Effectiveness of EMG biofeedback training for controlling arousal in subsequent stressful situations

Thirty-five subjects participated in (1) a pretreatment session during which arousal was measured while subjects anticipated and then viewed a stressful film; (2) four 20-min treatment sessions during which subjects received either contingent EMG biofeedback (biofeedback treatment), instructions to attend to a variable pitch tone (attention-placebo control), instructions to relax as much as possible (instructions-only control), or instructions to sit quietly (no-treatment control); and (3) a posttreatment session that was identical to the pretreatment session. Results indicate that when compared to the subjects in the control conditions, subjects who received EMG biofeedback were not effective in reducing frontalis EMG levels during treatment or while viewing the stressful film, but they were effective in reducing frontalis EMG levels while anticipating the stressful film. There was no evidence that EMG biofeedback influenced either skin conductance or self-reports of arousal.This research was supported in part by Bio-Medical and General Research Fund grants from the University of Kansas to David S. Holmes. Appreciation is due to B. Kent Houston, Edward F. Morrow, and Charles A. Hallenbeck for their contributions to the project.