Sequence Motifs in Transit Peptides Act as Independent Functional Units and Can Be Transferred to New Sequence Contexts

A large number of nuclear-encoded proteins are imported into chloroplasts after they are translated in the cytosol. Import is mediated by transit peptides (TPs) at the N termini of these proteins. TPs contain many small motifs, each of which is critical for a specific step in the process of chloroplast protein import; however, it remains unknown how these motifs are organized to give rise to TPs with diverse sequences. In this study, we generated various hybrid TPs by swapping domains between Rubisco small subunit (RbcS) and chlorophyll a/b-binding protein, which have highly divergent sequences, and examined the abilities of the resultant TPs to deliver proteins into chloroplasts. Subsequently, we compared the functionality of sequence motifs in the hybrid TPs with those of wild-type TPs. The sequence motifs in the hybrid TPs exhibited three different modes of functionality, depending on their domain composition, as follows: active in both wild-type and hybrid TPs, active in wild-type TPs but inactive in hybrid TPs, and inactive in wild-type TPs but active in hybrid TPs. Moreover, synthetic TPs, in which only three critical motifs from RbcS or chlorophyll a/b-binding protein TPs were incorporated into an unrelated sequence, were able to deliver clients to chloroplasts with a comparable efficiency to RbcS TP. Based on these results, we propose that diverse sequence motifs in TPs are independent functional units that interact with specific translocon components at various steps during protein import and can be transferred to new sequence contexts.The chloroplasts of plant cells have more than 3,000 different types of proteins involved in their functions (Leister, 2003; Li and Chiu, 2010), and more than 90% of these proteins are encoded in the nucleus and translated by cytosolic ribosomes (Li and Chiu, 2010; Lee et al., 2013a). Consequently, one of the most critical processes in chloroplast proteome biogenesis is the specific, posttranslational delivery of these nuclear-encoded proteins to chloroplasts (Jarvis, 2008; Li and Chiu, 2010; Lee et al., 2013a, 2014). Delivery to chloroplasts requires a specific targeting signal whose form depends on the type of protein and its location in the chloroplast. Most proteins imported into the chloroplast contain an N-terminal transit peptide (TP) as a targeting signal (Lee et al., 2006, 2008, 2013a; Chotewutmontri et al., 2012; Li and Teng, 2013). The TP is cleaved off after import into the chloroplast; thus, the proteins that still contain the TP are called preproteins. Despite progress made in previous studies (Lee et al., 2008; Chotewutmontri et al., 2012; Li and Teng, 2013), the types of information encoded by the long TPs, as well as how this information determines translocation through the import channel, remain to be elucidated.One long-lasting question regarding the mechanism of TP-mediated protein import is how TPs can specifically deliver proteins into chloroplasts. In striking contrast to endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-targeting signals, TPs are highly diverse at the primary sequence level and do not converge toward a consensus sequence. The leader sequence, which contains the N-terminal ER-targeting signal, is composed of a stretch of hydrophobic amino acids ranging from 15 to 20 residues. Although the exact sequence is highly variable, the residues tend to be hydrophobic, making a high degree of hydrophobicity a common characteristic feature for both luminal and membrane proteins. Despite their diversity in primary sequence, TPs also share certain characteristics that serve as the basis for the software prediction of chloroplast proteins; these features include an amino acid composition with a high concentration of hydroxylated residues and a lack of acidic residues (Bruce, 2000; Bhushan et al., 2006), an unfolded and extended structure, an α-helix-containing secondary structure that may be induced by binding to the lipids of chloroplasts (Wienk et al., 1999; Bruce, 2000), and an abundance of Pro residues that may contribute to the unstructured nature of TPs (Pilon et al., 1995; Bruce, 2000; Zybailov et al., 2008).These features provide insight into the sequence information carried by TPs. However, we are still far from fully understanding how TPs function in the mechanism of protein import into chloroplasts. Recent studies have identified sequence motifs by analyzing various deletion and substitution mutants (Pilon et al., 1995; Lee et al., 2006, 2008, 2013a; Chotewutmontri et al., 2012). These motifs, or domains, are thought to be involved in the interaction with components of the translocon (Chotewutmontri et al., 2012; Li and Teng, 2013). Moreover, multiple sequence motifs function individually, or in a combinatorial manner, during specific steps of the import process (Lee et al., 2006, 2008, 2009a). In addition, certain motifs share functional redundancy, or are additive or synergistic. However, despite the progress in identifying sequence motifs from different TPs, it remains unknown how the large number of diverse TPs, as a whole, can deliver proteins to chloroplasts. In ER targeting, the targeting machinery recognizes hydrophobicity, a common feature of the leader sequences, but not the primary sequence (Hessa et al., 2005). Therefore, leader sequences with different primary sequences can be recognized by the same molecular machinery. However, in contrast to the leader sequences, the TPs of chloroplast preproteins contain different sets of sequence motifs (Lee et al., 2006, 2008). These observations raise several questions, including (1) how the large number of TPs with different sets of sequence motifs can be recognized by only a few import receptors (Li and Chiu, 2010; Lee et al., 2013a; Li and Teng, 2013), and (2) how TPs can have such diverse sequences while still retaining their function.In this study, we investigated the design principles of TPs with diverse primary sequences. Using TPs of the Rubisco small subunit (RbcS) and chlorophyll a/b-binding protein (Cab) proteins, which have completely different primary sequences and functional motifs (Lee et al., 2006, 2008), we generated hybrid TPs and examined their activities in chloroplast protein import within protoplasts. We provide evidence that sequence motifs are independent functional units that interact with various components of the translocon during import into chloroplasts and can be transferred to new sequence contexts. However, the functionalities as well as the activities of these motifs are greatly dependent on the overall sequence context of, and their positions in, TPs. In addition, we demonstrated that functional synthetic transit peptides (SynTPs) can be generated by incorporating only a few sequence motifs from RbcS and Cab TPs into an unrelated sequence.