Photosynthesis-nitrogen relations in Amazonian tree species

The relationships between leaf nitrogen (N), specific leaf area (SLA) (an inverse index of leaf thickness or density), and photosynthetic capacity (A_max) were studied in 23 Amazonian tree species to characterize scaling in these properties among natural populations of leaves of different ages and light microenvironments, and to examine how variation within species in N and SLA can influence the expression of the A_max-to-N relationship on mass versus area bases. The slope of the A_max-N relationship, change in A per change in N (mol CO₂ gN^-1 s^-1), was consistently greater, by as much as 300%, when both measures were expressed on mass rather than area bases. The x-intercept of this relationship (N-compensation point) was generally positive on a mass but not an area basis. In this paper we address the causes and implications of such differences. Significant linear relationships (p<0.05) between mass-based leaf N (N_mass) and SLA were observed in 12 species and all 23 regressions had positive slopes. In 13 species, mass-based A_max (A_mass) was positively related (p<0.05) with SLA. These patterns reflect the concurrent decline in N_mass and SLA with increasing leaf age. Significant (p<0.05) relationships between area-based leaf N (N_area) and SLA were observed in 18 species. In this case, all relationships had negative slopes. Taken collectively, and consistent in all species, as SLA decreased (leaves become thicker) across increasing leaf age and light gradients, N_mass also decreased, but proportionally more slowly, such that N_area increased. Due to the linear dependence of A_mass on N_mass and a negative 4-intercept, thicker leaves (low SLA) therefore tend, on average, to have lower N_mass and A_mass but higher N_area than thinner leaves. This tendency towards decreasing A_mass with increasing N_area, resulting in a lower slope of the A_max-N relationship on an area than mass basis in 16 of 17 species where both were significant. For the sole species exception (higher area than mass-based slope) variation in N_area was related to variation in N_mass and not in SLA, and thus, these data are also consistent with this explanation. The relations between N, SLA and A_max explain how the rate of change in A_max per change in N can vary three-fold depending on whether a mass or area mode of expression is used.