首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Multi-centre testing and validation of current protocols for the identification of Gyrodactylus salaris (Monogenea)
Authors:A.P. Shinn,C. Collins,M. Snow,G. Paladini,T. Lindenstrø  m,J.F. Turnbull,C. Vá  zquez Rivera,T.A. Mo,K. Olstad,P.D. Harris,D. Graham,G.H. Yoon,N.G.H. Taylor,R. Raynard,J.E. Bron
Affiliation:a Institute of Aquaculture, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK
b Marine Scotland - Science, Marine Laboratory, 375 Victoria Road, Aberdeen AB11 9DB, UK
c Cefas Weymouth Laboratory, Barrack Road, Weymouth DT4 8UB, UK
d Adjuvant Research, Dept. of Infectious Disease Immunology, Division of Vaccine, Statens Serum Institut, 5 Artillerivej, 81/306, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark
e National Veterinary Institute, Section for Parasitology, P.O. Box 750 Sentrum, NO-0106 Oslo, Norway
f Natural History Museum, Dept. of Zoology, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1172, NO-0318 Oslo, Norway
g School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AX, UK
h Disease Surveillance & Investigation Dept., Veterinary Sciences Division, Agri-food & Biosciences Institute, Stoney Road, Stormont, Belfast BT4 3SD, UK
i University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Life Sciences, Dept. of Veterinary Pathobiology, Section of Fish Diseases, Stigbøjlen 7, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
Abstract:Despite routine screening requirements for the notifiable fish pathogen Gyrodactylus salaris, no standard operating procedure exists for its rapid identification and discrimination from other species of Gyrodactylus. This study assessed screening and identification efficiencies under real-world conditions for the most commonly employed identification methodologies: visual, morphometric and molecular analyses. Obtained data were used to design a best-practice processing and decision-making protocol allowing rapid specimen throughput and maximal classification accuracy. True specimen identities were established using a consensus from all three identification methods, coupled with the use of host and location information. The most experienced salmonid gyrodactylid expert correctly identified 95.1% of G. salaris specimens. Statistical methods of classification identified 66.7% of the G. salaris, demonstrating the need for much wider training. Molecular techniques (internal transcribed spacer region-restriction fragment length polymorphism (ITS-RFLP)/cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) sequencing) conducted in the diagnostic laboratory most experienced in the analysis of gyrodactylid material, identified 100% of the true G. salaris specimens. Taking into account causes of potential specimen loss, the probabilities of a specimen being accurately identified were 95%, 87% and 92% for visual, morphometric and molecular techniques, respectively, and the probabilities of correctly identifying a specimen of G. salaris by each method were 81%, 58% and 92%. Inter-analyst agreement for 189 gyrodactylids assessed by all three methods using Fleiss’ Kappa suggested substantial agreement in identification between the methods. During routine surveillance periods when low numbers of specimens are analysed, we recommend that specimens be analysed using the ITS-RFLP approach followed by sequencing of specimens with a “G. salaris-like” (i.e. G. salaris, Gyrodactylus thymalli) banding pattern. During periods of suspected outbreaks, where a high volume of specimens is expected, we recommended that specimens be identified using visual identification, as the fastest processing method, to select “G. salaris-like” specimens, which are subsequently identified by molecular-based techniques.
Keywords:Gyrodactylus salaris   Contingency planning   Pathogen introduction   Validation   Identification   Monogenea   Protocol
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号