Conversion of a methionine initiator tRNA into a tryptophan-inserting elongator tRNA in vivo.

The role of the anticodon and discriminator base in aminoacylation of tRNAs with tryptophan has been explored using a recently developed in vivo assay based on initiation of protein synthesis by mischarged mutants of the Escherichia coli initiator tRNA. Substitution of the methionine anticodon CAU with the tryptophan anticodon CCA caused tRNA(fMet) to be aminoacylated with both methionine and tryptophan in vivo, as determined by analysis of the amino acids inserted by the mutant tRNA at the translational start site of a reporter protein containing a tryptophan initiation codon. Conversion of the discriminator base of tRNA(CCA)fMet from A73 to G73, the base present in tRNA(Trp), eliminated the in vivo methionine acceptor activity of the tRNA and resulted in complete charging with tryptophan. Single base changes in the anticodon of tRNA(CCA)fMet containing G73 from CCA to UCA, GCA, CAA, and CCG (changes underlined) essentially abolished tryptophan insertion, showing that all three anticodon bases specify the tryptophan identity of the tRNA. The important role of G73 in tryptophan identity was confirmed using mutants of an opal suppressor derivative of tRNA(Trp). Substitution of G73 with A73, C73, or U73 resulted in a large loss of the ability of the tRNA to suppress an opal stop codon in a reporter protein. Base pair substitutions at the first three positions of the acceptor stem of the suppressor tRNA caused 2-12-fold reductions in the efficiency of suppression without loss of specificity for aminoacylation of the tRNA with tryptophan.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Suppression of amber codons in vivo as evidence that mutants derived from Escherichia coli initiator tRNA can act at the step of elongation in protein synthesis

The absence of a Watson-Crick base pair at the end of the amino acid acceptor stem is one of the features which distinguishes prokaryotic initiator tRNAs as a class from all other tRNAs. We show that this structural feature prevents Escherichia coli initiator tRNA from acting as an elongator in protein synthesis in vivo. We generated a mutant of E. coli initiator tRNA in which the anticodon sequence is changed from CAU to CUA (the T35A36 mutant). This mutant tRNA has the potential to read the amber termination codon UAG. We then coupled this mutation to others which change the C1.A72 mismatch at the end of the acceptor stem to either a U1:A72 base pair (T1 mutant) or a C1:G72 base pair (G72 mutant). Transformation of E. coli CA274 (HfrC Su- lacZ125am trpEam) with multicopy plasmids carrying the mutant initiator tRNA genes show that mutant tRNAs carrying changes in both the anticodon sequence and the acceptor stem suppress amber codons in vivo, whereas mutant tRNA with changes in the anticodon sequence alone does not. Mutant tRNAs with the above anticodon sequence change are aminoacylated with glutamine in vitro. Measurement of kinetic parameters for aminoacylation by E. coli glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase show that both the nature of the base pair at the end of the acceptor stem and the presence or absence of a base pair at this position can affect aminoacylation kinetics. We discuss the implications of this result on recognition of tRNAs by E. coli glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase.     

Recognition by tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetases of discriminator base on tRNATrp from three biological domains

To study the recognition by tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase (TrpRS) of tRNA(Trp) discriminator base, mutations were introduced into the discriminator base of Bacillus subtilis, Archeoglobus fulgidus, and bovine tRNA(Trp), representing the three biological domains. When B. subtilis, A. fulgidus, and human TrpRS were used to acylate these tRNA(Trp), two distinct preference profiles regarding the discriminator base of different tRNA(Trp) substrates were found: G>A>U>C for B. subtilis TrpRS, and A>C>U>G for A. fulgidus and human TrpRS. The preference for G73 in tRNA(Trp) by bacterial TrpRS is much stronger than the modest preferences for A73 by the archaeal and eukaryotic TrpRS. Cross-species reactivities between TrpRS and tRNA(Trp) from the three domains were in accordance with the view that the evolutionary position of archaea is intermediate between those of eukarya and bacteria. NMR spectroscopy revealed that mutation of A73 to G73 in bovine tRNA(Trp) elicited a conformational alteration in the G1-C72 base pair. Mutation of G1-C72 to A1-U72 or disruption of the G1-C72 base pair also caused reduction of Trp-tRNA(Trp) formation. These observations identify a tRNA(Trp) structural region near the end of acceptor stem comprising A73 and G1-C72 as a crucial domain required for effective recognition by human TrpRS.     

Structural and sequence elements important for recognition of Escherichia coli formylmethionine tRNA by methionyl-tRNA transformylase are clustered in the acceptor stem

We show that the structure and/or sequence of the first three base pairs at the end of the amino acid acceptor stem of Escherichia coli initiator tRNA and the discriminator base 73 are important for its formylation by E. coli methionyl-tRNA transformylase. This conclusion is based on mutagenesis of the E. coli initiator tRNA gene followed by measurement of kinetic parameters for formylation of the mutant tRNAs in vitro and function in protein synthesis in vivo. The first base pair found at the end of the amino acid acceptor stem in all other tRNAs is replaced by a C.A. "mismatch" in E. coli initiator tRNA. Mutation of this C.A. to U:A, a weak base pair, or U.G., a mismatch, has little effect on formylation, whereas mutation to C:G, a strong base pair, has a dramatic effect lowering Vmax/Kappm by 495-fold. Mutation of the second basepair G2:C71 to U2:A71 lowers Vmax/Kappm by 236-fold. Replacement of the third base-pair C3:G70 by U3:A70, A3:U70, or G3:C70 lowers Vmax/Kappm by about 67-, 27-, and 30-fold, respectively. Changes in the rest of the acceptor stem, dihydrouridine stem, anticodon stem, anticodon sequence, and T psi C stem have little or no effect on formylation.     

Structural studies on tRNA acceptor stem microhelices: exchange of the discriminator base A73 for G in human tRNALeu switches the acceptor specificity from leucine to serine possibly by decreasing the stability of the terminal G1-C72 base pair.

Correct recognition of transfer RNAs (tRNAs) by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRS) is crucial to the maintenance of translational fidelity. The discriminator base A73 in human tRNALeuis critical for its specific recognition by the aaRS. Exchanging A73 for G abolishes leucine acceptance and converts it into a serine acceptor in vitro . Two RNA microhelices of 24 nt length that correspond to the tRNALeuacceptor stem and differ only in the discriminator base were synthesized: a wild-type tRNALeumicrohelix, where nt 21 corresponds to the discriminator base position 73, and an A21G mutant microhelix. To investigate whether different identities of both tRNAs are caused by conformational differences, NMR and UV melting experiments were performed on both microhelices. Two-dimentional NOESY spectra showed both microhelices to exhibit the same overall conformation at their 3'-CCA ends. Thermodynamic analysis and melting behaviour of the base-paired imino protons observed by NMR spectroscopy suggest that the A21G (A73G in tRNA) exchange results in a decrease of melting transition cooperativity and a destabilization of the terminal G1-C20 (G1-C72 in tRNA) base pair. Furthermore, the fact that this 3'-terminal imino proton is more solvent-exposed at physiological temperature might be another indication for the importance of the stability of the terminal base pair for specific tRNA recognition.     

The exchange of the discriminator base A73 for G is alone sufficient to convert human tRNA(Leu) into a serine-acceptor in vitro.

Transfer RNA (tRNA) identify is maintained by the highly specific interaction of a few defined nucleotides or groups of nucleotides, called identity elements, with the cognate aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase, and by nonproductive interactions with the other 19 aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Most tRNAs have a set of identity elements in at least two locations, commonly in the anticodon loop or in the acceptor stem, and at the discriminator base position 73. We have used T7 RNA polymerase transcribed tRNAs to demonstrate that the sole replacement of the discriminator base A73 of human tRNA(Leu) with the tRNA(Ser)-specific G generates a complete identity switch to serine acceptance. The reverse experiment, the exchange of G73 in human tRNA(Ser) for the tRNA(Leu-specific A, causes a total loss of serine specificity without creating any leucine acceptance. These results suggest that the discriminator base A73 of human tRNA(Leu) alone protects this tRNA against serylation by seryl-tRNA synthetase. This is the first report of a complete identity switch caused by an exchange of the discriminator base alone.     

tRNA discrimination by T. thermophilus phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase at the binding step

The extent of tRNA recognition at the level of binding by Thermus thermophilus phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase (PheRS), one of the most complex class II synthetases, has been studied by independent measurements of the enzyme association with wild-type and mutant tRNA(Phe)s as well as with non-cognate tRNAs. The data obtained, combined with kinetic data on aminoacylation, clearly show that PheRS exhibits more tRNA selectivity at the level of binding than at the level of catalysis. The anticodon nucleotides involved in base-specific interactions with the enzyme prevail both in the initial binding recognition and in favouring aminoacylation catalysis. Tertiary nucleotides of base pair G19-C56 and base triple U45-G10-C25 contribute primarily to stabilization of the correctly folded tRNA(Phe) structure, which is important for binding. Other nucleotides of the central core (U20, U16 and of the A26-G44 tertiary base pair) are involved in conformational adjustment of the tRNA upon its interaction with the enzyme. The specificity of nucleotide A73, mutation of which slightly reduces the catalytic rate of aminoacylation, is not displayed at the binding step. A few backbone-mediated contacts of PheRS with the acceptor and anticodon stems revealed in the crystal structure do not contribute to tRNA(Phe) discrimination, their role being limited to stabilization of the complex. The highest affinity of T. thermophilus PheRS for cognate tRNA, observed for synthetase-tRNA complexes, results in 100-3000-fold binding discrimination against non-cognate tRNAs.     

Role of acceptor stem conformation in tRNAVal recognition by its cognate synthetase.

Although the anticodon is the primary element in Escherichia coli tRNAValfor recognition by valyl-tRNA synthetase (ValRS), nucleotides in the acceptor stem and other parts of the tRNA modulate recognition. Study of the steady state aminoacylation kinetics of acceptor stem mutants of E.coli tRNAValdemonstrates that replacing any base pair in the acceptor helix with another Watson-Crick base pair has little effect on aminoacylation efficiency. The absence of essential recognition nucleotides in the acceptor helix was confirmed by converting E.coli tRNAAlaand yeast tRNAPhe, whose acceptor stem sequences differ significantly from that of tRNAVal, to efficient valine acceptors. This transformation requires, in addition to a valine anticodon, replacement of the G:U base pair in the acceptor stem of these tRNAs. Mutational analysis of tRNAValverifies that G:U base pairs in the acceptor helix act as negative determinants of synthetase recognition. Insertion of G:U in place of the conserved U4:A69 in tRNAValreduces the efficiency of aminoacylation, due largely to an increase in K m. A smaller but significant decline in aminoacylation efficiency occurs when G:U is located at position 3:70; lesser effects are observed for G:U at other positions in the acceptor helix. The negative effects of G:U base pairs are strongly correlated with changes in helix structure in the vicinity of position 4:69 as monitored by19F NMR spectroscopy of 5-fluorouracil-substituted tRNAVal. This suggests that maintaining regular A-type RNA helix geometry in the acceptor stem is important for proper recognition of tRNAValby valyl-tRNA synthetase.19F NMR also shows that formation of the tRNAVal-valyl-tRNA synthetase complex does not disrupt the first base pair in the acceptor stem, a result different from that reported for the tRNAGln-glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase complex.     

tRNA leucine identity and recognition sets

Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) are grouped into two classes based on the structure of their variable loop. In Escherichia coli, tRNAs from three isoaccepting groups are classified as type II. Leucine tRNAs comprise one such group. We used both in vivo and in vitro approaches to determine the nucleotides that are required for tRNA(Leu) function. In addition, to investigate the role of the tRNA fold, we compared the in vivo and in vitro characteristics of type I tRNA(Leu) variants with their type II counterparts.A minimum of six conserved tRNA(Leu) nucleotides were required to change the amino acid identity and recognition of a type II tRNA(Ser) amber suppressor from a serine to a leucine residue. Five of these nucleotides affect tRNA tertiary structure; the G15-C48 tertiary "Levitt base-pair" in tRNA(Ser) was changed to A15-U48; the number of nucleotides in the alpha and beta regions of the D-loop was changed to achieve the positioning of G18 and G19 that is found in all tRNA(Leu); a base was inserted at position 47n between the base-paired extra stem and the T-stem; in addition the G73 "discriminator" base of tRNA(Ser) was changed to A73. This minimally altered tRNA(Ser) exclusively inserted leucine residues and was an excellent in vitro substrate for LeuRS. In a parallel experiment, nucleotide substitutions were made in a glutamine-inserting type I tRNA (RNA(SerDelta); an amber suppressor in which the tRNA(Ser) type II extra-stem-loop is replaced by a consensus type I loop). This "type I" swap experiment was successful both in vivo and in vitro but required more nucleotide substitutions than did the type II swap. The type I and II swaps revealed differences in the contributions of the tRNA(Leu) acceptor stem base-pairs to tRNA(Leu) function: in the type I, but not the type II fold, leucine specificity was contingent on the presence of the tRNA(Leu) acceptor stem sequence. The type I and II tRNAs used in this study differed only in the sequence and structure of the variable loop. By altering this loop, and thereby possibly introducing subtle changes into the overall tRNA fold, it became possible to detect otherwise cryptic contributions of the acceptor stem sequence to recognition by LeuRS. Possible reasons for this effect are discussed.     

Evidence for a conserved relationship between an acceptor stem and a tRNA for aminoacylation.

The anticodon-independent aminoacylation of RNA hairpin helices that reconstruct tRNA acceptor stems has been demonstrated for at least 10 aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. For Escherichia coli cysteine tRNA synthetase, the specificity of aminoacylation of the acceptor stem is determined by the U73 nucleotide adjacent to the amino acid attachment site. Because U73 is present in all known cysteine tRNAs, we investigated the ability of the E. coli cystein enzyme to aminoacylate a heterologous acceptor stem. We show here that a minihelixCys based on the acceptor-T psi C stem of yeast tRNACys is a substrate for the E. coli enzyme, and that aminoacylation of this minihelix is dependent on U73. Additionally, we identify two base pairs in the acceptor stem that quantitatively convert the E. coli acceptor stem to the yeast acceptor stem. The influence of U73 and these two base pairs is completely retained in the full-length tRNA. This suggests a conserved relationship between the acceptor stem alone and the acceptor stem in the context of a tRNA for aminoacylation with cysteine. However, the primary determinant in the species-specific aminoacylation of the E. coli and yeast cysteine tRNAs is a tertiary base pair at position 15:48 outside of the acceptor stem. Although E. coli tRNACys has an unusual G15:G48 tertiary base pair, yeast tRNACys has a more common G15:C48 that prevents efficient aminoacylation of yeast tRNACys by the E. coli enzyme.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)