On the inability of ants to protect their plant partners and the effect of herbivores on different stages of plant reproduction

Ants co‐occur with herbivorous thrips in several tropical plants, but their interactions are largely unexplored. Should thrips be deterred by ants, a positive effect of ants on plant fitness might be expected. Here, by using an experimental study design with ant‐present and ant‐excluded treatments, we investigated the influence of Camponotus blandus on Pseudophilothrips obscuricornis abundance and herbivory in three extrafloral nectaried species: Banisteriopsis malifolia, B. laevifolia and B. stellaris. In addition, we examined the effect of thrips herbivory on flower set and fruit development and dispersion. Thrips abundance and herbivory were higher on ant‐present stems of B. malifolia and B. laevifolia, where thrips managed to escape from ants by hiding in between clusters of flower buds (thygmotaxis behaviour). In B. stellaris the results were the opposite, as flower bud clusters did not offer hiding places, so thrips were unable to hide from ants; thus both thrips abundance and herbivory were lower on ant‐present stems. Thrips herbivory had no significant effect on flower and fruit set, but samaras (V‐shaped winged fruits of Malpighiaceae) attacked by thrips presented severe distortions and asymmetries. This caused damaged fruits to be dispersed closer to the mother plant, whereas uninjured fruits were dispersed further away. This study is evidence that ant–plant–herbivore systems have variable outcomes depending on the species involved, their behaviour and the plant structure under consideration. Unlike other herbivores, thrips negatively influence the very last stage of plant reproduction. The minute and furtive herbivorous thrips have long been ignored in natural systems, but because of their wide host range, they may be important herbivores even in extrafloral nectaried plants, which are usually fiercely protected by ants.