Intracavitary Immunotherapy and Chemotherapy for Upper Urinary Tract Cancer: Current Evidence

A review of the literature was performed to summarize current evidence regarding the efficacy of topical immunotherapy and chemotherapy for upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma (UUT-UCC) in terms of post-treatment recurrence rates. A Medline database literature search was performed in March 2012 using the terms upper urinary tract, urothelial cancer, bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), and mitomycin C. A total of 22 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 19 studies reporting the outcomes of patients who underwent immunotherapy or chemotherapy with curative or adjuvant intent for UUT-UCC were chosen for quantitative analysis. Overall, the role of immunotherapy and chemotherapy for UUT-UCC is not firmly established. The most established practice is the treatment of carcinoma in situ (CIS) with BCG, even if a significant advantage has not yet been proven. The use of BCG as adjuvant therapy after complete resection of papillary UUT-UCC has been studied less extensively, even if recurrence rates are not significantly different than after the treatment of CIS. Only a few reports describe the use of mitomycin C, making it difficult to obtain significant evidence.Key words: Upper urinary tract, Urothelial cell carcinoma, Bacillus Calmette-Guérin, Mitomycin C, Chemotherapy, ImmunotherapyAccording to the 2011 update of the European Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma (UUT-UCC),¹ urothelial carcinomas are the fourth most common tumors after prostate and breast cancer, lung cancer, and colorectal cancer. Bladder tumors account for 90% to 95% of urothelial carcinomas; UUT-UCC are relatively uncommon and account for only 5% to 10% of urothelial carcinomas. The annual incidence of UUT-UCC in Western countries is approximately one or two new cases per 100,000 inhabitants. Pyelocaliceal tumors are approximately twice as common as ureteral tumors. In 8% to 13% of cases, concurrent bladder cancer is present, and 60% of UUT-UCC are invasive at diagnosis, compared with only 15% of bladder tumors. This kind of carcinoma has a peak incidence in people in their 70s and 80s, with a higher prevalence in men.Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with excision of the bladder cuff represents the gold standard treatment for UUT-UCC, regardless of the location of the tumor in the upper urinary tract.¹ Lymph node dissection associated with RNU is of therapeutic interest and allows for optimal staging of the disease.Conservative surgery for low-risk UUT-UCC allows for preservation of the upper urinary renal unit; conservative management can be considered in imperative cases (renal insufficiency, solitary functional kidney) or in elective cases (ie, when the contralateral kidney is functional) for low-grade, low-stage tumors. Endoscopic ablation can be considered if a flexible ureteroscope, laser generator, and pliers (pluck) for biopsies are available, if the patient is informed of the need for closer follow-up, and if a complete resection is advocated.Segmental ureteral resection with wide margins provides adequate pathologic specimens for definitive staging and grade analysis while also preserving the ipsilateral kidney. Segmental resection is possible for the treatment of low- and high-risk tumors of the distal ureter, whereas segmental resection of the iliac and lumbar ureter is associated with a greater failure rate. Open resection of tumors of the renal pelvis or calices has almost disappeared.Percutaneous management can be considered for low-grade or noninvasive UUT-UCC that are inaccessible or difficult to manage by ureteroscopy, even if a theoretical risk of seeding exits in the puncture tract and if perforations occur during the procedure.After conservative treatment of UUT-UCC or for the treatment of carcinoma in situ (CIS), the instillation of bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) or mitomycin C (MMC) is technically feasible by means of a percutaneous nephrostomy or even through a ureteric stent.Different agents have been used for topical therapy, including BCG, MMC, epirubicine, and thiotepa. Topical chemotherapeutic agents can be administered after endoscopic management, whereas instillations of BCG need to be postponed until the urothelium heals to avoid systemic side effects.According to a recent review,² topical therapy appears to be safe, although its efficacy is debatable. Complications from the administration of topical immunotherapy or chemotherapy can be avoided by maintaining low intracavitary pressures during administration. Renal function does not seem to be impaired after instillation of BCG or MMC.³ No systemic side effects result from perfusion with MMC, and persistent fever was reported in 5% of patients in combined major series after BCG administration; therefore, this side effect was resolved with appropriate antimicrobial therapy in all cases. Furthermore, up to 25% of patients may have granulomatous involvement of the urinary tract after BCG.This review summarizes current evidence about the efficacy of topical immunotherapy and chemotherapy in terms of post-treatment recurrence rates.