首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Diatoms from two macro-tidal mudflats in Chignecto Bay,Upper Bay of Fundy,New Brunswick,Canada
Authors:M?Trites  Email author" target="_blank">I?KaczmarskaEmail author  JM?Ehrman  PW?Hicklin  J?Ollerhead
Institution:(1) Department of Biology, Mount Allison University, Sackville, NB, E4L 1G7, Canada;(2) Environment Canada, Canadian Wildlife Service, Atlantic Region Headquarters, Sackville, NB, E4L 1G6, Canada;(3) Department of Geography, Mount Allison University, Sackville, NB, E4L 1A7, Canada
Abstract:Mudflat research is dispersed among several fields (ecology, sedimentology), each with its own focus and methodology. Consequently, although the volume of mudflat literature is considerable, our understanding of mudflat ecology remains fragmented. For example, little is known about the structure of microbial communities outside Western Europe. Here we present the first North American specific composition and densities of live mudflat diatoms and relate them to properties of their environment on two closely located flats. The two flats (Daniel’s and Buck’s) were similar until the mid–1980s. After this time the biological and sedimentary environment on Buck’s Flats began to change and resulted in a precipitous decline of the keystone invertebrate Corophium volutator (Pallas). The specific diatom composition on each of the two flats examined was still very similar. Tychoplanktonic diatoms were numerically dominant on both flats. The flats differed significantly in the relative contribution of epipelic diatoms, which were about an order of magnitude greater on Buck’s Flats. CCA analysis suggests that very few of these species exist within their optimal habitat. Some of the differences appeared small, but were statistically and biologically significant. Daniel’s Flats sediments had a 30% larger mean grain size, less water and organic carbon compared to Buck’s Flats sediments. Buck’s Flats had more variable depths of the oxygenated layer, often with anoxic inclusions throughout. Daniel’s Flats supported more C. volutator, while Buck’s Flats contained greater densities of diatoms. The importance of preserving environmental conditions (sedimentary and biotic) prevailing on flats such as Danielȁ9s Flat in order to foster populations of Corophium at a level necessary to support foraging migratory shorebirds is also discussed.
Keywords:mudflat  benthic diatoms  epipelon  epipsammon  tychoplankton  Corophium volutator
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号