PD-1免疫抑制剂联合化疗治疗晚期NSCLC的效果及对肿瘤标志物、预后的影响 |
| |
引用本文: | 戴 婷,查名宝,许林利,童玫瑰,娄 悦. PD-1免疫抑制剂联合化疗治疗晚期NSCLC的效果及对肿瘤标志物、预后的影响[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2024, 0(10): 1901-1905 |
| |
作者姓名: | 戴 婷 查名宝 许林利 童玫瑰 娄 悦 |
| |
作者单位: | 芜湖市中医医院肿瘤科 安徽 芜湖 241000 |
| |
基金项目: | 安徽省卫生健康委科研计划项目(2020SEY079) |
| |
摘 要: | 摘要 目的:探究PD-1免疫抑制剂联合化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的效果及对肿瘤标志物、预后的影响。方法:回顾性选取2020.6~2023.6间收治的处于III B期~IV期NSCLC患者为研究对象,依据其治疗方案分为化疗组(n=32,培美曲塞/紫杉类+铂类化疗方案)和联合组(n=36,免疫抑制剂+培美曲塞/紫杉类+铂类化疗方案),治疗至少2个周期后比较两组实体瘤治疗效果[疾病控制率(DCR)、客观缓解率(ORR)],随访预后生存情况[无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)],比较治疗期间药物不良反应,比较两组治疗前、治疗2个周期后的血清生化指标[癌胚抗原(CEA)、细胞角蛋白19片段抗原(CY-FRA21-1)和白蛋白(ALB)]水平变化。结果:治疗2个周期后,联合组DCR(83.33% vs 59.38%)显著高于化疗组(P<0.05),但ORR(58.33% vs 40.63%)与化疗组比较无显著差异(P>0.05);随访18个月,联合组PFS为(11.44±1.81)个月,死亡11例,OS为(15.17±1.42)个月;化疗组PFS为(6.87±3.05)个月,死亡16例,OS为(11.91±1.09)个月,联合组PFS显著高于化疗组(log rank x2=4.377,P<0.05),两组OS比较无显著差异(log rank x2=3.442,P>0.05);治疗期间,两组药物不良反应总发生率比较无显著差异(P>0.05);治疗2个周期后,两组CEA和CY-FRA21-1水平逐渐降低(P<0.05),ALB水平显著升高(P<0.05),且联合组治疗2个周期指标变化显著高于化疗组(P<0.05)。结论:PD-1免疫抑制剂联合化疗治疗晚期NSCLC效果良好,可显著抑制肿瘤发展进程,延长患者PFS,改善预后,值得推荐。
|
关 键 词: | 晚期NSCLC;PD-1免疫抑制剂;化疗;肿瘤标志物;预后 |
收稿时间: | 2023-10-22 |
修稿时间: | 2023-11-18 |
Effect of PD-1 Immunosuppressant Combined with Chemotherapy in Treating Advanced NSCLC and Its Influence on Tumor Markers and Prognosis |
| |
Abstract: | ABSTRACT Objective: To explore the effect of PD-1 immunosuppressant combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and its influence on tumor markers and prognosis. Methods: Patients with stage III-B-IV NSCLC admitted from June 2020 to June 2023 were retrospectively selected as the study subjects, and were divided into chemotherapy group (n=32, pemetrexed/paclitaxel + platinum chemotherapy regimen) and combined group (n=36, camrelizumab + pemetrexed/ paclitaxel + platinum chemotherapy regimen). The solid tumor treatment effect [disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR)] and follow-up prognosis and survival [progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS)] after at least 2 cycles of treatment, adverse drug reactions during treatment and levels of serum biochemical indicators [carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen (CY-FRA21-1), albumin (ALB)] before treatment and after 2 cycles of treatment were compared between both groups. Results: After 2 cycles of treatment, DCR in combined group was significantly higher than that in chemotherapy group (83.33% vs 59.38%) (P<0.05), but ORR was not significantly different from that in chemotherapy group (58.33% vs 40.63%) (P>0.05). After 18 months of follow-up, the PFS, the number of dead cases and OS in combined group were (11.44±1.81) months, 11 cases and (15.17±1.42) months and those in chemotherapy group were (6.87±3.05) months, 16 cases and (11.91±1.09) months. The PFS was significantly longer in combined group than that in chemotherapy group (log rank χ2=4.377, P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in OS between the two groups (log rank χ2=3.442, P>0.05). During treatment, the total incidence rate of adverse drug reactions showed no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). After 2 cycles of treatment, the levels of CEA and CY-FRA21-1 in both groups were gradually reduced (P<0.05) while the level of ALB was significantly risen (P<0.05), and the changes of the above indicators in combined group were significantly higher compared to chemotherapy group (P<0.05). Conclusion: PD-1 immunosuppressant combined with chemotherapy is effective in the treatment of advanced NSCLC, which can significantly inhibit the tumor progression, prolong the PFS, and improve the prognosis. |
| |
Keywords: | Advanced NSCLC PD-1 immunosuppressant Chemotherapy Tumor markers Prognosis |
|
| 点击此处可从《现代生物医学进展》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《现代生物医学进展》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|