首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Evaluation of scanning resolution,detector choice and detector orientation to be used for accurate and time-efficient commissioning of a 6MV clinical linear accelerator
Authors:Azhar  Deeba  Gul  Attia  Javid  Muhamad Arshad  Hussain  Muhammad Mubashar  Shehzadi  Nazia Neelam
Institution:1.Department of Basic Sciences, University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila, 47080, Pakistan
;2.Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Oncology and Radiotherapy (INOR), Abbottabad, 22010, Pakistan
;3.Institute of Physics, Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, 63100, Pakistan
;4.Atomic Energy Cancer Hospital NORI, Islamabad, 44080, Pakistan
;
Abstract:

The present study is aimed at exploring different scanning parameters, detectors and their orientations for time-efficient and accurate commissioning of a 6 MV clinical linear accelerator (LINAC). Beam profiles and percentage depth dose (PDD) curves were measured with a PTW dosimetry diode, a PTW Semiflex and a PinPoint ion chamber in different orientations. To acquire beam data, equidistant (step size of 0.5 mm, 1 mm, 2 mm and 3 mm) and fanline (step size of 2–0.5 mm, 2–1 mm, 3–0.5 mm and 3-1 mm) scanning modes were employed and data measurement time was recorded. Scan time per measurement point was also varied (0.2 s, 0.5 s and 1.0 s) to investigate its effect on the accuracy and acquisition time of beam data. Accuracy of the measured data was analyzed on the basis of the variation between measured data and data modeled by a treatment planning system. Beam profiles (particularly in penumbra region) were found to be sensitive to variation in scanning resolution and showed an improved accuracy with decrease in step size, while PDD curves were affected negligibly. The accuracy of beam data obtained with the PTW dosimetry diode and the PinPoint ion chamber was higher than those obtained with the PTW Semiflex ion chamber for small fields (2?×?2 cm2 and 3?×?3 cm2). However, the response of the PTW diode and the PinPoint ion chamber was significantly indifferent in these fields. Furthermore, axial orientation of the PTW Semiflex ion chamber improved accuracy of profiles and PDDs as compared to radial orientation, while such a difference was not significant for the PinPoint ion chamber. It is concluded that a scan time of 0.2 s/point with a fanline scanning resolution of 2–1 mm for beam profiles and 3 mm for PDDs are most favorable in terms of accuracy and time efficiency. For small fields (2?×?2 cm2 and 3?×?3 cm2), a PinPoint ion chamber in radial orientation or a dosimetry diode in axial orientation are recommended for both beam profiles and PDDs. If a PinPoint ion chamber and a PTW dosimetry diode are not available, a Semiflex ion chamber in axial orientation may be used for small fields.

Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号