Bystander effects and the structure of dominance hierarchies

Prior modeling work has found that pure winner and loser effects(i.e., changing the estimation of your own fighting abilityas a function of direct prior experience) can have importantconsequences for hierarchy formation. Here these models areextended to incorporate "bystander effects." When bystandereffects are in operation, observers (i.e., bystanders) of aggressiveinteractions change their assessment of the protagonists' fightingabilities (depending on who wins and who loses). Computer simulationsdemonstrate that when bystander winner effects alone are atplay, groups have a clear omega (bottom-ranking individual),while the relative position of other group members remainsdifficult to determine. When only bystander loser effects arein operation, wins and losses are randomly distributed throughouta group (i.e., no discernible hierarchy). When pure and bystanderwinner effects are jointly in place, a linear hierarchy, inwhich all positions (i.e., to when N = 4) are clearly defined,emerges. Joint pure and bystander loser effects produce thesame result. In principle one could test the predictions fromthe models developed here in a straightforward comparativestudy. Hopefully, the results of this model will spur on suchstudies in the future.