Lamarck redux and other false arguments against SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccination: Pseudoscientific arguments against vaccination do not stand up to scrutiny |
| |
Authors: | Emanuel Goldman |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark NJ, USA |
| |
Abstract: | The COVID‐19 pandemic has triggered a new bout of anti‐vaccination propaganda. These are often grounded in pseudoscience and misinterpretation of evolutionary biology. Subject Categories: Economics, Law & Politics, Microbiology, Virology & Host Pathogen Interaction, Science Policy & PublishingTowards the end of summer of 2021, there seemed cause for cautious optimism for putting this pandemic behind us. It was clear that the route of viral transmission was airborne and not via surfaces (Goldman, 2021a), which means that masks are very efficient at reducing the spread of SARS‐CoV‐2. The number of cases in the United States and Europe were declining, and the first vaccines became available with many people lining up to get their jabs. But not all. A significant portion of the population have been refusing to get vaccinated, some of whom were fooled or encouraged by pseudoscientific misinformation propagated on the Internet. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|