| Abstract: | This paper presents the first experimental study of the effects of mobbing on predators. Two captive little owls Athene noctua and a tawny owl Strix aluco, having stabilized activity patterns and roosting sites, were singly confronted with one or two mobbing blackbirds Turdus merula. The little owls showed marked stress (gular fluttering, panting and panic flights), abandoned chosen roosts and remained unsettled for several days. A permanent alternative roost was chosen after one mobbing encounter, other encounters resulted in several days of ‘floating’ before returning to the original sites. One little owl used ‘camouflage’ by ‘freezing’ during repeated harassments, the other tended to retaliate if mobbing was close and weak. The tawny owl seemed to ignore the rather weak blackbird mobbing, but abandoned its roost for up to 36 h when mobbed by larger numbers of woodland birds at close range. It is concluded that mobbing causes profound distress, especially in small, vulnerable predators like the little owl and forces it to change its daytime roost. If abandoning the area is not possible, time and energy are expended in increased vigilance as a protection against further mobbing attacks. Thus there is strong support for the ‘Move on’ hypothesis. Results also support the ‘Perception advertisement’ hypothesis, implying that the detected hunter deliberately forfeits the surprise element. Which effect prevails depends on predator evaluation of the signals involved. |
