Amphipods, isopods and surface currents: a case for passive dispersal in the Bay of Fundy, Canada |
| |
Authors: | Locke, A. Corey, S. |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Zoology, University of Guelph Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1 1Present address: Department of Zoology, Erindale College, University of Toronto, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5L 1C6 |
| |
Abstract: | Six species of isopods and 18 species of amphipods were collectedin the neuston of the Bay of Fundy and adjacent waters. Collectionswere made over a grid of stations covering 2.4x104 km2 duringthree spring, three summer and two autumn surveys. No isopodsand only five species of amphipods were found in spring surveys.Isopods and amphipods were diverse and plentiful in the neustonin summer and autumn. Dominant isopods were Idotea baltica andI.metallica, and dominant amphipods were Calliopius laeviusculusand Parathemisto gaudichaudi. Amphipods and isopods reach theneuston of the Bay of Fundy in three ways. Idotea metallica,the only euneustonic species present, was probably advectedinto the Bay of Fundy from southern waters in summer, and didnot appear to overwinter in the Bay. Most species, includingI.baltica, were collected with drifting littoral vegetation,and we suggest that transport by surface currents is an importantfactor in dispersal of some shoreline crustaceans. Midwaterplankton, such as Parathemisto gaudichaudi, reached the neustoneither by advection in upwelling waters or by an extension oftheir normal diel vertical distribution. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 Oxford 等数据库收录! |
|