Polynuclear nickel (II) and copper (II) complexes of hexaazamacrocycles incorporating pairs of diethylenetriamine subunits separated by aromatic spacers

A series of Ni(II) and Cu(II) complexes of the hexaaza macrocycles, 3,6,9,17,20,23-hexaazatricyclo23.3.1.1^11,15]triaconta-1(29),11(30),12,14,25,27-hexaene (L¹) and 3,6,9,16,19,22-hexaazatricyclo22.2.2.2^11,14]triaconta-1(26),11(29),12,14(30),24(28),25-hexaene (L²), have been prepared and the crystal structures determined for Ni₂L¹(O₂CCH₃)₂(H₂O)₂](ClO₄)₂ (1), Ni₂L²(DMF)₆](ClO₄)₄ · 2H₂O (2), {Cu₂L²Br(O₂CCH₃)](ClO₄)₂}_n (3), Cu₂L²(μ-CO₃)(H₂O)₂]₂(ClO₄)₄ · 8H₂O (4), Cu₂L²(O₂CCH₃)₂](BF₄)₂ (5), and Cu₂L¹(μ-imidazolate)Br]₂Br₄ · 6H₂O (6). In these complexes, two metal centers are bound per ligand; in 1 and 3-6, the N₃ subunits of L¹ or L² coordinate meridionally to the metal centers, whilst in 2, each N₃ subunit in L² adopts a facial mode of coordination. The binuclear cations in 1 and 2 have chair-like conformations, with the distorted octahedral Ni(II) coordination spheres completed by terminal water and a bidentate acetate ligand in 1 and three DMF ligands in 2. The Cu(II) centers in 3-6 generally reside in square planar environments, although a weakly binding ligand enters the coordination sphere in some cases, generating a distorted square pyramidal geometry. The binuclear Cu₂L²]⁴⁺ units in 3, 4 and 5 adopt similar bowl-shaped conformations, stabilized by H-bonding interactions between pairs of amine groups from L² and a perchlorate or tetrafluoroborate anion. In 3, the binuclear units are linked through acetate groups, bridging in a syn-anti fashion, to produce a zig-zag polymeric chain structure, whilst 4 incorporates a tetrameric cation consisting of two binuclear units linked via a pair of carbonate bridges. Compound 6 features an imidazolate bridge between the two Cu(II) centers bound by L¹. Pairs of Cu₂L¹(μ-imidazolate)]³⁺ units are then weakly linked through a pair of bromide anions.