5' flanking region of var genes nucleate histone modification patterns linked to phenotypic inheritance of virulence traits in malaria parasites

In the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum antigenic variation facilitates long-term chronic infection of the host. This is achieved by sequential expression of a single member of the 60-member var family. Here we show that the 5' flanking region nucleates epigenetic events strongly linked to the maintenance of mono-allelic var gene expression pattern during parasite proliferation. Tri- and dimethylation of histone H3 lysine 4 peak in the 5' upstream region of transcribed var and during the poised state (non-transcribed phase of var genes during the 48 h asexual life cycle), 'bookmarking' this member for re-activation at the onset of the next cycle. Histone H3 lysine 9 trimethylation acts as an antagonist to lysine 4 methylation to establish stably silent var gene states along the 5' flanking and coding region. Furthermore, we show that competition exists between H3K9 methylation and H3K9 acetylation in the 5' flanking region and that these marks contribute epigenetically to repressing or activating var gene expression. Our work points to a pivotal role of the histone methyl mark writing and reading machinery in the phenotypic inheritance of virulence traits in the malaria parasite.     

Epigenetic regulation: methylation of histone and non-histone proteins

Histone methylation is believed to play important roles in epigenetic memory in various biological processes. However, questions like whether the methylation marks themselves are faithfully transmitted into daughter cells and through what mechanisms are currently under active investigation. Previously, methylation was considered to be irreversible, but the recent discovery of histone lysine demethylases revealed a dynamic nature of histone methylation regulation on four of the main sites of methylation on histone H3 and H4 tails (H3K4, H3K9, H3K27 and H3K36). Even so, it is still unclear whether demethylases specific for the remaining two sites, H3K79 and H4K20, exist. Furthermore, besides histone proteins, the lysine methylation and demethylation also occur on non-histone proteins, which are probably subjected to similar regulation as histones. This review discusses recent progresses in protein lysine methylation regulation focusing on the above topics, while referring readers to a number of recent reviews for the biochemistry and biology of these enzymes     

Computational characterization of substrate and product specificities,and functionality of S‐adenosylmethionine binding pocket in histone lysine methyltransferases from Arabidopsis,rice and maize

Histone lysine methylation by histone lysine methyltransferases (HKMTs) has been implicated in regulation of gene expression. While significant progress has been made to understand the roles and mechanisms of animal HKMT functions, only a few plant HKMTs are functionally characterized. To unravel histone substrate specificity, degree of methylation and catalytic activity, we analyzed Arabidopsis Trithorax‐like protein (ATX), Su (var)3‐9 h omologs protein (SUVH), Su(var)3‐9 related protein (SUVR), ATXR5, ATXR6, and E(Z) HKMTs of Arabidopsis, maize and rice through sequence and structure comparison. We show that ATXs may exhibit methyltransferase specificity toward histone 3 lysine 4 (H3K4) and might catalyse the trimethylation. Our analyses also indicate that most SUVH proteins of Arabidopsis may bind histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9). We also predict that SUVH7, SUVH8, SUVR1, SUVR3, ZmSET20 and ZmSET22 catalyse monomethylation or dimethylation of H3K9. Except for SDG728, which may trimethylate H3K9, all SUVH paralogs in rice may catalyse monomethylation or dimethylation. ZmSET11, ZmSET31, SDG713, SDG715, and SDG726 proteins are predicted to be catalytically inactive because of an incomplete S‐adenosylmethionine (SAM) binding pocket and a post‐SET domain. E(Z) homologs can trimethylate H3K27 substrate, which is similar to the Enhancer of Zeste homolog 2 of humans. Our comparative sequence analyses reveal that ATXR5 and ATXR6 lack motifs/domains required for protein‐protein interaction and polycomb repressive complex 2 complex formation. We propose that subtle variations of key residues at substrate or SAM binding pocket, around the catalytic pocket, or presence of pre‐SET and post‐SET domains in HKMTs of the aforementioned plant species lead to variations in class‐specific HKMT functions and further determine their substrate specificity, the degree of methylation and catalytic activity.     

Oxidative stress alters global histone modification and DNA methylation

The JmjC domain-containing histone demethylases can remove histone lysine methylation and thereby regulate gene expression. The JmjC domain uses iron Fe(II) and α-ketoglutarate (αKG) as cofactors in an oxidative demethylation reaction via hydroxymethyl lysine. We hypothesize that reactive oxygen species will oxidize Fe(II) to Fe(III), thereby attenuating the activity of JmjC domain-containing histone demethylases. To minimize secondary responses from cells, extremely short periods of oxidative stress (3 h) were used to investigate this question. Cells that were exposed to hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) for 3 h exhibited increases in several histone methylation marks including H3K4me3 and decreases of histone acetylation marks including H3K9ac and H4K8ac; preincubation with ascorbate attenuated these changes. The oxidative stress level was measured by generation of 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein, GSH/GSSG ratio, and protein carbonyl content. A cell-free system indicated that H₂O₂ inhibited histone demethylase activity where increased Fe(II) rescued this inhibition. TET protein showed a decreased activity under oxidative stress. Cells exposed to a low-dose and long-term (3 weeks) oxidative stress also showed increased global levels of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3. However, these global methylation changes did not persist after washout. The cells exposed to short-term oxidative stress also appeared to have higher activity of class I/II histone deacetylase (HDAC) but not class III HDAC. In conclusion, we have found that oxidative stress transiently alters the epigenetic program process through modulating the activity of enzymes responsible for demethylation and deacetylation of histones.     

Histone lysine demethylases in Drosophila melanogaster

Epigenetic regulation of chromatin structure is a fundamental process for eukaryotes. Regulators include DNA methylation, microRNAs and chromatin modifications. Within the chromatin modifiers, one class of enzymes that can functionally bind and modify chromatin, through the removal of methyl marks, is the histone lysine demethylases. Here, we summarize the current findings of the 13 known histone lysine demethylases in Drosophila melanogaster, and discuss the critical role of these histone-modifying enzymes in the maintenance of genomic functions. Additionally, as histone demethylase dysregulation has been identified in cancer, we discuss the advantages for using Drosophila as a model system to study tumorigenesis.     

Histone H3K4 demethylases are essential in development and differentiation.

Lysine histone methylation is one of the most robust epigenetic marks and is essential for the regulation of multiple cellular processes. The methylation of Lys4 of histone H3 seems to be of particular significance. It is associated with active regions of the genome, and in Drosophila it is catalyzed by trithorax-group proteins that have become paradigms of developmental regulators at the level of chromatin. Like other histone methylation events, H3K4 methylation was considered irreversible until the identification of a large number of histone demethylases indicated that demethylation events play an important role in histone modification dynamics. However, the described demethylases had no strictly assigned biological functions and the identity of the histone demethylases that would contribute to the epigenetic changes specifying certain biological processes was unknown. Recently, several groups presented evidence that a family of 4 JmjC domain proteins results in the global changes of histone demethylation, and in elegant studies using model organisms, they demonstrated the importance of this family of histone demethylases in cell fate determination. All 4 proteins possess the demethylase activity specific to H3K4 and belong to the poorly described JARID1 protein family.     

The H3K27 demethylase UTX-1 regulates C. elegans lifespan in a germline-independent, insulin-dependent manner

Aging is accompanied by alterations in epigenetic marks that control chromatin states, including histone acetylation and methylation. Enzymes that reversibly affect histone marks associated with active chromatin have recently been found to regulate aging in Caenorhabditis elegans. However, relatively little is known about the importance for aging of histone marks associated with repressed chromatin. Here, we use a targeted RNAi screen in C. elegans to identify four histone demethylases that significantly regulate worm lifespan, UTX‐1, RBR‐2, LSD‐1, and T26A5.5. Interestingly, UTX‐1 belongs to a conserved family of histone demethylases specific for lysine 27 of histone H3 (H3K27me3), a mark associated with repressed chromatin. Both utx‐1 knockdown and heterozygous mutation of utx‐1 extend lifespan and increase the global levels of the H3K27me3 mark in worms. The H3K27me3 mark significantly drops in somatic cells during the normal aging process. UTX‐1 regulates lifespan independently of the presence of the germline, but in a manner that depends on the insulin‐FoxO signaling pathway. These findings identify the H3K27me3 histone demethylase UTX‐1 as a novel regulator of worm lifespan in somatic cells.