首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


No diagnostic impact of routinely use of respiratory gating to characterize lung nodules with 18F-FDG PET/CT
Authors:S Gonzalez  Olivier Mundler  Christophe Doddoli  Fabrice Barlesi  Thomas Tessonnier  Bardia Farman  Serge Cammilleri  Laurent Boyer  Eric Guedj  Laurent Tessonnier
Institution:1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Aix Marseille University, La Timone University Hospital, European and Center for Research in Medical Imaging, La Timone University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, 13305 Marseille, France;2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, centre hospitalier intercommunal, 83100 Toulon-la-Seyne-sur-mer, France;3. Department of Thoracic Surgery, North Hospital, 13015 Marseille, France;4. Multidisciplinary Oncology and Therapeutic Innovations Department, Aix Marseille University, Assistance publique–hôpitaux de Marseille (AP–HM), 13015 Marseille, France;5. Public Health department, Aix Marseille University, Assistance publique–Hôpitaux de Marseille (AP–HM), 13015 Marseille, France
Abstract:

Purpose

To evaluate diagnostic impact of routinely use of respiratory gated (RG) 18FDG PET/CT to distinguish benign and malignant lung nodules.

Methods

We analyzed retrospectively data of 76 patients referred for metabolic characterization of lung nodules who underwent whole body 18FDG PET/CT scan followed by RG PET/CT (deep-inspiration breath-hold, DIBH). RG was prospectively planned without knowledge of WB PET/CT results. Independent reading of PET/CT scans with or without respiratory gating was separately conducted by two nuclear medicine physicians. Uptake of lung nodules was evaluated visually (positive if nodule's uptake superior to pulmonary background uptake), and quantitatively (SUVmax, SUVmean, metabolic volume, tumor to background ratio). Reference standard was obtained for all patients by histology (n = 37) or clinico-radiological follow-up (n = 39). Sub-groups were also evaluated (nodule < 15 mm, lower lobe nodules).

Results

Nodules were classified positives without RG scans in 43/76 (59.7%) patients and with RG scans in 41/75 (54.6%) patients. Results were discordant for 5/75 (6.7%) patients. According to the reference standard, 35/39 cancers were correctly identified by PET/CT without RG, and 34/38 by RG PET/CT. Without RG PET, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 89.7%, 78.4% and 84.2% respectively. With RG PET, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 89.5%, 81.1% and 85.3% respectively, not statistically different. Concerning quantitative analysis, results were not statistically better with RG than without RG and were not better than visual analysis. Sub-groups analysis showed no added value of RG scans in specific groups (lower lobes and smaller nodules).

Conclusion

Routinely use of RG did not help in the diagnosis of neoplastic lung nodules. Others evaluations are needed to assess the contribution of RG for others selective indications (therapeutic evaluation, radiotherapy planning, characterization of liver lesions).
Keywords:PET/CT  FDG  Respiratory gating  Lung nodule  Lung cancer  TEP/TDM  FDG  Synchronisation respiratoire  Nodule pulmonaire  Cancer du poumon
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号