Enantiomers of cis-constrained and flexible 2-substituted GABA analogues exert opposite effects at recombinant GABA(C) receptors

The effects of the enantiomers of a number of flexible and cis-constrained GABA analogues were tested on GABA(C) receptors expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes using two-electrode voltage-clamp electrophysiology. (1S,2R)-cis-2-Aminomethylcyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid ((+)-CAMP), a potent and full agonist at the rho1 (EC(50) approximately 40 microM, I(max) approximately 100%) and rho 2 (EC(50) approximately 17 microM, I(max) approximately 100%) receptor subtypes, was found to be a potent partial agonist at rho3 (EC(50) approximately 28 microM, I(max) approximately 70%). (1R,2S)-cis-2-Aminomethylcyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid ((-)-CAMP), a weak antagonist at human rho1 (IC(50) approximately 890 microM) and rho2 (IC(50) approximately 400 microM) receptor subtypes, was also found to be a moderately potent antagonist at rat rho3 (IC(50) approximately 180 microM). Similarly, (1R,4S)-4-aminocyclopent-2-ene-1-carboxylic acid ((+)-ACPECA) was a full agonist at rho1 (EC(50) approximately 135 microM, I(max) approximately 100%) and rho2 (EC(50) approximately 60 microM, I(max) approximately 100%), but only a partial agonist at rho3 (EC(50) approximately 112 microM, I(max) approximately 37%), while (1S,4R)-4-aminocyclopent-2-ene-1-carboxylic acid ((-)-ACPECA) was a weak antagonist at all three receptor subtypes (IC(50)>300 microM). 4-Amino-(S)-2-methylbutanoic acid ((S)-2MeGABA) and 4-amino-(R)-2-methylbutanoic acid ((R)-2MeGABA) followed the same trend, with (S)-2MeGABA acting as a full agonist at the rho1 (EC(50) approximately 65 microM, I(max) approximately 100%), and rho2 (EC(50) approximately 20 microM, I(max) approximately 100%) receptor subtypes, and a partial agonist at rho3 (EC(50) approximately 25 microM, I(max) approximately 90%). (R)-2MeGABA, however, was a moderately potent antagonist at all three receptor subtypes (IC(50) approximately 16 microM at rho1, 125 microM at rho2 and 35 microM at rho3). On the basis of these expanded biological activity data and the solution-phase molecular structures obtained at the MP2/6-31+G* level of ab initio theory, a rationale is proposed for the genesis of this stereoselectivity effect.