首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Land-use coverage as an indicator of riparian quality
Affiliation:1. Grup de Recerca “Freshwater Ecology and Management (FEM)”, Departament d''Ecologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain;2. Department of Ecology and Hydrology, Regional Campus of International Excellence “Campus Mare Nostrum”—University of Murcia, Spain;3. Instituto di Ricerca Sulle Acque (CNR-IRSA), Italy;4. Hellenic Center for Marine Research (HCMR), Greece;5. Institut Cavanilles de Biodiversitat i Biologia Evolutiva, Universitat de València, Spain;6. Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Berlin, Germany;1. School of Environment, Natural Resources & Geography, Bangor University, Environment Centre Wales, Deiniol Road, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK;2. School of Geography, Geology and the Environment, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK;3. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Environment Centre Wales, Deiniol Road, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK;1. Finnish Environment Institute, Freshwater Centre, P.O. Box 413, 90014 Oulu, Finland;2. Department of Ecology and Genetics, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 8000, 90014, Finland
Abstract:Sustaining or restoring riparian quality is essential to achieve and maintain good stream health, as well as to guarantee the ecological functions that natural riparian areas provide. Therefore, quantifying riparian quality is a fundamental step to identify river reaches for conservation and/or restoration purposes. Most of the existing methods assessing riparian quality concentrate on field surveys of a few hundreds of metres, which become very laborious when trying to evaluate whole catchments or long river corridors. Riparian quality assessment obtains higher scores when riparian vegetation consists of forested areas, while land-uses lacking woody vegetation typically represent physical and functional discontinuities along river corridors that undermine riparian quality. Thus, this study aimed to analyse the ability of riparian land-cover data for modelling riparian quality over large areas. Multiple linear regression and Random Forest techniques were performed using land-use datasets at three different spatial scales: 1:5000 (Cantabrian Riparian Cover map), 1:25,000 (Spanish Land Cover Information System) and 1:100,000 (Corine Land Cover). Riparian quality field data was obtained using the Riparian Quality Index. Hydromorphological pressures affecting riparian vegetation were also included in the analysis to determine their relative weight in controlling riparian quality. Linear regression showed better predictive ability than Random Forest, although this may be due to our relatively small dataset (approx. 150 cases). Forest coverage highly determined riparian quality, while hydromorphological pressures and land-use coverage related to human activities played a smaller role in the models. While acceptable results were obtained when using high-resolution datasets, the use of Corine Land Cover led to a poor predictive ability.
Keywords:River restoration  Catchment management  Fluvial corridor  Fluvial landscape  Environmental assessment
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号