Modeling Cumulative Effects of Climate and Development on Moose,Wolf, and Caribou Populations |
| |
Authors: | Robert S. Rempel Matthew Carlson Arthur R. Rodgers Jennifer L. Shuter Claire E. Farrell Devin Cairns Brad Stelfox Len M. Hunt Robert W. Mackereth Janet M. Jackson |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, 103-421 James Street South, Thunder Bay, Ontario, P7E 2V6 Canada;2. Alces Landscape and Land-Use, 4290 Wheatley Rd, Duncan, British Columbia V9L 6H1, Canada;3. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, 103-421 James Street South, Thunder Bay, Ontario, P7E 2V6 Canada Current affiliation: Wildlife Conservation Society Canada, Thunder Bay, Ontario P7A 4K9, Canada;4. Alces Landscape and Land-Use, 7218 Kirk Ave, Summerland, British Columbia, V0H 1Z9 Canada;5. Alces Landscape and Land-Use, Unit 1208, 1234-5th Avenue NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 0R9 Canada |
| |
Abstract: | Wildlife models focused solely on a single strong influence (e.g., habitat components, wildlife harvest) are limited in their ability to detect key mechanisms influencing population change. Instead, we propose integrated modeling in the context of cumulative effects assessment using multispecies population dynamics models linked to landscape-climate simulation at large spatial and temporal scales. We developed an integrated landscape and population simulation model using ALCES Online as the model-building platform, and the model accounted for key ecological components and relationships among moose (Alces alces), grey wolves (Canis lupus nubilus), and woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) in northern Ontario, Canada. We simulated multiple scenarios over 5 decades (beginning 2020) to explore sensitivity to climate change and land use and assessed effects at multiple scales. The magnitude of effect and the relative importance of key factors (climate change, roads, and habitat) differed depending on the scale of assessment. Across the full extent of the study area (654,311km2 [ecozonal scale]), the caribou population declined by 26% largely because of climate change and associated predator-prey response, which led to caribou range recession in the southern part of the study area. At the caribou range scale (108,378 km2), which focused on 2 herds in the northern part of the study area, climate change led to a 10% decline in the population and development led to an additional 7% decline. At the project scale (8,331 km2), which was focused more narrowly on the landscape surrounding 4 proposed mines, the caribou population declined by 29% largely in response to simulated development. Given that observed caribou population dynamics were sensitive to the cumulative effects of climate change, land use, interspecific interactions, and scale, insights from the analysis might not emerge under a less complex model. Our integrated modeling framework provides valuable support for broader regional assessments, including estimation of risk to caribou and Indigenous food security, and for developing and evaluating potential caribou recovery strategies. © 2021 The Authors. The Journal of Wildlife Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Wildlife Society. |
| |
Keywords: | caribou cumulative effects assessment landscape simulation moose population dynamics regional assessment wolf |
|
|