility by the Na(+)-driven flagella of Vibrio alginolyticus. When we purified the flagellar basal bodies, MotX and MotY were detected in the basal body, which is the supramolecular complex comprised of the rotor and the bushing, but PomA and PomB were not. By antibody labelling, MotX and MotY were detected around the LP ring. These results indicate that MotX and MotY associate with the basal body. The basal body had a new ring structure beneath the LP ring, which was named the T ring. This structure was changed or lost in the basal body from a DeltamotX or DeltamotY strain. The T ring probably comprises MotX and MotY. In the absence of MotX or MotY, we demonstrated that PomA and PomB were not localized to a cell pole. From the above results, we suggest that MotX and MotY of the T ring are involved in the incorporation and/or stabilization of the PomA/PomB complex in the motor.     

Load‐sensitive coupling of proton translocation and torque generation in the bacterial flagellar motor

The Salmonella flagellar motor consists of a rotor and about a dozen stator elements. Each stator element, consisting of MotA and MotB, acts as a proton channel to couple proton flow with torque generation. A highly conserved Asp33 residue of MotB is directly involved in the energy coupling mechanism, but it remains unknown how it carries out this function. Here, we show that the MotB(D33E) mutation dramatically alters motor performance in response to changes in external load. Rotation speeds of the MotA/B(D33E) and MotA(V35F)/B(D33E) motors were markedly slower than the wild‐type motor and fluctuated considerably at low load but not at high load, whereas the rotation rate of the wild‐type motor was stable at any load. At low load, pausing events were frequently observed in both mutant motors. The proton conductivities of these mutant stator channels in their ‘unplugged’ forms were only half of the conductivity of the wild‐type channel. These results suggest that the D33E mutation induces a load‐dependent inactivation of the MotA/B complex. We propose that the stator element is a load‐sensitive proton channel that efficiently couples proton translocation with torque generation and that Asp33 of MotB is critical for this co‐ordinated proton translocation.     

Cysteine-scanning mutagenesis of the periplasmic loop regions of PomA, a putative channel component of the sodium-driven flagellar motor in Vibrio alginolyticus

The sodium-driven motor consists of the products of at least four genes, pomA, pomB, motX, and motY, in Vibrio alginolyticus. PomA and PomB, which are homologous to the MotA and MotB components of proton-driven motors, have four transmembrane segments and one transmembrane segment, respectively, and are thought to form an ion channel. In PomA, two periplasmic loops were predicted at positions 21 to 36 between membrane segments 1 and 2 (loop(1-2)) and at positions 167 to 180 between membrane segments 3 and 4 (loop(3-4)). To characterize the two periplasmic loop regions, which may have a role as an ion entrance for the channel, we carried out cysteine-scanning mutagenesis. The T186 residue in the fourth transmembrane segment and the D71, D148, and D202 residues in the predicted cytoplasmic portion of PomA were also replaced with Cys. Only two mutations, M179C and T186C, conferred a nonmotile phenotype. Many mutations in the periplasmic loops and all of the cytoplasmic mutations did not abolish motility, though the five successive substitutions from M169C to K173C of loop(3-4) impaired motility. In some mutants that retained substantial motility, motility was inhibited by the thiol-modifying reagents dithionitrobenzoic acid and N-ethylmaleimide. The profiles of inhibition by the reagents were consistent with the membrane topology predicted from the hydrophobicity profiles. Furthermore, from the profiles of labeling by biotin maleimide, we predicted more directly the membrane topology of loop(3-4). None of the loop(1-2) residues were labeled, suggesting that the environments around the two loops are very different. A few of the mutations were characterized further. The structure and function of the loop regions are discussed.     

Roles of charged residues of rotor and stator in flagellar rotation: comparative study using H+-driven and Na+-driven motors in Escherichia coli

In Escherichia coli, rotation of the flagellar motor has been shown to depend upon electrostatic interactions between charged residues of the stator protein MotA and the rotor protein FliG. These charged residues are conserved in the Na+-driven polar flagellum of Vibrio alginolyticus, but mutational studies in V. alginolyticus suggested that they are relatively unimportant for motor rotation. The electrostatic interactions detected in E. coli therefore might not be a general feature of flagellar motors, or, alternatively, the V. alginolyticus motor might rely on similar interactions but incorporate additional features that make it more robust against mutation. Here, we have carried out a comparative study of chimeric motors that were resident in E. coli but engineered to use V. alginolyticus stator components, rotor components, or both. Charged residues in the V. alginolyticus rotor and stator proteins were found to be essential for motor rotation when the proteins functioned in the setting of the E. coli motor. Patterns of synergism and suppression in rotor/stator double mutants indicate that the V. alginolyticus proteins interact in essentially the same way as their counterparts in E. coli. The robustness of the rotor-stator interface in V. alginolyticus is in part due to the presence of additional charged residues in PomA but appears mainly due to other factors, because an E. coli motor using both rotor and stator components from V. alginolyticus remained sensitive to mutation. Motor function in V. alginolyticus may be enhanced by the proteins MotX and MotY.     

Multimeric structure of PomA, a component of the Na+-driven polar flagellar motor of vibrio alginolyticus

Four integral membrane proteins, PomA, PomB, MotX, and MotY, are thought to be directly involved in torque generation of the Na(+)-driven polar flagellar motor of Vibrio alginolyticus. Our previous study showed that PomA and PomB form a complex, which catalyzes sodium influx in response to a potassium diffusion potential. PomA forms a stable dimer when expressed in a PomB null mutant. To explore the possible functional dependence of PomA domains in adjacent subunits, we prepared a series of PomA dimer fusions containing different combinations of wild-type or mutant subunits. Introduction of the mutation P199L, which completely inactivates flagellar rotation, into either the first or the second half of the dimer abolished motility. The P199L mutation in monomeric PomA also altered the PomA-PomB interaction. PomA dimer with the P199L mutation even in one subunit also had no ability to interact with PomB, indicating that the both subunits in the dimer are required for the functional interaction between PomA and PomB. Flagellar rotation by wild-type PomA dimer was completely inactivated by phenamil, a sodium channel blocker. However, activity was retained in the presence of phenamil when either half of the dimer was replaced with a phenamil-resistant subunit, indicating that both subunits must bind phenamil for motility to be fully inhibited. These observations demonstrate that both halves of the PomA dimer function together to generate the torque for flagellar rotation.     

Deletion analysis of the carboxyl-terminal region of the PomB component of the vibrio alginolyticus polar flagellar motor

The stator of the sodium-driven flagellar motor of Vibrio alginolyticus is a membrane protein complex composed of four PomA and two PomB subunits. PomB has a peptidoglycan-binding motif in the C-terminal region. In this study, four kinds of PomB deletions in the C terminus were constructed. None of the deletion proteins restored motility of the DeltapomB strain. The PomA protein was coisolated with all of the PomB derivatives under detergent-solubilized conditions. Homotypic disulfide cross-linking of all of the deletion derivatives through naturally occurring Cys residues was detected. We conclude that the C-terminal region of PomB is essential for motor function but not for oligomerization of PomB with itself or PomA.     

Roles of charged residues in the C-terminal region of PomA, a stator component of the Na+-driven flagellar motor

Bacterial flagellar motors use specific ion gradients to drive their rotation. It has been suggested that the electrostatic interactions between charged residues of the stator and rotor proteins are important for rotation in Escherichia coli. Mutational studies have indicated that the Na(+)-driven motor of Vibrio alginolyticus may incorporate interactions similar to those of the E. coli motor, but the other electrostatic interactions between the rotor and stator proteins may occur in the Na(+)-driven motor. Thus, we investigated the C-terminal charged residues of the stator protein, PomA, in the Na(+)-driven motor. Three of eight charge-reversing mutations, PomA(K203E), PomA(R215E), and PomA(D220K), did not confer motility either with the motor of V. alginolyticus or with the Na(+)-driven chimeric motor of E. coli. Overproduction of the R215E and D220K mutant proteins but not overproduction of the K203E mutant protein impaired the motility of wild-type V. alginolyticus. The R207E mutant conferred motility with the motor of V. alginolyticus but not with the chimeric motor of E. coli. The motility with the E211K and R232E mutants was similar to that with wild-type PomA in V. alginolyticus but was greatly reduced in E. coli. Suppressor analysis suggested that R215 may participate in PomA-PomA interactions or PomA intramolecular interactions to form the stator complex.     

Charged residues in the cytoplasmic loop of MotA are required for stator assembly into the bacterial flagellar motor

MotA and MotB form a transmembrane proton channel that acts as the stator of the bacterial flagellar motor to couple proton flow with torque generation. The C-terminal periplasmic domain of MotB plays a role in anchoring the stators to the motor. However, it remains unclear where their initial binding sites are. Here, we constructed Salmonella strains expressing GFP-MotB and MotA-mCherry and investigated their subcellular localization by fluorescence microscopy. Neither the D33N and D33A mutations in MotB, which abolish the proton flow, nor depletion of proton motive force affected the assembly of GFP-MotB into the motor, indicating that the proton translocation activity is not required for stator assembly. Overexpression of MotA markedly inhibited wild-type motility, and it was due to the reduction in the number of functional stators. Consistently, MotA-mCherry was observed to colocalize with GFP-FliG even in the absence of MotB. These results suggest that MotA alone can be installed into the motor. The R90E and E98K mutations in the cytoplasmic loop of MotA (MotA(C) ), which has been shown to abolish the interaction with FliG, significantly affected stator assembly, suggesting that the electrostatic interaction of MotA(C) with FliG is required for the efficient assembly of the stators around the rotor.     

Intragenic Suppressor of a Plug Deletion Nonmotility Mutation in PotB,a Chimeric Stator Protein of Sodium-Driven Flagella

The torque of bacterial flagellar motors is generated by interactions between the rotor and the stator and is coupled to the influx of H⁺ or Na⁺ through the stator. A chimeric protein, PotB, in which the N-terminal region of Vibrio alginolyticus PomB was fused to the C-terminal region of Escherichia coli MotB, can function with PomA as a Na⁺-driven stator in E. coli. Here, we constructed a deletion variant of PotB (with a deletion of residues 41 to 91 [Δ41–91], called PotBΔL), which lacks the periplasmic linker region including the segment that works as a “plug” to inhibit premature ion influx. This variant did not confer motile ability, but we isolated a Na⁺-driven, spontaneous suppressor mutant, which has a point mutation (R109P) in the MotB/PomB-specific α-helix that connects the transmembrane and peptidoglycan binding domains of PotBΔL in the region of MotB. Overproduction of the PomA/PotBΔL(R109P) stator inhibited the growth of E. coli cells, suggesting that this stator has high Na⁺-conducting activity. Mutational analyses of Arg109 and nearby residues suggest that the structural alteration in this α-helix optimizes PotBΔL conformation and restores the proper arrangement of transmembrane helices to form a functional channel pore. We speculate that this α-helix plays a key role in assembly-coupled stator activation.