Ultrasonography and abdominal radiography versus intravenous urography in investigation of urinary tract infection in men: prospective incident cohort study |
| |
| Authors: | S J Andrews P T Brooks D C Hanbury C M King C M Prendergast G B Boustead T A McNicholas |
| |
| Institution: | aDepartment of Urology, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, Hertfordshire SG1 4AB, bDepartment of Radiology, Lister Hospital |
| |
| Abstract: | ObjectivesTo compare ultrasonography and abdominal radiography with intravenous urography in the investigation of urinary tract infection in men.DesignProspective study in two hospital departments. Radiological procedures and urological assessments performed on different days by different cliniciansSettingDistrict general hospital.ParticipantsConsecutive series of men (n=114) referred to the department of urology for investigation of proved urinary tract infection.InterventionsUltrasonography and intravenous urography of renal tract and assessment of urinary flow rate. Clinical assessment, cystoscopy, urodynamic studies, and transrectal ultrasonography with biopsy.ResultsImportant abnormalities were seen in 53 of 100 fully evaluated patients, the most common being a poorly emptying bladder (34). The combination of plain radiographs of kidneys, ureter, and bladder and ultrasonography detected more abnormalities than intravenous urography alone. No important abnormality was missed by this combination (sensitivity 100% and specificity 93%).ConclusionsUltrasonography with abdominal radiography is as accurate as intravenous urography in detecting important urological abnormalities in men presenting with urinary tract infection. This combination is safer than intravenous urography and should be the initial investigation for such patients. Additional determination of urinary flow rate is useful for the assessment of an incompletely emptying bladder. What is already known on this topicUltrasonography alone is the primary investigation of choice for urinary tract infection in children and womenUltrasonography has limited sensitivity for renal stones and poor sensitivity for ureteric stonesUrinary infection is less common in men than women and the risk factors are differentWhat this study addsUltrasonography is as effective as intravenous urography in men with urinary tract infection only when it is combined with plain radiographyIn men aged over 50 an incompletely emptying bladder is the most common abnormalityIn such patients determination of urinary flow rate is particularly helpful |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
