Addressing Within-Role Conflicts of Interest in Surgery |
| |
Authors: | Wendy A. Rogers Jane Johnson |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Philosophy Department and Australian School of Advanced Medicine, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia 2. Philosophy Department, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
|
| |
Abstract: | In this paper we argue that surgeons face a particular kind of within-role conflict of interests, related to innovation. Within-role conflicts occur when the conflicting interests are both legitimate goals of professional activity. Innovation is an integral part of surgical practice but can create within-role conflicts of interest when innovation compromises patient care in various ways, such as by extending indications for innovative procedures or by failures of informed consent. The standard remedies for conflicts of interest are transparency and recusal, which are unlikely to address this conflict, in part because of unconscious bias. Alternative systemic measures may be more effective, but these require changes in the culture of surgery and accurate identification of surgical innovation. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|