ABRF-PRG07: Advanced Quantitative Proteomics Study

A major challenge for core facilities is determining quantitative protein differences across complex biological samples. Although there are numerous techniques in the literature for relative and absolute protein quantification, the majority is nonroutine and can be challenging to carry out effectively. There are few studies comparing these technologies in terms of their reproducibility, accuracy, and precision, and no studies to date deal with performance across multiple laboratories with varied levels of expertise. Here, we describe an Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities (ABRF) Proteomics Research Group (PRG) study based on samples composed of a complex protein mixture into which 12 known proteins were added at varying but defined ratios. All of the proteins were present at the same concentration in each of three tubes that were provided. The primary goal of this study was to allow each laboratory to evaluate its capabilities and approaches with regard to: detection and identification of proteins spiked into samples that also contain complex mixtures of background proteins and determination of relative quantities of the spiked proteins. The results returned by 43 participants were compiled by the PRG, which also collected information about the strategies used to assess overall performance and as an aid to development of optimized protocols for the methodologies used. The most accurate results were generally reported by the most experienced laboratories. Among laboratories that used the same technique, values that were closer to the expected ratio were obtained by more experienced groups.     

Development and application of proteomics technologies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Proteomics research focuses on the identification and quantification of "all" proteins present in cells, organisms or tissue. Proteomics is technically complicated because it encompasses the characterization and functional analysis of all proteins that are expressed by a genome. Moreover, because the expression levels of proteins strongly depend on complex regulatory systems, the proteome is highly dynamic. This review focuses on the two major proteomics methodologies, one based on 2D gel electrophoresis and the other based on liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. The recent developments of these methodologies and their application to quantitative proteomics are described. The model system Saccharomyces cerevisiae is considered to be the optimal vehicle for proteomics and we review studies investigating yeast adaptation to changes in (nutritional) environment.     

Implications of new proteomics strategies for biology and medicine

Advances in proteomics have fundamentally changed the paradigm of discovery for drug targets and novel biomarkers. Proteomics methodologies currently used will be reviewed in this paper, including structural proteomics, quantitative proteomics, and functional proteomics. A strategy to identify differentially expressed cell surface proteins as monoclonal therapeutic targets in oncology will be discussed.     

ABRF-PRG03: Phosphorylation Site Determination

A fundamental aspect of proteomics is the analysis of post-translational modifications, of which phosphorylation is an important class. Numerous nonradioactivity-based methods have been described for high-sensitivity phosphorylation site mapping. The ABRF Proteomics Research Group has conducted a study to help determine how many laboratories are equipped to take on such projects, which methods they choose to apply, and how successful the laboratories are in implementing particular methodologies. The ABRF-PRG03 sample was distributed as a tryptic digest of a mixture of two proteins with two synthetic phosphopeptides added. Each sample contained 5 pmol of unphosphorylated protein digest, 1 pmol of each phosphopeptide from the same protein, and 200 fmol of a minor protein component. Study participants were challenged to identify the two proteins and the two phosphorylated peptides, and determine the site of phosphorylation in each peptide. Almost all respondents successfully identified the major protein component, whereas only 10% identified the minor protein component. Phosphorylation site analysis proved surprisingly difficult, with only 3 of the 54 laboratories correctly determining both sites of phosphorylation. Various strategies and instruments were applied to this task with mixed success; chromatographic separation of the peptides was clearly helpful, whereas enrichment by metal affinity chromatography met with surprisingly little success. We conclude that locating sites of phosphorylation remains a significant challenge at this level of sample abundance.     

From Proteomics Research To Clinical Practice

The third International Conference of the Hellenic Proteomics Society, From Proteomics Research to Clinical Practice, took place in Nafplio (Greece), from 30 March to 1 April 2009. This year the conference was dedicated to the application of proteomics in clinical practice. Many scientists from different European counties participated in the conference, which made this event unique in the field of proteomics for the southeastern region of Europe. Extensive presentations and discussions covered nearly every aspect of the modern point of view regarding the application of proteomics in various diseases, the quantitative peptidomics and proteomics approaches, and the advances of methodologies for biomarker discovery and validation.     

The ABRF Proteomics Research Group studies: educational exercises for qualitative and quantitative proteomic analyses

Resource (core) facilities have played an ever-increasing role in furnishing the scientific community with specialized instrumentation and expertise for proteomics experiments in a cost-effective manner. The Proteomics Research Group (PRG) of the Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities (ABRF) has sponsored a number of research studies designed to enable participants to try new techniques and assess their capabilities relative to other laboratories analyzing the same samples. Presented here are results from three PRG studies representing different samples that are typically analyzed in a core facility, ranging from simple protein identification to targeted analyses, and include intentional challenges to reflect realistic studies. The PRG2008 study compares different strategies for the qualitative characterization of proteins, particularly the utility of complementary methods for characterizing truncated protein forms. The use of different approaches for determining quantitative differences for several target proteins in human plasma was the focus of the PRG2009 study. The PRG2010 study explored different methods for determining specific constituents while identifying unforeseen problems that could account for unanticipated results associated with the different samples, and included (15) N-labeled proteins as an additional challenge. These studies provide a valuable educational resource to research laboratories and core facilities, as well as a mechanism for establishing good laboratory practices.     

A review on recent developments in mass spectrometry instrumentation and quantitative tools advancing bacterial proteomics

Proteomics has evolved substantially since its early days, some 20 years ago. In this mini-review, we aim to provide an overview of general methodologies and more recent developments in mass spectrometric approaches used for relative and absolute quantitation of proteins. Enhancement of sensitivity of the mass spectrometers as well as improved sample preparation and protein fractionation methods are resulting in a more comprehensive analysis of proteomes. We also document some upcoming trends for quantitative proteomics such as the use of label-free quantification methods. Hopefully, microbiologists will continue to explore proteomics as a tool in their research to understand the adaptation of microorganisms to their ever changing environment. We encourage them to incorporate some of the described new developments in mass spectrometry to facilitate their analyses and improve the general knowledge of the fascinating world of microorganisms.     

Methods of quantitative proteomics and their application to plant organelle characterization

Many cell biologists wish to know the subcellular localization of proteins of interest. Proteomics methods have the potential to describe the entire protein content of organelles. However, practical limitations in organelle isolation and analysis of low abundance proteins have meant that organelle proteomics has had, until recently, only limited success. Some examples of quantitative proteomic methods and their use in the study of plant organelle proteomes are discussed here. It is concluded that 2D-difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) as well as differential isotope tagging strategies coupled to non-gel-based LC-MS are proving useful in this area of research.     

Proteomics without polyacrylamide: qualitative and quantitative uses of tandem mass spectrometry in proteome analysis

Proteomics can be thought of as an attempt to understand the information encoded in genomic sequences from the perspective of proteins; i.e. the structure, function and regulation of biological processes at the protein level. In practice it stands in stark contrast to the hypothesis-driven serial approach practiced in the last century that was so successful for protein chemists and is built on the basic understanding of protein physicochemical properties developed during that era. Proteomics attempts to study biological processes comprehensively or globally by systematic parallel analysis of proteins expressed in a cell. While there are many analytical techniques in use and under development in proteomics, mass spectrometry is currently one of the field's most important discovery-based tools. This article will review some of the current approaches for qualitative and quantitative uses of tandem mass spectrometry in the field of proteomics specifically avoiding a discussion of the use of gel electrophoresis prior to mass spectrometry. Electronic Publication     

Report on the 1st International Conference of the Hellenic Proteomics Society in Athens, Greece

The First International Conference of the Hellenic Proteomics Society took place at the Foundation for Biomedical Research of the Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece, 22-25 May 2005. Scientists from about 20 countries attended this conference where proceedings in proteomics methodologies, advances in mass spectrometry, proteomics applications, disease diagnostics and bioinformatics were presented. The relatively small size of the meeting gave the opportunity for the attendees to interact and discuss projects and collaborations. The event was completely financed by companies which exhibited their products and services related to proteomics research.     

Plant proteome analysis: a 2006 update

This 2006 'Plant Proteomics Update' is a continuation of the two previously published in 'Proteomics' by 2004 (Canovas et al., Proteomics 2004, 4, 285-298) and 2006 (Rossignol et al., Proteomics 2006, 6, 5529-5548) and it aims to bring up-to-date the contribution of proteomics to plant biology on the basis of the original research papers published throughout 2006, with references to those appearing last year. According to the published papers and topics addressed, we can conclude that, as observed for the three previous years, there has been a quantitative, but not qualitative leap in plant proteomics. The full potential of proteomics is far from being exploited in plant biology research, especially if compared to other organisms, mainly yeast and humans, and a number of challenges, mainly technological, remain to be tackled. The original papers published last year numbered nearly 100 and deal with the proteome of at least 26 plant species, with a high percentage for Arabidopsis thaliana (28) and rice (11). Scientific objectives ranged from proteomic analysis of organs/tissues/cell suspensions (57) or subcellular fractions (29), to the study of plant development (12), the effect of hormones and signalling molecules (8) and response to symbionts (4) and stresses (27). A small number of contributions have covered PTMs (8) and protein interactions (4). 2-DE (specifically IEF-SDS-PAGE) coupled to MS still constitutes the almost unique platform utilized in plant proteome analysis. The application of gel-free protein separation methods and 'second generation' proteomic techniques such as multidimensional protein identification technology (MudPIT), and those for quantitative proteomics including DIGE, isotope-coded affinity tags (ICAT), iTRAQ and stable isotope labelling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) still remains anecdotal. This review is divided into seven sections: Introduction, Methodology, Subcellular proteomes, Development, Responses to biotic and abiotic stresses, PTMs and Protein interactions. Section 8 summarizes the major pitfalls and challenges of plant proteomics.     

p53-Dependent subcellular proteome localization following DNA damage

The nucleolus is involved in regulating several aspects of stress responses and cell cycle arrest through the tumor suppressor p53. Under normal conditions, p53 is a short-lived protein that is present in cells at a barely detectable level. Upon exposure of cells to various forms of exogenous stress, such as DNA damage, there is a stabilization of p53 which is then responsible for an ensuing cascade of events. To further investigate the effect of p53 activation, we used a MS-based proteomics method to provide an unbiased, quantitative and high-throughput approach for measuring the subcellular distribution of the proteome that is dependent on p53. The spatial proteomics method analyses a whole cell extract created by recombining differentially labeled subcellular fractions derived from cells in which proteins have been mass labeled with heavy isotopes [Boisvert, F.-M., Lam, Y. W., Lamont, D., Lamond, A. I., Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2010, 9, 457-470]. This was used here to measure the relative distribution between cytoplasm, nucleus and nucleolus of around 2000 proteins in HCT116 cells that are either expressing wild-type p53 or null for p53. Spatial proteomics also facilitates a proteome-wide comparison of changes in protein localization in response to a wide range of physiological and experimental perturbations. We used this method to study differences in protein localization in HCT116 cells either with or without p53, and studied the differences in cellular response to DNA damage following treatment of HCT116 cells with etoposide in both p53 wild-type and null genetic backgrounds.     

Mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics

A major aim of present-day proteomics is to study changes in protein expression levels at a global level, ideally monitoring all proteins present in cells or tissue. Mass spectrometry is a well-respected technology in proteomics that is widely used for the identification of proteins. More recently, methodologies have been introduced showing that mass spectrometry can also be used for protein quantification. This article reviews various mass spectrometry-based technologies in quantitative proteomics, highlighting several interesting applications in areas ranging from cell biology to clinical applications.     

The effects of shared peptides on protein quantitation in label-free proteomics by LC/MS/MS

Assessment of differential protein abundance from the observed properties of detected peptides is an essential part of protein profiling based on shotgun proteomics. However, the abundance observed for shared peptides may be due to contributions from multiple proteins that are affected differently by a given treatment. Excluding shared peptides eliminates this ambiguity but may significantly decrease the number of proteins for which abundance estimates can be obtained. Peptide sharing within a family of biologically related proteins does not cause ambiguity if family members have a common response to treatment. On the basis of this concept, we have developed an approach for including shared peptides in the analysis of differential protein abundance in protein profiling. Data from a recent proteomics study of lung tissue from mice exposed to lipopolysaccharide, cigarette smoke, and a combination of these agents are used to illustrate our method. Starting from data where about half of the implicated database protein involved shared peptides, 82% of the affected proteins were grouped into families, based on FASTA annotation, with closure on peptide sharing. In many cases, a common abundance relative to control was sufficient to explain ion-current peak areas for peptides, both unique and shared, that identified biologically related proteins in a peptide-sharing closure group. On the basis of these results, we propose that peptide-sharing closure groups provide a way to include abundance data for shared peptides in quantitative protein profiling by high-throughput mass spectrometry.     

Mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics

A major aim of present-day proteomics is to study changes in protein expression levels at a global level, ideally monitoring all proteins present in cells or tissue. Mass spectrometry is a well-respected technology in proteomics that is widely used for the identification of proteins. More recently, methodologies have been introduced showing that mass spectrometry can also be used for protein quantification. This article reviews various mass spectrometry-based technologies in quantitative proteomics, highlighting several interesting applications in areas ranging from cell biology to clinical applications.     

Proteomics: current techniques and potential applications to lung disease

Proteomics aims to study the whole protein content of a biological sample in one set of experiments. Such an approach has the potential value to acquire an understanding of the complex responses of an organism to a stimulus. The large vascular and air space surface area of the lung expose it to a multitude of stimuli that can trigger a variety of responses by many different cell types. This complexity makes the lung a promising, but also challenging, target for proteomics. Important steps made in the last decade have increased the potential value of the results of proteomics studies for the clinical scientist. Advances in protein separation and staining techniques have improved protein identification to include the least abundant proteins. The evolution in mass spectrometry has led to the identification of a large part of the proteins of interest rather than just describing changes in patterns of protein spots. Protein profiling techniques allow the rapid comparison of complex samples and the direct investigation of tissue specimens. In addition, proteomics has been complemented by the analysis of posttranslational modifications and techniques for the quantitative comparison of different proteomes. These methodologies have made the application of proteomics on the study of specific diseases or biological processes under clinically relevant conditions possible. The quantity of data that is acquired with these new techniques places new challenges on data processing and analysis. This article provides a brief review of the most promising proteomics methods and some of their applications to pulmonary research.     

GProX, a user-friendly platform for bioinformatics analysis and visualization of quantitative proteomics data

Recent technological advances have made it possible to identify and quantify thousands of proteins in a single proteomics experiment. As a result of these developments, the analysis of data has become the bottleneck of proteomics experiment. To provide the proteomics community with a user-friendly platform for comprehensive analysis, inspection and visualization of quantitative proteomics data we developed the Graphical Proteomics Data Explorer (GProX)(1). The program requires no special bioinformatics training, as all functions of GProX are accessible within its graphical user-friendly interface which will be intuitive to most users. Basic features facilitate the uncomplicated management and organization of large data sets and complex experimental setups as well as the inspection and graphical plotting of quantitative data. These are complemented by readily available high-level analysis options such as database querying, clustering based on abundance ratios, feature enrichment tests for e.g. GO terms and pathway analysis tools. A number of plotting options for visualization of quantitative proteomics data is available and most analysis functions in GProX create customizable high quality graphical displays in both vector and bitmap formats. The generic import requirements allow data originating from essentially all mass spectrometry platforms, quantitation strategies and software to be analyzed in the program. GProX represents a powerful approach to proteomics data analysis providing proteomics experimenters with a toolbox for bioinformatics analysis of quantitative proteomics data. The program is released as open-source and can be freely downloaded from the project webpage at http://gprox.sourceforge.net.