首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Enhanced DNA photocleavage properties of Ru(II) terpyridine complexes upon incorporation of methylphenyl substituted terpyridine and/or the polyazine bridging ligand dpp (2,3-bis(2-pyridyl)pyrazine)
Authors:Jain Avijita  Slebodnick Carla  Winkel Brenda S J  Brewer Karen J
Institution:a Department of Chemistry, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0212, United States
b Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0212, United States
Abstract:The heteroleptic complexes, (MePhtpy)RuCl(dpp)](PF6) and (tpy)RuCl(dpp)](PF6), have been synthesized, characterized, and investigated with respect to their photophysical, redox, and DNA photocleavage properties (where MePhtpy = 4′-(4-methylphenyl)-2,2′:6′,2′′-terpyridine and dpp = 2,3-bis(2-pyridyl)pyrazine, tpy = 2,2′:6′,2′′-terpyridine). The X-ray crystal structure confirms the identity of the new (MePhtpy)RuCl(dpp)](PF6) complex. These heteroleptic complexes were found to photocleave DNA in the presence of oxygen, unlike the previously studied complex, Ru(tpy)2](PF6)2. The photophysical, redox, and DNA photocleavage properties of the heteroleptic complexes were compared with those of the homoleptic complexes, Ru(MePhtpy)2](PF6)2 and Ru(tpy)2](PF6)2. The heteroleptic complexes showed intense metal to ligand charge transfer (MLCT) transition at lower energy ((MePhtpy)RuCl(dpp)](PF6), 522 nm; (tpy)RuCl(dpp)](PF6), 516 nm) and longer excited state lifetimes as compared to the homoleptic complexes. The Ru(MePhtpy)2]2+ complex was found to photocleave DNA in contrast to Ru(tpy)2]2+. The introduction of a methylphenyl group on the tepyridine ligand not only enhances the 3MLCT excited state lifetime but also increases the lipophilicity and thereby the DNA binding ability of the molecule. An increase in lipophilicity upon addition of a methylphenyl group on the 2,2′:6′,2′′-terpyridine ligand was confirmed by determination of the partition coefficient ((MePhtpy)RuCl(dpp)](PF6), log P = +1.16; (tpy)RuCl(dpp)](PF6), log P = −1.27). The heteroleptic complexes photocleave DNA more efficiently than the homoleptic complexes, with the greatest activity being observed for the newly prepared (MePhtpy)RuCl(dpp)](PF6) complex.
Keywords:Ruthenium polyazine complex  Bridging ligand  Partition coefficient  Lipophilicity  DNA photocleavage  Quantum yield
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号