首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


An Investigation of Factors Influencing Bear Spray Performance
Authors:Tom S Smith  James M Wilder  Geoffrey York  Martyn E Obbard  Blake W Billings
Institution:1. Brigham Young University, 701 East Campus Parkway, Provo, UT, 84602 USA;2. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Marine Mammals Management, 1011 E. Tudor Road, Anchorage, AK, 99503, USA;3. Polar Bears International, 810 North Wallace, Unit E, Bozeman, MT, 59715 USA;4. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Trent University, Peterborough, ON, K9J 7B8 Canada;5. Chemical Engineering Department, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112 USA
Abstract:Several studies have documented the effectiveness of bear spray in protecting users from aggressive bears. Bear spray failures, however, have also been reported along with speculation regarding the influences of temperature, wind, repeated canister use, and canister age on spray efficacy. We designed lab and field experiments to document the influence that temperature, wind, repeated discharges from the same canister, and canister age have on bear spray performance. To determine the influence of temperature on spray performance, we recorded canister head pressures at temperatures ranging from ?23°C to 25°C and found a strong, positive linear relationship. Even at the lowest temperature tested (?23°C), bear spray had a range >4 m, though the plume was narrow and the spray was not well aerosolized. As canister temperature increased, head pressure, plume distance, and dispersion increased. We used computational fluid dynamics modeling and simulated the effect that headwinds, crosswinds, and tailwinds of varying speeds had on spray performance. Even under high headwind and crosswind scenarios (>10 m/sec), sprays reached targets that were approximately 2 m directly in front of the user. Crosswinds affected spray plume distance similar to headwinds, but the effect was not as pronounced. Tailwinds improved spray performance with respect to speed and distance. By weighing unused canisters ≤18 years old, brands tested lost weight ranging from 0.65 g/year to 1.92 g/year, presumably because of propellant that escaped canister seals. We also documented that bear spray head pressure declines in a logarithmic, not linear, fashion; over half of a new (7-sec spray time) canister's pressure was lost in the first 1 second of spray. We recommend not test-firing cans, keeping cans warm when in the cold, and retiring them when ≥4 years of age. Our results provide no compelling reason to not carry bear spray in all areas where bears occur, even if it is windy or cold. © 2020 The Wildlife Society.
Keywords:bears  bear attack  bear behavior  bear deterrents  bear spray  human-bear conflicts
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号