首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Survival and cause-specific mortality of male wild turkeys across the southeastern United States
Authors:Patrick H Wightman  Erin E Ulrey  Nicholas W Bakner  Jay R Cantrell  Charles R Ruth  Emily Rushton  Cody A Cedotal  John C Kilgo  David J Moscicki  Krishna Pacifici  Christopher E Moorman  Bret A Collier  Michael J Chamberlain
Institution:1. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602 USA;2. South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, Columbia, SC, 29202 USA;3. Georgia Department of Natural Resources–Wildlife Resources Division, Social Circle, GA, 30025 USA;4. Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Baton Rouge, LA, 70808 USA;5. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, P.O. Box 700, New Ellenton, SC, 29809 USA;6. Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology Program, Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695 USA;7. School of Renewable Natural Resources, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803 USA
Abstract:Estimating survival and cause-specific mortality of male eastern wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris) is important for understanding population dynamics and implementing appropriate harvest management. To better understand age-specific estimates of annual survival and harvest rates, we captured and marked male wild turkeys with leg bands (n = 311) or bands and transmitters (n = 549) in Georgia, Louisiana, North Carolina, and South Carolina, USA, during 2014–2022. We fitted time to event models to data from radio-marked birds to estimate cause-specific mortality and annual survival. We used band recovery models incorporating both band recovery and telemetry data to further investigate harvest rates and survival. Annual survival from known-fate models in hunted populations was 0.54 (95% CI = 0.49–0.59) for adults and 0.86 (95% CI = 0.81–0.92) for juveniles. Cause-specific mortality analysis produced an annual harvest estimate of 0.29 (95% CI = 0.24–0.33) for adults and 0.02 (95% CI = 0.01–0.03) for juveniles, whereas predation was 0.15 (95% CI = 0.10–0.20) and 0.12 (95% CI = 0.08–0.17), respectively. Annual survival for adult males in a non-hunted population was 0.83 (95% CI = 0.72–0.97). Survival rate was negatively correlated with harvest rate, indicating harvest was an additive mortality source. Annual survival from band recovery models was 0.40 (95% CI = 0.37–0.44) for adults and 0.88 (95% CI = 0.81– 0.93) for juveniles, whereas annual harvest estimates were 0.24 (95% CI = 0.23–0.25) for adults and 0.04 (95% CI = 0.03–0.05) for juveniles. Both models suggested no differences in annual survival across years or among study areas, which included privately owned and public properties. Harvest was an additive mortality source for male wild turkeys, suggesting that managers interested in increasing annual survival of adult males could consider ways of reducing harvest rates.
Keywords:Barker recovery model  harvest  known-fate  Meleagris gallopavo  predation
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号