首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Tumor‐suppressive roles of ΔNp63β‐miR‐205 axis in epithelial–mesenchymal transition of oral squamous cell carcinoma via targeting ZEB1 and ZEB2
Authors:Yuma Hashiguchi  Shintaro Kawano  Yuichi Goto  Kaori Yasuda  Naoki Kaneko  Taiki Sakamoto  Ryota Matsubara  Teppei Jinno  Yasuyuki Maruse  Hideaki Tanaka  Masahiko Morioka  Taichi Hattori  Shoichi Tanaka  Tamotsu Kiyoshima  Seiji Nakamura
Institution:1. Section of Oral and Maxillofacial Oncology, Division of Maxillofacial Diagnostic and Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan;2. Maxillofacial Diagnostic and Surgical Science, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Rehabilitation, Course for Developmental Therapeutics, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan;3. Cell Innovator, Inc., Venture Business Laboratory of Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan;4. Laboratory of Oral Pathology, Division of Maxillofacial Diagnostic and Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
Abstract:We previously revealed that epithelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition (EMT) was mediated by ΔNp63β, a splicing variant of ΔNp63, in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Recent studies have highlighted the involvement of microRNA (miRNA) in EMT of cancer cells, though the mechanism remains unclear. To identify miRNAs responsible for ΔNp63β‐mediated EMT, miRNA microarray analyses were performed by ΔNp63β‐overexpression in OSCC cells; SQUU‐B, which lacks ΔNp63 expression and displays EMT phenotypes. miRNAs microarray analyses revealed miR‐205 was the most up‐regulated following ΔNp63β‐overexpression. In OSCC cells, miR‐205 expression was positively associated with ΔNp63 and negatively with zinc‐finger E‐box binding homeobox (ZEB) 1 and ZEB2, potential targets of miR‐205. miR‐205 overexpression by miR‐205 mimic transfection into SQUU‐B cells led to decreasing ZEB1, ZEB2, and mesenchymal markers, increasing epithelial markers, and reducing cell motilities, suggesting inhibition of EMT phenotype. Interestingly, the results opposite to this phenomenon were obtained by transfection of miR‐205 inhibitor into OSCC cells, which express ΔNp63 and miR‐205. Furthermore, target protector analyses revealed direct regulation by miR‐205 of ZEB1 and ZEB2 expression. These results showed tumor‐suppressive roles of ΔNp63β and miR‐205 by inhibiting EMT thorough modulating ZEB1 and ZEB2 expression in OSCC.
Keywords:Δ  Np63β    cancer  EMT  miRNA  OSCC
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号