Magnified Risks From Cigarette Smoking for Coronary Prone Families in Utah

The contribution of currently accepted risk factors to the familiality of early coronary heart disease (CHD) is poorly understood. In a telephone and mail survey, risk factor and disease morbidity and mortality data were collected from 100 proband and 185 control families encompassing about 40,000 person-years of experience. Probands were white married men who had died of CHD by age 45. There was a threefold increase in CHD incidence among first-degree relatives of probands compared with control families. In all, 67% of probands had at least one first-degree relative with early CHD, and 29% had two or more first-degree relatives with early CHD compared with 8% of the control families with two or more cases of early CHD.The most striking new finding of this study is the apparently magnified liability of cigarette smoking in families prone to have early coronary heart disease. This effect was seen strongly at younger ages (under 50). Furthermore, in about a third of all families with a history of early CHD, smoking seemed to be the only risk factor contributing to the familial occurrence of the disease. The findings show a large excess absolute risk for CHD among smoking members of proband families and further suggest a possibly heritable susceptibility to the deleterious effects of smoking in many families prone to early coronary disease. Modification of coronary risk factors, especially cigarette smoking, would be of greatest benefit among members of high-risk families.     

Significance of inherited fragile sites in the occurrence of chromosome aberrations in tumor cells

The data on localization of heritable fragile sites and cellular oncogenes on individual human chromosomes involved in tumour-specific aberrations are summarized in the review. Only two fragile sites (8q22 and 11q13) out of eight ones, coinciding with breakage sites in such aberrations are the loci of cellular oncogenes (mos and bcl-1, respectively). Analysis of the data confirms the supposition that heritable fragile sites are predisposing factors for chromosomal rearrangements and in the end for development of the pathological processes.     

Expression of fragile sites in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients and normal controls

Summary A high concordance has been reported between fragile sites and breakpoints involved in chromosomal rearrangements in cancer. A prospective study on the role of fragile sites in the etiology of childhood acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), with appropriate comparisons to results obtained from normal controls, analyzed fluorodeoxyuridine-, aphidicolin-, and caffeine-induced fragile sites in the peripheral blood of seven ALL patients (three with cytogenetically normal karyotype and four with pseudodiploid karyotype) and eight normal controls. While extensive variations in the number and distribution of fragile sites was observed within each group, there was no significant difference in the mean total fragile sites and mean fragile sites per cell between the two groups (P>0.05) in all three treatments. Similarly, within the ALL patients, the two karyotypic groups did not exhibit any significant difference in fragility (P>0.05).     

Fragile sites,chromosome evolution,and human neoplasia

Summary In a study of the possible relationship between human fragile sites, chromosomal rearrangements related to neoplasia, and chromosome regions involved in evolutionary changes, we have found that 17 fragile sites related to cancer, 15 fragile sites not related to cancer, and 17 non-fragile regions also related to human malignancy correspond or are close to bands involved in rearrangements that have taken place during chromosomal evolution in primates.     

A familial association between twinning and upper-neural tube defects.

An increased twinning rate has been observed in the near relatives (sibs, parents, and aunts and uncles) of probands with neural tube defects (NTDs) occurring at the level of the 11th thoracic vertebra and above (upper NTDs). The twin rate was more than double that of the near relatives of probands with lower NTDs and of those of probands with Mendelian disorders (the controls). The excess twinning was same sex and can therefore consist of either MZ or same-sex DZ twins. Furthermore, upper-NTD families with twins had a higher NTD-sibling occurrence rate than did families without twins. These findings, if corroborated, may imply an etiology common to twinning and NTDs and can perhaps be applied in counseling NTD families.     

Chromosomal fragile site expression in lymphocytes from patients with schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is a common complex mental disorder. The lifetime prevalence of this disease is about 1% across different populations. The etiology is still unknown despite decades of intensive study. This report is aimed at studying the relationship between chromosomal fragile sites and the etiology of schizophrenia. Lymphocytes of 72 schizophrenic patients and 66 healthy controls were cultured in M medium, which is deficient in folic acid, and in medium RPMI1640 with distamycin A. G-banding was carried out on 100 metaphases of each individual. Fragile sites were characterized as specific chromosomal bands that exhibit nonrandom gaps or breaks. Culture in M medium resulted in significant differences in the total number of chromosomal lesions and the total number of cells with chromosomal lesions between patients and controls (P<0.001), while no difference was noted after exposure to distamycin A. In the case of M medium, 17 bands in both patients and controls were recognized as expressing fragile sites nonrandomly using a statistical method based on the relationship of the binomial and F distributions. Further analysis using Fisher’s exact test revealed a significant excess of expression of a rare fragile site at 2q11.2 among patients compared with controls (P<0.05). In the case of distamycin A induction, 13 bands were identified as having nonrandom expression of fragile sites using the same statistical method. A significant excess expression of a fragile site at 9q12 was identified among patients compared with controls by applying Fisher’s exact test (P<0.001). Thus, our data suggest that chromosomal bands 2q11.2 and 9q12 are interesting regions that may harbor important genes associated with schizophrenia. Received: 21 July 1998 / Accepted: 19 September 1998     

Three infants having null acute lymphoblastic leukemia with chromosome rearrangements at 11q23: no involvement of a heritable fragile site in this band

Three families are presented in which an infant with null acute lymphoblastic leukemia had a karyotype rearrangement involving a break at 11q23. Peripheral blood was obtained, where possible, from both parents and from the child during periods of remission. The blood was stimulated with phytohemagglutinin and cultured under conditions that enhance expression of heritable folate-sensitive fragile sites. In all individuals studied very low levels of fra(11)(q23.3) were observed. These levels were far below those recorded for expression of the heritable folate-sensitive site fra(11)(q23.3) but are comparable with expression of the common fragile site fra(11)(q23.3) under these conditions.     

Increased genetic instability of the common fragile site at 3p14 after integration of exogenous DNA.

We determined previously that the selectable marker pSV2neo is preferentially inserted into chromosomal fragile sites in human x hamster hybrid cells in the presence of an agent (aphidicolin) that induces fragile-site expression. In contrast, cells transfected without fragile-site induction showed an essentially random integration pattern. To determine whether the integration of marker DNA at fragile sites affects the frequency of fragile-site expression, the parental hybrid and three transfectants (two with pSV2neo integrated at the fragile site at 3p14.2 [FRA3B] and specific hamster fragile sites [chromosome 1, bands q26-31, or mar2, bands q11-13] and one with pSV2neo integrated at sites that are not fragile sites) were treated with aphidicolin. After 24 h the two cell lines with plasmid integration at FRA3B showed structural rearrangements at that site; these rearrangements accounted for 43%-67% of the total deletions and translocations observed. Structural rearrangements were not observed in the parental cell line. After 5 d aphidicolin treatment, the observed excess in frequency of structural rearrangements at FRA3B in the cell lines with pSV2neo integration at 3p14 over that in the two lines without FRA3B integration was less dramatic, but nonetheless significant. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of these cells, using a biotin-labeled pSV2neo probe, showed results consistent with the gross rearrangements detected cytogenetically in the lines with FRA3B integration; however, the pSV2neo sequences were frequently deleted concomitantly with translocations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Gene order, amplification, and rearrangement of chromosome band 11q23 in hematologic malignancies

Eleven genes were found to be amplified in a patient with acute myelogenous leukemia and a homogeneous staining region 11q23qter. The gene order of such region was determined by using transverse alternating field electrophoresis of normal cell DNA and Southern blots of DNA from somatic cell hybrids, each containing a single human derivative chromosome 11 from six different chromosomal defects. This in turn allowed us to uncover a breakpoint in band 11q23.3 between the CD3 gamma and the ets-1 genes in genomic rearrangements found in acute myelogenous leukemia, acute lymphocytic leukemia, and B-cell diffuse lymphoma. The breakpoint of a constitutional deletion from a patient whose mother and brother have a heritable 11q23.3 fragile site occurs in the same region.     

DNA instability at chromosomal fragile sites in cancer

Human chromosomal fragile sites are specific genomic regions which exhibit gaps or breaks on metaphase chromosomes following conditions of partial replication stress. Fragile sites often coincide with genes that are frequently rearranged or deleted in human cancers, with over half of cancer-specific translocations containing breakpoints within fragile sites. But until recently, little direct evidence existed linking fragile site breakage to the formation of cancer-causing chromosomal aberrations. Studies have revealed that DNA breakage at fragile sites can induce formation of RET/PTC rearrangements, and deletions within the FHIT gene, resembling those observed in human tumors. These findings demonstrate the important role of fragile sites in cancer development, suggesting that a better understanding of the molecular basis of fragile site instability is crucial to insights in carcinogenesis. It is hypothesized that under conditions of replication stress, stable secondary structures form at fragile sites and stall replication fork progress, ultimately resulting in DNA breaks. A recent study examining an FRA16B fragment confirmed the formation of secondary structure and DNA polymerase stalling within this sequence in vitro, as well as reduced replication efficiency and increased instability in human cells. Polymerase stalling during synthesis of FRA16D has also been demonstrated. The ATR DNA damage checkpoint pathway plays a critical role in maintaining stability at fragile sites. Recent findings have confirmed binding of the ATR protein to three regions of FRA3B under conditions of mild replication stress. This review will discuss recent advances made in understanding the role and mechanism of fragile sites in cancer development.     

A systematic cytogenetic study of a population of 1170 mentally retarded and/or behaviourly disturbed patients including fragile X-screening. The Hondsberg experience

A cytogenetic study was performed in a population of 1170 mentally retarded and/or behaviourly disturbed patients of the Hondsberg Institute in the south of the Netherlands. The cytogenetic data are presented and discussed. In all patients chromosomal evaluation was performed with Giemsa-banding and Quinacrine fluorescence, and additional banding techniques were performed whenever they were necessary to clarify the chromosomal abnormality. A fragile X screening with M199 cultures was performed in 311 males. In 22.1% of the patients a chromosomal basis was found for their developmental retardation: 14.3% Down syndrome patients, 6.1% other chromosomal abnormalities (mainly partial autosomal trisomies and monosomies and sex-chromosome abnormalities). In 24 males, through 21 index patients, a positive fragile X screening was found, i.e. 6.7% of the screened population and 1.8% of the total population. These results indicate that the diagnostic contribution of the fragile X screening is numerically of equal importance as are advanced chromosome banding techniques, and its contribution to the diagnosis of fragile X syndrome in one index male patient in general leads to the detection of several female relatives at risk to be carrier of this X-linked recessively inherited condition. The causal relationship between the occurrence of mental retardation and chromosomal aberration in genera i.e. autosomal trisomies, partial autosomal trisomies and monosomies, and Xq27-28 fragility is well established and is, to some extent, easy to understand. Whether carriers of other chromosomal rearrangements, mainly of balanced reciprocal and Robertsonian translocations, small extra chromosomes, paracentric inversions and chromosomal variants, have increased risk for mental handicap and/or congenital malformations in their progeny, remains unclear at the present time. Some of these residual problems and questions are discussed in the perspective of their importance for genetic counseling. Detailed data will be presented about the mental development and psychological profile of patients with these different types of chromosomal abnormalities and rearrangements.     

Reduced levels of DNA polymerase delta induce chromosome fragile site instability in yeast

Specific regions of genomes (fragile sites) are hot spots for the chromosome rearrangements that are associated with many types of cancer cells. Understanding the molecular mechanisms regulating the stability of chromosome fragile sites, therefore, has important implications in cancer biology. We previously identified two chromosome fragile sites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae that were induced in response to the reduced expression of Pol1p, the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase α. In the study presented here, we show that reduced levels of Pol3p, the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase δ, induce instability at these same sites and lead to the generation of a variety of chromosomal aberrations. These findings demonstrate that a change in the stoichiometry of replicative DNA polymerases results in recombinogenic DNA lesions, presumably double-strand DNA breaks.     

Variation in the expression of aphidicolin-induced fragile sites in human lymphocyte cultures

Summary A correlation between specific fragile sites and cancer breakpoints has been suggested raising the question of fragile site expression as a predisposing factor in the occurrence of cancer in some persons. Before addressing the question of increased fragility among patients at high risk for cancer, we analyzed the variability of aphidicolin-induced fragile sites among nine normal persons and also among repeated samples from three of these individuals. Considerable variation in both the frequency and location of these fragile sites was observed and the data strongly suggest the significant variation of 6 of the 16 selected sites to be primarily due to sampling differences. These findings indicate that the use of fragile sites as a screening tool for patients at high risk of cancer should be carefully monitored relative to the variation inherent in both culture and individual expression.     

How common are common fragile sites: variation of aphidicolin-induced chromosomal fragile sites in a population of the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus)

Aphidicolin (APC)-induced chromosomal gaps and breaks were analyzed for ten deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) from a natural population. The FSM statistical methodology was used to identify fragile sites as chromosomal loci exhibiting significantly non-random numbers of gaps/breaks in each individual and enabled an assessment of variation in fragile sites among the individuals. The individual deer mice exhibited as few as 7 to as many as 19 of the populational total of 34 sites. Two sites were fragile in all individuals and 13 sites were fragile in single individuals only. Defined by populational frequencies of greater than 50%, high-frequency fragile sites constituted 26% of the populational total. Approximately 35% of the total fragile sites were fragile in 20–40% of the population (low-frequency fragile sites) and about 38% were fragile in single individuals only. Analysis of the data pooled over all individuals identified significantly non-random breakage at 80 sites, 47 of which were not identified as fragile in any single individual. It appears, therefore, that fragile site identifications from pooled data have fostered an inflated estimate of the numbers and frequencies of common fragile sites. Comparison of the fragile site and spontaneous breakage (control) data suggest that APC-induced fragile sites represent regions of chromosomes that experience elevated levels of somatic mutation. Additionally, the occurrence of APC-induced fragile sites at or near the interstitial breakpoints of two pericentric-inversion polymorphisms in this population supports the hypothesis that fragile sites experience an increased rate of meiotic chromosomal mutation and are predisposed to undergo phylogenetic rearrangement. Received: 22 January 1997 / Accepted: 24 February 1997     

Common fragile sites as targets for chromosome rearrangements

Common fragile sites are large chromosomal regions that preferentially exhibit gaps or breaks after DNA synthesis is partially perturbed. Fragile site instability in cultured cells is well documented and includes gaps and breaks on metaphase chromosomes, translocation and deletions breakpoints, and sister chromosome exchanges. In recent years, much has been learned about the genomic structure at fragile sites and the cellular mechanisms that monitor their stability. The study of fragile sites has merged with that of cell cycle checkpoints and DNA repair, with multiple proteins from these pathways implicated in fragile site stability, including ATR, BRCA1, CHK1, and RAD51. Since their discovery, fragile sites have been implicated in constitutional and cancer chromosome rearrangements in vivo and recent studies suggest that common fragile sites may serve as markers of chromosome damage caused by replication stress during early tumorigenesis. Here we review the relationship of fragile sites to chromosome rearrangements, particularly in tumor cells, and discuss the mechanisms that may be involved.     

Potential G-quadruplex formation at breakpoint regions of chromosomal translocations in cancer may explain their fragility

Genetic alterations like point mutations, insertions, deletions, inversions and translocations are frequently found in cancers. Chromosomal translocations are one of the most common genomic aberrations associated with nearly all types of cancers especially leukemia and lymphoma. Recent studies have shown the role of non-B DNA structures in generation of translocations. In the present study, using various bioinformatic tools, we show the propensity of formation of different types of altered DNA structures near translocation breakpoint regions. In particular, we find close association between occurrence of G-quadruplex forming motifs and fragile regions in almost 70% of genes involved in rearrangements in lymphoid cancers. However, such an analysis did not provide any evidence for the occurrence of G-quadruplexes at the close vicinity of translocation breakpoint regions in nonlymphoid cancers. Overall, this study will help in the identification of novel non-B DNA targets that may be responsible for generation of chromosomal translocations in cancer.     

Risk of nonocular cancer in first-degree relatives of retinoblastoma patients

Summary The increased risk of nonocular cancer seen consistently in studies of survivors of retinoblastoma may be caused in part by the presence of a retinoblastoma gene that also predisposes to other cancers. It has been claimed that this gene also increases the risk for cancer among unaffected relatives of genetic retinoblastoma probands. We report here a population-based study of the risk of nonocular cancer in parents and siblings of persons notified to the Danish Cancer Registry with retinoblastoma during 1943–84. No excess was observed among first degree relatives of 61 genetic retinoblastoma probands, whereas a slight (10%) excess was seen among the parents of 115 nongenetic probands. The latter was the result of significant excesses of malignant melanoma (4 observed, 0.4 expected), multiple myeloma (2 observed, 0.2 expected) and osteogenic sarcoma (1 observed, 0.03 expected). The observed risk pattern cannot be explained by the presence of the retinoblastoma gene.     

BRCA1 is required for common-fragile-site stability via its G2/M checkpoint function

Common fragile sites are loci that form chromosome gaps or breaks when DNA synthesis is partially inhibited. Fragile sites are prone to deletions, translocations, and other rearrangements that can cause the inactivation of associated tumor suppressor genes in cancer cells. It was previously shown that ATR is critical to fragile-site stability and that ATR-deficient cells have greatly elevated fragile-site expression (A. M. Casper, P. Nghiem, M. F. Arlt, and T. W. Glover, Cell 111:779-789, 2002). Here we demonstrate that mouse and human cells deficient for BRCA1, due to mutation or knockdown by RNA interference, also have elevated fragile-site expression. We further show that BRCA1 functions in the induction of the G(2)/M checkpoint after aphidicolin-induced replication stalling and that this checkpoint function is involved in fragile-site stability. These data indicate that BRCA1 is important in fragile-site stability and that fragile sites are recognized by the G(2)/M checkpoint pathway, in which BRCA1 plays a key role. Furthermore, they suggest that mutations in BRCA1 or interacting proteins could lead to rearrangements at fragile sites in cancer cells.