Interpreting microbiopsies in cervical smears. A cytohistologic approach |
| |
Authors: | Mravunac M Smedts F Philippi A Remerij D Krul A Schrik M van't Hof B van Heusden C Vooijs G P |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Pathology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, The Netherlands. |
| |
Abstract: | OBJECTIVE: To assess interobserver variation in the diagnosis of thick tissue specimens (microbiopsies) in cytology smears and histologic sections taken from them, to evaluate the applicability of MIB-1 in histologic sections from microbiopsies and to evaluate whether processing microbiopsies in inconclusive smears has additional diagnostic value. STUDY DESIGN: Cytologic smears were selected in which there were diagnostic disagreements between pathologists and cytologists and microbiopsies were present. Interobserver variation among three pathologists and three cytologists in the diagnosis of these microbiopsies was investigated. The smears were processed for histologic sections, and interobserver variation between pathologist diagnoses were analyzed. An additional histologic slide stained for MIB-1 was used for consensus diagnosis. The consensus diagnosis was compared with available follow-up and its sensitivity and specificity determined. The value of applying the microbiopsy technique in slides diagnosed as inadequate or atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) was analysed. RESULTS: From a series of 62,334 cervical smears, 49 with microbiopsies were selected. It was possible to derive histologic slides from 38 cases. Interobserver variability in the diagnosis of microbiopsies and histologic sections from them was moderate--kappa = .44 (SE = .06) and kappa = .44 (SE = .09), respectively. In the consensus meeting for all cases, a conclusive diagnosis was reached. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the consensus diagnosis and MIB-1 staining was r = .62. The sensitivity of the consensus diagnosis for the follow-up diagnosis was 71% and the specificity 60%. Diagnosis on approximately 50% of slides diagnosed as inadequate or ASCUS could be made. CONCLUSION: The histotechnical workup of microbiopsies is not difficult; however, their diagnosis can be a problem. Adequate diagnostic criteria are not available. Aided by MIB-1 staining, histologic sections from microbiopsies can be diagnosed, and the diagnoses correlated with follow-up in most cases. Processing of microbiopsies in smears with an inconclusive cytologic diagnosis or a diagnosis of ASCUS allowed correct diagnosis in 50% of cases in this study. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|