首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Carbohydrate reserves in the facilitator cushion plant <Emphasis Type="Italic">Laretia acaulis</Emphasis> suggest carbon limitation at high elevation and no negative effects of beneficiary plants
Authors:Email author" target="_blank">Mary?Carolina?García LinoEmail author  Lohengrin?A?Cavieres  Gerhard?Zotz  Maaike?Y?Bader
Institution:1.Departamento de Botánica, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanográficas,Universidad de Concepción,Concepción,Chile;2.Instituto de Ecología y Biodiversidad (IEB),Santiago,Chile;3.Functional Ecology, Institute of Biology and Environmental Sciences,Carl-von-Ossietzky University,Oldenburg,Germany;4.Ecological Plant Geography, Faculty of Geography,University of Marburg,Marburg,Germany;5.Herbario Nacional de Bolivia,Universidad Mayor de San Andrés,La Paz,Bolivia
Abstract:The elevational range of the alpine cushion plant Laretia acaulis (Apiaceae) comprises a cold upper extreme and a dry lower extreme. For this species, we predict reduced growth and increased non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) concentrations (i.e. carbon sink limitation) at both elevational extremes. In a facilitative interaction, these cushions harbor other plant species (beneficiaries). Such interactions appear to reduce reproduction in other cushion species, but not in L. acaulis. However, vegetative effects may be more important in this long-lived species and may be stronger under marginal conditions. We studied growth and NSC concentrations in leaves and stems of L. acaulis collected from cushions along its full elevational range in the Andes of Central Chile. NSC concentrations were lowest and cushions were smaller and much less abundant at the highest elevation. At the lowest elevation, NSC concentrations and cushion sizes were similar to those of intermediate elevations but cushions were somewhat less abundant. NSC concentrations and growth did not change with beneficiary cover at any elevation. Lower NSC concentrations at the upper extreme contradict the sink-limitation hypothesis and may indicate that a lack of warmth is not limiting growth at high-elevation. At the lower extreme, carbon gain and growth do not appear more limiting than at intermediate elevations. The lower population density at both extremes suggests that the regeneration niche exerts important limitations to this species’ distribution. The lack of an effect of beneficiaries on reproduction and vegetative performance suggests that the interaction between L. acaulis and its beneficiaries is probably commensalistic.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号