| Abstract: | Twenty-two reverse-flow island flaps were transferred. These included peroneal, forearm, anterior tibial, and temporal flaps. Sixteen of 22 flaps survived completely. We encountered partial necrosis in 4 flaps and total necrosis in only 2 flaps. We credit this success to the reliability and availability of the peroneal, forearm, and temporal flaps; but we do not encourage use of the anterior tibial flap. The flaps that survived well did not show any signs of venous congestion. The advantage of the reverse-flow island flap is that it can be transferred from a proximal to a distal location. Using cadavers and fresh amputated limbs, studies on venous drainage of the reverse-flow island flap were performed. The venae comitantes had numerous venous valves and communicating branches, but more than sufficient reflux of the venous blood occurred through the valves at pressures of 90 to 105 cmH2O. We believe that the venous drainage of the reverse-flow island flap occurs as a result of reflux actions at the valve, communicating branches between the venae comitantes, and bypass vessels around the valves. |
