Host specific variation in photosynthesis of an obligate xylem‐tapping mistletoe Dendrophthoe curvata in a Bornean heath forest |
| |
| Authors: | Quang‐Vuong Le Kushan U Tennakoon Faizah Metali Linda B L Lim Jay F Bolin |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Life and Environmental Sciences Program, Faculty of Science and Inst. for Biodiversity and Environmental Research (IBER), Univ. Brunei Darussalam, Tungku Link, Gadong, Brunei Darussalam;2. Biology Faculty, Vinh Univ., Vinh City, Nghe An Province, Vietnam;3. Chemistry Program, Faculty of Science, Univ. Brunei Darussalam, Tungku Link, Gadong, Brunei Darussalam;4. Dept of Biology, Catawba?College, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | Most mistletoe–host ecophysiological studies have paid attention to the influence of parasites on host performance. This paper explored the impact of varying hosts on the photosynthesis of a single mistletoe species. Here, we studied an obligate xylem‐tapping tropical mistletoe (Dendrophthoe curvata (Blume) Miquel) parasitizing four different hosts (Acacia auriculiformis A. Cunn. Ex Benth, Andira inermis (W. Wright) DC., Mangifera indica L. and Vitex pinnata L.) in a homo geneous tropical heath forest patch in Brunei Darussalam. We compared photosynthetic capacity and photosynthesis‐related characteristics of the mistletoe on four different hosts to evaluate the overall impact of hosts on the parasite. Results showed that the mistletoe–host patterns of CO2 assimilation rates, transpiration rates and water use efficiency varied significantly based on the host. In the D. curvata–Vitex pinnata association, the mistletoe exhibited significantly lower CO2 assimilation rates but showed no significant variations in transpiration rates and water use efficiency when compared to the host. In D. curvata–Andira inermis and D. curvata–Mangifera indica associations, the mistletoe showed significantly higher photosynthetic rates than the hosts, whereas in the D. curvata–Acacia auriculiformis association, there was no significant difference in photosynthetic rates between the counterparts. Host specificity also significantly influenced some mistletoe photosynthetic parameters such as light saturated photosynthesis, specific leaf area, leaf chlorophyll content, CO2 assimilation rates, stomatal conductance, transpiration rates and water use efficiency. Different tree hosts intrinsically offer different resources to their obligate mistletoe parasites based on their physiology and environmental parameters. We argue that host‐specific responses have driven these intra‐specific variations in mistletoe physiology. This study provides background for future investigation on potential host‐regulated mechanisms that drive functional changes in host‐dependent mistletoes. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
