首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Physical parameter estimation from porcine ex vivo vocal fold dynamics in an inverse problem framework
Authors:Pablo Gómez  Anne Schützenberger  Stefan Kniesburges  Christopher Bohr  Michael Döllinger
Institution:1.Division of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen,Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg,Erlangen,Germany;2.ENT Department, University Hospital Regensburg,University Regensburg,Erlangen,Germany
Abstract:This study presents a framework for a direct comparison of experimental vocal fold dynamics data to a numerical two-mass-model (2MM) by solving the corresponding inverse problem of which parameters lead to similar model behavior. The introduced 2MM features improvements such as a variable stiffness and a modified collision force. A set of physiologically sensible degrees of freedom is presented, and three optimization algorithms are compared on synthetic vocal fold trajectories. Finally, a total of 288 high-speed video recordings of six excised porcine larynges were optimized to validate the proposed framework. Particular focus lay on the subglottal pressure, as the experimental subglottal pressure is directly comparable to the model subglottal pressure. Fundamental frequency, amplitude and objective function values were also investigated. The employed 2MM is able to replicate the behavior of the porcine vocal folds very well. The model trajectories’ fundamental frequency matches the one of the experimental trajectories in \(98.6\%\) of the recordings. The relative error of the model trajectory amplitudes is on average \(9.5\%\). The experiments feature a mean subglottal pressure of 10.16 (SD \(= 2.31\)) \({\text {cmH}}_2{\text {O}}\); in the model, it was on average 7.61 (SD \(= 2.40\)) \({\text {cmH}}_2{\text {O}}\). A tendency of the model to underestimate the subglottal pressure is found, but the model is capable of inferring trends in the subglottal pressure. The average absolute error between the subglottal pressure in the model and the experiment is 2.90 (SD \(= 1.80\)) \({\text {cmH}}_2{\text {O}}\) or \(27.5\%\). A detailed analysis of the factors affecting the accuracy in matching the subglottal pressure is presented.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号