Relationships between microzooplankton and mesozooplankton: competition versus predation on natural assemblages of the Gulf of Trieste (northern Adriatic Sea) |
| |
Authors: | Fonda Umani S; Tirelli V; Beran A; Guardiani B |
| |
Institution: | 1 Department of Biology, University of Trieste, Via Giorgieri 10, I-34127 Trieste, Italy and 2 Laboratory of Marine Biology (LBM), via Auguste Piccard 54, I-34010 Trieste, Italy |
| |
Abstract: | We performed, on a seasonal basis, 16 dilution experiments and,simultaneously, copepod or cladoceran grazing experiments onnatural assemblages from Gulf of Trieste (northern AdriaticSea). The autotrophic fraction was almost entirely composedof diatoms in late winter. As the seasons progressed, relativeabundance of nanoplankton and cyanobacteria increased. Microzooplanktonwas always present in the diet of mesozooplankton, even if inpercentages usually not exceeding 6% of diet intake on carbonbasis. Microzooplankton took advantage of ephemeral increasesof autotrophic biomass when prey were in the optimal size rangebut did not consume diatoms when these were large. When autotrophicresources were scarce, micrograzers used heterotrophic biomasswhich, in turn, fuelled the upper trophic levels through predationby mesozooplankton on microzooplankton. Microzooplankton grazingwas the most important loss term of primary production in theGulf of Trieste (on average, microzooplankton consumed 100%of primary production, while mesozooplankton only 76%), whichcan be considered a mesotrophic coastal system.
This paper is one of six on the subject of the role of zooplanktonpredatorprey interactions in structuring plankton communities. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 Oxford 等数据库收录! |
|