Long-Term Nitrogen Storage and Soil Nitrogen Availability in Post-Fire Lodgepole Pine Ecosystems

Long-term, landscape patterns in inorganic nitrogen (N) availability and N stocks following infrequent, stand-replacing fire are unknown but are important for interpreting the effect of disturbances on ecosystem function. Here, we present results from a replicated chronosequence study in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (Wyoming, USA) directed at measuring inorganic N availability (ion-exchange resin bags) and ecosystem N pools among 77 lodgepole pine stands that varied in age and density. Inorganic N availability ranged from 0.07 to 3.20 μN bag⁻¹ d⁻¹ and nitrate (NO₃⁻) was, on average, 65% of total resin-sorbed N. Total ecosystem N stocks (live + detrital + soil) averaged 109.9 ± 3.0 g N m⁻² (range = 63.7–185.8 g N m⁻²). Live N was 14%, detrital N was 29%, and soil N was 57% of total stocks. Soil NO₃⁻, total ecosystem N, live N, and detrital N generally increased with stand age, but soil N stocks decreased. Models (AIC_c) to predict soil N availability and N stocks included soil P, soil Ca, bulk density, and pH in addition to age (adj R ² ranged from 0.18 to 0.53) and density was included only for live N stocks. Patterns of N stocks and N availability with density were strongest for young stands (<20 years) regenerating from extensive fire in 1988; for example, litterfall N stocks increased with density (adj R ² = 0.86, P < 0.001) but inorganic N availability declined (adj R ² = 0.47, P < 0.003). Across the complex Yellowstone landscape, we conclude that N stocks and N availability are best predicted by a combination of local soil characteristics in addition to factors that vary at landscape scales (stand density and age). Overall, total ecosystem N stocks were recovered quickly following stand-replacing fire, suggesting that moderate increases in fire frequency will not affect long-term landscape N storage in Greater Yellowstone. Electronic supplementary material  The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Author contributions   EAHS, MGT, and MGR conceived the study; DMK performed field research; EAHS and DMK oversaw laboratory analyses and analyzed data; EAHS wrote the paper.